User Reviews

When 11-year-old Gitty (Peyton Kennedy) discovers that her beloved father is hiding a wealthy man (Richard Schiff) in her family's silo in order to save their struggling farm, she is forced to choose between saving the man's life or protecting her family from the consequences of their actions.

The "fable" of the title is the film's explicit parallel between Gitty and the story of the lion and the mouse. When the mouse sees that the lion is in trouble (perhaps from a thorn in his foot), the mouse does the seemingly right thing and aids the lion. But what is the outcome? Is the lion grateful or does he turn around and devour the tasty morsel? This is the problem facing Gitty: she wants to do the right thing, but is it worth the unknown outcome?

With its blend of fantasy and the pastoral, "American Fable" might call to mind other films such as "Pan's Labyrinth" or even "The Reflecting Skin". The latter would be unfair, but the former is a good touchstone. While the fantasy in "Fable" is relatively mild -- more dream than altered reality -- it does feature a strong-willed young girl in a perilous world. And, for the record, Peyton Kennedy excels in this role, really carrying the weight of the entire film on her shoulders successfully.

Speaking of the pastoral setting, credit must be given to the filmmakers for their location choices. Certainly you could replicate a Wisconsin farm in California or elsewhere, but actually filming in Wisconsin and Illinois captured the authentic nature of the Midwest. And the inclusion of the House on the Rock was brilliantly conceived. Anyone from the Midwest should instantly recognize the Infinity Room and the World's Largest Carousel, both of which double effectively as a dream sequence.

Veteran actor Richard Schiff balances with Kennedy quite well and plays an excellent "lion". Viewers will be kept guessing if he really intends to keep his promises or if he will say anything just to survive. Kip Pardue's acting is the weak point of the film. Whether it is him or the script, he often seems out of place. Which leaves Gavin MacIntosh. His character, Martin, is impossible to love, coming across very much like a budding sociopath. MacIntosh's portrayal is therefore excellent -- he creates an uneasiness in the viewer that shows a real mastery of the character.

As the debut feature film for writer-director-producer Anne Hamilton, "American Fable" is a winner, pure and simple. Moviegoers ought to keep their eyes open for Hamilton's name on future projects; whether she ends up staying in the independent film world or moves on to bigger studio projects, she exhibits world-class skill and imagination that we should hope to see more of.

The home video release from IFC Midnight has a few small perks. There are deleted scenes that may add a little something for audience members who cannot quite get enough of this family. Sadly, there is no audio commentary or in-depth interview with Hamilton. Perhaps keeping some aspects shrouded in mystery is for the best, but it would have been nice to hear some thoughts on the writing, casting, funding and other topics from the auteur.

This is a movie that could have benefited from putting more "fable" into the story and less realism. While beautifully shot with a couple of good performances, overall the story could have used more polish. The protagonist is a little girl (11 years old) named Gitty, whom we follow and experience life on a farm in the 80's, as seen through her eyes. The general overarching theme of the film is about the struggles of the American farmer who can no longer get by because of federal cut-backs and big business coming in and acquiring the smaller farms.

****SPOILERS****

The main plot involves a kidnapped land developer (Richard Schiff's character) who is buying up farm land, and an unknown woman who has something to gain off his disappearance. Gitty's family participates in helping keep the secret, in exchange for financial gain aka: Money to save their farm. Gitty secretly befriends the kidnapped gentleman while he is secured in an abandoned silo and hi-jinks ensue (just kidding). They bond and she learns chess and literature from the man, while the family (specifically Gitty's older brother, Martin) keep an eye on him. And by "keep and eye on him", I mean beat him and cut off his finger. And for this, they get a bag full of money. Just for following the plan set in play by the mysterious woman.

We get all-too brief flashes of some mystical elements here (coming from the imagination of the protagonist, Gitty), but they are few and far between. The film mainly just consists of miserable characters talking about miserable things happening to them. For a film centered around only a few characters, it's amazing how underdeveloped they are. Gitty is the most fully fleshed out, and the girl who plays her - does a good job at expressing her emotions - but there just seems to be something missing. She plays off Richard Schiff's character well, but they don't develop his character enough to really care. There are hints at who he is, but we're never really shown or told. He's just a kind, old man. But is he really? We never find out.

Now I'm guessing the title "American Fable" is sort of a play on "The American Dream" and how the dream isn't all that it's cracked up to be, but come on - if you're going to have "Fable" in your title and follow a little girl through a beautifully shot landscape - don't just hint at a supernatural element. Show us something. Anything. And I don't just mean a woman on a horse in Maleficent garb showing up every so often randomly to as if exclaim "See, this IS a fairy tale. Kinda!".

Gitty explores a well early in the movie, with a violin and scribblings from a past unknown figure laying at the bottom of it. I remember thinking, "I wonder what kind of fantastical element this will turn into?". And the answer? Nothing. It's never explained, and it doesn't lead to anything - except one brief scene where Gitty brings the violin to the man in the silo. But he doesn't play it. No one does. It's just a prop. A useless prop.

See how frustrating that is? It's like an hour and a half of build-up to an interesting idea, and then nothing. Even the psychotic brother Martin is left hanging. He's an evil for purely evil's-sake character, just so the film has some kind of tension and climax. And at the end, he falls down the well. And then? And then we have no idea. No idea if he's alive or dead, or what the consequences of his actions were - or if he had any kind of revelation. This is the brother of the main character, and not just some random person - so why aren't we provided with any kind of closure?

This film had potential to be something with depth - but whether it was budget constraints or just bad storytelling - it's really quite disappointing because I honestly wanted to like the movie, based on the main character and the visuals alone. American Fable was just too vanilla, with nothing really to say or show, to recommend to anyone. A real shame since there appears to be talent involved.

An 11-year-old girl named Gitty enjoys the 1980's farm life while living with her pregnant mother, Sarah; evil brother, Martin; and doting father, Abe. A young Gitty discovers a businessman named Jonathan hidden in an abandoned grain silo located on the vast property that is her family's farm. Gitty befriends Jonathan and begins bringing him food and literature at his request with a promise that when he escapes the silo, he would give her anything she wanted. Gitty asks Jonathan to tell her a story, and he tells her the story of the lion and the mouse. Later on, Gitty asks her father if he has heard the story of the lion and the mouse. Abe says he knows the story, but then he ends up reciting the story to her with an incorrect, sinister ending. Abe's version of the story has the mouse setting the lion free, but then the lion harming the mouse anyway after it is set free. I thought this was a foreshadow to the man in the silo being set free by Gitty in the future and then harming Gitty anyway.

We learn that Abe was about to lose the family farm and has made some sort of plan with an evil woman named Vera. Abe has agreed to hold the man for ransom, but when evil Martin finds out that Gitty has been speaking to the man in the silo, the game now changes because the man may later be able to identify them with the police. The family panics at the thought of going to prison, so they decide Jonathan must be killed so they will not get caught. Just then, Gitty's mom goes into labor and she and Abe leave for the hospital. Gitty sees her chance to save her friend from a horrible fate. She calls the town's bumbling sheriff, but the sheriff ends up being no help at all and ends up being shot by Martin. A chase ensues, and the Martin now threatens to kill Gitty but ends up falling into a shallow, dried-up well during his pursuit of his sister. Jonathan finally breaks free, only to find Abe has come home from the hospital to kill him. Gitty jumps in front of Jonathan, and an injured Jonathan scampers away.

Later, we see a still 11-year-old Gitty fending for herself and eating roadkill to survive, as I assume, her parents are now in prison. As she is preparing her roadkill meat for consumption, we see a fancy car pull up and a clean, and well-suited Jonathan step out. Then the movie ends.

Because of Abe's incorrect recital of the Lion and the Mouse, I am left wondering whether Jonathan was there to harm her or if he was there to grant her the wishes he promised to fulfill when he was still captive in the silo. I am not sure if this was supposed to be a cliffhanger, or if the ending was accidentally unclear.

All in all, it was a very slow and gentle "thriller." I liked it, but I just with the ending had been more clear.

It started out intriguing enough, then things get weird fast, lots of characters whose behavior makes little sense. The lady on the horse, 2 little playmates who just disappear from one frame to the next...maybe they were supposed to be imaginary? An older, increasingly psychotic brother, the former policewoman-turned-mailcarrier who is allowed to keep her marked patrol car to deliver mail from a different city (like, when does THAT ever happen?), long skinny ropes we're supposed to believe the little girl capable of climbing (if so, maybe she could've just found a sturdier rope for the captive to climb?) Skipping ahead to avoid real spoilers, we're supposed to believe that nobody takes the girl into foster care, she's left to fend for herself, dressing out a roadkill deer for sustenance. And then, a big black car rolls in, rich dude to the rescue...maybe? I'm left with more questions than answers. Usually, I would re-watch a movie like this to see what clues and "ah-ha" moments I missed; not this one. Could've been good, wasn't.

This movie was set back when Ronald Reagan was president ( - we hear him on TV) - it's about a farm family trying to make ends meet... Neighboring farmers are being foreclosed on- Gitty ( the young protagonist of the story) buys a chess set at one auction- Gitty finds a man in one of their empty silos- she doesn't say anything because he begs her not to- they become friends-she brings him food and water - he asks for really big books ( to reach a door he hopes to break through- by standing on them) there is a strange woman named Vera - we see her I believe in her true form- she is a demon- she I believe made Gitty's dad kidnap the man for ransom...I won't spoil the ending - but it's definitely worth watching....

Lots of holes. #1...the 'prisoner" must stink to high heaven, living in that silo w/o toilet facilities or water. #2...Gitty, the 11 yr old can not possibly climb up and down a 50-75 foot silo on a rope. #3...how did Martin cut the 'prisoner's" finger? The man just willingly let him chop it off? Many other 'holes' make this movie a 1-star except for Peyton's acting, a dang good 8-star job she did. I don't recommend this.

This is an over abundance of ideas and no fleshing out.

The synopsis insists there's a 'magical slant' but besides some beautiful cinematography and a single dream sequence, absolutely nothing is wondrous about it. The father is 'healed' from an accident and it's doesn't feel magical like the movie would want you to think, instead, feeling like extremely poor editing and writing.

The characters are very one dimensional, and even with the large chunk of time spent 'fleshing them out', they're still weak, and have two to three character traits on them at most. Which would be fine if it truly delivered on some more magic.

It's an extortion plot that probably could have worked better if there was more threat than the last twenty minutes. Even when Gitty's secret is discovered, it doesn't feel tense or as if something huge is about to happen, and in part, the awkward cuts hinder the flow. Scenes stop and the movie continues as if it didn't happen.

I will give it this; It's oddly timely for the present day.

Nothing about this film in any way constitutes it being a "thriller", and the title is a complete lie; there's nothing fairy tale-ish or fable-y about it at all.

it's a plain, straight-forward drama about a little farm girl who discovers some rich big city man being held prisoner in her father's grain silo or something. We quickly learn this is part of a poorly thought out plan to ransom him for money because Ronald Reagan is evil and wrecking the economy so everyone's losing their farms.

all throughout the film, the girl's older brother is almost mentally deranged in how needlessly belligerent and violent he is towards her, culminating in an inexplicable sequence near the end where he literally tries to stalk and murder her with a rifle, and ends up killing a random neighbor woman who came to check up on them.

This movie is just bad. The director does a really bad job in explaining the characters and the purpose of the woman on the horse. Although, I am guessing it had something to do with chess. A fable and chess, humm.. Gitty check mated her family? Flash backs would have been helpful. M Night Shyamalan movies is sometimes crazy, but I could figure his movies out. I cant figure this movie out. Maybe a combination of Chess and "the lion and the mouse". Gitty is the mouse, maybe?

To be honest I almost didn't make it past the fifteen minute mark. I was just too lazy to change it. Did it get better, I can't say that it did. I can say that I began to appreciate it more. I still don't really like it, but on another level I really do like it. I hate it for the missed potential where both screen writer and director dropped the ball, almost like they weren't sure what to do with it.

The movie is set in the Heartland, the Bread Basket of America, on a farm, with farm people. The timing is back in the early eighties when we were losing our family farmers to banks and speculators. Well a woman the dad meets has a plan to raise money, why she would partner with a complete stranger was never addressed. Her plan was to abduct one of the speculators and hold him for ransom. in a silo on our farm. This farming family has a couple of kids, the wholly psychopathic son and Gertrude, known as Gitty. One day while Gitty was out playing with her chicken, Happy, she was by the forbidden silo and heard the captive. As he hasn't eaten in a couple days he asks Gitty to help him. Reluctant our 11 year-old heroine ends up helping him. She is small enough to fit through the opening at the very top of the silo. They become friends, he teaches her to play chess. Is he her friend or just cozying up to her to the end of freedom? I don't know, the movie is fragmented, sort of. The acting is decent, especially from our young protagonist. Several times Peyton's portrayal of Gitty brought to mind Lizzie Samuels (not sure I'll ever forgive Carol murdering her, I digress. Some other stuff happens (fairly boring) but then we are at dinner and the psychopath cooked. Did I mention he's a psychopath who hates his sister and now he's running around with a gun. Earlier he chopped off the finger of the captive then tells Gitty he is going to kill her. A little bit of this and that and if I gave any further detail you could skip the movie and just read this.

Now, is this movie about a kidnapping? Not really. It seems to b=me to be more of an allegory for Gitty growing up. We learn there are no books in the farm house, but Gitty thirsts for knowledge and experience. As she hangs with the captive her dress and hair style change subtly, slightly more mature, she develops goals for future career, a writer. Works much better as allegory that straight crime drama.

See it. Heck just writing this I liked it one star more, who knows maybe that will go up next time I watch it, and I will be watching it again. Give it a try.