The difference between this film and Superman: The Movie is astonishing. This film goes wrong on so many levels it's amazing that anybody associated with it is still working.
Superman 2 finds a far more introspective Superman. He questions whether he really wants the burden of being Superman, or whether he wants a domestic life where he can fall in love, have a family, and live for himself and his immediate significant other. This isn't a new theme (most of Superman is a Christ allegory anyhow), but has the potential to be tackled well here. Problem is, it isn't.
*SPOILERS* Superman is forced to choose between whether or not he wants his powers. He is told this by the spirit of his dead mother, who informs him that once he makes the choice, he cannot go back. He makes the choice, decides he doesn't like it, and goes back to being a superhero. It's stupid, and ruins the emotional resonance of his choice. *END SPOILERS*
The film had two directors, and the aforementioned thematic problem is not the only symptom of that change. The story appears to have been constructed by someone that knew what they were doing, but that then made the mistake of handing it off to a brain-damaged monkey to write the script.
The dialog is atrocious. In fact, you could mold a college class on how NOT to write dialog based on this film alone. When Superman saves a woman and her baby from a falling steeple (don't ask), the woman calmly turns to Superman, waves and says "thaaank youuuu." The villains have an annoying tendency to explain everything that is going on on screen, sort of like sports announcers. The primary motivation for General Zod is to get the earth to submit to him. We know this because he yells "KNEEL BEFORE ME!" approximately three dozen times throughout the movie. Though it would make for a great drinking game, it does not qualify as great writing.
The movie might be interesting otherwise if it weren't for the lousy acting, choppy pacing, stupid plotting, and cheap special effects. Now, you might be saying "How can you make fun of special effects from 1980 - 25 years ago," to which I reply "watch the movie." Non (the dumb villain) has the ability to shoot beams from his eyes. Okay, Superman has that, too. But Non's laser beams are better because they originate from the same place on the screen while Non bobs his head.
The film can be looked at as campy. It is clearly horrible, but there is not a hint of irony from anyone on the screen. They all play it straight. And in fact, it is so bad, that it almost overshadows the great performances by Gene Hackman and Christopher Reeve. Hackman, in a nearly throw-away performance by Lex Luthor, is so good in every frame that it's a shame that they weren't able to make the movie about him. Reeve plays the character of Superman quite well, though he's not the scene stealer that Hackman is. Margot Kidder is basically reduced to watching Superman, but she does good work with what she's given.
It's a shame that it had to be camp. It's fun for what it is, but because of what it could have been it's tragic to watch. If you're a fan of Superman and haven't seen any of the films, watch the first one and skip 2 - 4. They're not worth your time.
Superman 2 finds a far more introspective Superman. He questions whether he really wants the burden of being Superman, or whether he wants a domestic life where he can fall in love, have a family, and live for himself and his immediate significant other. This isn't a new theme (most of Superman is a Christ allegory anyhow), but has the potential to be tackled well here. Problem is, it isn't.
*SPOILERS* Superman is forced to choose between whether or not he wants his powers. He is told this by the spirit of his dead mother, who informs him that once he makes the choice, he cannot go back. He makes the choice, decides he doesn't like it, and goes back to being a superhero. It's stupid, and ruins the emotional resonance of his choice. *END SPOILERS*
The film had two directors, and the aforementioned thematic problem is not the only symptom of that change. The story appears to have been constructed by someone that knew what they were doing, but that then made the mistake of handing it off to a brain-damaged monkey to write the script.
The dialog is atrocious. In fact, you could mold a college class on how NOT to write dialog based on this film alone. When Superman saves a woman and her baby from a falling steeple (don't ask), the woman calmly turns to Superman, waves and says "thaaank youuuu." The villains have an annoying tendency to explain everything that is going on on screen, sort of like sports announcers. The primary motivation for General Zod is to get the earth to submit to him. We know this because he yells "KNEEL BEFORE ME!" approximately three dozen times throughout the movie. Though it would make for a great drinking game, it does not qualify as great writing.
The movie might be interesting otherwise if it weren't for the lousy acting, choppy pacing, stupid plotting, and cheap special effects. Now, you might be saying "How can you make fun of special effects from 1980 - 25 years ago," to which I reply "watch the movie." Non (the dumb villain) has the ability to shoot beams from his eyes. Okay, Superman has that, too. But Non's laser beams are better because they originate from the same place on the screen while Non bobs his head.
The film can be looked at as campy. It is clearly horrible, but there is not a hint of irony from anyone on the screen. They all play it straight. And in fact, it is so bad, that it almost overshadows the great performances by Gene Hackman and Christopher Reeve. Hackman, in a nearly throw-away performance by Lex Luthor, is so good in every frame that it's a shame that they weren't able to make the movie about him. Reeve plays the character of Superman quite well, though he's not the scene stealer that Hackman is. Margot Kidder is basically reduced to watching Superman, but she does good work with what she's given.
It's a shame that it had to be camp. It's fun for what it is, but because of what it could have been it's tragic to watch. If you're a fan of Superman and haven't seen any of the films, watch the first one and skip 2 - 4. They're not worth your time.
Tell Your Friends