Reviews

4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
After 25 years, I once again believe that a man can fly.
3 July 2006
Warning: Spoilers
1978's Superman was for me, the most amazing movie a child can embrace. I outwore two copies of my VHS when I was five years old shows how much I love it. 1981's Superman II continued on with that tradition of leaving me in amazement and wonder. It wasn't as epic as the original, but it certainly had much of the same charm and imagination that made the original so special to me.

The next two entries weren't up to par, and that's putting it nicely. While Superman III and IV both hold a place in my heart from a child's perspective, I can't help but shake my head during most of Superman III and burst out laughing at the poor production of Superman IV when I watch it now.

Finally, it took a long time, but it got here. Superman Returns is essentially the real Superman III. Bryan Singer pays infinite (perhaps too much) respect to Richard Donner's vision of the character on the big screen. Brandon Routh steps into the role of the world's greatest superhero, and much like Christopher Reeve, he owns the role. Routh is powerful as Superman, and his Clark Kent is still the same bumbling, lovable mild-mannered reporter.

Kate Bosworth is more beautiful than Margot Kidder, and for a 23-year old actress, she plays the role of Pulitzer Prize winning, working mom quite well. She is obviously heartbroken from when Superman left to find Krypton for all those years and it shows with her hesitance to have anything to do with him at first. But when she does meet with him on the roof of the Daily Planet, she realizes she can't avoid him or her feelings.

The supporting cast in the Daily Planet all fill out their roles well also. Frank Langella smartly does not try and ruin Perry White by turning him into J. Jonah Jameson and instead plays him as a calm, father-figure to all his reporters who cares about his paper as well as his reporters. Sam Huntington's Jimmy Olsen is the best I've seen in a live-action adaptation. He is played mostly for comic relief, but compared to Marc McClure, Huntington gets a lot more screen time and you definitely remember him more than McClure. James Marsden's Richard White stayed away from being the jealous boyfriend and instead was essentially the embodiment of what Superman would be if he were just a man. Even when it looks like at the end of the movie that he realizes he'll never be her soul mate, he still does the right thing and lets her deal with her emotional attachment to Superman.

Kevin Spacey was remarkable as Lex Luthor. Spacey's Luthor has similar traits to Gene Hackman's used car-salesman approach to the villain, such as the use of ridiculous wigs at times and campy sidekick. (Parker Posey also did a nice job as Kitty, serving as some good comic relief at times). But Spacey is also a much more sinister, cold and vengeful Luthor than Hackman's could ever dream of being. The massacre on New Krypton makes the audience despise the character and take him more seriously than Luthor had appeared in any of the previous films.

Of course, the main plot twist comes when Lois' son Jason, believed to be the son of Richard, is in fact Superman's. The boy has health problems, he's asthmatic and allergic to everything, but he is able to use his powers at one crucial moment. And Superman's speech to the boy at the end of the movie lets everyone know that while Superman might not have Lois anymore, he'll finally never be alone.

The film gives some closure to what happened in the original two movies, but also serves as a bridge to a new trilogy. Singer is able to maintain the verisimilitude that Donner achieved in the original, and keeping the classic theme and credits gives it a sense of tradition and familiarity that makes you feel like a kid again. Superman is back for good, and we'll see him around for more, all we need to do is look up on the screen.
9 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Superman (1978)
10/10
25 Years Later and I still believe a man can fly
29 October 2003
I first saw Superman when I was about 3 or 4 years old on video. I was in love with this incredible movie back then and watched the tape so much it was worn out after about a year. I made sure I watched it whenever it was on TV and always watched the sequels due to my love of the original.

For a while, I hadn't sat and watched it. I caught a couple of clips on TV every now and then, but didn't sit and be mesmerized like I was years ago. Finally, I got a DVD player and was looking for some movies to rent. And I suddenly got the urge to rent Superman. It's amazing how much I remembered, and how much I picked up on things I didn't get back when I was young. Sometimes I'd get bored with the slower moving parts, but found them to be wonderfully filmed. The movie was once again my favorite without any question.

Christopher Reeve IS Superman. He's so intimidating and so genuinely sincere as the Man of Steel, as he does what he's here to do, fight for truth, justice and the American way. Margot Kidder was also very good as Lois Lane, a very hungry and determined ace reporter. Hackman, while a bit campy, was excellent as Lex Luthor, and the way he delivered the line "No, by CAUSING the deaths of innocent people" brings great menace to Superman's greatest enemy. The rest of the supporting actors are great, and Brando's small role was well done as Jor-El.

There will be better movies that come out, bigger movies, but Superman will always be my favorite movie. A classic movie, and still the greatest comic book movie of all time.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Underrated, misunderstood entry in the 007 Series
1 July 2003
Warning: Spoilers
Licence To Kill came out during the huge box office summer of '89 (which included Batman, Indiana Jones, Ghostbusters II, etc). Unfortunately, lousy advertising and Timothy Dalton's lack of appeal to American audiences did not bring in the big bucks that could have been expected. While the film did not do great in the US compared to other Bond films, it still did well overseas. Because of the assumption that LTK was a flop, people consider it one of the weakest entries in the series. Needless to say, they're dead wrong.

(Possible Spoilers)



Sanchez is one of the most realistic, deadly villains Bond has ever met, and this is also 007's most personal mission yet. Felix Leiter, the trusted ally and Bond's best friend is fed to sharks and his newlywed bride has been murdered. After Bond decides to attend to Felix and find out what happens and doesn't leave for his mission, he resigns and his license to kill is revoked by M. Bond goes on a personal vendetta which involves more spying, more detective work and less gadgets and over the top villanious plans. Licence to Kill isn't everybody's cup of tea, and some think it's a Charles Bronson rip off, but personally I see it as more of an Ian Fleming Bond movie, which is ironic since this is the first movie title not to be taken from a Fleming novel. Q has a nice supporting role rather than the smaller role he usually has.

In a way, I always see Licence to Kill to be the end of an era for Bond films. It seemed with Goldeneye's release in 1995, Pierce Brosnan's Bond is not the same Bond as portrayed by his four predecessors. I don't know why, but with Felix Leiter out of action, Bond losing his license, the last appearance of so many members of the Bond crew and cast, it seems like Dalton's final portrayal was the end of one continuity, and Brosnan's is a new, revamped Bond. Nonetheless, this is one of the best Bond films of the entire series, both pre-Brosnan and the Brosnan era.
73 out of 81 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Dalton is underrated
9 June 2003
After Roger Moore's 12 year run as 007, Timothy Dalton took over in the late '80s. Dalton is the most underrated Bond and is usually not considered one of the best due to his short run. The Living Daylights was the perfect Bond role for Dalton (Licence to Kill, although good, is a bit too dark for the average Bond fan). Dalton shines in this film and plays a much more human Bond unlike the over the top self-parody some of the Moore films had been. The action sequences are solid, the relationship between Bond and the girl is one of the most developed in the series and you can sense the two really care about each other. It's a shame Timothy Dalton did not make one or two more Bond films, for if he did he would probably be considered better the best Bond since Connery.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed