Reviews

9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Are We Supposed to Like This Guy?
16 February 2019
Because he smiles a lot and is nice to people he sticks up?

I don't like people who steal. They are not nice people, no matter how polite they may be while taking the loot. To me, crime is not romantic or exciting or anything good. It's stupid and self-destructive.

I guess I see the point of making a movie like this - "it's a character study." Yeah - of a guy I don't respect. He even had the love of a good-hearted woman with a nice house on green acreage with horses. But no: he threw that all away to rob banks for fun. Okay, great.

I know this isn't technically Redford's film but ... yeah, it is. He produced and starred - and that means he hand-picked it. Maybe he wanted to play a bad guy for once. It is very well-made, but I guess I don't really care.

Best thing is SFX that shows, somehow, an actual real young Redford escaping from prison. It ain't a ringer, nor is it makeup. THAT was film magic.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Two of the most effective scenes in horror history
17 April 2006
Warning: Spoilers
After sitting through almost everything produced in the 70's -- and far too much that came after -- two scenes from this film are unforgettable:

Joy Bang being slowly surrounded, then attacked by patient, bloodthirsty ghouls. Original, comic, theatrical, unnerving. An entire series of 80's horror -- Bava's "Demons", was inspired by this single scene.

Anitra Ford following a stranger in the wee hours of Point Dune's eerily quiet streets into a Ralph's supermarket only to find a cadre of well-dressed carnivores busily tearing into packaged red meat. But then, of course, fresh is so much better. This is, unequivocally, one of the most effective horror scenes ever. Artfully filmed, atmospheric, extremely creepy. Phillan Bishop's score is a minimalist's gem.

Unfortunately, it's clear this scene as it appears in all known releases is bowlderized, as evidenced by jump cuts appearing after the zombies start to tear open lovely Anitra's insides. As George Romero knows too well, the MPAA does not allow more than a few frames of disembowelment to achieve an R rating, and that's all we get here. Perhaps no great loss, that.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Defending the Ending ***SPOILER***
30 December 2005
For years I've listened to nitpickers attack the ending. "Why didn't they just drive away?" If you recall, the attendant at the last gas station they stopped at warned, "You got a busted headlight on that thing". Not to mention half of the front end torn off, exposing the engine compartment.

Fonda's character pulls off the road to repair the headlight "while there's still enough light to see what I'm doing". The cultists last contacted them at the roadside construction project, and followed them to where they stopped -- at twilight.

When night fell, they either smashed the other headlight or disabled the engine by quietly pulling a cable or belt. In the dark, with no headlights, surrounded by hills and dales and rocks and streams and trees, that big behemoth isn't going anywhere, if it's even still running.

The couples originally see their $26,000 Vogue as a castle on wheels -- king of the road. "We don't need anything. We are self-contained, baby!" They quickly realize that it is in fact a lumbering, vulnerable deathtrap that makes them easy prey in isolated, unfamiliar territory. This refusal to accept that they are so out of their element -- in a race that they can't possibly win -- is the movie's entire point.
63 out of 80 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Blair Witch Project meets Afghanistan
17 March 2005
Me so gullible, actually thought this a real documentary.

Stark Afghan locales are very real, but alas the story ain't so much.

Contrived story and amateur acting give it away. But . . . still tense, involving, ultimately moving. Be sure to check out "Behind the Scenes" in DVD's Special Features: the true tale of filming a feature -- illegally -- in this war-torn faraway unknown pocket is almost as fascinating as the fictional story.

The "money shot" here is every scene captured in the forbidden netherworld of the former Taliban. Apparently, this is the first -- and only -- feature film ever shot here, and you will definitely feel yourself visiting a world unknown.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Hollywood movies only for brain-dead teens? Here's Exhibit A.
22 February 2002
This is the kind of movie that can make you think that movies are not for you.

Unwaveringly juvenile and dumb. Amateurish acting (excepting the always-riveting Vin Diesel). Predictable as President Bush's energy policy, you'll be ahead of this movie at every dull turn. You might think there will at least be exciting racing footage; you'd be wrong. I wouldn't have thought it possible to make illegal street racing dull, but they have. Using skip frame and other unnecessary photographic razzle, the movie offers about as much real racing feel as a handheld video game.

Skip it.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Haunting (1999)
1/10
Astoundingly inept remake of horror classic
22 February 2002
For all the money spent on Catherine Zeta Jones' presence and makeup, and CGI effects, this dud retains a staggering inability to entertain. The thought of how many decent independent titles -- or even cable movies -- could have been made instead of this colossal waste riles my sense of cinematic justice.
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Roger & Me (1989)
10/10
One of the boldest, funniest, and most important documentaries ever made.
22 February 2002
Whatever your beliefs, you WILL be moved by this film. It's simply impossible to ignore or forget.

A major Hollywood studio, Warner Brothers, paid a handsome fee, including $2 million in indemnification against possible lawsuits for distribution rights to this title. That's hardly business as usual for documentaries. Why did they take such an untypical gamble? Because they correctly recognized its unique appeal. So too will you.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Safe House (1998)
Good Try, but plot makes predictability inevitable
24 January 2000
Warning: Spoilers
**WARNING: SPOILER**

I knew everything that was going to happen in this movie. You will, too. But you've never seen a movie that tries harder to throw you off the scent.

Patrick Stewart lives alone in a big house filled with security devices and weapons. He is afraid to go out, even to see his psychiatrist. He tells his family that all this is necessary to protect him, as he used to work for the "DIA" and because of that, there are those who want him dead. Is he telling the truth, or is he just an eccentric old man who's paranoid? A look at the jacket for the VHS tape tells all: it's all true. How do we know? Because this is an action movie, marketed to people who like Seagal and Schwarzenegger. If he were just an old guy losing his mind, there's no movie.

Same goes for Kimberly Williams' character. No matter how sweet she is, she has to be the assassin. Why? Because for the mystery to be interesting, the assassin has to be a central character. And for most of the movie, there are only two: Kimberly Williams and Patrick Stewart.

So we know what's going to happen, and by whom. The question is, when will it happen? Well here the movie gives it the old college try, bombarding us with an endless series of McGuffins like you've never seen. And with each one, we sit, like a Los Angeles resident waking to a trembling house, wondering if this is it: The Big One. I won't spoil it (like I haven't done enough of that already), but the last McGuffin is the best.

Along the way, Patrick Stewart gets to deliver some real gems ("No, HERE'S the deal: I'll go get the mail, you go F*** yourself.") And it's fun to watch Kimberly slowly infiltrate his life and his trust (to no avail).
0 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Classic classy campy horror, but MUST see uncut version
24 January 2000
It's no surprise to horror fans that HBO's Tales From the Crypt was a huge success -- the UK's Amicus Productions was cranking out 4- and 5-story anthologies in the late 60's and early 70's. Utilizing veteran actors and cameramen who knew how to beautifully combine camp and horror, Vault of Horror was one of the best.

But you'd probably never know it, if you live in the US. Every version ever available on tape or on TV is cut, badly enough to almost totally destroy any payoff. A "Tale from the Crypt" is more dependent than most on a shocking ending; chop out the deliciously gory ending, or water it down, and you've got a big build-up to nothing. I first saw VOH in its hacked-up, PG version, and thought it pretty limp. It's so unfair: the last-minute hacks of a studio butcher (!) can render any carefully created piece of work into tepid mush, making the filmmakers appear incompetent.

Where can you find the uncut version in the US? Legally, nowhere. You'll need a friend in the UK who can lend you a copy, or possibly a Japanese import. This movie begs for release on DVD.

**UPDATE** The uncut version is finally available on DVD from Vipco (Britain). It won't play on most U.S. players, but may be played with some PC software such as WinDVD.
13 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed