Reviews

36 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Father Brown (2013– )
7/10
Nearly perfect fun.
1 February 2024
Love these types of shows and FB is near perfect - a fun cast of characters with varied episodes, with the added bonus of the side characters you want to come back for another appearance usually do.

Which leads to my only gripe about the series: I found the characters of Inspector Mallory and later his replacement Inspector Sullivan to take me out of things at times. Surrounded by impressively multi-faceted characters that actually grow with the series (i.e. Lady Felicia making up with her husband, Flambeau actually caring about Father Brown, Bunty learning some responsibility/encouraging other young women, Mrs. McCarthy becoming more accepting and adventurous, Brenda learning to trust people... etc.) makes the Mallory's unchanging and Sullivan's backward moving characters more noticeably strange. It's fine to have a hard-headed character who doesn't grow (i.e. Filch in the Harry Potter movies), but it only started to bother me when Mallory had 2 episodes where he was put in dire situations and seemed to have changed - the fact that even his family's well-being/safety wasn't enough to change him even a little was very unbelievable, especially with him mentioning his wife and kids multiple times and it being made pretty obvious he cares about them (i.e. Made the move to Kembleford specifically for them even though he doesn't like it there and was terrified to have his wife angry at him for missing his daughter's solo singing recital and going above and beyond to make it because he obviously loves his daughter, even crying when he finally heard her sing).

The most bizzare character is Sullivan in Season 10... in previous seasons, he is calm, friendly, competent, and respectful (compared to Mallory's more blatant annoyance with... everyone). Especially in S8E10, he and Inspector Valentine are extremely respectful towards Father Brown and openly welcome and even seek out his assistance, prefering him over Mallory. I was very surprised and confused when he reappeared in S10 as almost a "Mallory Version 2" - he is rude to Father Brown and Sargeant Goodfellow (throwing a teacup and saucer on the ground and ordering Goodfellow to clean it up?!) and suddenly is a TERRIBLE detective, ignoring obvious evidence and jumping to fallacious conclusions. It would have made more sense for a new character to have been the new Mallory instead of Sullivan.

Again, love this series and must emphasize my observations (about the characters and NOT the actors) are just what I think would bump it up a notch.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Christian Bale, Harry Melling, & Gillian Anderson carry this.
15 January 2023
Warning: Spoilers
I would have rated this a 5 for story/plot, if not for the excellent work of CB, HM, and GA.

The movie starts slow and has a nice build; I don't mind that in movie and can appreciate it. That said, there were quite a few lucky coincidences and not very many (if any at all) red herrings to make things more interesting. When the pace starts to pick up, it's pretty straight foward, not much of a mystery until the final twist at the end.

While Lea's involvement/reveal as a baddie might be considered a twist, there's enough in Lucy Boynton and Harry Lawtey's (Artemus) performances by the dinner scene that give away a little more than a hunch. I felt Gillian Anderson (Julia/Mrs. Marquis) gave it away in her first scene during her conversation with Bale (Landor) at the gate.

In relation to the twist with Landor at the end, there were some MAJOR plot holes for me - if the only clue Poe, played to perfection by Melling BTW, had to Landor's involvement was his handwriting on the notes, it makes no sense why Landor would have pointed out the note or handed it/given it to Poe to decode. One might argue that he didn't realize a piece was missing (hard to believe considering he's supposedly a preeminent detective who would have presumably burned the note he "tore" from Fry's hand and noticed it was missing a chunk from the middle); the argument could also be made that he knew a piece was missing but didn't know it was in Fry's hand, and chose to open his hand and reveal it to the Captain Hitchcock (Simon McBurney) and Dr. Marquis (an excellent Toby Jones, whose character in this reminded me a little of his Dr. McBrearty in "The Wonder") to bolster the idea that the academy brass need him to help solve the case (i.e. He is quickly/easily noticing things they are missing). Even if that is the case, there's no reason for him to pursue a working relationship of any kind with Poe and even less to ask him for help decifering the torn note and even less than that to let him hang on to it (which I think might be a goof, since Poe gives the scrap back to Landor at the tavern). Finally, one would think Landor would try to disguise his handwriting or not leave a note for Poe at all, knowing Poe has seen/studied his handwriting. Without this note/handwriting match, Poe would have only discovered Landor's secret through his late mother, who is the ultimate deus ex machina (she could have been less cryptic warning her son off Lea... jk). Another slightly annoying detail for me - paper and ink in this movie seem miraculously impervious to water... The note scrap seems to survive in Fry's sweaty hand as he claws at his neck to save himself, the snow outside, and finally, being submerged in a literal bathtub of formaldehyde; Fry's journal pages also seem to stand up just fine under a water bath.

My final gripe - is it possible the three cadets didn't know Mattie Landor was related to Detective Landor? At formal balls during this time, women had escorts and men and women had to be introduced; balls also involved dance cards that were signed by dance partners...etc. It's hard to believe that Ballinger or Stoddard (Fry was understandably caught off guard) wouldn't have made the connection - the cadets obviously knew why he was there, since Poe (who was not close with Fry) approaches Landor early on and says, "Are you Augustus Landor? Unless I mistake, you've been tasked with solving the mystery..."

So, while not necessarily mystery, the movie is enjoyable enough - beautifully shot, fantastic costumes and settings, fantasitcally acted.
8 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Sweet with some oddities.
15 December 2022
Warning: Spoilers
This is a feel-good, colorful love letter to Paris (complete with knowing nods to it's political/social history) - as advertised. It also covers themes as following one's dreams, knowing yourself, finding yourself, and not letting your job or what others see/believe what you are define you.. albeit not delving very deeply.

There were a few things that did rub me the wrong way, the major one being that after her dress is damaged, she THROWS IT IN THE THAMES. More than being littering, it is astonishingly wasteful and unbelieveably out of character: one of the female staff at Dior who is very kind to Mrs. Harris takes her on a tour of the atelier and tells her all the materials such as fabric, beads...etc. Are all carefully sourced from the best of the best; throughout the movie, Mrs. Harris, an acomplished seamstress, expresses extreme respect and awe for the artisans (seamstresses, embroiderers, fabric cutters and drapers...etc.). She would have known the dress (which has a signifcant jeweled beaded front that was not damaged) could have been salvaged. Even if it was not salvageable or she could not afford to fix it, it's beyond imagining she would throw a massive, custom, handmade silk ballgown painstakingly made (on a rush order, mind you) by people she befriended and respected (she is even not-too-subtly reminded by the garbage man on strike that in France "the worker is king") and she believed the spirit of her beloved late husband and her friends helped her obtain, into the river. She would more likely carefully pack it away, finding it too painful to look at, or hang it in her wardrobe to stare at in perpetual despair. This also being post-WW2 and her being old enough to remember rationing (i.e. Silk was saved for soldier's parachutes and NOT available for frivolities like dresses), it definitely took away from the movie for me to have her just unceremoniously toss it into the river. Maybe I'm being silly, but to drive the fact home: $1 USD today was roughly $10.59 in 1957. The green dress cost 430 pounds, equivalent to about $4,553.70 today... a WHOPPING sum of money. For context, the average new home in the US at the time was about $12,200 and a new car was about $2,000.

That scene aside, the movie delivers what it promises - a sweet and sometimes silly feel-good film to fill the time.
11 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
I get why some gave up.
11 December 2022
A lot of other reviews have already touched on the same problem: 1st episode was definitely a winner, but all episodes after that start going a little downhill - lots of logic/plot/character decision issues start piling up.

Started off with lots of potential and the series is obviously visually stunning (sometimes almost unnecessarily so, if that makes any sense). The actors also do their best, but for some reason Chloe Grace Moretz (Flynn), Jack Reynor (Burton), and Charlotte Riley (Aelita) are just not striking for me in these roles (not to say they're bad actors) - can't put my finger on whether it's the exaggerated accents (I'm a Southerner and it's just off), strange character choices/behavior, or odd direction (story/script issues)... could be all of it. Definitely also several instances of near-camp (i.e. The over abundance/usage of bottles and cans of beer as props, entering then immediately leaving rooms just to dramatically deliver lines, baddie T'Nia Miller's formula-perfect villainy complete with classical flourishes... etc. That said, I feel Gary Carr (Wilf), JJ Feild (Lev), Adelind Horan (Billy Ann), Katie Leung (Ash), and Chris Coy (Jasper) all do great work here, with much more believable and grounded characters.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Outfit (2022)
7/10
Stunning. Rylance shines.
24 September 2022
The big shoes that "Knives Out" (2019), "A History of Violence" (2005) and other excellent twisty-turny-thinky movies want to fill belong to movies like this. I guessed/predicted a few elements early on (won't spoil here) but it might be more the fault of the camera's lingering eye here and there and less the plot/story/script. Rylance and Flynn are fantastic; Deutch and O'Brien are good as well, though their dialogue at times (especially with each other) seemed a little strange/empty/forced/obviously driving the plot. I was surprised and impressed by O'Brien's accent attempt the second he started speaking, although you can hear it slip a little here and there.

Perfect little sleeper - definitely worth a watch.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Belle (2021)
6/10
Beautifully animated; story needs work.
18 September 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Animation/direction is gorgeous - lovely shots in "U" and in the MC's real world. I was really hoping to watch this with subs, but Prime and HBO only have English dubs, which might be the reason quite a bit of the dialogue seems off/strange. Even with that in mind, the story does need a little more fleshing out to make the serious topics it's trying to tackle actually have weight - i.e. It's hard to feel completely sympathetic towards the MC when she seems oblivious to her father's suffering. There are also some illogical/unrealistic/unanswered plot devices - i.e. Why Suzu's mom doesn't take an extra life jacket with her into the river, how the dragon/beast has wounds at all in a virtual world, how the AI characters work (the ones in the castle called the beast "master"...), are the "Justices" AI or real people/U employees/self-styled neighborhood watch (which if they are, why don't the U creators just suspend the beast's account instead of letting him cause disruption for all the other users), and how 5 billion global users aren't able to discover the identity of arguably the two most popular avatars despite really trying (we all know a much smaller social media hive mind today can find anything/anyone), and why the hell a father who has already lost his wife from her trying to help a stranger's kid would allow/at least not immediately follow his only child/teenage daughter to the capitol city after finding out she's trying to save 2 young boys from their emotionally, verbally, and physically abusive father... Expanding on/adjusting these things would help raise the stakes and make us care more about the characters.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Kimi (2022)
5/10
Had potential but fell a bit short.
14 February 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Started off strong, but never really became what it could have been. The main character is strangely unlikeable; something that could have been solved with more subtle clues to a cause dropped here and there instead of a sudden, giant late exposition dump to a another character who doesn't care/is on screen for 5 minutes. There were also MANY loose ends: Why was Samantha not able to go to the police? Why did the she use Kimi instead of some other more secure recording device? Why did Chowdury help Brad if his crime really was rape? Was there resolution between Angela and her mom? Did her Mom ever call the cops after that video call? What happened to Kevin? Are they friends now? Did he also overcome his issues? What happened to the company and Chowdhury (did the IPO happen)?

There were also too many strange oversights - especially infuriating, illogical pauses by Angela while being chased (i.e. Stopping to take a breather in the hallway of her apartment building, then barely making it through her apartment door...) I definitely found myself yelling at her from the couch, "Why are you stopping?!" several times. Two of the baddies at the end also inexplicably pause after Angela arms herself and turns the tables, making them convenient, easy prey. The apartment also has a wall of windows facing a busy building and street, with several windows open - why not scream for help? Angela is shown considering taking additional anxiety meds before the chase starts, but decides against it - an agoraphobe would NOT be as calm as she is for the remainder of the film, unless she had popped a few extra. Finally, the Kevin-rescue really caused a problem for me: when I first saw him, I thought he might have been an undercover cop/detective/FBI already on the case/investigating Amygdala. That would have tied up several threads - why he seems to never leave his apt, why he would know when she's in trouble and know who she is. For him to find out who she is as simply a fellow agoraphobe/shut-in, he would have had to do more than his character states... he would have to search for her apartment building, find the floor plans and estimate which apartment is hers (the building is under construction and her apartment was worked on by her contractor father so changes might have been made that can't be determined from the several windows he sees her in), then know what apartment number/letter it is (if anyone has ever gotten lost in a hotel looking for their room they know this can get tricky), then find her name, the make sure her name matches her face, since she might not be the owner/on paper. Sure, he helps save her, but it's still creepy, dude.

All in all, a fine movie to watch to fill the time - felt like more of an awkward summary of a thriller. Nothing outstanding, nothing new.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Good watch, but heads up on a few possible triggers.
24 November 2021
An entertaining watch, but definitely of it's time. A word of warning to those who might possibly be triggered by some jarring racial elements - young actor Antony Scott plays a young African servant in blackface, and unfortunately also attempts to speak in the caricature of one. Lead actor Stewart Granger also plays Othello in blackface, and later refers to an African in his employ as "his n****r".

Other than these understandably distasteful moments, it's well-acted.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Finally just watched this. And... NO.
17 November 2021
1) As a woman, this movie did not age well. Omce again, Asian women shown as meek, sexual objects who might be able to fight really well, but they're still prostitutes and spend most of the film scantily clad. This was written by a non-Asian man, right? Just checking.

2) As an Asian-American, so much of this was trope and stereotypes - surprised the Asian acting talent in this didn't point this out. The Monkey King facial hair, having random Chinese characters (language) written here and there, but everyone speaking English... "Jungle Village"?! Are you serious? Blossom, Lion, Silk... We're just missing a Jade and a Dragon and we've got the whole set.

Don't get me wrong - I'm a creative action-with-a-twist fan (I see a lot of reviews here referencing QT)... but this is just messy with a lot of dead-pan, wooden acting. Would have been a 1 star, but wanted to give the set, costume, and stunt teams their due.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dune (2021)
7/10
Visually and musically stunning - but what else?
29 October 2021
Dune fan here - own/read the books, watched/own all previous movies/mini-series.

This was a visual feast and the soundtrack/music was amazing - credit to the cinematographer and composer (and Denis' vision, of course) for those absolute wins.

The actors all also did well - especially liked Oscar Isaac's portrayal of Duke Leto; Stellan S. As Vladimir H. Was also much more dark and brooding than Kenneth McMillan and Ian McNeice, which I appreciated (not that those actors did poorly). The reason why I'm rating this the same as I did the previous versions is that I didn't really feel surprised or inspired... other than the way it looked or sounded, I didn't feel like I got anything new (Keynes being a woman doesn't count - that's a wonderful change but her gender doesn't affect the story so far).

Part II will be the decider - if Feyd or Chani brings something new to the table, or perhaps Alia or Irulan are presented in a different way, I may feel differently. A little torn becasue not much happened in this film.
1 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Reminiscence (2021)
4/10
Total Recall - Book on Tape
1 September 2021
Was looking forward to this - it's a shame because it has a great cast and had potential.

Movie is basically Hugh Jackman narrating... the entire time. He even states things that are happening while we're watching him watching the moments happen (i.e. "You saved him." That alone shouldn't be a spoiler, but you'll know what I mean when you get there/hear it). You can listen to this movie with your eyes closed and not miss a thing - which is the opposite of what a movie is supposed to be.

The movie also uses this narration to skip all the parts that should have been shown/expanded on in favor of "cooler" scenes that really don't need a ton of show-and-tell; for example we see people use the machine way too many times - we know how it works after the first 3. Instead, it would have been much more interesting to show how/why the floods came, how quickly the water is rising, and how that affects the current landcape (jobs, rich poor, prices, economy...etc.) For example, Rebecca Ferguson's character is basically a lounge singer at a seedy bar, but her apartment is pretty great compared to how bad things are supposed to be in this post-apocalyptic world... complete with a roof and view. Is... she rich? We don't know. Jackman's character seems better off than she is, but he and Thandie Newton's characters argue about money from the get go.

Verdict: Slow, small world, simple static characters, predictable.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Jolt (2021)
3/10
So. Much. Narration.
1 August 2021
Ridiculous premise made even more ridiculous by ridiculous amount of narration right when the movie starts. Would have been a much better movie to see all that instead of being told it along quick cuts of her childhood/past (aka character development...) in 4 minutes.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
El Cid (2020–2021)
6/10
Well-acted; missing details & plot holes keep it from reaching that next level.
28 July 2021
All the actors were fantastic; sets and costumes were also great. Drama/political intrigues...etc. Were just a little too two-dimensional, missing that extra layer or twist that give them true complexity or make them real obstacles. Some strange decisions/plot holes also seemed a bit far-fetched... people that very obviously should have been executed or killed were left alive, some fight/battle scenes were cut so bizarrely I had no idea what happened until it was made clear in the final scene who the winner was, and the political connections between some countries and why they were the way they were ("vassals", "tribute" or "tax" paying countries...etc.) didn't make sense/wasn't clear.

A good, fun watch.
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
P is for Prenentious, Pants, and Plot Holes.
6 July 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Beautifully shot, but only provides one ludicrous conclusion for the central mystery.

All the characters, but especially the lead, are very pretentious and seemingly wise and unbothered, but it's not earned. Not a single character seems to be accomplished at or aware of anything. The only jobs we're aware of are these girls that apparently are all prostitutes, or singing troupe "brides", or actual brides. And none of the women wear pants - maybe there's a hidden message there?! 80% of the main character getting anywhere is luck, the other 20% is paranoia. Finally, why was the 'zine author killed? What does the Homeless King have to do with the "ascension" of gross rich men and their cult wives? What did dogs have to do with anything? Who was the Owl's Kiss? Does the rich guy not care about his kids or that his daughter was murdered (probably by those who are keeping his secret) while trying to find him? Why did old songwriter-Methusala try to kill Sam? What did the parrot and old topless lady have to do with anything? There's no message here.

This movie is like a journey through the mind of someone's deteriorating brain - in the end, there's not even any stakes because she wasn't murdered. Verdict: MEH.
15 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Mortal Kombat (2021)
4/10
Missed opportunity; relies on fights & CGI.
2 May 2021
Warning: Spoilers
As a MK fan, really wanted to like this. Yes, it was faithful to the games, but that's the "video game movie curse" - ignoring story, pacing, purpose, emotion, character origins/arcs... etc., just to tick off superficial boxes.

This should have been planned as a series - instead of the main character meeting a series of people who deliver lengthy explanations of what's going on, which the main character believes, leading to a series of fights. Actions also don't make sense: Sub-Zero is the worst assassin, mistakenly thinking he killed Scorpion AND Jax, the former who stupidily tried to take him on single-handedly when he could have just driven away. Cole also conveniently leaves his family behind with no protection (so writers didn't have the burden of doing something with the characters until they're needed to up the ante later on). The story would have been much more effective if Cole discovered MK lore on his own - i.e. Spotting the mark on Jax or narrowly escaping an assassination attempt...etc.). There was also no need to try and fit so much in one film - I think the first 7 min is pretty highly regarded; they should have kept the storyline more focused on Sub-Zero and Scorpion (the surviving daughter, the bloodline...); there was no need to include so many characters and try to explain/show everything - spreading it all out over two or three films would have been much neater, enjoyable, and build up anticipation for popular characters.

There's more to pick at, but long story short, this game probably satisfied most MK fans, but failed as an actual movie (for the masses).
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Story told well, but without purpose.
15 January 2021
Warning: Spoilers
5 for meandering story with no meaningful ending, 6 for the acting; everyone did well. Beautifully shot. Great soundtrack. Basically, this movie is probably what happens when you bump into an old acquaintance and they're like, "Oh, hey, did you hear about that guy from wherever from way back when? Well, let me tell you..." The friend launches into a long-winded story that you end up listening to over beers and smokes and at the end, they finish with, "...and no one knows, bro. It's anyone's guess." You're left heading home wondering if that was a waste of time - it was told well, but what was the point? There wasn't a lesson, or resolution, or even an opinion/point made. For me, this immediately seemed like an attempt at a version of "The Virgin Suicides" (1999). Entertaining enough; worth a watch.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Absolute Chaos.
4 January 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Being a good director does NOT mean being a capable storyteller/screenwriter. No fault of the actors, this story and script was a bunched up carpet, riddled with holes. A rushed telling with a timeline that doesn't fit WW's other DCU appearances (i.e. tells Batman in current day/decades after the events in this film she "disappeared" and stayed hidden... not exactly what happens in 1984...) , a lazy plot device that requires absolutely no detective work by our heroine (Barbara does the one research scene and delivers all we need to know in one scene of dialogue condensed in one phone call; Diana finds the main villain almost immediately just driving on a road...), illogical/tired trope decisions transparently made for cheap reactions (Barb being a nerd complete with glasses, not being able to walk in heels and dropping things; Steve's outfit montage...), WW's powers being all over the place (she loses Steve unexpectedly and "discovers" her power in the first WW film and defeats Ares, the GOD OF WAR, but after revoking her wish in this film to regain her powers she can't stand her ground against the WIND created by a human who absorbed the powers of a little TRINKET another god created for kicks/laughs...), and no consequences for the main villain at the end - which completely decimates the original "lesson" from the beginning, about how cheating to gain what you haven't earned is... bad. The movie lost me when Steve was brought back... in another man's body. WHY. WHY? If the stone is so powerful, why couldn't it just manifest him as himself, instead of some poor dude who probably got fired for not showings up for days and got dumped by his girlfriend...etc. The way Diana and Steve just take over this person's apartment and life with no concern is strange, concerning, and completely out of character. There's so much more... Cheetah looking nothing like the comics, how much damage she was able to do to supposedly indestructible armor, no explanation of if the ENTIRE POPULATION OF THE WORLD would remember the events of this movie and if not, why/how... I'll just stop here. I heard there's a third film in the works - hope they learn from their mistakes.
29 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Definitely for kids.
29 December 2020
As an adult and a fan of the book, this was a 5. Seeing as how it was clearly for kids and they're also less likely to be distracted by how fake the CGI dogs look, it's a 6 - hopefully it will interest them in the book. Also, my dog liked it.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
More plot holes than bullet holes.
11 October 2020
I am not a "franchise fan" but have seen all of and enjoyed some of the films. I agree with other reviewers that the reboot is bizarre and this series has long gotten to the point of trying to squeeze blood from a stone.

No fault of the actors, this movie suffers from plot holes, a bad script and strange but also boring and predictable synopsis. Nothing we haven't seen before already; this entire film suffers from the "paper-thin disguise" trope. The new advanced robot vilain, which is supposedly unbeatable (character Grace says you run from it), makes unwise, unstealthy decisions again and again. Isn't conserving energy and avoiding contact with witnesses and being seen on cameras basic tenants of being a successful, undetected hunter?

I was going to pass on this but ended up watching on Hulu for the CGI and fight/chase sequences. If you're looking for more, skip this one nd remember the Terminator series as it was, not what it's become.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Enola Holmes (2020)
6/10
Not bad for younger audience; simple, fun viewing.
27 September 2020
Suffragettes and feminism, a female mind as sharp and tenacious as a man's in a period drama for younger viewers = check. I'm probably too old for this movie, but am a fan of Helena Bonham Carter, Sam Claftin and Burn Gorman. The plot was a bit simple but was still fun and entertaining - my only complaint was how one-dimensional and nasty Mycroft Holmes was depicted. Stephen Fry's Mycroft in "Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows (2011)" was much more complex and likeable since his perculiarities were explained/had backstory. While Claftin did a great job, I don't think the character of Mycroft is supposed to be a baddie/villain - he's supposed to be helpful, a "life line call" for Sherlock when he's working on a case. Bottom line: A fun family movie. Enjoy.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Miss Fisher and Crew, without the Crew.
27 September 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Really wanted to rate this higher knowing what fans did to get it made... Was really hoping to see the whole gang, but as another review said, our favorite faithful pals barely rated a mention. When Miss Fisher sees Jack again, she doesn't seem to care that she's hurt him or the lengths he's gone to/how moved he was thinking she was dead; this doesn't jive at all with how we left things at the end of MFMM Season 3. Definitely could have had a more complex plot, more twists and turns, and involved more of the cast we did get to see; as a fan who has seen every episode of the tv series multiple times, I feel each episode packed more punch in the limited time than this movie did. I also wanted to give one whole star just for Phryne and Jack finally taking their relationship to the next level, but couldn't because I felt their kiss in the tv show finale was much more satisfying. Wouldn't mind seeing another if they can write themselves out of a corner, since I see an issue with trying to include the Scooby gang + Jack beause a sequel would probably have to involve Miss Fisher trying to solve who killed her Maharaja husband, of which no clues are likely to be in Australia.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Didn't age well; shocked this was from 1999.
25 September 2020
Considering Pocahontas came out in 1995 and also featured non-English speakers meeting English people/English-speakers, but without the cringe-worthy mistake of having the Native American characters speak in ridiculous, caricature broken-English, I'm really not sure why/how that decision was made for these Asian characters (could have also done without the one villain with slits for eyes and sparse buck-teeth). It made them sound stupid, simple and backwards compared to the "enlightened" white characters. Guess it can't be too surprising, since it's based on a 1951 musical based on a 1944 book, but it's something that should and could have been handled better or not been considered good material for an animated movie.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Well, Dave Bautista was funny.
15 August 2020
Definitely more of a kid's film but still could have been better.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Bumbling Couple Surviving on Luck.
2 August 2020
Checked this out as a fan of the genre. Had promise but quickly went downhill - no cleverness at all and many foolish, illogical choices with strange motivations. No fault of the actors, but could have been much, much better.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A less cerebral, more pink version of Gattaca for young adults.
7 June 2020
The premise is a simplified version of Gattaca (1997), with much lower goals and stakes. Credit for lavish sets and costumes, but then again, Gattaca said much more with even more style; timeless style. No bad actors, dialogue was very straightforward, nothing special. Felt like I was watching something more directed toward the 21 years and under crowd. Might have been better if they didn't focus so narrowly and built out more of the outside world to give everything more perspective.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed