Reviews

4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Barbarian (2022)
5/10
A Perfect Start, but then Something Went Wrong
3 November 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Director's delivery of movie's plot: raining night, cozy house, two young strangers, suspicious coincidence with booking - was just perfect. For the reason that you always anticipate that there is something wrong, and this intrigue (lying on the background of homely half-romantic atmosphere) is a terrific director's move.

Creepy and thrilling moments work absolutely great on that ground. I mean here the night-time, terrifying neighborhood (revealed in the morning) and of course the basement.

However, the first wrong step was too sudden death of Bill's Skarsgard character. It killed all the suspense and conspiracy around him (plus his character was indeed appealing). It was definitely a wrong decision, knowing that it happend at the middle of the movie.

Appearing of Justin Long's character and his moving to the house, obviously, couldn't be compared to the intrigue which was around Campbell and Skarsgard's characters at the beginning.

After Long discovers Campbell, and Mother's prehistory is presented, you may say goodbye to all the intrigue and say hello to a whole lot of questions.

What had happened to the neighborhood?

How is it possible that the only house with this disgusting creature is also the only house which stayed not abandoned?

And how, for heaven's sake, is this same evil house became the one owned by the agency offering its rent?

And it gets cleaned up regularly without noticing the Mother or any traces of her filth left in the house? (Homeless man made it clear that the creature leaves the basement, hence the marks of her presence should have been definitely there)

How could all of the tunnels be made by only one man? And for what reason? (If the secret room in the basement was more than enough)

I don't even want to mention the explaination of Mother's nature and origins (homeless person described her as a product of multiple incest acts and births, though if she was born in 80s, and her mother and grandmother "aka her sisters" should have been at least 13 to bear a child, and obviously the maniac wasn't doing his evil deeds since childhood; - there just mathematically can't be such a whole lot of incest generations as the movie tries to put it.

Also it was extremely hard to believe that director made this booking coincidence indeed just a coincidence.

To sum up, everything is merely perfect untill the death of Skarsgard character. Second part of the movie and especially the ending were simply unsatisfying comparing to the the first part.

It was very disappointing to see how abruptly the movie had lost this great intriguing thread surrounded by this peculiar cozy-trilling ambience, and had gone into the typical case of modern horror film.

Really disappointing...
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ready or Not (I) (2019)
1/10
It's a cheap schlock in every possible cinematic way
16 June 2022
I tried to avoid watching modern movies since 5 or 4 years ago, they brought to much disappointment, and a good movie started to be more and more rare case.

A few days ago I've stumbled at this one with a decent rating for a horror thriller (I have an experience of a few dozens films with akin and even less rating in the same genre, and almost each of those movies is at least worth spending time on).

Being fond of the genre and not having much new picks of such movies, I decided to watch Ready or Not, and you've already seen my opinion in the headline of the review, I can only add that it wasn't that bad in visual aspect.

Concerning script and characters.

Each minute of the movie is absolutely predictable, even the end, which was supposed to be a great twist due to illogical decision of one of the characters (it was totally contradictory to the personality and background of that persona, however, it was still obvious that following twist will happen, because it is inevitable part of storylines made by cheap and untalented writers who are all about triggering audiences' shock effect).

Besides illogical decisions, the characters are simpy poor and irritating. They are trying to be funny, try to make absurd jokes and mock some features of human's character (if they actually try, because sometimes I was thinking that the whole script was written by the author who just didn't much care about inserting any ideas to his composition), but actually they are making fun of and mock the creator of those dialogues.

If you want a bloody dark humor film, (even though I am not a huge fan of the such) I would recommend any of Martin McDonagh's pictures. The quality difference between "Ready or Not" and any of Martin's movies is incomparable, because the first one doesn't have any.

If you are searching for a horror or thriller, then you've come wrong way for sure. This movie doesn't have any features inherent to the genre.

The movie is just a waste of time. Nothing more.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Model Absurd Comedy
16 June 2022
I had an intention to watch the movie for the last few years, the only thing that stopped me was a thought that this was a typical type of an action movie, just with some comedy elements. Take for instance any film with Jackie Chan in the leading role, if you want to understand to what type of movie am I inclining.

However, to my biggest surprise, it's absolutely not the case.

The movie is something like a parody to the whole asian action genre. It's about enormously hyperbolizing action scenes, making fun of eastern philosophical dialogues (inherent to Kung Fu movies) by using proverbs and wise quotes absurdly.

The whole movie is about total absurd with quite decent visual effects for its time.

If you like absurd humor, you will most likely consider this movie to be a hilarious one.

Due to my humble opinion, it's one of the best representatives of its genre.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Mummy (1999)
9/10
Already a classic, or even cult, representative of adventure film genre
10 June 2022
When I was a teen, I used to see it a couple of times on TV. The movie had certainly made an impression on me, and wasn't the type I would forget about, meaning that the picture's atmosphere made by sound, visual effects, actors, and so further, was indeed authentic.

And now rewatching it as an adult with a package of thousands of movies experience from various decades, I may certainly say, that the impression this movie made long time ago was totally justified.

Indeed awesome sound effects, no surprise the film was nominated for Oscar in this category. Visual effects are of a good quality for it's time (however, not impressive). The story is also has nothing impressive behind it, nevertheless it surely can't be called boring.

But the main merit of the movie are no doubt the characters. Each character, even the most minor one whose part takes only a few minutes of pictures time, has a bright personal features and is memorable.

Occasional situational jokes are one of the main reasons for this, they are the both the causes of a smile on your face and of the characters' personality exposition.

Brendan Fraser was a perfect choice for the main character; his acting just perfectly fits throughout the whole picture. His comic part was not of the irritating kind of simply making funny faces, and at the thrilling and action moments he also did his best.

He deserves all of the credit, and the film definitely wouldn't be itself without him.

Hence, if you are a fun of adventure films (especially with an easy comic features) you are no doubt recommended to watch it.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed