I left the theatre with that feeling of satisfaction you get when something hits the spot. I have watched a lot of movies lately that have left me a little empty. I find my self craving a little more of it.
First, I'm baffled by a lot of the reviews - its like if the movie didn't fit their expectation perfectly it suddenly becomes the worst thing ever. This movie wasn't meant to be another "Joker"-esk psychoanalytical piece of art. I also have a few other theories about why people seem to dock this heck of an entertaining movie. Some have docked this movie because of some cock-imposed conspiracy that it is anti-male. This did not cross my mind at all when I watched the movie despite all the criticism I read regarding it before hand. I watched a video of a guy giving his take on the movie and seemed really offended by this false "premise". Sure, a movie about empowerment, symbolic of women breaking free from the masculine construct of a woman's role and worth and that they are things and property, but to consider it a man-hate film would be overreactive and probably reflects. If we were to watch the masculine filled mile a minute movie playing next door that objectifies women then I probably would hear a bunch of men completely ignorant of it as women attempt to point it out. And disclaimer, I'm a man, and I loved this movie and will probably buy it the moment I can.
Other reasons as to how the movie was made, the narrative and timeline of the movie and it being boring and all, and having little character development outside of Harley and the villain not being fleshed out - no pun intended - is all wrapped up in picky expectations. Sure, the movie may not be completely accurate to the comics, but there are many other movies and shows based on comics with a lot of inaccuracies - but people aren't criticizing them like BOP.
To the movie itself:
The movie was down-right funny. It was highly entertaining, the action scenes were wonderful and the way the action was filmed (unlike how it typically is these days) was refreshing. The story was simple, the underlying tone of empowerment (as referenced earlier) was relevant and wasn't shaming; it was loud enough to be heard and soft enough not to deflect from the value of the movie as a whole but to add to it. The acting was great spot on. One of the critiques is all the flash backs and the back and forth narrative. I admit, for some people this might not hold attention spans very well, but we can't use out own issues and processes with attention to determine how good the movie actually is. That being said, the DC movies do have a tendency to use this back and forth approach a lot rather than sticking to a linear narrative, and for the sake of audiences this might be something DC should take into consideration.
In summary, I'm satisfied with the film we got. I know not everyone is going to be just as satisfied, but take into account that people bring with them their personal issues and preferences based on a context that isn't related to the movie at all - so don't let all of that taint your impression of the movie whether you have seen it or not.
First, I'm baffled by a lot of the reviews - its like if the movie didn't fit their expectation perfectly it suddenly becomes the worst thing ever. This movie wasn't meant to be another "Joker"-esk psychoanalytical piece of art. I also have a few other theories about why people seem to dock this heck of an entertaining movie. Some have docked this movie because of some cock-imposed conspiracy that it is anti-male. This did not cross my mind at all when I watched the movie despite all the criticism I read regarding it before hand. I watched a video of a guy giving his take on the movie and seemed really offended by this false "premise". Sure, a movie about empowerment, symbolic of women breaking free from the masculine construct of a woman's role and worth and that they are things and property, but to consider it a man-hate film would be overreactive and probably reflects. If we were to watch the masculine filled mile a minute movie playing next door that objectifies women then I probably would hear a bunch of men completely ignorant of it as women attempt to point it out. And disclaimer, I'm a man, and I loved this movie and will probably buy it the moment I can.
Other reasons as to how the movie was made, the narrative and timeline of the movie and it being boring and all, and having little character development outside of Harley and the villain not being fleshed out - no pun intended - is all wrapped up in picky expectations. Sure, the movie may not be completely accurate to the comics, but there are many other movies and shows based on comics with a lot of inaccuracies - but people aren't criticizing them like BOP.
To the movie itself:
The movie was down-right funny. It was highly entertaining, the action scenes were wonderful and the way the action was filmed (unlike how it typically is these days) was refreshing. The story was simple, the underlying tone of empowerment (as referenced earlier) was relevant and wasn't shaming; it was loud enough to be heard and soft enough not to deflect from the value of the movie as a whole but to add to it. The acting was great spot on. One of the critiques is all the flash backs and the back and forth narrative. I admit, for some people this might not hold attention spans very well, but we can't use out own issues and processes with attention to determine how good the movie actually is. That being said, the DC movies do have a tendency to use this back and forth approach a lot rather than sticking to a linear narrative, and for the sake of audiences this might be something DC should take into consideration.
In summary, I'm satisfied with the film we got. I know not everyone is going to be just as satisfied, but take into account that people bring with them their personal issues and preferences based on a context that isn't related to the movie at all - so don't let all of that taint your impression of the movie whether you have seen it or not.
Tell Your Friends