Reviews

4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
One of the most unique and daringly good films in years
31 May 2001
Ghost Dog: Way of the Samurai

* * * * Stars

Forest Whitaker stars in this amazingly good character driven film. Whitaker is Ghost Dog, a New York hitman who lives by the code of the ancient samurai. When a job for the mob goes wrong they decide to cut their losses and put a hit out on him. But since he's a samurai and not just a normal hitman this proves to be a huge mistake for them.

This film really works on three levels. First is the duality of the film's coolness factor and the strength of Whitaker's performance. Whitaker radiates cool in this film. In every scene and every frame, through both action and inaction we know he is being of awesome power. His performance is note perfect. There's one scene where a grievous wrong has been done and we see Whitaker absorb the devastation, then he narrates that when a making decision it should be done in the space of seven breathes. Once that decision is made and we realize Whitaker's full fury will now be unleashed upon his enemies, it sends a tingle up the spine of the viewer. Whitaker's resolve shines through the screen and through his subsequent acting the pace builds until we reach the film's ultimate battle, which is a really, really good fight scene-one of the most satisfying ever filmed.

Furthermore we have the film's philosophy. This aspect of the film is the most important of all even more so than Whitaker's superb performance. As the film's tale unfolds we do need learn about the Way of the Samurai through the eastern philosophy Whitaker espouses as he narrates the film. Often times the film breaks from the action just to linger on the narration and let in sink in. It's a technique that helps set the tone of the film and makes it a completely absorbing experience.

The third thing that the film does really well is it is character and not plot driven. At least just as much time is spent following Whitaker through his day to day life as he interacts with people in his community as is spent on the action parts of the plot. In many ways the film works as commentary on the values of modern society. The scenes with Whitaker and his best friend, a Haitian ice cream vendor provide this film with true heart and soul. We see repeatedly that the two friends can understand each other because they are at peace with the world and in tune with their surroundings, so that their bond transcends mere language. Ghost Dog also has a touching relationship with a young girl that he hopes to impart his code to so that she may one day have the tools of knowledge necessary to escape life in the inner city. These are characters that would have been interesting a two-hour film just living their lives without the samurai and hitman aspects of the film. However both aspects work exceptionally well, the effect taken as a whole make this one of the best films of the past few years.

Besides Whitaker and his friends, one other great performance is given by Tricia Vessey as Louise Vargo, the young girl that sets all that happens in motion. It's a small part but a key one that she does an admirable job with.

If there is a flaw with this film it is that the gangster villains are unnecessarily racist. These scenes are somewhat jarring on first viewing, but are at least consistent with the film's ultimate tone that the gangster's way of life is dying, while the code of the samurai is timeless. It is no coincidence that all the mobsters are much older than Whitaker. Both characters note numerous times that the world is changing, the difference is the gangsters say it with fear and trepidation, while Whitaker notices it as observation. Like the changing of the wind the changing of time and circumstance is neither good nor bad when weighed against his code.

While Whitaker deserves infinite praise for his performance, almost just as much praise must be given to director Jim Jarmush. His directing of this film is quite daring and even more skillfull. His approach to the narration is unusual and yet it works on multiple levels and lets us this is a film more about tone than action. The character driven film is a rare commodity. Most films are plot driven moving from point A to point B with no more creativity than a child connecting a dot-to-dot. Here we have a film that starts with its characters and lets them live the lives they've always lived before the central plot elements invaded their existence. The plot is addressed in a timely enough manner, but we see the characters have their own commitments to fulfill too. It's a hard trick to make a character driven film really work without seeming disjointed or slowly paced but Jarmush succeeds masterfully. Jarmush also fills the film with other references in the background that emphasize the character's natures-such as book on bears or the dialogue of a few cartoons here and there. Many films of try to do this, but few films I have ever seen do it as well as Ghost Dog does.

A final note, the ending of this film that is one that will be very divisive. People will either love it or hate, personally I loved it. It is an ending that is true to all that his come before for both the characters and their conflicting codes but also one that is both surprising despite being adequately foreshadowed.
171 out of 216 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
What a sad and uninspired film . . . .
6 November 2000
Warning: Spoilers
Book of Shadows: Blair Witch Project 2 ½ star

What a sad and uninspired film has been made in an attempt to capitilze on the success of last year's excellent and original Blair Witch Project.

What perhaps is most disappointing about this film is that it had such potential. The first 35 minutes are good. The set-up provided in that time period with these exact same characters could have been used to make a great horror film by simply following the rules of the genre. Instead this film strays from those rules but doesn't break any ground it just retreads poorly what occurred in the first film with a twist that basically just cheats the audience.

The story starts by telling us the first film was indeed a fictional film but the town in it is real. It then shows how that film impacted the town, taking place about 5 months after the first film's release. One resident, Jeff, who had been in an insane asylum a year earlier creates a tour that goes into the woods to look for the witch and the legend discussed in the first film. For his initial tour he gets four young adults, Stephen and Tristen a couple writing a book on the mythology of the Blair Witch and the hysteria effect caused by the film. He is a man of reason who does not believe in mythology, she feels that there is always a factual basis to any myth. She is also six weeks pregnant. The other tour goers are Erica who is a Wiccan that wants to commune with the spirit of the Blair Witch, and Kim a Goth with psychic powers that is going simply because she thought the movie was cool.

The tour group goes to the remains of the Blair Witch's house where they discover a mysterious tree. The Wiccan casts a pair of spells one to undo the evil at the sight, and one to awaken the Blair Witch's spirit. The group sets up some cameras provided by the tour guide and then engages in liberal drug and alcohol use around the campfire as they try to stay up all night. They have brief run-in with another tour group whom they convince to set-up camp at Coffin Rock where the witch committed her murders in the 1800's (as revealed in the first film).

The group then collectively blacks out and when they awaken it is raining paper and all of their equipment has been destroyed. They soon find their videotapes in the exact place where the tapes of the first film were supposedly found. At first they suspect the other tour group of sabotaging their equipment but when they find out the next day the other tour group was murdered they don't know what to think.

And then the film falls apart. The group goes to the home of the tour guide, which conveniently is an abandoned factory with a shaky metal bridge over a ravine providing the only way in or out. The factory also happens to be located on the Black Hills outside of town which are haunted by the witch. But that alone wouldn't have sank the movie. While we would have been in familiar territory (I'm sure you can guess what happens to that bridge) the elements were in place for a good film. The characters begin watching the tapes to try put together the lost time. The psychic and the Wicca both sense an evil presence among them.

But the film is all build and no delivery and it requires the characters to have the intelligence of chipmunks. Before the characters set up house in the factory they have to go to the hospital due to a medical emergency. Later in the factory they notice they all have strange markings carved onto their body. You think they would be alarmed. But the two men both argue that it must be poison oak. It has to be one of the most laughably inane scenes in film history. The one character lives in the woods; he doesn't poison oak looks like? The other characters are writing a book on witchcraft or in the case of Erica is a witch herself. Earlier scenes in the film show them deciphering these same types of symbols. Yet they don't recognize them. Not to mention the symbols are obviously scar tissue from like a knife or something, even if they were so dumb as to think the symbols were coincidental why would think it was poison oak? Have they ever scene leaves that are so thin they can draw straight lines? And since they were in the hospital earlier anyway wouldn't they ask doctor to look at these symbols? Later in the film Erica does read the symbols and tells a character she's next to die. Yet that character does not die next meaning either Erica isn't a very well educated witch or the screenwriter failed foreshadowing in film school.

This film is basically a one scare film. Characters will see something supernatural, the audience jumps and the character blinks and your back to where you were 10 seconds ago the image was a hallucination. The film plays this trick at least 30 times, no exaggeration, probably because it was too devoid of original thought to do anything else. The gore quotient is also up quite unnecessarily more than in the first film yet again probably because the director had no other way to manufacture scares. SPOILER ALERT The film has other problems, which I can only reveal by discussing specific plot points so feel free to skip this paragraph if you don't like minor spoilers. Much of the character's traits mean nothing. Kim's psychic powers end up having no bearing on the plot at all other than them finding the tapes which could have been done in a dozen other ways. Jeff's insanity again means nothing unless the viewer wants to interpret the ending of the film that he is still insane, the other characters never find out about it to cause dissension among them, it's just a tool to fill time for some pointless flashbacks. Halfway through the film we see the sheriff interviewing certain characters about the events basically letting us know who survives and doesn't before the film ends, yet once everything that happened in the woods and the factory is revealed the film just ends. Again couldn't we have seen them get arrested afterwards for all the difference it made? The jumps in time are more jarring then suspenseful throughout the film and since nothing happens after them at least the ending would have had more of an impact without them.

Even the title cheats the viewer. There is no Book of Shadows in this film. Video tapes of shadows perhaps but not a book. The characters never find a book belonging to the witch. None of the characters own a book or read a book in the course of the film. And the two characters writing a book intend to title it "The Blair Witch: History or Hysteria?"

Still other problems include the nonsensical way the filmmaker's decide Erica's take the evil spell back worked. Even the motivations of the witch make no sense considering the alternatives that are foreshadowed in the first 35 minutes. Then to top it all off the film provides a chronology of the witch's life in direct conflict with facts provided in the earlier film that based on other events in this film would also have to be true.

Ultimately the film leaves the viewer letdown. It doesn't payoff, there are no scares, it is unnecessarily violent and most of the plot twists are pointless and/or disappointing. If it didn't have such a good set-up and character development in the early portion it wouldn't even get the half star I gave it.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Almost Famous (2000)
The best film of the year so far
6 November 2000
Almost Famous * * * * Stars

Almost Famous is the best movie to be released so far in calendar year 2000. It is a great character driven human story filled with almost dozens of great memorable breakthrough performances.

The film stars Patrick Fugit as 15 year old William Miller who through a combination of persistence and talent finds himself hired by Rolling Stone magazine to join up with the band Stillwater on tour in 1973. William comes from an unconventional and somewhat disfunctional family. His father died when he was 6 and his mother, a college professor (played by Francis McDormand of Fargo fame) will not allow her children to engage in activities that she thinks limits their potential including rock music and forcing them to celebrate Christmas in September when it isn't commercialised. His sister flees the home when he is 11 as soon as she turns 18 to be a stewardess but she leaves him her collection of LPs and they become his lifeline in the lonely world he inhabits. William is smart enough that he's skipped a few grades so that by age 15 he is on the verge of graduating high school but of course it has also left him an outsider through his school experience as all his classmates are 3 years older than him.

But once he begins his career of rock journalism he finds that the eccentric life on the road is where he fits in. He meets a groupie of the band, using the pseudonym Penny Lane (Kate Hudson) who has a long term relationship with the band's guitarist Billy Cruddup (played by Russell Hammond) as his mistress. William of course instantly falls in love with the gorgeous and sparkling Penny Lane, and who can blame him? The band too takes an immediate liking to this kid who idolises their music but at the same time has some fear of him since his position with Rolling Stone can conceivably make or break the careers.

This film does not just tell the story of the William's article and the band, which is highly compelling on it's own, but is also a basic human story of people looking for a place to belong. It is also a film filled with moments of pure transcendent joy such as when the band and their entourage break out signing along with Elton John's "Tiny Dancer" as their bus tours along the lonely road. Another excellent scene sees one of the band members take William with him to a party in a quest to find people who are "real." In fact the film is filled with many great scenes that we will be remembered and discussed by anyone who views the film. Besides all of the above the film works on another level since this a rock driven film and the soundtrack is excellent and does great job of adding resonance to the onscreen events.

The cast is excellent. Fugit brings just the right amount of innocence and wonder to his performance as we see film through his eyes. Hudson is almost certainly headed on to a career as one of Hollywood's top stars as she sparkles in every scene and takes what could have been a cliché (Groupie with a heart of gold which is only one degree removed from the ever popular prostitute with a heart of gold) into a complex character. She is also allowed to show her vulnerability in another compelling scene late in the film.

McDormand who is always excellent has a tricky performance here as the domineering overprotective mother. The audience has to see and understand why it's imperative for her children to escape from her and this film provides that. Yet the film does not pigeonhole her into a one dimensional character, we see how much she loves her children and how it hurts her that the sister has left. Furthermore the film consistently and effectively uses her to provide humor yet the serious side of her character is never undercut. In the hands of a lesser actress one of the three of aspects of the character could tend to dominate and spoil what the director need to create but McDormand finds the perfect balance in the role.

Other great performances include Anna Paquin and Faruza Balk (of X-Men and The Craft respectively) as additional groupies on tour with the band who take a protective liking to William and Jason Lee (of many Kevin Smith films) in his best performance to date as the band's lead singer. Indeed I can't think of a member of the cast who isn't perfect in their role.

Tying the film all together is director Cameron Crowe whose 1996 film Jerry MacGuire is in this reviewer's opinion one of the very best films ever made. His most recent effort shares a lot with the previous one. Both films tell compelling heartwarming human tales. Both featured female leads who were positively effervescent. Both films featured great supporting casts and gave the supporting characters enough screen time that you cared about their stories just as passionately as the lead's. Finally both walk a line between dramatic storytelling and comedy that gives the films a special feel. Also in Almost Famous, as with Jerry MacGuire, much of the comedy comes from the characters and some amazingly timed cuts, edits, and pan shots. Although nominated Jerry MacGuire was unfortunately denied the full recognition it deserved at the academy awards in March 1997. Hopefully in 2001 the academy will make it up to Crowe and honour both this film and the director with the appropriate Oscars since barring a miracle in the next three months there most likely will not be a better film this year.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A lot of fun, good action scenes and three hot chicks
6 November 2000
Charlie's Angels * * * ½ Stars

While no one would accuse this of being the most intelligent or meaningful film of the year, it's just filled with energy from beginning to end making it one of the most fun

It's funny and the action scenes are great but if you're a guy there's three reasons to love this film from beginning to end: Cameron Diaz, Drew Barrymore, and Lucy Liu. The girls in this film are HOT! Even better the director knows it and uses the plot an excuse to dress them in a number fantasy type outfits (such a Swedish band, race car drivers, etc.) and gives the plenty of reasons to run, be wet, do gymnastics, wear skin tight leather, and in one particularly amazing scene let Cameron Diaz dance in nothing but a baby t and her underwear!

However ignoring the sumptuous T&A factor there is still a lot to like about this film. For one the action scenes are fast paced and a lot of fun. A cross between Mortal Kombat and The Matrix, it seems the girls and their foes have superpowers, which is sort of inexplicable, but the fights are so well choreographed that I just decided to go along with it and enjoy. Hands down the best action scenes of the year are in this film. There is also perhaps the most exhilarating twist on the old action standby of the car chase in 20 years in this film. In a lot of ways it plays like a really good James Bond film, only gender reversed.

The movie also knows it's remaking a campy 70's TV show so it has fun with itself and consequently it's legitimately funny on a lot of levels. Which is good, since if it tried take itself seriously it would obviously fall flat. Instead the humor, action scenes and the girls combined are so stimulating that the film can be forgiven having a paper-thin plot.

But perhaps the film's best asset is the cast. The girls aren't just good looking they are developed enough as characters to sparkle. Diaz as the ditsy blonde is really the breakout star of the film, giving perhaps the best performance of her Hollywood career here. Barrymore brings her trademark feistiness to the role and Liu is just dynamic to watch as she has the bulk of the action scenes. Bill Murray stars as the girls' boss Bosley and while the script doesn't ask much of him than his usual shtick that's still enough to be entertaining especially when he gets to interact with Tim Curry. Crispen Glover is just pure evil in this film and yet contains an aura of total bad-ass cool. But perhaps the second best performance in the entire film is a small supporting part for Tom Green who has the film's funniest and most uplifting scene. LL Cool J has also has an excellent cameo appearance.

I'd also be remiss not to comment on this film's soundtrack which uses the original TV theme and good mix of 70's disco and early 80's pop music to correspond with the action and like so many other elements of this film just enhance the total sense of fun one gets in watching it. Diaz again has two break out scenes involving the music, one on a disco dance floor early in the film and one on a first date that is just terrific comedic set piece.

Ultimately if you don't mind a film that's a little low on intelligence then this is definitely a film you want to check out. It just pure entertainment from beginning to end. And if you're a guy it's also the sexiest film since last year's Entrapment with Catherine Zeta Jones.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed