Change Your Image
The_Lite_Ages
Reviews
The Portwine Stain (2009)
A well produced short that is only slightly short of excellent
I watch a great many short films, and the vast majority of them fail to impress and often leaves this reviewer wishing he had never viewed them to begin with. Thankfully Mick Foley's The Portwine Stain does not fall into this (ather full) category, instead it manages to become a rather shining example of what a low budget short can be.
This is not to say it does not have its problems - it does, but none that spoils the film to a degree that turns away the viewer. It could be said that these "problems" are nothing of the sort and are just examples of my own rather picky standards. There is a lag towards the films middle, a victim perhaps of The Portwine Stains rather languid pacing and perhaps something that could be fixed with a little more brutality in its editing. It could also be said that the films ending a is a little too obvious and lacks the resonance it might have had under slightly more driven direction.
These criticisms are minor ones however, and from a more objective viewpoint it has to be said that the film flows well and the characters are well drawn and extremely likable. The films humour is always subtle and it never feels forced, perhaps it is these strengths that shows the films slight weaknesses in contrast rather than those weaknesses having any strength in themselves.
It also has to be mentioned that this film was shot on actual film, super 8 and super 16 I believe, and this is no easy endeavor for a modern film maker. It is not fair to judge such a film maker against those of us who use a purely digital format and as someone who has used both I tip my hat to him.
My main regret concerning The Portwine Stain is that we have seen nothing more from Mick Foley in the three years between this films release and the writing of this review. If you get a chance I urge you to see this short film, it may not be the best you ever see, but it will certainly be one that will leave you with fond memories.
evelyn (2011)
Mmmm... What can I say?
A month or two ago I frequented an evening of films shown at the Worcester Arts Workshop (in Worcester in case you hadn't guessed) and this film was on of the ones shown (second in the billing if I remember rightly). The film seemed to go down okay with most of the viewers so I understand that I may be a minority in my views regarding it, and this should be taken into account when reading my little review of "Evelyn".
There are many film-makers that use ambiguity in their work but it has to be understood that there is a difference between ambiguity and vagueness. Ambiguity is such a state that multiple meanings can be extrapolated from the information given, whereas vagueness is simply not giving any information to begin with (though I admit this to be a simplified distinction).
The problem with Evelyn is that it is a film that doesn't seem to understand this distinction. It gives no information and relies to much on cinematography to fill its ten minutes or so of screen time. No characters are created and little story is hinted at, any story in fact is supplied by the viewer reading their own meanings into the work in an attempt to make the experience worthwhile.
This was quite telling in a short Q and A with the film-makers afterwards. A member of the audience asked for clarification on the meaning and being flatly refused any clarification under the rather peculiar reasoning that "it couldn't be spoken about in an open forum". This suggested to me (as well as those I went to the event with) that there was no real meaning behind the film, or that any meaning it did have wasn't worth sitting through the ten minutes of film anyway.
I realise this may seem rather harsh, and for this I apologise (there were far worse films on offer that day), and to redress the balance somewhat I have to admit that there was some very fine cinematography in this short film, but unfortunately little else.
If you get a chance to see Evelyn please do so, I may be completely wrong and its important that film-makers are supported and encouraged. Though it is also important that they are given honest and direct feedback on their films if they are ever likely to improve.