Reviews

16 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Cambridge Footlights Revue (1982 TV Special)
9/10
An amazing showcase of young British talent
12 September 2007
I was lucky enough to have owned a video recorder when the Revue was first aired on British TV in 1982. I frequently replayed the tape over the following years, up until the time it was eventually erased; ...probably to make room for something inferior.

My given name is Steven Fry, so I've always taken an extra interest in the young man who shares my name. (Albeit he spells his first name differently). I remember that he used to pop up regularly on University Challenge, representing Cambridge. There was no doubt Stephen Fry was clever …very clever. It's therefore no surprise either, to note that he dominates this Revue with his presence.

Three things stand out for me, mainly because of the way they tend to anticipate the future-lives of the actors concerned. 1. Emma Thompson's'Award winning diva' sketch, which was to become an uncanny rehearsal for her eventual Oscar acceptance speech some eleven years later in Hollywood. 2. Tony Slattery's song: 'I'm going to shoot somebody famous'. Perhaps giving an insight into the demons that plagued him later in his life. He was actually interviewed by Fry in 2007, as part of the latter's TV series on people suffering from Bi-polar depression. (The Secret Life of the Manic Depressive). A condition Slattery shares with Fry himself. 3. The interaction and comedic personalities of Fry and Laurie. The bedrocks of which were already well-formed. Laurie, with his bumbling, bug-eyed, puppy stare, and Fry, with his intense appreciation of the sounds and uses of words and his obvious love of knowledge itself.

Fry, Laurie and Thompson all found great fame later in their careers, while Slattery and Shearer never quite lived up to their potential. Penny Dwyer, having decided that showbiz was not for her, became a metallurgist instead. Unfortunately she died in 2003.

I'm hopeful that this show will one day become a classic. It's full of bright, early-80s sketches and decent songs, all performed by a talented, highly-intelligent cast who had the world at their feet.
13 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Coen Coen Gone!!!
15 December 2004
This was the first film in years that we had to switch off half way through,- mainly because we found it too unbearable to endure any longer, ...and I never thought that I'd ever be saying that about a Coen brothers movie. Personally, I usually love Coen Brothers films! ('Fargo' is probably my favourite all-time movie). Which makes the fact that they were also responsible for this pathetic, puerile-trash, all the more lamentable.

On top of this, Marlon Wayons wins our award for the least funny, most obnoxious character ever to ever appear in a so-called 'comedy'.

What the hell were both the Coens and Tom Hanks thinking??? 0/10
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Crow in Cuckoo Land
15 March 2002
This film has too many flaws to be very good. But it is fairly good. Hollywood has once again taken lots of liberties with the true John Nash story. However, I think that even though little Russell Crowe (5' 8") was playing BIG John Nash (6' 5") - he is still better at being an academic than he ever was as a hardman-type. There was not enough emphasis on the groundbreaking work that Nash carried out. All this was sidelined to make way for the typical 'human-interest' aspects. I felt cheated. How long will it take Hollywood to make a film about Stephen Hawking? (starring either Tom Cruise or Brad Pitt as the brainy, wheelchaired one.)

One final thing. What the hell has happened to the voluptuous body of Jennifer Connelly? - Her once beautiful curves, have been replaced by boney angles. Aaaargh!!
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Not as scary as its declining genre!
23 October 2001
The whole horror genre has had the scary-rug pulled out from under it by the seemingly endless exposure of TV 'kiddy' horror, such as 'Buffy' and 'Angel'.

We now live in a world where children can see a man graphically bitten in half by a realistic-looking Tyranosaurus Rex (Jurrasic Park. Cert. 12) and still carry on eating their popcorn without missing a single crunch!

What chance then, has a good, old-fashioned monster movie like 'Jeepers Creepers? - Probably not a lot. Personally, I love 'real' monsters such as Alien and Predator (And yes... this!) They collectively knock scales off all the new-fangled CGI efforts (Jurrasic Park excluded) or the tiresome stalk and slash teen-fodder that's cynically churned out by the Studios these days.

For this reason, I'm going to give it 8/10. - Although I may not be so generous when the inevitable 'Jeepers Creepers 2' comes out!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Homer Sweet Homer.
1 September 2001
I watched this film again after ten years, to try and see the point at which the relationship between the Roses started to go into freefall.

The plot is much more subtle than I first thought. There are a lot of psychological things happening, - especially to Turner's character. She gradually releases her pent up emotions, from initial subversion, into a crescendo of hate. Maybe this explains why some women prefer their husbands when they're actually under the patio rather than when building it.

I also loved the irony of seeing Dan Castellaneta (now famous for his voice) in a totally silent part!!! Maybe DeVito was advising him to patch things up with Marge?
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Memento (2000)
Lest we forget...
1 May 2001
Warning: Spoilers
There are so many attempts on this Board at unravelling the plot of this film and I think the answer lies in understanding the truth of what happens at the start of the story, -which is the end of the film.

Here is my interpretation of just this particular section:

*****WARNING: SPOILER ALERT*****

Leonard is an Insurance Investigator. Two drug addicts murder Leonard's wife. He manages to shoot one, but the other gets away. In the process, Leonard ends up with brain damage causing the loss of his short-term memory.

Teddy, a bent Cop, eventually tracks the killer down and Leonard subsequently murders him as an act of revenge. Because he knows that Leonard will not remember any of this, Teddy takes a Polaroid of Leonard while he's still covered in the guy's blood. However, this serves no purpose, because Leonard still doesn't remember this act of revenge. Because of his impairment, the process of bereavement cannot unfold and therefore everyday that Leonard awakes, the need for enacting revenge on his wife's killer is as powerful as the last. Teddy uses Leonard's hunger for vengeance for his own ends, and Leonard ends up killing an innocent man. When he eventually finds out, he is mad at Teddy and decides to mark him down as the killer instead by giving himself cryptic clues to Teddy's pseudo-identity as the assassin. Thereby giving Leonard fuel to pour on his burning desire for retribution.

Frustratingly, there is also a possibility that Leonard himself killed his wife with an insulin overdose, and then used his memory loss to his advantage by transposing this deed onto another person named Sammy Jankis. (Teddy tells Leonard at the end of the film, that Jankis didn't have a wife!) So where otherwise did this memory come from?

The whole storyline evolves from this beginning, but because the tale is filmed in reverse, the above becomes the climax rather than the commencement. It is always refreshing to see an intelligent film. My local cinema wouldn't touch it, preferring instead to show such gems as `Dude Have You Seen My Car' Another movie which features memory loss – but mainly brain cell loss in its audience.

Memento: 9/10
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Avengers (1998)
Uma'st Be Joking!!
27 February 2000
How did this incompetent Director get the job? A lot of people seem to be blaming the Editor as well; but I say thank god that before any more of this dross took up minutes of my valuable life, it thankfully became consigned to the Cutting Room floor!!

The film tries desperately to be silly, more like the later, Tara King TV series episodes than those featuring Emma Peel. To make this work, a certain amount of TALENT must be employed! -Pity nobody told anyone. Not the worse film I've ever seen, -that honour still belongs to Independence Day. But a close second! The only marks to give this film are skidmarks!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
You may get a headache... but it's worth it!
27 February 2000
Oh what a magnificent film! If only every movie was half as good as this one, then going to the Cinema would be akin to a religious experience!

The script was intelligent, the Direction superb, the ensemble of Movieland's finest male thespians make this one of the greatest films I've ever seen. Feel yourself get drawn into the claustrophobic, climactical ambience of their interplay; but don't buy any Real Estate from them! 9/10
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Multi-layered magic.
13 February 2000
What a great film! -A well-observed little masterpiece relating to the field of low-brow social interaction.

Multi-layered in the same way as 'The Simpsons';- you can look as deeply as you want to into this movie and always be rewarded. The hierarchy of school life is cruelly and hilariously depicted. -I half expected to see John Cussack at the Reunion. -If you've ever seen the wonderful 'Grosse Pointe Blank', you'll know what I mean!

Sorvino, Kudrow and Garofalo have never been better. What is it about Garofalo that makes her so marvellous? Turn up the volume and let the soundtrack drag you into their live-for-today lives! 5 out of 5
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I must be the one from another planet!
25 December 1999
In all my many years of going to see films, of all the multifarious offerings that I have witnessed in that time, - here it is! – The nadir, the pits, the utter abomination of all my film-going history. Independence Day has to be the most puerile, incompetent excuse for a film that I can throw an adjective at!

There are many, -too many, things wrong here to even begin to outline them. Even the respectable special effects are tainted by the context they try hard to enhance. How you wish that the dog had died, that the alien had not been devised by some ten year-old kid, that the stereotypes would stop coming, that maybe something would happen to make one of your neurones twitch. Alas…

Speaking rationally, I think I found it all the more incredible, because the audience around me were enormously enthusiastic and proceeded to break into applause whenever the drivel demanded it of them. - I simply cannot remember a time when I felt so detached from the rest of mankind as we know it. But enough of all this! I must look on the bright side. The only way is up!

Will things ever be this bad again? Sadly I'm afraid probably yes. Anyhow, I'm going to have a lie down now and try to rid myself of the horrible memory of that speech! Aaargh! 3/10 (For effects only).
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Clark -The Herald Angels Sing.
24 December 1999
Welcome to the world of Superdad, otherwise known as mild-mannered Clark (can't do anything right), Griswold.

Everyone knows who the real child is in this family; but Clark's well-meaning enthusiasm for all things Christmas and his altruistic attitude to stereotypically -obnoxious relatives, ensures that he stops short of being a pain in the little donkey.

I love this film; -but then I've only ever seen it accompanied by my wife, who practically has a fit every time through laughing so much, -this can be, without a doubt, extremely infectious.

The balance of Chase, D'Angelo, Quaid and Flynn is spot on. One question though: would someone as inept as Clark really be so successful in his business-life?

Worth it just to hear my wife laugh. 8/10.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Pulp Fiction (1994)
Palatial Pulp
19 December 1999
Pulp Fiction is one of those wonderfully compelling, beautifully written, absurdly unpredictable films that come along every now and again.

The subject matter, -a pot-pourri of various low-life scumbags' and their daily doings, is so lovingly crafted. Each story and set piece so silkily woven around an underbelly that is usually used to coarser a cloth.

No member of the cast is found wanting. No part of the storyline a disappointment. If violent movies have to be made, then this is the way to make them. The cartoonish manner of both characterization and action makes it far more digestible than films such as Goodfellas.

A special mention for Samuel L Jackson. He is the axle on which the whole thing turns. I think he was highly underestimated and was generally crowded out in the plaudits by supporters of cinema's prodigal son,- John Travolta.

Score 9/10
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Matrix (1999)
The Matrix: A Web of Deceit
18 December 1999
It seems to me that The Matrix wants badly to be seen as complex and intellectual; but the makers were constrained by the type of audience to which it would predominately be screened in front of. They therefore compromised by giving it both a script (?) and a male lead (Reeves) which would appeal to this 16-24 male viewer. In doing so, yet another potentially mature and clever film has been sacrificed to suit the young and the terminally thick. 4/10
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Blade Runner (1982)
Cutting the mortal thread
18 December 1999
This film poses the powerful question: will an artificial intelligence, once it has reached a certain level, then demand that there is an after-life for itself? -Its electronic emotions straining to come to terms with the thought of the nothingness that is death. Whether we ourselves as humans have a life after death, is open to debate; but the message is clear. We are all carbo-electrical beings facing this same dilemma and convincing ourselves that 'there must be something else.'- a necessary crutch to support the fear that rises when we face this ultimate question. A superb film. 8/10
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Postman (1997)
7/10
There's More Deadlier than the Mail!
5 December 1999
The Postman is neither better nor worse than scores of other films of this genre. It seems to me that a general mood or trend has to be established, -which in turn dictates the feeling with which a film is then received.

Critics have called it over-sentimental and patriotic; - but Independence Day, -one of the most appalling, cringe-making films ever made, was greeted with audiences clapping and cheering here in Britain! Mainly because of the pre-publicity.

If I were Costner, I would cut the film by around 30 minutes. I understand why his films are so long; but I cannot see the point now that the public trend is hostile against anything of this nature that he attempts. Also, he should remove the scene of the little girl singing, and the final statue fiasco (which made me laugh out loud, -not a healthy note on which to finish!). Another major flaw was the fight scene with Bethlehem. This podgy baddie was so inept at hand-to-hand combat that my granny could have easily beaten him! A spectacular finale was badly needed, but sadly it all disintegrated into predictability. (You just knew how the fight would end).

I would give this film 7 out of ten. No film is perfect -and compared to abominations like Independence Day, The Postman delivered quit a lot.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Exorcist (1973)
Better the First Time.
5 December 1999
I first saw The Exorcist on my own, underage and unprepared back in 1974. It terrified me. My walk home from the cinema meant that I had to cut across dark, isolated farmland. Every noise of every hidden creature became a demon in the shadows. I recently watched it a second time. It is still a relatively scary film, but it has been parodied so many countless times that I feel it is now impossible to get the original effect. The world is increasingly less innocent even by 1970s standards. Children are now brought up on diets of violent video games and films. It is hard to know how a movie is ever going to capture the raw horror that this one once did. But then again, - Older people were probably saying the same thing about King Kong!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed