You know the drill: Celtic head honcho women are trying to keep Christianity from taking over Wales, while Arthur spawns trouble children and Lancelot and Gwenavear fall in love on the side, with some weird lovemaking thrown in for good measure.
My two cents: Well... The book's 900 pages. They cram the first 200 pages into the first 10 minutes. That should give you some idea of how much the main plot was abbreviated. Most of the philosophy of the book is left out in favor of the 'weird lovemaking' mentioned above (which is probably the only part of the movie that's true to the book, sadly enough, and one I could have done with LESS of). The only people who would really understand what's going on in this movie are those who have read the book (I spent a lot of time filling in back story for the benefit of my friends), and the fans are the ones least likely to care, given how uninteresting this adaption is. If it's any credit, the scenery (especially of Avalon) was nice, and the acting, while not brilliant, is serviceable.
Recommendations: Fans of the book "Mists of Avalon" should check out Katherine Kerr's Deverry series. Stephen Lawhead's Pendragon series isn't too bad, if you're a huge King Arthur fan. The "Merlin" miniseries is a much better adaption of the Arthur legend than this, and "First Knight" and "Sword in the Stone", while not as in depth, aren't bad either.
My two cents: Well... The book's 900 pages. They cram the first 200 pages into the first 10 minutes. That should give you some idea of how much the main plot was abbreviated. Most of the philosophy of the book is left out in favor of the 'weird lovemaking' mentioned above (which is probably the only part of the movie that's true to the book, sadly enough, and one I could have done with LESS of). The only people who would really understand what's going on in this movie are those who have read the book (I spent a lot of time filling in back story for the benefit of my friends), and the fans are the ones least likely to care, given how uninteresting this adaption is. If it's any credit, the scenery (especially of Avalon) was nice, and the acting, while not brilliant, is serviceable.
Recommendations: Fans of the book "Mists of Avalon" should check out Katherine Kerr's Deverry series. Stephen Lawhead's Pendragon series isn't too bad, if you're a huge King Arthur fan. The "Merlin" miniseries is a much better adaption of the Arthur legend than this, and "First Knight" and "Sword in the Stone", while not as in depth, aren't bad either.
Tell Your Friends