Major Spoiler! Others have commented on the quality of the acting, and I agree. Right down the line, this ensemble was a joy to watch. Others have also commented on what might be called the movie's Hallmark Channel approach to its material. I found it appropriate. My friends and I were of the opinion that it would have been very difficult to try another approach on this very real, thorny subject.
The movie sets up a complex and poignant problem within the family. Kate (Sofia Vassilieva) is dying of leukemia, and Sara, the mother (Cameron Diaz), can't let go. The film goes to great lengths to show us how the situation is damaging everybody else, as well. In her scrapbook Kate writes that not only is she dying, she is killing her family. Unfortunately, she's right.
Anna (Abigail Breslin) fights for her medical emancipation not because she hates her sister, but because she has a right to her own life. This is a brilliant and fundamental conflict experienced in all families, though not so dramatically. How much of my life do I have to give up to promote the needs of the others or of the whole? There is no easy solution to this problem. One person's welfare is often in irrevocable conflict with another's. But after working so hard to help us understand this conflict and all that it implies for this family, the movie cops out. Anna is not seeking her own life. She is, actually, secretly carrying out the wishes of her sister, who wants to be allowed to die. She is bravely going through one more terribly painful procedure on Kate's behalf.
By abandoning the central conflict, the film loses its drama just as it peaks. And, perhaps unintentionally, it comes down on Sara's side. Anna does not have a right to her own life; in fact, she doesn't even conceive it. (The fact that she wins her lawsuit is an epilogue and carries no weight by the time we get there.) It is as if Cain didn't really kill Able. Rather, he pretended to so he could inherit the farm and then give it to Able afterward.
To throw away the movie's major dramatic arc just as it is peaking is a pretty major decision. Why would the movie makers do such a thing? Did they think that we, the audience, couldn't stomach anything more? Are they right?
The movie sets up a complex and poignant problem within the family. Kate (Sofia Vassilieva) is dying of leukemia, and Sara, the mother (Cameron Diaz), can't let go. The film goes to great lengths to show us how the situation is damaging everybody else, as well. In her scrapbook Kate writes that not only is she dying, she is killing her family. Unfortunately, she's right.
Anna (Abigail Breslin) fights for her medical emancipation not because she hates her sister, but because she has a right to her own life. This is a brilliant and fundamental conflict experienced in all families, though not so dramatically. How much of my life do I have to give up to promote the needs of the others or of the whole? There is no easy solution to this problem. One person's welfare is often in irrevocable conflict with another's. But after working so hard to help us understand this conflict and all that it implies for this family, the movie cops out. Anna is not seeking her own life. She is, actually, secretly carrying out the wishes of her sister, who wants to be allowed to die. She is bravely going through one more terribly painful procedure on Kate's behalf.
By abandoning the central conflict, the film loses its drama just as it peaks. And, perhaps unintentionally, it comes down on Sara's side. Anna does not have a right to her own life; in fact, she doesn't even conceive it. (The fact that she wins her lawsuit is an epilogue and carries no weight by the time we get there.) It is as if Cain didn't really kill Able. Rather, he pretended to so he could inherit the farm and then give it to Able afterward.
To throw away the movie's major dramatic arc just as it is peaking is a pretty major decision. Why would the movie makers do such a thing? Did they think that we, the audience, couldn't stomach anything more? Are they right?
Tell Your Friends