Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Mutant X (2001–2004)
Good
22 February 2003
As a sci-fi fan, I find this show to be a wonderful blend of action and adventure. As with most everything now a days, its based on a comic book.

The cast is wonderful, they seem to fit like a well put together puzzle.

It is also my understanding that Victoria does as many of her own stunts.

Mutant X lives!
13 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Rawhide (1959–1965)
And they said.....
8 January 2003
In watching this old Western on the Hallmark Channel, I've come to enjoy it. A favorite of my mother's when she was a girl, who, like many others, thought Gil Favor was the handsome one. I sat down and watched them on this cattle drive and have come to enjoy the show.

And of course, Clint Eastwood, co-stars as Rowdy Yates. I was told that back in the day, critics said he wouldn't amount to anything. Guess he showed them.
35 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Star Trek: Enterprise (2001–2005)
Hmmm......
26 November 2001
I grew up watching QL with Scott. Imagine my excitement when I heard he was tapped to play the lead role in this series. I enjoy Scott, truly, but maybe its me, but I think there is something lacking in the series. Archer and T'Pol click on screen, but not everyone does. I believe that ST: Voyager lacked the same thing.

That I believe is the on screen chemistry, the writers can write all they want, but if its not there, it just doesn't work for me.

Take ST:TNG these actors and actresses worked and clicked, like a good puzzle, all the pieces fit and made a wonderful series.

If you want a non Trek example of good chemistry, check out Babylon 5.

I believe that this might be a good series, but it feels like its a rushed project.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed