Reviews

12 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Don't Blink (2014)
9/10
SO MUCH BETTER than what I expected
24 August 2021
Warning: Spoilers
I should preface this review by saying that I love weird Twilight Zone-ey movies and shows. If there are mass disappearances involved, I love them even more.

This first ten minutes or so, I almost backed out. I was not particularly crazy about any of the characters, everything felt quite run of the mill.

Then when the action (quite suddenly) started happening, I pricked up my ears and paid attention. I was delighted!

Throughout the movie, while I was enjoying myself very much, I kept worrying about how they would wrap this up.

I sort of remember the movie Phantoms, but I deeply remember the book Phantoms that the movie was adapted from and I recall feeling, upon finishing the book, that the whole thing went to hell when Koontz tried to explain the events away in the last chapter. Yikes. It was not good.

I was so so so hoping that this wouldn't happen. Would a filmmaker have the courage to end a movie like this without feeling like they had to try to explain anything?

To my delight, YES!

I was thrilled and, afterwards, I kept thinking about the movie, even having weird Don't Blink-related dreams during the night. I woke up in the morning still thinking about it and now, 24 hours later, I am STILL thinking about it.

So yes, if you remotely like this kind of weirdness, watch it and you will not regret it.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Atmospheric, chilling and comforting all at once!
10 October 2020
I must preface this by saying that I am a huge fan of everything retro and vintage. I love just about everything from the 50s and 60s - especially in the area of sci-fi and horror. I'm not sure what drew me to this title on Prime (the poster design and font don't exactly scream "retro") but I found myself delightfully lost in what could have been an original Twilight Zone episode (as soon as I saw "Cayuga", I was like "Ah ah!".

What a delight! All actors are great - the leads are fantastic. Movies often caricature decades rather than depict them faithfully. This was bang on! The story was intriguing, well-handled. The long-shot cinematography was wonderful and I, for one, enjoyed the dialogue - sometimes it felt like I was listening to a radio play!

And for some reason, maybe because of the familiarity of it all, I found this movie extremely comforting, like eating a big bowl of homemade stew with a hunk of freshly baked bread.

What a brilliant little gem!
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Devil's Pond (2003)
1/10
Eek.
26 June 2020
I rarely write reviews and when I do they are rarely bad because hey, I like all kinds of movies, even some abysmal ones. What attracted me to this one was the title... I expected a little devilry, you know? But no. What I got instead was almost an hour and a half (apparently my stream committed suicide 20 minutes from the end) with the two most unlikable characters I have met in a very long time. Cue weak-chinned and thick-lipped psycho and precious whiney princess. I managed to remain uninvolved with either of them for the entirety of the film. Now, to be fair, I found the acting to be not so bad... I mean, I don't think either character was meant to be very compelling so, mission accomplished there. But the plot was plodding, lame, obvious, slow, boring... Oh, I need a thesaurus to find even more adjectives to describe my non-horror. Anyway, if you are stuck in a remote cabin with a DVD player and this lone movie, by all means watch it. But if you have ANY other choice, trust me, anything is better than this. One last thing: Meredith Baxter was my only source of joy in the entire movie.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Decline (2020)
10/10
What a lovely surprise
31 March 2020
Warning: Spoilers
What a pleasure to see this first Quebec production from Netflix!

The topic was appropriate as well, considering that we are living through a global pandemic...

I had no idea what to expect (didn't even read the teaser sentence on Netflix, really) and I was delighted to find this film to be original and gripping.

The plot line moves up slowly to a (very surprising to me) particular point after which all hell breaks loose.

I REALLY loved the non-Hollywood ending.

The acting work was fantastic. I didn't know any of the actors but it was a pleasure discovering them.

And finally, what a joy it is to hear a movie in my native language with all its richness and colour.

Merci tout le monde, excellent film!
39 out of 68 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Elvis in Concert (1977 TV Special)
8/10
Eminently lovable
25 March 2006
Warning: Spoilers
The CBS Special stands as a piece of history which I think has not received the care and respect it deserves from EPE. The badly-edited footage (you have to see the unedited footage to really appreciate Elvis' work) has been relegated to the Graceland attic and that's a shame.

The emotional punch this production packs should be enough to warrant an official DVD release. I think that to any Elvis fan, Elvis remained Elvis. EPE seems to think that it's OK to write off the last three years of his life, which to me are as important as any other.

The Elvis that appears in the CBS Special, is, and this has been said ad nauseam, in bad shape physically, sometimes slightly incoherent but he is possibly the most "human" Elvis ever caught on film. He is flawed, he is shy, he is hokey at times (in the way that a teenager would find his/her dad hokey) but he is humble, and remarkably likable.

Being an E fan, I enjoy watching his concert documentaries and I must say that I much prefer 1977 Elvis to his previous incarnations. Of course, as a showman, he was truly dynamic and possibly at his best in the 68 Special and "That's the way it is", but in 1977, he had lost this arrogance that characterized his late 60s/early 70s persona and was obviously comfortable sharing himself, as he was, with his audience.

His voice is as powerful as ever (perhaps more), he enjoys his audience. You can plainly see and hear that he is bored with some of his older songs (I can't blame him - how many years can you sing Hound Dog at every single concert without getting absolutely sick of it), but watch how his face lights up when he sings "Hurt". Through the first two lines of the song, he's looking back at the band and grinning with joy. Same thing for the extremely moving "Unchained Melody" (which was inexplicably NOT included in the final CBS footage but is available in the unedited concert footage). He ends the song with a final flourish and you can just see how pleased he is, grinning, loving what he is doing.

EPE is doing the world of Elvis fans a great disservice by refusing to re-release this amazing production. It has much more "meat" to it than the blah Aloha Special where Elvis, while looking superbly iconic and in fine voice, is wooden and emotionally removed from the whole thing.

One final word: if you watch the CBS Special, you will notice that the use of the word "fat" is unwarranted and incorrect. Elvis was certainly bigger by then, and he has the typical middle-aged sedentary guy "spare tire", but he is otherwise not particularly big. His face is not as much fat as it is bloated. But if you watch the Unchained Melody footage, make sure to catch that brief moment, about halfway through the song, where he pauses for a second, turns to the audience and smiles. In that one instant, you can plainly see Elvis from 10 years before, and, in this context, it'll both break your heart - knowing that he has such little time left - and make you love him.

What a great guy. I still miss him.
14 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Why is it just so good?
3 November 2003
I have no idea. But I know that I first saw that movie as a child, shortly after it came out, and never stopped loving it. I think the best word to describe the entire film is "colorful". The cast is, the characters are, the cinematography is, the script is. I bought a VHS copy a few years back and every 6 months or so, I just have to pop it in, jump into bed with my wife and a bowl of popcorn and enjoy it again. The movie hasn't aged well at all but as another reviewer said, it's a pure time capsule of 1969 and that in itself is a great positive attribute.
23 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Pure delight
7 March 2003
I saw N&A as a child, the year it came out. For me, it started a lifelong passion for Romanov history. Michael Jayston and Janet Suzman were nothing short of flawless, the cinematography was breathtaking, the production was lavish. Moviemaking at its best! This is truly a gem.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Perspectives shift over the years...
19 November 2002
Warning: Spoilers
**Possible spoilers** I saw "The Amityville Horror" when it came out in 1979. I was a 14 year old kid at the time and I was quite taken by the whole thing. The entire premise scared me: the voices, the goo, the upside-down crucifix, the flies, the distorted "GET!!! OUT!!!"... Not to mention that, at the time, we all had heard that this was based on a true story and we all WANTED SO BAD to believe that it really was.

Fast forward to this year, 2002. I buy the DVD, pop it in, welcome it again as I would an old friend... and find myself terrified again. But wait: I'm 37 and a Dad and a homeowner...

This movie should have been called "The Mortgage of Doom"! As it turns out, I feel that this movie SHOULD be scary for grown-ups, a spine-tingling economic horror. I'm watching it and thinking: "Oh no! They sunk all their money into this! Oh no! Don't axe down the basement wall - think of the price of getting the whole thing up again! Oh no! The basement stairs were eaten away by termites! Oh no! The plumbing system has to be upgraded! Oh no! What will it cost to clean up the blood and goo from the walls and stairs?"

You get my drift.

Scary, scary stuff, man. Just give it a shot. :)
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I hate to even say this but...
6 August 2001
...this is one of the worst movies I have ever seen.

I had reasonable expectations - I have been a fan of the original since it came out, I have liked Burton's work in the past... But nothing prepared me for this disappointment.

Dialogue: From the quotes from the original PotA to the Rodney King quote "Can't we all just get along?!?", the dialogue is the most contrived and asinine I have heard in a long time. Even worse than Titanic.

Plot: Any simpler could not have been possible. Witholding the interest of the viewer becomes a practical impossibility.

Character development: zilch. The only character I remotely cared about was Pericles. ALL other characters were left blank - and oh so boring.

Cinematography: Everything occurred in darkness or in confusing shots of mass battles between humans and simians.

And was it necessary to hit us over the head continuously, with a VERY heavy hand, with the fact that "!!!Hey!!! These are APES and they act like HUMANS!!!!" Seems like Burton just couldn't get over it...

As for the ending... What the h?!? It was nonsensical, non logical, and yet SO predictable.

For the record: I fought sleepiness throughout the first half and I had to leave the theater and go for a little walk to wake myself up. When I returned, about 10 minutes later, I asked my wife "Did I miss anything?" Her answer: "Nope."

It really saddens me to write such a bad review - I was looking forward to this movie so much! As it turns out, Burton sank all his budget into costumes and makeup, leaving us with a tasteless-as-cardboard summer slam-fest/FX flick with no redeeming value.

Stay away from this one and rent the first three of the original series instead!

PS: Zira would have howled with laughter at the sight of the female apes in this one. PS2: And why were all gorillas played by black actors? Sheesh.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Titanic (1997)
Interesting...
11 July 2001
Some love it, some hate it. But no one remains indifferent to it. The fact that Titanic can raise such passionate raves and rants, even three years after release, testifies of the impact it made. As for me, it's in my top ten, probably forever. Sure, the story lacks, sure, the dialogue was wooden at times, but that movie stayed with me for weeks after I saw it for the first time. Few movies have done it for me to that extent.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Rubberface (1981 TV Movie)
10,000 Rubberface haters can't be wrong.
11 July 2001
I also picked up this movie by accident, I also bought it for, like, $2.00 in the bargain bin of my local video store. I love cheesy, bad movies and I figured I was in for a treat. Well, this had got to be one of the worst movies ever made. Ed Wood himself would refuse to claim responsibility for it. BE FOREWARNED: If you are also a lover of bad cinema, THIS IS NOT THE MOVIE FOR YOU. This movie is not even laughingly bad, it's just bad. There are absolutely no redeeming elements. My home/vacation movies have more substance... and THAT says a lot.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fools (1970)
9/10
A fine underrated movie...
22 May 2001
I saw that movie when I was 6 years old, the year after it came out, and it made me fall in love with Katharine Ross... I recently purchased it (VERY hard to find) and watched it - 30 years later! What a great movie! Very much "of its time", Fools truly captures the early 70s... Katharine Ross is the very embodiment of the young modern woman struggling to establish an identity of her own, struggling against the establishment she's a part of, struggling for freedom and to be appreciated for herself. Jason Robards plays an excellent Matthew South, a struggling, aging actor, yet so vibrant and alive... Scott Hyland's part as Katharine's husband is the only part that is underdeveloped and the rationale for his behavior is never explained satisfactorily. The soundtrack is great (Kenny Rogers and the First Edition)and the cinematography is well done - watch for the "traffic signs" that pop-up throughout the movie - clever! If you can get a hold of this little disturbing gem, go ahead - great stuff.
19 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed