"Supernatural" The Chitters (TV Episode 2016) Poster

(TV Series)

(2016)

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
One of the better gay men depictions in the show, on the CW
CubsandCulture19 October 2020
The show has done LGBT characters before-Corbett comes to mind and the home owners in "Safe House"-the depictions are never much to talk about as they have been largely incidental to the show. Here Jesse, Cesar being a gay couple is fairly central to the episode. For one thing the monster is literally forcing people to breed with each other and there's an obvious irony to that. The depiction is de-sexed annoyingly enough but overall the characters are not stereotypical (both are traditionally masculine) and the show handles the issue in an...umm...straight forward, matter of fact way.

Add in the Chitters are one cool monster and this is pretty good standalone.
14 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Great atmosphere and new monsters
shwetafabm25 July 2020
It was a pretty ok episode with a decent feel to it. S11 has been doing very good with its tone. The monsters were unique. It lackes a little bit in the end with it being too easy but the setup was good.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
It's an isolated episode for a reason
therockapoe12 September 2021
And the reason is, the shooting schedule or post-work is behind, this episode is most likely pre-made before season airing, it can be put anywhere in a season and not really ruining things, all you have to do is add some scene where Dean or Sam give it a reason to enter this story. "We can't find anything new, why not just hunt a normal case"

Most tv show use "the road so far" episodes for this purpose, some times a bottled episode where everyone do flashbacks, SPN do this, giving new content new characters and new monsters, it's better and it's responsible to audiences.

The episode is solid, Cesar and Jesse are good lovable characters, if this is a season2 episode it can be one of the most praised, but it's not season2 anymore, and this monster of the week story can't feed the growing appetite anymore.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Very good episode
rich-fouts6 June 2019
This was one of supernatural's character driven episodes which I enjoyed very much. Especially liked Lee Rumohr as Jesse. Emotional story, well done. I don't get the negative responses.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Supernatural "The Chitters"
JensenAckles276 May 2016
This was a very good episode and don't know why someone put 1 star. I enjoy watching this episode Wednesday night and i loved it. I found this episode interesting to know about those creatures with the green eyes. Sam and dean meet two hunters in a small town and they kill the creatures. Supernatural is an awesome show, Jensen and Jared are great actors. I never missed one new episode from season 11 and will continue to watch it. i will never give up on the Winchester brothers because they help normal people from killing monsters and things like that. I just love Jensen Ackles and that he is adorable in all episodes and also like Jared too. I don't care what people say about this episode cause all they wanna say is bad stuff about it. I give this episode 9 stars
9 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Classic Monster-of-the-Week Episode
Toadsith12 May 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Note: This review WILL contain spoilers. You have been warned.

This episode seems to have people heavily divided, either hating it or loving it, but it is deserving of neither. It is a classic episode that hearkens back to the early seasons of Supernatural, where the main story arc is put on hold while the boys hunt down a new and unusual threat and try to source its history within some random small town.

Unfortunately for this episode, the history of the creature(s) in question is left as question mark with a dismissive shrug by the writers, who say, "They're Mexican I guess." The creatures are supposedly giant, Cicada spirit creatures that develop for 27 years underground and then show up top-side for few days of a gleeful procreation-focused orgy, before putting their offspring underground and then dying off. An interesting enough idea, but then why were the giant cicadas so damned violent and angry?

They of course needed to use humans as breeding husks, making for a creepier and more lethal monster, but it was a perfect opportunity for some hilariously awkward scenarios with the Winchesters constantly happening upon copulating couples before they fully realized what they were fighting. Sure, we need the monsters to be monsters and be wantonly slaughtering people, but they don't need to always be mindless savages. The show has plenty of those creatures, passing up an opportunity for a more human and relatable monster is a mistake. When the creature's behavior, no matter how awful, is somewhat understandable, it lets us explore the morality of the hunter lifestyle and the Winchester's "kill them before they kill you" attitude.

I liked the LGBT theme of having a same-sex couple as a pair of hunters and I'm glad they didn't take the easy, "sexy", way out by using two female hunters. However, Cesar and Jessy were the most chaste couple I've ever seen. If ever there was a time for a reassuring and romantic kiss, it is when your partner has finally ended his 27 year revenge crusade for the killer of his brother, not to mention at the viking pyre of the same brother. This as odd as Jet Li's missing kiss from Aaliyah in 2000's Romeo Must Die.

That all said, I've been waiting for Supernatural to have a same-sex hunter couple and Cesar and Jessy had the makings of an interesting one. It would be nice to see them return on the show. Or maybe the show is going to reveal that Bobby and Rufus actually had a bit of a romantic relationship.

In the end, this is a solid but not stand-out episode. It had some good humor at the beginning, but grew more and more serious as the episode ran on. It had some good plot motivations, but ultimately fell down on providing a satisfying origin story. It missed some great opportunities, but also checked off some satisfying boxes, both in providing a new and interesting villain and with a maturely, if chaste, handling of a comfortably LGBT couple.

The episode proves that the show still has new ground to cover and that there is still steam in the old, monster-of-the-week format that the show was built upon.

Carry on my wayward sons, I hope to keep watching your adventures for years to come.
23 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The Chitters
alaraaba20 May 2021
I love this episode but as far as i know Winchesters never hunted a vampire or a rugaru before the show starts.
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Shows it's mediocrity only because of the high calibar of season 11.
hollygwood1 May 2018
This episodes sticks out like a sore thumb, for me, simply because this season has been outstanding and this one just doesn't keep up. The plot of all the other episodes has been brilliant, all the actors are at their peak, all the writers are doing well too - especially Andrew Dabb and Robbie Thompson. Even the two who I have had massively critiqued in the past - Buckner and Ross-Lemming have brought us a couple of STELLAR episodes! But this one l, written by Nancy Won, isn't great. As a side note, she wrote my other least favourite episode from this season, the not as bad but still not great 'Thin Lizzie.' The fillers this season have been some of my favourites of all time; 'baby' and 'red meat' to name a couple. But this one just isn't good enough. It sits like season 9; my personal least favourite season. The writing is clunky and it was pointless. I didn't warm to the new hunters either. You could miss this and not miss anything of value. Giving it 6 because as always Jared and Jensen did the best with what they were given!
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Please get back to the show's former self!
aleander-18 May 2016
I can only agree with the former critic by mikewichert. This episode was just a waste of time from my point of view. There is nothing to say against filler episodes as long as they are as good as RedMeat for example, where the boys were able to show their acting skills, but Chitters was just dumb. The storyline has not always been brilliant in the past but at least the dialogues and the chemistry of the boys have made up for some lack here and there. With most episodes in Series 11 I really miss heart, the acting of the boys is becoming wooden, so are the dialogues often and I would like to make a point in saying that this is not the boys' fault as we all know why we have been watching the show since Season 1. I would really like to grow old with the boys, but please give them good stories, fresh dialogues, get fun and wit back to Supernatural! If this seems to be an impossible task I think it would be better to stop - with a grand finale of course! The crew does not deserve to go out like that. So please go and look for writers who grasp why fans have been loyal for such a long time. Saying all this I can imagine that the writer's job is not an easy one but please make an effort! 😉
13 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed