Reviews

35 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Birds of Prey (2020)
9/10
Satisfied!
14 February 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I left the theatre with that feeling of satisfaction you get when something hits the spot. I have watched a lot of movies lately that have left me a little empty. I find my self craving a little more of it.

First, I'm baffled by a lot of the reviews - its like if the movie didn't fit their expectation perfectly it suddenly becomes the worst thing ever. This movie wasn't meant to be another "Joker"-esk psychoanalytical piece of art. I also have a few other theories about why people seem to dock this heck of an entertaining movie. Some have docked this movie because of some cock-imposed conspiracy that it is anti-male. This did not cross my mind at all when I watched the movie despite all the criticism I read regarding it before hand. I watched a video of a guy giving his take on the movie and seemed really offended by this false "premise". Sure, a movie about empowerment, symbolic of women breaking free from the masculine construct of a woman's role and worth and that they are things and property, but to consider it a man-hate film would be overreactive and probably reflects. If we were to watch the masculine filled mile a minute movie playing next door that objectifies women then I probably would hear a bunch of men completely ignorant of it as women attempt to point it out. And disclaimer, I'm a man, and I loved this movie and will probably buy it the moment I can.

Other reasons as to how the movie was made, the narrative and timeline of the movie and it being boring and all, and having little character development outside of Harley and the villain not being fleshed out - no pun intended - is all wrapped up in picky expectations. Sure, the movie may not be completely accurate to the comics, but there are many other movies and shows based on comics with a lot of inaccuracies - but people aren't criticizing them like BOP.

To the movie itself:

The movie was down-right funny. It was highly entertaining, the action scenes were wonderful and the way the action was filmed (unlike how it typically is these days) was refreshing. The story was simple, the underlying tone of empowerment (as referenced earlier) was relevant and wasn't shaming; it was loud enough to be heard and soft enough not to deflect from the value of the movie as a whole but to add to it. The acting was great spot on. One of the critiques is all the flash backs and the back and forth narrative. I admit, for some people this might not hold attention spans very well, but we can't use out own issues and processes with attention to determine how good the movie actually is. That being said, the DC movies do have a tendency to use this back and forth approach a lot rather than sticking to a linear narrative, and for the sake of audiences this might be something DC should take into consideration.

In summary, I'm satisfied with the film we got. I know not everyone is going to be just as satisfied, but take into account that people bring with them their personal issues and preferences based on a context that isn't related to the movie at all - so don't let all of that taint your impression of the movie whether you have seen it or not.
4 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Circle (I) (2017)
7/10
Not what you think... but is that so bad?
29 April 2017
The Circle is one of those movies that once the general audience has time for their minds to wrap around the concept of this movie, then it has a chance at higher ratings and better reviews.

It was not want I expected, and yet I left with the sense that I could engage in a three hour philosophical discussion about the movie.

It lacks your typical "antagonist" or rather, the "antagonist" is not what you thought or would expect in a typical thriller. And the antagonist may not be so much of a person as it is a concept or idea that goes too far or in the wrong direction but is not in and of itself bad.

The conclusion of the film did not resolve how I would have predicted having seen the trailers. But, I won't go there so as not to spoil the movie.

You may be hesitant to see this movie, and you may not like it after having seen the movie - but none-the-less, it is still worth seeing and hopefully *maybe* you will leave the theatre thinking if you are that type of person.

Its like going to an art show. I, as an amateur, would go hoping to be "wowed" by the typical entertaining pieces - the ones that make sense to me. However, I can easily over look a masterpiece because I do not take the time and focus to look deeper and past the non-traditional.

All that being said, the acting was a little strange, which makes some of the interactions awkward. But in hindsight, it kind of makes sense because the "circle" is all about community and engaging with your community. And, so some of the social interactions can be "odd". So if I compare it to the basic formula and standard quality of movie entertainment that money pushes out there, I could easily overlook a possible deeper element.

Or maybe I'm just being ridiculous and looking too deep into this movie.

There were some intense moments. But, not so much of what you would think of in a thriller. This is not a cat-and-mouse dystopian type thriller where your life is at stake.

So, maybe you would like it - like I did. Maybe you won't. Maybe it will take a while for the concept of this movie to catch up to everyone who didn't feel entertained. Either way, worth a shot.
61 out of 111 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Split (IX) (2016)
7/10
A Really Good M. Night Film with some deep thoughts to consider
21 January 2017
Warning: Spoilers
This is not a perfect film - but it is still a really good film and I think it explores deep, dark territory.

It was intense. Though, in a way it felt more predictable in some ways compared to other M. Night's movies. Because of this it felt less like a horror film and more an exploration of psychological trauma.

The topic of multiple personalities is not something new to the world of cinema - nor the presentation that a person suffering this type of mental health disorder is a dangerous person. Yet, some find offense by how "Split" presents and treats mental illness to scare people.

In my experience of the move, Split does not have many in your face jumps or scares. And I feel like that was intentional on M. Night's part.

Though the antagonist is portrayed as a monster, I found some elements of the character(s) to be conveyed that this is a person who is suffering from a traumatic past and there seemed to me to be some level of sensitivity.

At first, with the beast, I was a little put off by the sense of the character being able to evolve to some degree. But, I have to remind myself that M. Night is storyteller and along with that comes symbolism and allegory. Perhaps we are not meant to take some of these seemingly ridiculous factors so seriously - but look deeper into what those elements represent and the story they are telling.

With that in mind. I feel this story explores brokenness, and even though a person suffers from mental health issues, a traumatic past, etc., they may see themselves as "impure" and broken - but they are strong and can survive their situation - there is hope.

Maybe I'm the only one who is seeing this film and story from this perspective. I can see how it can be seen that using mental illness to entertain in a horror film is disrespectful. I think it is easy to come away confused about what M. Night is trying to say about the whole "pure" versus "impure" thing. That the broken are the pure and the unbroken are the impure. That can seem on the surface rather ridiculous, but maybe with a little more thought - it could actually make sense.

I mean, what is the difference between someone who has suffered and someone who is foreign to suffering? People don't understand mental illness, how trauma affects a person's mental health, and yes the world in reality tend to place labels and see people with mental health issues as "monsters" in various different contexts. Maybe this film was geared to showing challenge and complexity of these issues, while using a popularly entertaining medium to present these ideas to the audience to grapple with. I usually come away from M. Night's movies talking about them for a long time and more interesting exploring some sort of deep philosophical-type insight expressed through the films.

As expressed through one of the girls, we see in subtlety how she comes to realize that she is not a monster because of her past and her own mental health needs - that because she is broken she has a different understanding of life which in some way of looking at it - makes her pure. Sort of playing off the concept of Plato's cave. To be in ignorance of pain and suffering, or of reality such as in living a lie whether you realize it or not could be seen as something of impure. Impure may be a confusing way to express a concept but I'm sort of thinking of the Matrix movies here. Maybe I'm going way off topic here. But those who know the truth, such as in Plato's Cave and in the Matrix - perhaps they are pure because they are free from the lie, the illusion - that we are all broken.

Pain and suffering can lead a person to becoming something more. That pain is a chisel which can shape a person depending on how a person chooses to see and understand that pain and suffering. Not in the sense of biological evolution - but that of character, of maturity, of spiritual growth in a sense.

Anyway, enough of my two-cents on the meaning behind the story.

Split is a very well-made film. Well-acted. In some ways it didn't seem to be anything out of the ordinary. It was intense and suspenseful. Funny and enjoyable, all the while it is heart-breaking and hopefully eye-opening for people. It is worth the watch and I will likely watch it again.
4 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Great Entertainment with Heart
5 July 2015
Great Entertainment and better than the last two movies. Sure, the first two are classics as for that time and age, the concept of was completely fresh. Now-days, we have all kinds of movies involving machines and robots and what-not.

Some people want to say that this movie is trying to re-hash the original, they are missing the point. In a film about time-traveling terminators to kill of people in the past to change the future, would you not expect something like what we have here?

The film leaves you with unanswered questions, but I believe its because they are planning for two sequels.

I was entertained throughout the whole film. It was intense and action packed with great special effects and visuals. The acting was good (obviously not Academy Award worthy, but that's not the goal here). The story was great and kept your interest. The relationship between Sarah Conner and the Terminator was great and heartwarming, like that of John Conner and the Terminator in T2 - this added a great depth to the movie.

There are some elements that don't quite add up, but work well enough that the rest of the movie serves as a good distraction and it doesn't bother you too much.

All in all, great movie. People are too critical through comparing it to original works, especially when the originals were groundbreaking concepts for their time. But, we all have an opinion and this is mine.
16 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Last Knights (2015)
8/10
Familiar retelling, but Amazing!
30 June 2015
The discussion about originality is so cliché and very annoying. Just because it was a retelling of the familiar Japanese tale of the 47 Ronin, doesn't tell you anything about the movie itself. So don't let anyone babbling about those kinds of things stop you from watching this movie.

This movie was well made and though not original in story, it was uniquely conceptualized. The acting was good. The style of the moving was exciting. It felt medieval yet it was blended with so many unique cultural aspects. THIS IS STORYTELLING people!

There were moments in the movie that it felt like the ever popular Game of Thrones, especially in terms of the political tension and development. And just like in Game of Thrones, there are slow moments and episodes with very little action. In fact, Last Knight boasts two major action scenes. The movie opens with one and ends with another. In-between you have the story and builds up to the exciting final action packed climax.

So, yes, you have already read reviews about how the movie was ruined with the slow boiling plot building in the middle. I found the entire movie as a hole to be pretty epic. Maybe you wouldn't quite admire it as much as I did. Of course with all the reviews I thought I may be let down, but if all you want is a typical by the numbers mindless action film... don't watch it. This is mature action film and the slow story in the middle is just as epic as the two really cool action scenes.

sure, the movie may have its flaws but very few blockbusters can boast flawlessness.

Simply, I was content at the end and was happy with what I just watched. I enjoyed every moment of the movie... maybe you will too.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Elysium (I) (2013)
8/10
Highly entertaining and moving.
20 October 2013
The standard for which we hold to movies is based upon what we are expecting of them. There are sci-fi classics, and there are sci-fi wonders, and there are sci-fi entertainments. Not every sci-fi movie has to hold up to one person's standard of expectations for ALL sci-fi films.

I do admit, I left the movie having enjoyed the movie greatly but also feeling that there was a lack of depth. But that is hardly anything to affect my rating of the movie.

I enjoyed what I paid for. I would probably be willing to pay for the movie.

I believe there is a great story in the movie. But it's depth does get a little crowded out by the action and the visuals... but it is still there. I'm sure with multiple more viewings I will come to see more of the depth because I will not be distracted from everything else.

The acting is very good. It was hard for me to see the guy from D9 and A-team as the villain and take him seriously for a tough guy. But in the end he did a great job with his character.

I thought the other actors did a great job as well.

Of course, the action and visuals were amazing and worth the price to see on their own.

I did find a good level of emotion to the movie.

I feel like another 10-15 minutes to the movie could have been used to set up the characters better, including the side characters and add more depth to the movie's story. Nonetheless, I greatly enjoyed the movie!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good Movie.
28 July 2013
"Olympus has Fallen" is an over the top action film that satisfied my movie-going experience. Not every movie in the world has to be "A - B - C". Not every movie has to have incredible character development, or completely logical. The point of some movies is just to entertain. As another review stated, I didn't find myself bored at any point of the movie. In that case, this movie was successful.

The story is simple, but simple can be better than overrated complex stories. The simple story allows you to just sit and enjoy the content of the movie. Of course, I like my deeper stories and character developments. But I like these no-brainer action movies just as much.

The acting isn't bad. The action is pretty good.

Overall and entertaining movie.

By the way, the previous is what I would consider a true "Nutshell review". What's up with nutshell reviews extending into thousands of words?
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Man of Steel (2013)
A Solid entertaining Superhero movie
16 June 2013
Man of Steel has redefined the cinematic experience for Superman. The visuals were very impressive as well as the acting.

The first part of the movie on Superman's home planet was one of my few favorite scenes. Then, the first major fight sequence with Superman's enemies in a small town would be another of my favorite scenes.

Overall, what you get is a movie with a compelling story which felt a little crammed with a lot of other sub-stories mixed with amazing visuals and cool action scenes.

There are a few scenes that I have some issues with, but I won't go into them because I don't want to spoil anything.

I really liked the style of the fight scenes. It feels hard to realize what's going on but its not so bad.

Overall, Man of Steel is a great achievement in the Superman movies much like Nolan's batman movies. (I still like the batman movies better though, but this is by far the best superman movie).

You can't watch it and not enjoy it.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not what you hope for in a Die Hard movie, but enjoyable.
16 June 2013
Okay, I get it. "A Good Day to Die Hard" fails be a true die hard movie.

I can sit here and tear it a part, pick out the things that bothered me, the details I wish would be changed when I watch it again. Yes, I plan on watching this again.

Some parts were funny. The action was enjoyable.

The story itself is probably the worst part - simply, it is messy and poorly developed.

My second disappointment was the lack of violence. Die Hard 4 had more violence and it carried a PG-13 rating. I was hoping for more physical fighting along with the shooting and explosions. A fight between father and son near the beginning would have been cool. Some scenes seemed rushed while others seemed like they could have been cut a few seconds shorter.

Then, John's character didn't feel like the John McClain we see in the other movies. For instance, the lack of his funny rants that are in the other movies.

Some of the action was artistic. The car chase was not too long, but what made it feel long was that it lacked a lot of suspense.

I believe that this movie was simply rushed and thrown together. Plus, its a good 15-20 minutes shorter than the other movies.

The thing I liked most about the movie was the development of the father son conflict. Which, I think that jack and john should have got into a physical fight when John started messing up Jack's operation.

Overall, this Die Hard installment is one that shouldn't be taken seriously, but isn't so bad that it deserves anything lower than a 5/10 rating.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
After Earth (2013)
8/10
My Not So Popular Opinion
16 June 2013
"After Earth" seems to have failed many individual's expectations, but this movie didn't fail me.

This movie is story-based. M. Knight is a storyteller. He particularly tells stories through suspense. The best part of this movie was the story, and the message the story revolves around.

The sci-fi elements were very intriguing to me. It fits well with the overall story.

The acting, overall (the sum of all the actors) was really good. Many thought Young Smith was terrible in this movie. I didn't think so.

The suspense and action elements were very good as well. This isn't a movie driven by its action, this is a movie with suspense and action which is driven and energized by the story and its message.

I will probably buy this movie when it is released. Based on all the other reviews, I can't say that you will enjoy this movie. All I can say is that I really enjoyed this movie.
11 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
This Entertainer certainly SURPRISED me!
12 April 2013
On a scale for entertainment alone, the new G.I. Joe movie gets bonus points from me. I liked the first one, yet at the same time it let me down. It was too sci-fi and less military. This new movie adds a better balance between the sci-fi and the realistic (thats my perspective).

This movie was in retaliation to the first one. The action scenes were solid, they exceeded my expectations. For example, the fight scenes between Shadow and Snake-eyes never lasted very long and the fighting between them was bland and generic. In this new movie, the fight between them was so much cooler and much more pleasing, especially to the eye.

The acting was great for what some would call a "no-brainer" movie.

The story and plot was simple yet entertaining. And honestly, some elements to the story I didn't expect - but they weren't exactly what you would call twists or anything like that.

I know that there are a lot of mixed reviews. But, you should know that Retaliation feels a lot different than the first one. Its not quite as cheesy and the acting is better, and it didn't have any romance driven sub-plots.

Entertainment Level: High (8/10) Acting Level: Great (7/10) Story/plot: good (6.5/10) Visual effects/sound/: High (8/10)

Overall, great movie (7/10) I could watch this movie several times and enjoy it every time.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Good Sci-Fi Adventure for the Halo Games.
23 November 2012
I enjoy playing the games, though I really haven't played much and nor am I a hard core fan but "Halo: Forward Unto Dawn" was a fun and entertaining sci-fi adventure for the games.

I really enjoy sci-fi, especially the artistic and creative ones. The story isn't magic, it sets you up for something yet to come (perhaps the next video game... I don't know... but that's just what the movie feels like, esp. after the ending). However, its the journey of some cadets who get their world shaken as the fight comes to them.

The acting is surprisingly good. Not anything amazing, but good enough so that the movie is still enjoyable. The visuals were great. I loved the effects and the scenery. The action was exciting. The film makers did a great job creating the action scenes in the dark settings. Once the action hits, you will understand the title of the movie.

Overall, if you have ever played the game, I'm sure you will enjoy watching this movie. If you have never played the game what-not, stop using "real life" as a standard for a science fiction film based and centered around a video game. I don't get the negative reviews, but certainly this movie isn't perfect despite how entertaining it is. My rating is on a scale of entertainment, not based on a standard of flawlessness. There was some depth to the movie, mostly in some of the characters and in some aspects of the war, but just surfacy stuff - this also added to the entertainment of the movie.

Fun movie. Worth watching. If you don't like the movie, I'm sure you would appreciate something from it to get your viewings worth.
6 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Day (I) (2011)
8/10
Stellar.
26 October 2012
"The Day" is exactly what I hoped for. The reason I am "raving" about this movie is because it was more than I expected it to be. When I say that I don't mean mind-bending and profound.

I love this movie. You may not feel as I do and that's great! I don't care how many people disagree with me. Nothing anyone can say about this movie can shake my opinion of it and how I feel about it.

Good acting from not-so renowned starts (but still familiar faces). A good script. A good story. Well-told. Solid, brutal action (some quite relentless).

With a running time of 1h 26min (which, movies are often given time restraints, which constrict a directors vision of the movie they want to make... I don't know if this often crosses people's minds.), so with the short running time, they do a great job setting the mood for this apocalyptic world our main characters are living in.

Some people will say that this movie doesn't really go anywhere, even with all the things that make it a pretty good (entertaining movie). I'd like to point out that it goes to all the places that it intends to go. That it indeed goes places. It shows you humanity from different angles. But yes, they don't go too deep into those places, but if you have a good enough imagination, perhaps the directors take us to the doorstep of different ideas and issues and emotions and "places" so that we take our selves there with our own imagination - which would mean getting more involved with the story. I don't know many people who would use their imaginations rather than desire for the movie makers to take them through those doors - and just get let down and upset when they don't. Venting.....

Anyways. I thoroughly enjoyed the movie. Even if you find that it doesn't fulfill everything you'd look for in a movie of this genre, I'm certain you will still enjoy it and not feel like you wasted your time.
13 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I for one... possibly the only one... enjoyed AVP!
3 October 2012
I'm not one of those "non-fans" who just so happened to like "AVP".

I am a fan of both the Alien movies and the Predator movies (though I thought Predator 2 was only half as good as the first).

All the other Alien and Predator movies give us the depth that so many people complain wasn't in AVP. This movie is all about FUN!

Some people may complain about the movie holding back on the violence and gore. My opinion, the PG-13 restraint pushed the makers to be more creative with the blood and gore. There was a lot for a PG-13 movie by the way. It almost takes on an artistic/stylish factor as opposed to drenching the screen with it.

Sure, its AVP..... Not AVH (alien vs. humans), but without the humans then there wouldn't be aliens for the predators to fight. Without the humans, the AVP would have truly been a film lacking depth.

I didn't think the script was so bad. It wasn't great or profound in anyway, but enjoyable. That acting wasn't terrible like so many people are saying. Trust me, there are a lot of overrated films with worse acting.

Finally, my favorite part of AVP is the development between the Predator and the lead actress. I thought it was pretty cool.... who in their right mind can tell me that that is not an element of depth. If you want depth, just let the Predator kill all the humans and then what? Kill the Aliens... and then what? Anyways.

In summary, this movie is not so bad, in fact I very much liked it. It is really short compared to the Alien and Predator movies, but that's okay. It is exactly what it was intended to be but I guess most people didn't get that.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Munger Road (2011)
7/10
Give it a Try.
16 September 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Munger Road is intense and frightening. The acting is not bad. Its quite good actually. Sometimes I felt like the acting from some characters could have been better.

**mild spoiler: no specific details mentioned**

The horror and terror of this movie is like a creature that lurks and creeps around. I don't know what you look for in a horror film, but consider that this movie is PG-13, so I will let you know if you are looking for gruesome killings then you wont find them. There are killings, but you don't see them. The killings are out of view but you can still hear what's happening.

**End mild spoiler**

Well, the story was interesting. There is mystery and a lot of suspense. However, there are moments when its really dark and difficult to see. One moment in the car, you can't see anything but it was not necessary to see anything. Even though it was hard to see at some moments, I'd say that the movie was still pretty scary and worth watching.

If you are a horror fan who has wasted several hours on horror films you wished you had never seen, then why not give this one a try as well. I promise its not the worst horror film you've ever seen, and you may even like it.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Batman....
22 July 2012
I can still remember when I watched Tim Burton's Batman Returns in the drive-in as a kid. I can't recall many things from those early years but I can clearly recall that moment. I love the Burton adaptations for the Batman character. I can't remember an age when I never loved Batman. I never understood why Superman was always considered to be the best superhero.

So, I loved Burton's films. Joel Schumacher took a different turn with the Batman movie franchise and made it cheesy - but, I still find the movies fun to watch. I loved the Batman Animated series growing up. I loved watching all the DC movies that came out that showcased Batman.

Then, I went frantic when I heard that there would be another Batman movie. I hoped, but also feared. When I saw Batman Begins, it became my favorite. Then I watched the Dark Knight, and it became my favorite as well. Then, I watched the third movie. And, there is hardly a movie parallel to the bar it has raised. Nolan's Batman series truly is the best trilogy in existence. Far better than the Lord of the Rings, in my personal opinion. It is EPIC.

The action was simply amazing. The acting, from the major roles to the small supporting roles, was consistently brilliant. The story could not have been written or told any better. This movie pleases on all levels. What I loved, was the depth. Nolan drew us into a far deeper level of emotion than the previous films of the trilogy.

Many people had their doubts about Catwoman, I had none. I trusted Nolan. I knew that he was capable of delivering every character flawlessly. Bane, he is far different than the Joker. The Joker has no heart. He is simply a psychotic maniac that has no boundaries to his insanity driven agendas.

Bane on the other hand, he was brutal and ruthless, but he wasn't psychotic. There was also an emotional depth to his character that was actually touching - considering he is the villain.

You can do no better than Cain as Alfred. Spot on brilliance.

Basically, this film has made history in the world of Cinema. A a personal favorite of mine.
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Transit (I) (2012)
7/10
Not Bad.
14 March 2012
I never heard of this movie. I really like Jim Caviezal as an actor. Coming into the movie, I suspected mediocre acting at best, a semi-terrible script, and illogical actions and decisions from the characters - keeping in mind that I had never heard of this movie until I stumbled across it by chance.

The acting was better than I expected. Plus. The basic story-line and subplots were interesting. Plus. The script was not great but still good enough where it didn't even matter. Plus. The characters did things that seem implausible - but the action and suspense of the movie was so well done that that simple flaw was easily ignorable (for me anyways). So, plus. Sure, Jim ended up seriously handicapped... but keep in mind that some fathers would fight for their family's safety despite their injuries or pain. In reality, people have been known to do pretty amazing things despite their lack or military training or fighting expertise.

So, if you have stumbled across this film and wonder if its worth giving a try but don't know because this movie is one of those that never made it to the big screen, this is my opinion. Try it anyway. What this movie has to offer is simple entertainment in the form or action and suspense, despite a few possible shortcomings.

Overall, I really enjoyed this movie. And no, I'm not getting paid to write a good review for this movie..... :)
35 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tower Heist (2011)
7/10
Lots of Fun
4 December 2011
Tower Heist is a fun movie. It's funny, and at the same time a little serious, not the satirical kind of serious, which I thought was nice because it didn't make the movie too cheesy. Speaking of cheesy, usually over the top type comedies can be really cheesy, but this movie was not as over the top as I had expected it to be, which made the movie feel so much more enjoyable.

I was really glad to see Ben Stiller and Eddie Murphy in a more adult comedy rather than a kids movie. I also thought the other actors were really good too.

Overall, it was a lot of fun.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Ruins (2008)
Uh... wow.
31 October 2011
After reading reviews. I didn't know what to expect from this movie. I still have this ball of excitement pacing up and down my chest.

One reviewer mentioned that there was no suspense in the movie. My only guess as to why that person thought so was because they thought the vines/plants trying to kill them was too unrealistic and cheesy and didn't make sense. Sure, perhaps if they explored the back story and history of this ancient mayan temple, perhaps there would have been more context to support the reality of the vine creature... for those who lack the ability of imagination.

The whole concept of the vines being alive and what not seems a lot like a sci-fi channel concept. However, it was well structured throughout the movie. The movie wasn't about the killer vines... it was about how the characters made an effort to survive. The whole movie played out so well that the "could have be cheesy sci-fi channel elements" didn't come across like that at all.

The acting in the movie was well done. The movie, above all else, was deeply emotional. The situations the characters found themselves in were really intense. It was surprisingly graphic as well.

This is a situational horror film. There are some few thrilling and heart pounding segments throughout the film apart from the intense interactions between the characters.

This is truly and underrated horror film. I agree with what someone had said, that horror is really a tricky genre... because taste seems to vary so much more within the horror genre than the other genres. I mean, you hardly see the ratings for horror movies about 6.9 or 7. A lot of the horror films I like are even rated as low a 3 and 4.

Anyways... if you watch this movie... its possible it may not suit your taste. Its a horror movie... it will entertain you if you simply let it be entertainment... and not hope to find some truly amazing spectacle.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
In Time (2011)
Decent Entertainment
30 October 2011
What we have here is a movie with a very interesting concept that deserved the skills of a much better director (such as Spielberg) and a much better lead actor.

The movie was entertaining. I never got bored. The concept, the supporting actors and lead actress, and unique elements related to the concept and subplots is what drove the movie. Justin Timberlake's role in this movie is just another example of Hollywood trying to invent movie stars who are nothing more than mediocre.

There was a lot lacking from the movie. The concept was great... the movie was moving along greatly until the lead got arrested at some guys house.

The direction and overall execution cause a great and interesting concept to suffer. This movie should have been much more... the concept deserved something along the lines of Minority Report or even better. But, it seemed like so much was left out of the movie.

This is not a bad review... the movie was good and entertaining... but that's not what this movie should have been. There was just so much that was lacking. So much of the movie seemed like it was just thrown together in order to produce a movie with a Hollywood icon and an interesting concept to get people interested and all you get is some hit and miss entertainment.

I wasn't satisfied... but I was entertained.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Good.
29 October 2011
After reading a lot of the reviews... my expectations were not very high... but not very low either. From the reviews, many people complained about how many segments from the trailers were not in the movie. And this was part of the reason why they didn't think it was so great. Well. One of the reasons why I liked the movie so much was because they didn't have everything from the commercials in the movie. I'm tired of trailers showing you everything that happens in the movie and when you watch it it is not as fun or exciting. Plus, one of the missing trailer scenes actually makes sense why it wasn't in the movie... it would have messed up part of the story.

Okay, so. I thought the movie was good. It was better than the second one and not as good as the first. But, if this movie was the first of the three released, then it would have been the best probably (maybe). It was scary. But, I didn't come home with the same fear of sleeping in my bed scared... (probably because I didn't watch it by myself in the same room that I would be sleeping in).

There were a few creative and inventive ideas in this movie that added a little something extra... to make it unique from the other two.

If you know that you don't find these type of scary movies scary... but rather humorous... then why watch it and then complain about it not being scary and such... why go into a movie knowing exactly what you would critique and hate about it and then go and complain about it. That's lame.

I rate the movie a 7... because it scared me... I sat through it and enjoyed it. I had fun watching it.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Flypaper (2011)
One of those movies
2 October 2011
That you're not sure about but decide to go for it and came out of it satisfied and mystified as to why you hesitated in the first place.

It was loads of fun! Great acting! Funny! Witty! Exciting! Stylistic! Unique! And in the end, satisfying. What makes this movie more interesting than a lot of the heist movies is that the twist in the movie is not really a twist in the plot... but rather twist the the genre of the heist/crime films. While the movie is about two different groups of robbers attempting to rob the same bank... something else is going on that adds to the chaos. Its like the movie "clue" (based on the board game), a wacky version of Sherlock Holmes, Columbo and the Monk mixed with a crazy bank robbery.

You won't go wrong if you decide to watch this. If you are thinking about it, but are not totally sold on how it looks from the commercials or what it sounds like from the description... then you've put yourself in a great position to be completely surprised. I watched the trailer... I felt that there was a strange and uneasy chemistry from Judd and Dempsey... and it also seemed like a comedy that was trying too hard to be funny... but I watched it cause I couldn't think of anything else to watch. And now I'm writing a review the few moments after watching it... telling you how satisfied with my decision and how satisfied you will be with your decision.
19 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
P2 (2007)
A surprising "WOW"!
10 September 2011
I'm going to use the cliché reviewer line, "When I went into this movie, I wasn't expecting a lot." LOL.

It looked like a decent horror/thriller so I gave it a try. I was expecting cheesy acting and a cheesy script. I didn't expect to get scared or anything. There's just a girl trying and a crazy guy locked in a car garage.

It turns out that the characters were surprisingly engaging. The actor who played the crazy guy did great. His character drove me crazy because he was a truly psychopathic character... not someone merely bent on hurting or killing someone... but a character so deluded...

The movie hardly attempts to scare you with the typical scares... there were a few parts that might cause you to jump a little. But the scary part of the movie is the whole scenario. The girl has no way out... doors locked, gates locked. Its almost claustrophobic.

The quality of the movie as a thriller was better than what I thought. The script was not cheesy. I didn't wince or gag at any of the lines.

A purely fun and suspenseful movie! Easy to enjoy!
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Tunnel (I) (2011)
7/10
It was terrible....
6 September 2011
because I about had a panic attack getting ready for bed in my dark room after watching this movie! I loved the style of the movie. Of documentary style horror films that I've seen, this one is one of the better ones. The acting is superb. Throughout the whole movie I kept thinking that I could easily believe that everything I was seeing was real even if I knew better.

The first half of the movie is mostly footage and interview stuff that leads you into the tunnels. Its the background story on how they came about going into the tunnels. Without all of that, I'm not sure how terrifying the last half would have been.

I'm glad I watched it, but at the same time... I wish I hadn't because it truly scared me. You and me may be very different. I like to let movies scare me. I know the movie is fake... but because it presents itself as real and that is part of what makes it scary... for the duration of the movie I allow myself to believe that it is real. That's what makes it so much scarier and much more fun and enjoyable.

Don't be one of those that tares a movie apart during the movie and thus spoil your entertainment... watch it enjoy it... and tare it apart after you enjoy the movie. Now, I understand some movies don't deserve to be enjoyed. But this one does!
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
People Need to Watch This! Here's why...
2 September 2011
Its way too much fun to risk not watching.

I was scanning through a list of sci-fi movies and came across this one. I thought the name reflected the typical B-rated cheesy science fiction alien movie. But, the cover art was too good and too cool not to look into what the movie was about and what people said about it. It didn't take much to convince me to watch it.

Its a satisfying alien attack movie because its unique. The aliens are really cool and not your typical aliens. They are really cool looking actually.

The acting is really good. The story is simply, but sometimes seems multi-layered. There is some depth to the story that is heartwarming and connects you to the characters.

The characters are all really interesting and the actors, especially since most of them are teenagers or children, did a really good job.

The action and suspense was really good and fun. There is also some good humor in it.

Don't let the sound of the title fool you! If you liked Shaun of the Dead, or Hot Fuzz then I'm sure you'll enjoy this movie. Even if you didn't like those movies... I'm sure you will find this movie entertaining if you like aliens and survival stories. Very good movie. There is a lot of bad language in the movie though, and much of it comes from the young actors in the movie.though I found a few parts funny when the young actors cursed, its hard to listen to young kids and teenagers cuss like that or even get high.

None-the-less, this movie is a ton of fun!
7 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed