Reviews

You can't blame anyone for making the fairy tale of epochal time travel entertaining or confusing. They are not possible and therefore there is never any danger. In physics, there are not even theories about 'traveling' to yesterday or tomorrow.

Epochal time travel would be something completely different from existing relative time travel, which we all do all the time. In her theory of relativity, Mileva Maric explained exactly how this type of time should be viewed. Incidentally, there is a crucial error in today's formula of the "space-time-clearance". Because it does not take into account the 'resistance' of the superfluid. It is therefore only applicable as long as objects with different motions move in the same space. In other words, without having a decisive influence on the superfluid.

The distance between moments is captured by the virtual concept of "time", i.e. The sum of all events from one moment to the next, to the next, to the next. Matter changes/disintegrates from one state to another. This is because we live in an annihilating universe subject to entropy. There is nothing left to 'travel' back to, because nothing is duplicated. The past, like the future, is not an existential place. It never was and never will be. The term 'timeline' is completely misleading because there is only one that shows the changes from the beginning until today. It is also just a virtual representation of how everything has evolved. In other words, time does not exist as an independent physical quantity that can be changed. Time is only a term for the representation of processes, comparative as in "truth" or "performance". Terms that merely relativize something, but do not exist independently and tangibly.

Ytterbium of atomic clocks has 580 trillion moments in the time span we call 'second'. Imagine how many universes there would have to be since 14 billion years ago if the moments doubled. And the doubling moments themselves too. And why? Perhaps just because an individual made a mistake that he wanted to correct? Bindingly to everything in the universe?! I don't even want to ask the question of how you want to find the corresponding universe and start it according to your ideas. However, the question of where all the protomatter for the duplicating universes came from and would continue to come from would be much more decisive.

I don't want to spoil anyone's mood, but this kind of time travel will never happen. However, there is one exceptional case. Which in itself would not be time travel at all, but a memory effect. This refers to the Moebius paradigm. It would also only have a limited influence and would therefore never encompass the entire universe. The smallest unit of influence could be a building, the largest perhaps a solar system. The crux of the matter, however, would be that you would have to determine a starting point with location and size and wait for the period of time that you want to bend in this way.

So time travel to yesterday or tomorrow is only possible in computer simulations and computer games. Perhaps you are lucky and life and existence is nothing more than such a simulation. Then anything is indeed possible. But it would only be illusory and never real.

I really like the series with Kelsey Grammer. Together with Christopher Lloyd, he's my favorite comedy producer. I first saw Chris in the series "Taxi" and Kelsey in "Cheers". Whereby I always noticed, even in other series, that one of the two was responsible for this or that episode.

You have to understand why Germans like me appreciate them so much. It is sometimes difficult to shape the humor in such a way that it is internationally competitive. Grammer and Lloyd have a natural sensitivity for this. Also as actors. Although I have to say that Americans are actually the better actors. There aren't many series that I like from a German pen. Because you always realize that the actors are just pretending. They lack the naturalness of realistic scenes. American actors, on the other hand, always act as if they were born for this or that role.

However, the Frasier series has a decisive disadvantage for me. I buy series and make non-stop editions of them. This means that since I watch many episodes in one go, I cut out the opening and closing themes. Unfortunately, I cut out a lot of the credits from Frasier, because the scenes with the credits are drowned out by a horrible screaming throughout all the seasons, which is probably supposed to be a song. I'm certainly not going to put myself through this torture permanently.

The series should actually be categorized as "Fantasy". Because Albert Einstein really was dumb as bread. He stole the theory of relativity from Mileva Maric. That's why he could never get the Nobel Prize for it. Mileva's father was outraged at the time and forbade his daughter to marry, otherwise he would have exposed everything. If it hadn't been for Max Planck and Werner Heisenberg, he would never have won a Nobel Prize. After that, everything threatened to be exposed because Albert didn't want to give any lectures and so he was literally blackmailed by Max. Finally, Planck and Heisenberg recommended that he should work on the field theory, because it would not be solved even in 1,000 years.

It was foreseeable that a complete idiot could never become anything. His school grades are clear proof of this. Albert was by no means subchallenged, but was in fact that stupid. In 7 years at the Swiss Patent Office, he had stolen so many ideas from others that he was able to set up his "own business". This is also easy to recognize, because after all the material had been used up, he could only utter cryptic nonsense. He was a living example of what power and influence can achieve through money from his parents. Not to mention the exploitation of a woman who was unable to defend herself in those patriarchal times.

No idea how this series could get such a high rating. We in german countries probably have a different idea of "modern". We have an expanded vocabulary and are therefore able to say much more clearly what is going on in this series. And that certainly has nothing to do with "modern". I find it particularly disturbing that a tv-show has been made out of a family, in which certain protagonists repeatedly express stupid thoughts on the couch. Do Americans really like such pseudo-reality nonsense? I, for one, bought only the first season and canceled all the following ones. It's perhaps not the series at all, but me. Maybe I am not developed enough to find something like this nice, entertaining and funny.

Production companies are constantly racking their brains as to what they can offer the viewer any time soon. In itself, this is not a problem, I think, as a European who sees high quality in American film. And that is in the convincing scenes of really good actors and, of course, the set design, that is, the scenery itself. They are always realistic portrayals.

Unfortunately, this does not always apply to the genre and the storytelling. Themes like the musketeers were transported very well many years ago. A remake like this is basically an insult. Because one believes to bring the spirit of the times into the given modernity. Which can succeed, if it is transposed to sci-fi level, for example. Light sabers and light swords are not an invention of George Lukas, they existed in comics decades before. That's what someone like me would like to see. The four musketeers in the year 2500.

This movie is not worth the production costs.

The FBI is the national American criminal agency. The US-American 'international' part would be the CIA. If you want to investigate something globally and all countries should be involved, you do it via Interpol, as short for "International Police".

One may be wrong but to sell the FBI as something international is again this arrogance of being not only the guardian but the owner of the planet. On which all other authorities than the owns only represent a meaningless kindergarten.

Please don't get it wrong, I'm more American than German in my heart, but this kind of overconfidence is unbearable.

This is a wonderful series, tranquil, reflective, intellectual. Since the series is set in a time when technology is at its beginning, it is easy to concentrate on the storytelling of each episode. Particularly outstanding are the many, rather unknown actors and actresses. Each convincing in his role, no arrogance; realistic scenes. David Suchet very charming and excellent to appear as Poirot as alive as Agatha Christie must have imagined when she breathed life into the character.

The series is particularly suitable for quiet Sunday afternoons when it's time for coffee or tea. In this crime series, the emphasis is not on exaggerating with violent scenes of crime, but on confronting an atrocity in a highly intellectual manner.

This was a really good SciFi series with all its inventions and of course the stories of the inhabitants. But when the nonsense with the time travel came, the end of the series was marked. In an annihilating universe there is no possibility to travel to a living past or nothing can come from the future. There are not even theories for it. All existing 'time travels' refer to the relative time according to Mileva Maric. That is something completely different than epochal time.

A thoroughly entertaining series, which is diverting for me because Patricia Arquette is one of my favorite actresses. This could give the impression that I am biased like most users here. Who rate movies/series well solely because they vote a) for their favorite actors or b) for the movies/series of their favorite genre. So not questioning at all if the stories told are good or bad.

This series also could not be saved by bringing in Ted Danson, who is also one of my favorites since 'Cheers'. Once because the technology portrayed in 'CSI: Cyber' is too much sci-fi and basically everyone is walking around with invisible Superman cape. Unlike in the familiar CSI universe, hardly anyone loses here. Llife doesn't work like that, there have to be defeats above all. It is through them that we develop further. In many places you are reminded too strongly of series like 'Medium' or 'Scorpion'. The interaction of the characters is missing, they are much too self-sufficient; they mostly want to see themselves confirmed as individuals, not as a team. The respective story of the episode is often overshadowed by pointless scenes that could have been left out in order to devote more time to others.

As already mentioned, the series is overshadowed above all by the sometimes excessive exaggeration of the technology. It's a strong manipulator, because everything else in the CSI universe is hard on reality. So through the title 'CSI' is made to believe so it would be in reality. Apart from the fact that computer technology is not as vulnerable to hackers as shown, it is also much less communicative in real time. WiFi or Bluetooth require handshakes until the connection is established, this is not possible in real time like: switched on, bang logged in. WiFi takes place on many different channels besides frequencies. Fast or synchronous infiltration is not possible. Just to name a few.

The series should not have been set in the familiar CSI universe. A title like "Cyber Scene Investigation" with an allusion to it would have been okay. For example, by putting the initial letters in bold. This would have given a higher flexibility, so you wouldn't have had to show corpses, murder and manslaughter in every episode. Then one could have also accepted the given SciFi much better. As I said, the series was quickly doomed to fail, because it had no place in the CSI universe.

The "Theme: Superman" has long since become hackneyed. This series, which will hopefully be finished after the second season, shows how badly it can be rehashed. It's not just the poor realization, but the actors. Someone must have been in a drunken stupor when casting the kids. If you want to be entertained with this genre, then you expect pretty characters and not yogurt faces. In my opinion, this series is a kick in the butt to this once great idea.

Although we are facing very sympathetic actors here, they can't build up any real tension. Someone who would deal with abstract incidents on this level wouldn't be so carefree and exaggeratedly cool.

The stories themselves are unconvincing and the "scary interludes" are sometimes unintentionally funny. All right, the series is still in its infancy. If this is to last, the 'quietness' needs to be taken out. And if someone tells a 'scary' anecdote from their past, it should appear as if they are speaking from memory and not reading a text from a blackboard.

The budget should have been invested in a sequel to the first two episodes. This is a completely pointless movie that only has the name in common. It's hard to understand why really good film series are driven against the wall with utter nonsense.

There would have been a much better theme: The Pole Shift. First noticed in the late 1960's, it has now almost reached the breakover point. What was concealed until today behind the "climate change". In late 2022 or early 2023, the dipole will collapse and trigger chains of events that even a Roland Emmerich could not imagine until today. That would have been a good topic, because it would have immediately tuned the masses in to the reality that stands before them.

--- Tja, mein guter Roland, der Zug ist nun leider abgefahren. Meine Bewertung betrifft alleine die gute und überzeugende schauspielerische Leistung der Akteure an sich. Welche typisch für amerikanische Filme ist. Den Rest musst Du leider in die Tonne treten.

In the last few days I have been watching the series from the first episode. Including the pilot, which was never broadcast. The first ten episodes are extremely good because there is no direction set for the protagonists to develop. Unfortunately, it was the wrong direction in the end. I didn't get to the final season 12; had thrown in the towel.

I'm surprised today that the series lasted as long as it did. She is full of narcissism, arrogance, smugness, chauvinism, humiliation and control compulsion as well as injury of peoples of different pikmentation and ethnic background (the term "racism" is not correct, because all humans are solely one race). Embedded behind laughter, which is supposed to lull the simple-minded viewer into the illusion that it would be okay to transport this kind of contempt through a comedy.

Particularly disturbing in the series is the display of a scientist "Sheldon Cooper", who has only condescension for others as if he were the center of the universe and the sun shines only because of him. He also calls this "gold" that comes out of his mouth. But just his presented knowledge is full of mistakes, which are supposedly brought in by real scientists.

Who thinks this series would be based on real principles of physics, is mistaken. Einstein was demonstrably stupid like bread, would have achieved absolutely nothing without Planck and Heisenberg; was only a plagiarist. Especially the time rafft neither in, nor outside of the series there anybody. Travels into an existential epochal past or future with return possibility are completely excluded in an annihilating universe; there are not even theories for it. Who studies the works of Mileva Maric, the discoverer of the relativity, exactly, he will find quickly. I also recommend the original works of Burkhard Heim.

I would like to say that the protagonists in front of the camera have nothing to do with it, because they only play their roles. But experience shows that they gradually, i.e. With increasing popularity, also have a massive influence on the development of their played characters. Fortunately, the series is over. I hope "Young Sheldon" will also be canceled soon, because she has been comparatively degenerating since the 5th season.

Since the death of Gene Roddenberry, the true Star Trek universe has collapsed. There is not much left of the actual philosophy. Which is not particularly surprising, if one recognizes today around which kind of humans it concerns with Hollywood & CO.

Patrick Steward is an acceptable actor, but his time is over. You can clearly see that the increasing shortcomings of age are compensated with modern special effects. So one tries to maintain Star Trek around a man who has grown old and to reinvent it in the process. The old-established Trekkers gratefully accept this, but Gene was never primarily interested in inspiring the fans, but in drawing a world as it should be, but is not. Star Trek today is therefore without him no more than an expensive video game.

In itself, the idea behind it is not a bad one. Unfortunately, it was not put into a convincing context. I honestly ask myself why a development to a good cause must be inspired by violence and madness. A series should appeal to the intellect and not the willingness to use violence. The story writer can't really imagine what it would mean for a normal person to become a superlative.

Due to the very high quality of the top actors and the star-studded lineup, the narrative is not beaten down by the special effects. I can only hope that there will be many sequels.