Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Pay close attention here...
9 August 2004
This film is so focused on the fighting they forget the name of the main character...we are introduced to a cop named "Jake", but then the woman he is trying to save at the end can't be bothered to remember what his name is; she calls him "Jack" NUMEROUS TIMES.

There are so many other cheesy lines which have been mentioned in these reviews...how funny is it when Avedon, looking like he's going to burst into tears, sternly demands Blanks to LET THE GIRL GO!! Great stuff.

BTW...I believe Blanks' finisher is U, U, D, D, L, R, L, R, B, A.
14 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Well, what did you expect??
23 November 2002
Look, let's be clear about it...it's the year 2002, not 1962. This franchise of movies has evolved over the years from a cool and clever spy series to an over-the-top slam bang action series. When you go to see a James Bond film, you should EXPECT any or all of the following: 1) A completely unrealistic, contrived plot 2) Unbelievably cheesy and corny one-liners (almost all of which are sexual in nature) 3) A supervillain seemingly brilliant and mad enough to quest for world domination, but is somehow stupid enough to let Bond get close enough to spoil the whole thing 4) A female counterpart (or several) that looks good, gets captured, and ultimately gets saved by our hero 5) Gadgets, cars, and weapons that do fantastic, unbelievable things 6) Action sequences and stunts that defy fundamental laws of physics and logic

Having said all of that, and knowing what I knew, I was so excited to see this movie, and I loved it. Why? Because I got to escape for a couple of hours in a fantasy-spy world. Because I've seen the other 19 movies and I got to see what other directions they went with the characters. Because I love the characters and have gotten to know them over the course of the last 19 movies. Of course it has its shortcomings (the CG was weak in parts) but it has everything that makes the franchise successful. It pays homage to the older films while pleasing younger fans with it's incredible action sequences.

Like it or not, this is what the series has evolved to. Personally, I like it, but having seen Dr. No, From Russia With Love, etc, I know that the newer movies don't really appeal to many of the fans of those movies (my dad hates the new movies) because they have completely moved away from reality (not to mention the novels). So understand that before you go and see this movie. If you can just sit back and enjoy the ride, you will. But if you're looking for the magic of 1962 to return, than you might be disappointed. But I will bet on this...judging by the reaction of the theater I was at, James Bond isn't going away anytime soon.

Oh by the way, what's with the comment "Look out Bond, xXx is taking over." Huh? When xXx has 20 successful movies under his belt, then we can start comparing the two.
52 out of 71 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Just watched it again...great movie!!
15 August 2002
Being a huge action movie fan, my dad suggested this movie to me several years ago, and three or four years ago, I finally did. I loved it then, and love it more every time I watch it. I'm not old enough to properly judge the time when it was released, but it is easy to see why people were turned off by it...the action scenes are very intense and uncompromising. By today's standards however, the "blood and guts" of the movie are quite tame.

Even if you're not a big fan of westerns (I wasn't until I watched this, and it's still my favorite), and you like action movies with interesting and complex characters you should really consider checking this out. I think it definitely deserves the praise it has gotten.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed