Reviews

6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Wolf Creek (2005)
7/10
A unique horror experience.
20 November 2006
Warning: Spoilers
This movie is a creative horror flick that plays on the clichés, then turns them on their head. And what I mean by that is you have the typical *STUPID* Jamie Lee Curtis chick who is trying to survive this horror experience, making all the outrageous, typical mistakes that make you bang your head against the wall and pray that she dies...

1. She has the killer down, but doesn't finish him. 2. She leaves a gun by his side. 3. She wastes time, exploring places, exploring the killer's personal goods - even watching videos - when she knows her time is limited. 4. She takes SECOND gun, doesn't take extra bullets... then leaves her SECOND gun because she HAS to explore the cold, dark cellar for NO REASON, and needs to climb a latter to get down.

These are but 4 of the extremely stupid things she does in this movie... but what keeps this movie from being a 2 and, in my eyes, redeeming itself fully is that, while I was praying for this stupid bint to die... this movie ANSWERS my PRAYERS! This script didn't award her with a Jamie Lee Curtis remarkable escape, despite sabotaging her own efforts at every turn with stupidity. The stupid bint gets stabbed, gutted and dismembered. Perhaps I'm a twisted individual, but I actually screamed: "Yes!" as he was killing her.

The acting was passable, the script only marginal... but this realistic twist was enough to make me remember this movie and think highly of it, even after it was over.

Good work!
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Stay Alive (2006)
4/10
Yep - this movie earned its 4 out of 10.
19 November 2006
Summary: People play a video game, and die the same way their characters do. Solid enough premise for a slasher/thriller - I'd be entertained to watch it if it was executed all right.

The problem with this horror of a movie was the execution was pitiful. Whenever it felt a need for a cheap thrill, it broke the rules it laid out for itself. It starts attacking people who have not died in the game, and even interferes with people PLAYING the game, trying to distract them so their characters die... and even 'playing' the game for people when they aren't around. It made no sense, and made this movie a total brain drain and a waste of time.

In a supernatural horror thriller, to break your own rules is the cardinal sin and the mother of poor execution. Inexcusable.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Plague (2006 Video)
6/10
A sound idea that suffered a similar fate as other sound ideas...
18 November 2006
Warning: Spoilers
... the writers had no idea how to end this movie, and it shows. I've flagged this as a spoiler post, so if you haven't seen it yet, don't read any more.

The ending of this movie, while intriguing for about a minute, doesn't fulfill our needs as viewers. There's no resolution and none of our questions are answered. They had themselves a fascinating plot and premise, did a great job building the suspense slowly in the beginning, developed our two leads enough to make them passable characters.... then what? That's about where the writers ran out of steam. They've set up the apocalypse, where children turn on their parents - we get our needed blood and gore - and suddenly, the producers said: "Okay, now wrap it up". After all the development they built up, they suddenly realized they had only 10-15 minutes to come up with an ending... so they used the typical: "open for interpretation ending" cop-out. That's a fine ending if executed well in a Suspense/Crime Drama story... but I don't watch movies like this to get in touch with my inner erudite. This movie is meant to amuse me, not make me think.

Think of all the classic horror movies that are in our culture. We can argue whether they are 'good' horror movies or not, but no one will refute these are the most popular: Friday the 13th, Halloween, Nightmare on Elm Street, The Excorcist, Alien, Night of the Living Dead, Village of the Damned. Each of these movies comes to a clear resolution in 1 of 3 ways: 1. All the main characters die. 2. The horror element is neutralized/destroyed or 3. We know nothing's changed, the horror elements there... and we can most likely look forward to a sequel. The Plague doesn't fit into either one of these solid endings... and thus, another perfectly good 1 hour and 15 minute movie is ruined in the last 15 minutes.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Really folks - it's *not* that bad a movie
20 October 2005
Gripping drama? Hell no.

Hilarious comedy? Nope.

Oscar Calaber Acting? Heh... yeah right.

But, really, this movie did not deserve to be slammed into the 3s. The movie had everything a mediocre early 90s horror movie should have - a plot you can follow without going cross-eyed, a few really gory death scenes and a pinch of humor. This movie won't make you roll on the ground laughing, but it will get your a chuckle here and there at Chucky's antics.

The young actors also pull performances that's beyond tolerable - it's flat out acceptable.

Absolutely great movie? No.

Absolutely horrible movie? No.

I was entertained and got exactly what I was looking for... thus it earns a 7 from me. You want a horrible horror movie that deserves its three - check out Leprachaun 4.
38 out of 59 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Red Dragon (2002)
10/10
A total thrill ride from the first five minutes.
5 October 2002
After the mildly mediocre script and directing of `Hannibal', by Ridley Scott, I was going into `Red Dragon' with mixed expectations. Having read the novel by Thomas Harris, I was both anxious yet weary as to how Ratner would make the transition from book to film.

While staying loyal to the novel, Red Dragon has taken many different elements and placed them out of order. In favor of the slow building suspense Harris built in his novel, Scott dives right into the action. Edward Norton gives a glamorous performance as the retired FBI Agent Will Graham, and as always, Sir Anthony Hopkins captivates both our minds and our emotions as the blood chilling and meticulous Hannibal Lector, who is in a similar situation as he was in Silence of the Lambs. A startling amazing performance is given by Ralph Feinnes as the jaded and schizophrenic Francis Dolarhyde. Ratner is able to place us inside Dolarhyde's head by use of simple dialogue and simple passions in a way that Scott failed miserably to do in `Hannibal' with his portrayal of Mason Verger as a shallow, two-dimensional villain.

This is a must see movie. Ratner has learned from Scott's mistakes, and has not repeated them. This movie WILL be nominated for just about every Academy Award possible, as a thrill ride of this psychological magnitude has not graced our movie screens since the original Silence of the Lambs.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Lucus learned from his mistakes in Episode I
16 May 2002
I absolutely loved Episode II... it had everything that a Star Wars Movie should have. Episode I catered to a younger audience, with a main character of 8 years old and an unbelievably stupid comic relief in the form of Jar Jar Binks. Without spoiling anything of the movie, I can say they have fixed this. Hayden Christensen comes off magnificently as 19 year old Anakin Skywalker, loyal, confused... and hinting at a dark nature. Ewan McGregor delivers a top notch performance as well, and the exchanges between the two are witty and quite funny. This is the prequel that we all know George Lukas could make... a movie on par with the first three movies. Also, the dreaded "love scenes" between Anakin and Amadalla were masterfully integrated with a mission of Obi-Wans... so as to not loose the interest of those of us who don't wish to see a Star Wars Romance. This movie had everything... action, suspense, romance and a great plot.

Solid 10 out of 10. You've restored my confidence, George!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed