Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Battle Ground (2013)
9/10
Forbidden Ground from the perspective of Cultural Studies
9 September 2013
According to Stuart Hall, Cultural Studies' outlook takes for granted the fact that knowledge in all its forms is always, unavoidably, contextually bound. With this in mind, and given that Cultural Studies is the study of an ever-changing culture, I think that spectators should analyze Forbidden Ground not only as a complex contextual intervention or as a representation/dramatization of certain ideologies and mores within the framework of WW1, but also as a film that thanks to its powerful and emotional leading characters, it gives an in-depth exploration of the human conscience that certainly appeals to present-day audiences.

Pierre Mackerey in 'A Theory of Literary Production' (1978) says that 'what is important is what the text does not say'. For this reason, I would like to bring to the fore the symbolic meaning that Forbidden Ground conveys. Actually, silences and close-ups are recurrent throughout the movie to create this dramatic atmosphere. I should first point out that the character of Grace Wilkins (Denai Gracie) is essential to offer an accurate view of women's relegation to the private sphere at the time. From a critical perspective, and as Grace is usually shown in closed spaces, this could be interpreted as a subtle way of underlining the tragic circumstances suffered by some women, especially the ones who due to their impure actions, were considered to threaten patriarchy. In this respect, we should also keep in mind, for example, the long-standing Nature/Culture dichotomy that, according to Sherry Ortner in 'Is Female to Male as Nature is to Culture?' (1982) or Simone De Beauvoir in 'The Second Sex' (1949), relegates women to being the 'Other' of men. And yet, this view is cleverly reversed in the scene where Sergeant Wilkins (Johan Earl) finally returns to England and kneels on the graveyard. However, a description of this particular scene would reveal too much information and I prefer leaving this task for any avid spectator who really wants to take a look 'beyond the canvas', that is, for those who are eager to explore the psychological aspects of the human being.

Thus, human connection is more important than any other issue in Forbidden Ground. In this respect, we should pay attention to the soldiers' uniforms and the lack of distinguishing badges or patches that identify them. Director Johan Earl states that he wanted them to symbolize every soldier on the battlefield and not just one unit. And the battlefield itself could be a metaphor of our daily lives too, for life in itself is a roller-coaster, a story within the story, always a constant struggle.

Forbidden Ground connects with problems that affect most audiences, pointing out the cruel reality and imperfections of those past times but, at the same time, it gives a final message to understand Sergeant Wilkins' physical and mental journey. This said, perhaps it is not coincidental that, in the above mentioned scene, he is shown by a river/lake, for the contact with Nature has always been said to symbolize a new beginning or at least, the chance to be redeemed from past mistakes and start from scratch.

The whole team and cast that made this movie possible should be praised for their dedication and effort (Adrian Powers did a brilliant job co-directing and editing). But above all, I should say that Johan Earl deserves a special mention. Earl's work as a screenwriter, director and actor is absolutely outstanding and all his artistic decisions only enhance the high quality of the movie. With this in mind, I should conclude by asserting that Forbidden Ground is an excellent film to watch and a good exercise to unveil its hidden meanings. For this reason, it could also be taken to the academic field.
26 out of 54 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Three Days of Hamlet. When reality and fiction collide.
24 July 2012
It is a critical commonplace that Shakespeare's Hamlet is a play that brings to the fore a self-created reality that, through the leading character's changing monologue, becomes the core of evolving consciousness. In this respect, the documentary Three Days of Hamlet, directed by Alex Hyde-White, while displaying Hamlet's inner passions and fears, focuses on family bonds, human feelings, as well as the long-standing dichotomies Nature/Nurture and Nature/Culture where patriarchal values were of utmost importance. In my opinion, this film takes spectators on a journey that shows a different reality that merges with fiction and makes us watch the images 'beyond the canvas': a subtext whose meaning should be unveiled, while letting viewers question not only the psychological issues that the characters display, but also the 'ghosts' of the past that sometimes haunt people's lives. The amazing cast includes Stephanie Powers, Richard Chamberlain, Peter Woodward and Alex Hyde-White, who also plays the role of the actor/manager confronting his father's ghost. They all offer amazing performances that, together with the great editing and brilliant soundtrack, lead us to a delightful , yet thought-provoking world where art is always valued and never forgotten. For this reason, Three Days of Hamlet is a very moving documentary that - due to its invaluable contribution to understanding Shakespeare's Hamlet - should be also considered for academic purposes as it could be enjoyed by many scholars and students alike.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed