Reviews

15 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Ex Machina (2014)
7/10
Of Gods and women?
7 June 2015
Nathan played by Oscar Isaac, and looking like Alan from The Hangover, is the head of the Bluebook Corporation, Google by any other name. Caleb, played by Domnall Gleeson, is a gifted programmer who has 'won' a week long getaway with his boss. Very early on in the film we discover that Caleb has been specially selected by Nathan to test out his latest creation. Caleb's task is to determine whether Ava, a beautiful female robot played by Alicia Vikander, is the first truly artificially intelligent lifeform.

The film has only three main characters, Nathan, Caleb and Ava and this adds to the isolated and claustrophobic feel of the film. The action takes place in a handful of locations in Nathan's subterranean research facility. The atmosphere is dark and brooding and it is clear that the relationship between the mercurial Nathan and Ava is not as it first appears. The film mostly concentrates on Caleb's relationships with Nathan and Ava, purposefully avoiding the three central characters being in the same scenes; this adds to the films brooding intensity.

I had been waiting for a long time to watch this film, the subject matter is one that interests me. The set up for the film and the acting is first class. Vikander's performance as Ava is especially powerful. I really enjoyed watching Domnall's character develop from naïve computer geek into a slightly less naïve almost freedom fighter! Although the subject matter is contemporary, the film's strength is the development of the relationships between Caleb, Nathan and Ava. There are numerous layers and twists and turns in the plot and we are given the impression that Caleb is not in full possession of the facts behind his visit.

Although I would recommend the film, I have a few slight reservations. I thought the ending was a little too clichéd and while I didn't object to the female nudity, it was unnecessary.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Stoker (2013)
6/10
Great idea for a film, but fizzles out.....
18 July 2014
Warning: Spoilers
After the death of Richard Stoker in a bizarre car accident, his brother Charlie (Matthew Goode) comes to stay with Richard's family for an extended period. Charlie is a bit of an enigma, from his initial appearance we are left in no doubt there is a dark secret lurking in his past and he is not all he seems to be.

Most of the film is viewed through the eyes of India (Mia Waskowska), Richard's daughter. India has a distrust of her uncle from the beginning, after all until now she didn't know she had an uncle. Her mother Evelyn (Nicole Kidman) is more trusting and seems to be falling in love, or at least in lust with him.

India discovers that the housekeeper knows something of Charlie's history. But instead of confronting her, she seemingly ignores it - despite her desperately wanting to know more of the stranger in their midst.

India and Charlie's relationship is a very strange one. At one point it is almost incestuous, at others hateful and at some points reminiscent of Bonnie and Clyde.

The film develops with various plot twists and surprises, all of which add to the tension. But the twists get gradually more and more bizarre and less believable. The film's final act is completely unrealistic ultimately giving the film an unrealistic and empty feeling.

There are many good films through the years that have great promise but ultimately fail to deliver. In my opinion this is certainly one of those.

It's still a film worth watching, the cinematography is wonderful, the acting is at times very good, Wasikowsksa in particular. But, the second half of the film is all a bit of a let down.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Movie 43 (2013)
7/10
Actually pretty funny, but pretty gross at the same time
30 August 2013
I had heard lots of terrible reviews of this film and seen a few clips. I was intrigued to know why so many Hollywood A listers would star in such a poor film. I wanted to see just how bad it really was.

I didn't wan't to spend even a couple of $$ renting this movie, so I managed to borrow it free from the local library. I actually feel quite dirty and ashamed for saying it, but I laughed out loud all of the way through this movie - I really enjoyed it. The movie, is actually not really a movie at all, but a collection of sketches that have no connection with each other. Some are better than others, some cruder than others, but they all made me laugh to some extent. All of the sketch ideas are original, I'm sure you will never have seen them before. I'm not even going to attempt to describe the them, as the shock value is one of the best things about them. All I will say, is the that some of them rely pretty heavily on 'toilet humor' and 'gross out value' and one sketch in particular is pretty bad taste - but still funny. If you don't offend too easily you could do worse than watch this film. 7/10
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Quentin, please just calm down a little!!
8 March 2013
Unlike many of QT's films - Django Unchained has quite a simple plot. The film is really all about revenge. The set up is that Django (Jamie Foxx) is freed from his life as slave by Dr Shultz (Christoph Walz) to help him track down 3 outlaws and in return he will help Django free his wife from her life of slavery. Simple.

The film is a mammoth 165 minutes long - but the time flew by and the film kept me entertained from beginning to end.

Django has everything you'd expect from a QT film, both good and bad. Excellent dialogue, rounded colourful characters, magnificent acting, a wonderful soundtrack and of course bucket loads of humour. Last but by no means least the most important element of any of QT's films - lots and lots of violence, blood and gore and liberal use of the 'N' word....... Unlike many critics, I don't have a problem with the use of the "N' word. It certainly seems warranted in a film set in the deep south in 1858.

Now, for the bad parts of the film. Some of the plot developments seem a little too silly, but that is forgivable. It is after all a work of fiction and not a documentary. But the one big unforgivable, is that QT needs to reign himself in, or to have someone strong that can stand up to him and reign him in. The final act of the film, was a little on the ridiculous side. I don't want to give anything away here, but it is pretty obvious where QT thinks, you know what, there just hasn't been enough blood and violence and crazy developments yet - so he just goes over board..... I've got to say, Quentin JUST STOP IT!!!!!

I really don't understand how Django won the Oscar for "Best Writing, Screenplay written directly for the screen". Surely that honour should have gone to Wes Anderson for Moonrise Kingdom. I guess Django is a long film and most of the members of The Academy are very old, so probably feel asleep after 2 hours and missed most of the crazy last act.

Having said all of that, I thoroughly enjoyed the film and would have given it a better score if QT had have been a little less like a kid in a sweetshop in the last 40 minutes of the film!
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Watch (I) (2012)
7/10
A much better watch than I expected (see what I did there?)
25 February 2013
This film has received some terrible reviews and I for one did not hold out much hope for it. But, I actually found this film consistently funny (after the first 10 minutes or so). It contained several laugh out loud moments and the gags come at a swift rate.

Ben Stiller is the manager of the local Costco and prides himself on being very public spirited. After a murder takes place in the store he manages, he organises a Neighbourhood Watch to solve the murder. The set up for the film is a little shaky and left me fearing the worst. But once Stiller is joined by his posse of Vaughn, Hill and Ayoade the laughs begin.

The plot isn't great, but the four members of the watch each play well caricatured characters that gel together well. I can imagine that large chunks of the film are improvised by our four musketeers. This film is really a buddy movie, don't get too hung up on the inadequacies of the plot - but rather enjoy the interactions between the watch members.

There is nothing ground breaking here. Stiller, Vaughn and Hill have played these characters time and time again in their individual films. Those that have seen the British TV show "The IT Crowd" will recognise Ayoade's character as a rehash of Moss. But, putting them all together works well.

For my money, the film gets funnier the longer it goes on. Well worth a watch.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Master (2012)
7/10
Not quite a masterpiece
19 February 2013
The Master tells a simple story and is a simplistic film. The story follows Freddie (Joaquin Phoenix) a WWII veteran and his troubled life after the war. Freddie eventually stumbles across the path of Lancaster Dodd (Philip Seymour Hoffman) - The self proclaimed Master of a teaching or a cult.

The film examines how Freddie reacts to and is eventually swallowed by the cult. The Master lacks narrative, and structure but not in a bad way. Paul Thomas Anderson (writer and director) has actually used the lack of narrative and structure almost as characters in the film. The film is presented almost as if it were a documentary, and this is I believe it's key strength.

If you are looking for an action packed film exploring a cult, then this may not be for you. But if you enjoy character development over plot driven films then The Master is well worth a look.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Lots of promise, but it left me wanting more..
19 February 2013
I was really looking forward to seeing this film. I am a big fan of Martin McDonagh's previous work. Both Six Shooter and In Bruges are very unusual and creative additions to the genre.

Unfortunately, I was left slightly disappointed by Seven Psychopaths. Although the film is very original and undoubtedly enjoyable it left me feeling a little let down by Martin McDonagh. The film lacked the character development of McDonagh's previous work. Which is a crime when the film has cast with actors of the calibre of Colin Farrell, Christopher Walken and Woody Harrelson.

The film is one of the most original of the year. But in my opinion could have and perhaps should have been one of the best films of the year.

My advise, (for what it's worth), is that if you are a fan of the genre or of Martin McDonah's previous work - go and see this film and see what you make of it. You may just love it.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ted (2012)
7/10
Light on story, but very funny
5 February 2013
I must start off by saying; I'm not a Seth MacFarlane fan. I don't think I have ever watched an entire episode of American Dad or Family Guy. But after watching the trailers and a couple of clips of Ted, I thought it looked funny and I'd give it a go.

If you don't mind sexism, mild racism, jokes in poor / bad taste, I'm sure you'll love this film. But then, I guess that could apply to all Seth MacFarlane's back catalogue. In short, if you offend easily - don't watch this film.

Ted is all over the place as a film. Even though there is at least one central theme running through it, I still felt it was more a collection of funny sketches than a well crafted story, hence my low rating. But, Ted is almost certain to make you laugh if you aren't easily offended. I laughed out loud at least 7 or 8 times and chuckled quite a few times. If you get Seth MacFarlane's humor - give Ted a go, I'm sure you won't be disappointed. But if you are expecting a film with great plot and character development, you will be left wanting. In short, it is crude, vulgar, offensive and extremely funny.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Much funnier than I was lead to believable
4 February 2013
I really wanted to see this film when it came out at the cinema, but I heard some terrible reviews of it, so didn't. The cast looked pretty good, I mean can it be such a bad film if it stars Kevin Spacey (I forgive you for Fred Clause) and Jason Bateman (more to forgive him for, think Couples Retreat, The Break Up, Smokin Aces, Paul )and Jennifer Aniston isn't so bad (remember Office Space?).

When it came out on DVD, I ignored the poor reviews. I am so glad I did. I think it is one of those comedies that you have to be in "the mood" to enjoy. It is pretty silly, but then again it doesn't ever pretend to be anything more than that. There are some laugh out loud scenes, especially with MF Jones (Jamie Fox) and Dr Julia Harris (Aniston). Spacey's character Dave Harken is similar to Buddy Ackerman played by Spacey in the 1994 black comedy "Swimming with sharks". Indeed the two films have been compared by many. But, for my money "Horrible Bosses" is not as edgy and has many more laughs.

In short, a great cast, some laugh out loud moments, but not for those who are easily offended or love Political Correctness!

7.5/10
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Up (2009)
5/10
I really can't understand the fuss!
4 February 2013
OK, so this is a Pixar film. So the animation is going to be spectacular, yes?? Yes, the animation is without doubt fantastic, the film looks amazing, as you would expect with any Pixar film. Maybe it's unfair of me to just expect that of Pixar and not give them enough credit for it. Possibly. But what can I say - they have set the bar so high that it is not a surprise when they fosbury flop right over it. The animation is 10/10 or maybe even an 11/10 in reverence to Spinal Tap. In short the animation is top notch.

Now, we move on to the story. The story, where do I start? It's got everything you'd expect for this type of film, a strong moral, triumph over tragedy, action, adventure, a flying house, talking dogs, an evil villain (is he evil, or just misunderstood?!)....... Maybe it's just me, but I thought the story was too confused, too jumbled, had too many things going on and just too, well, silly I guess. Yes, I know I said silly, what did I expect, Shakespeare? But, for me it crossed the line. All genres of films have a line of silliness (for want of a better phrase) they shouldn't cross. Of course, the line is in a very different place for an animated film compared to say a historical drama. But, nevertheless - there is still a line. And, in my mind Up crosses the silliness line for an animation.

There are elements in the film that are very good. The talking dogs are very funny, there is a great moral to the story and did I mention that the animation is fantastic? But, I just didn't feel it hung together as a film very well. For me, a case where the whole is LESS than the sum of the parts.
1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Life of Pi (2012)
8/10
It didn't make me believe in god, but made me want to read the book!
31 January 2013
Life of Pi is one of those films that almost immediately draws you in to the world it has created. I watched the film with a permanent smile on my face and surely that is all you can ask of any film!

OK, so we all know the film is about a young man who is cast adrift with a tiger in the Pacific ocean in a small life boat. But, inevitably the story is so much more than that. Told largely in flashback, questions of faith and the human spirit are asked and sometimes answered. Almost uniquely in the day of the big Hollywood blockbusters, the film allows its audience to draw their own conclusions and not to be preached at. I'm sure the film says different things to different people, showing that what you bring in to a film will determine what you take out of it.

The cast are excellent, especially the various actors who play our hero Pi Patel through various stages of his life. The different actors are all engaging and make his character believable and likable.

The visuals are stunning and some of the 3D adds to the story and doesn't totally detract from it. I'm not a fan of 3D and this is the highest compliment I can pay to any 3D film. But, I think the visuals would be stunning in 2D. To be honest, I wish 3D would go away as it doesn't add very much and is a novelty at best. But, to be fair to director Ang Lee, he used it pretty well.

I haven't read the book on which this film is based, so I can't say how true to the book the film is. But, the highest compliment I can pay to the film is it made me want to read the book.

All in all a great film that I can highly recommend.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Looper (2012)
7/10
Entertaining action movie
31 January 2013
This film has a simple and interesting premise, involving time travel. Loopers are hired assassins, killing people sent back to their time by The Mob. Loopers know that they have a "shelf life", eventually being forced to close their loop by assassinating their future self. With me so far?

Don't try and analyze the plot lines too much or ask the many questions that are thrown up by the film. Just go with it and if you are a fan of action films, you will undoubtedly love it.

The action is fast paced, the violence equally so. The cast give strong performances. I'm a fan of Bruce Willis, surely he is the ultimate action hero? But he is well supported most notably by Joseph Gordon- Levitt and Emily Blunt.

Looper is a wildly entertaining way to spend a couple of hours - just go with it!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Do you hear the people sing?
31 January 2013
I guess there are two types of people in this world; those who buy in to the world of musicals and embrace them, and those who do not. If like me, you fall in to the first camp, I'm sure you will love this movie. From the opening scenes where the two main protagonists, Jean Valjean (Jackman) and Javert (Crowe), first lock proverbial horns, I was sucked in to the turbulent world of 19th century France. The story, if anyone doesn't know is based on Valjean's struggle to turn his life around whilst on the run from the police – in the guise of Javert. All the while playing surrogate father to Cosette, the child of Fantine. Along the way there are thrills, spills, action and romance. Basically, most of the ingredients in any blockbuster. What sets this film apart from the rest, is the seamless way it sweeps the audience through all of life's emotions.

The cast is exemplary. The singing, a triumph. Crowe has come in for much criticism for his vocals, which I believe to be extremely unfair. Would he be cast to play Javert in The West End or on Broadway? No, off course he wouldn't. But then I can't imagine that any of the main cast, with the exception of Samantha Barks (who plays Éponine) would. We must remember, this is a film musical and not a stage musical. Film and stage are two very different art forms, and require different talents. I cannot think of many (if any) other actors that would bring the required level of acting gravitas to the role of Javert.

The casting of Sacha Baron Cohen and Helena Bonham Carter in the comic roles of the Thénardiers is a master-stroke. Both slip into their roles with ease and play them as larger than life characters and bring much needed light relief. Bonham Carter somehow manages not to be completely upstaged by Baron Cohen. Surely not an easy task for anyone.

Les Misérables has received a whole host of Oscar nominations, but how Tom Hooper has not been nominated for the best director gong is beyond me.

This is a great film, it will make you laugh and make you cry, but most of all it will make you wish you could sing!
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
It's heart is in the right place
30 January 2013
I was in the library one afternoon, browsing through the DVD titles looking for something to jump out at me. Jesus Henry Christ, caught my eye because of its two leads, Michael Sheen and Toni Collette. I love their work and was surprised to see a film starring both of them, that I hadn't heard of.

Toni Collette is the single mother of Henry - a product of sperm donor father. Being a child genius, Henry knows all he needs to. Everything except the most important thing, "Who is his father?"

Several leaps of faith later and Henry is lead to Michael Sheen, who may or may not be the sperm donor. And 'hilarity' ensues. OK, I guess I may not have been very charitable there, but the film is not a great one. At the films core is an interesting idea and as I have titled my review "It's heart is in the right place". But I feel the film doesn't really know where it's going or what it wanted to be. It switches from moments of farce, black comedy and drama. It also shoots off at tangents, leaving several threads hanging.

Sheen and Collette do the best they can with the material at hand. But I couldn't help wondering how or indeed why either, but especially Sheen had ended up in this film.

The film describes itself as being "quirky". I am suspicious of anything that describes itself as quirky. Surely that is for the viewer to decide?

That said, the film is enjoyable in the most part, and it did make me laugh a couple of times. Perhaps best watched on a wet Saturday afternoon, if there is nothing better to do.

I have given it a 6/10 score - mainly due to Collette and Sheen. With lesser actors the score would have been less.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the most harrowing films I have ever seen.
29 January 2013
Warning: Spoilers
After struggling with myself for months, I finally decided to watch "We need to talk about Kevin". Knowing the subject matter of the film, my dilemma was whether or not it was for me. But after hearing good reviews from people I trust, I decided to take the plunge. I knew it wouldn't be an easy watch and it certainly isn't.

My one overriding 'take out' of the film is that it is one of the most powerful and harrowing examples of film making I have ever seen. Whilst not exactly enjoyable, it does the job any great piece of serious cinema, literature, music etc should do. It stays with and provokes an emotional response from the viewer.

The film concentrates on the relationship between Eva, her husband Franklin, their son Kevin, and their daughter Celia. The story is told in flashbacks, piecing together actions that lead to an event and its consequences to Eva. The full nature of the event is only revealed in the final minutes of the film, but is hinted at through its course. At the core of the film lies the question, does nature or nurture make the man. It is refreshing that the film leaves room for the audience to come to their own conclusion. From its first scenes, we are left in no doubt that the story is building up to tragedy. The broodingly atmospheric air of the film builds throughout, but thankfully never crosses the fine line of discomfort for too long.

Thankfully, the film is not born from Hollywood, so does not try to tie up the story with a neat little bow. Leaving several questions unanswered and not shouting at the viewer what he or she should be thinking.

The acting from the cast is first rate. As an unwilling mother to a boy ill at ease with the world, Tilda Swinton gives surely her most accomplished performance as Eva, Kevin's mother. No doubt it is only the subject matter of the film that prevented her from receiving an Oscar nomination. John C Reilly is fantastically understated in his role as Kevin's father, careful not to take the viewers attention away from Swinton. Both Jasper Newell and Ezra Miller are chilling in their depiction of Kevin at various stages in his life. Most of the plaudits will no doubt go to Miller, but the disturbing foundations of Kevin's character are expertly laid by Newell. To sum up, this film is certainly not for everyone. It is a challenging watch and will no doubt create a sense of unease in the viewer that will last from the first scenes to long after the final credits have finished rolling.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed