Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
The Lady's Not for Burning (1974 TV Movie)
8/10
Has it really been 30 years?
2 May 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I fell in love with Richard Chamberlain the night I saw this. If I saw it in 1974, then I was, god help us all, twelve years old. So long ago, and so different a person, and I retain a memory of it that is bright and painful, like sunlight.

"The Lady's Not for Burning" is a world-weary play about the darkness of the human soul, and about the grace that sometimes shines through that darkness and blesses the ones it shines upon.

The setting is a generic town in the generic middle ages. Jennet, a lovely woman of some property, is identified and hounded as a witch, the excuse being that the old rag-and-bones man has been found dead. The mayor of the town promises to hang her tomorrow, but just that night, he's busy with an important party. A mercenary, Thomas Mendip, who has seen too much of the world, demands to be hanged because it was he who killed the rag-and-bones man. The mayor refuses Thomas's request, and insists that Jennet must be hung on the following day. The discussion of who is to be hanged, and why, is so funny you can hurt your sides laughing, and so grim that you want to cry.

The play is, throughout, a darkly humorous portrait of the human condition. The priest who coddles his violin as if it were his only child, is utterly adrift from the world. He is unable to perform any of his proper functions as a priest, or even, really, as a human. He provides an odd counterpoint to the life and death issues that Thomas and Jennet face.

This may be Richard Chamberlain's best performance. It is intense and understated. His Thomas is grim in exactly the right ways, with his generosity and sweetness expressed in his despair, a neat trick, even for a good actor. I've seen Chamberlain in other productions, but none of those performances seem as nuanced and sharply defined as this one.

The later production, starring Branagh, is less impressive. As a general rule, Branagh is a better actor, but in this particular case, he is too arrogant. Chamberlain plays the flamboyant role of Thomas with a humility that makes the character more tragic, and funnier, and in the end, more satisfying than Branaugh's more dramatic rendition. Branaugh draws attention to himself in his role as Thomas, while Chamberlain's performance more realistically portrays what the character is trying to do, not draw attention to himself, but draw attention away from Jennet.

The spirit of this play is very similar to many of Tom Stoppard's plays. And both of them have a strong resonance of Shakespeare.

I, too, wish that they would release the PBS version of "The Lady's Not for Burning." Failing that, I wish it weren't so hard to find either of the other two productions. Surely, it's time for another production? It's such a brilliant play.

(Please note: I'm doing the plot summary from memory. I may well have some details wrong. If so, I humbly beg your pardon.)
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sneakers (1992)
9/10
How did this film manage to stay under the radar?
19 January 2005
"Sneakers" is a remarkable movie, with an even more remarkable cast. The only truly sour note is the title. It must be an anagram, but the only one I have found that might be relevant is "NSA Reeks" -- which indeed it does in this film.

The plot is both simple: steal the magic chip that decodes everything, and make your dreams come true. It is also complex. Everyone wants it, all for different reasons, and some are willing to kill for it. Secrets, lies, and betrayals; trust, truth, and faith. In the end, the loyalties are predictable, and the ending a bit pat, but extremely satisfactory.

The thing that makes this film special is its high geek value. The characters really are like the techies they play, and the science and cryptography are real or extremely plausible. It's so much fun to watch a movie with computers and cryptography in it that doesn't make me grind my teeth and want to throw things at the screen. The motivations of the characters, while a bit off-center, are realistic for people that were in the computer geek community at the time the film was written. (Not hackers, and not the professionals they're turning out of college these days. The wild-eyed, in love with the technology guys who can't seem to find the world outside of their monitors.)

The least believable claim is that the magic box would not be useful in decoding Russian messages and sites. The second most unbelievable scene is Redford posing as a PI investigating the infidelities of the mathematician who invented the decoder. He persuades the mathematician's mistress that her lover has a wife, but that she shouldn't say anything about it because she loves him. Redford's weird change of loyalties in that scene, from his alleged employer to his alleged subject of investigation, have no ring of truth, and I still can't see how the woman, even distraught, could have fallen for it.

Taken all for all, the film is a fun techno-thriller with an amazingly good cast and unprecedented technical accuracy.
8 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Pass the Ammo (1987)
7/10
Tim Curry as Jim Baker
21 May 2002
This is one of those quirky little comedies that never becomes a big hit, but has the charm and endurance of a cult movie like "Harold and Maude." Not to everyone's taste, but if if you like this sort of thing, this is the sort of thing that you'll really like. A young woman and her boyfriend enlist the help of some friends, recently released from jail, to rob the televangelist of the money that her recently deceased aunt had given to "God" and which should have been her inheritance.

Tim Curry as the televangelist is fun, but Annie Potts also turns in a wonderful performance has his wife. The remainder of the actors are between competent and quite good. The entire production is professional quality, unlike many cult classics.

"Pass the Ammo" is not without subtlety. There is a charming scene between the preacher and a career bank robber, talking about money, in which the preacher is shocked that the bank robber just spends all his take. "Why that's just wasteful," he exclaims. The bank robber asks about IRAs, and he says, "Well, they have their plusses and their minuses." Their geniality is that of two people in the same profession talking shop.

"Pass the Ammo" is not great theatre. It's not great cinema. It is, however, a good deal of fun for the right people, of which I am one. I recommend it if you are a Curry fan, or like odd little comedies, or found the fall of Jim and Tammy Faye Baker entertaining.
11 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed