Reviews

18 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Trainspotting (1996)
10/10
Best movie EVER
11 December 2008
OK, I've said that about a few movies, but Trainspotting is definitely one of my fave films of all time. It's got it all, and in the right amounts.

Who can say that Begbie, for example, isn't one of the most outlandish, hilarious characters ever to be put on screen? Ewan McGregor has never acted better. I am American but can appreciate anything Scottish, especially accents that sometimes go beyond my basic comprehending skills.

This film is witty in dialogue, very evenly-paced and very poignant in its themes. What more could you ask for? I can't wait to see it again.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Very thorough
25 October 2008
I was very impressed with this impartial account of the Arab world and the Israelis, and the peace that always seems to be just beyond their grasp. I am surprised their are not more review comments or messages on this film, as it is jam-packed full of useful information. You learn about Jerusalem, and what parts of that holy city are important to Muslims and which are important to the Jews. I have to admit this is something I would have never bothered to read, but I'm glad it was neatly packaged into a easy-to-watch film as this.

I never knew that Bill Clinton and Colin Powell had done so much to aid in this effort of peace between the two; and I am proud of them both.

You must watch this docu when you have time-it is rather long, but extremely worth it.

peace
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
25th Hour (2002)
9/10
It sucked me in...
25 July 2007
...I haven't written a review on this site in years...and I'm still not going to. I just had to pay my respects to this film, which I thought was very touching. There were a lot of emotions coming through the characters on the film, and you can't help but feel for all of them, just a little.

I don't have much experience with Spike Lee films. In fact this may be the first one I've seen of his. From what I can see in 25th Hour, he seems to have a hunger for poignancy and human emotion.

I look forward to seeing more of his films.

aurelie
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Pocahontas (I) (1995)
A mature Disney romantic drama
3 May 2005
I read the poster's comments (the one from Paris) and had to laugh, because I completely understand him. I went away for school in Europe in '95 when the film came out, and when I came back Pocahontas was the rage. You know, the way all Disney films were back then-there were commercials, songs on the radio, stuffed animals, etc....until the NEXT Disney movie came to dwarf it until a lame sequel or TV series came out. So let me tell you, I was skeptical about Pocahontas.

I saw this a year after it came out and instantly fell in love with it. It's a mature Disney animated feature- (in my opinion) even more mature than Japanime films I have seen. The love story seems very real-there is a sort of chemistry between the leads that you can feel.

The soundtrack is one of my favourite parts about the movie. Every song matches perfectly with the spirit of the time and place..a new world in the 1600's.

Finally..whoever had the idea to cast Mel Gibson(and Christian Bale) is a genius. Love those voices!

One aspect of this movie often overlooked is its dreamy editing. It is so consistent throughout and rivals many critically acclaimed films with great editing.

See it again, and remember: "You can own the earth and still, all you'll own is Earth until you can paint with all the colors of the wind."
59 out of 82 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Real Genius (1985)
10/10
Don't eat that. Eating that can cause very large breasts. Oh my God, I'm too late.
5 February 2005
This is one of those movies that is just perfect..the 80s were a time of daring movies, and that usually meant that you either had crap or a gem...this movie is one of those gems...the direction, soundtrack, acting is so good you don't even notice it.

This was on Comedy Central today and (except for commercials)i couldn't change the channel. I knew every line even though i hadn't seen it in about 2 years.

I love love love love this movie. It's freaking brilliant. You get so much out of it. Like, physics students are cool. Val Kilmer should've done more comedy. And the guy who plays Dr. Hathaway steals almost every scene. A must-see.
18 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
French in Action (1987– )
This show was so funny..
9 January 2005
My mother would try to get me to watch this when I was a little girl so I wouldn't forget my french. It wasn't really for me because I knew a lot of it, but it still helped me. I'm surprised to say that...and even more surprised that other people have seen this show because it was so obscure and low-budget and so old that I thought it would have fallen off the face of the earth by now! Plus they would many times re-air the same episodes over and over, I don't know how many were actually made, so that might have something to do with the reruns.

The teacher was really good because he was sort of omniscent, but only spoke in French. I often, no..I *always* wondered if this would work for Americans because it seemed so difficult, but it looks like some of them actually learned! Bravo, French in Action! Maybe they should do a reunion or something complete with Mireille and Marilore..if it worked the first time it should work again and many people still seem to wanna learn French:-)
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fahrenhype 9/11 (2004 Video)
Good but ultimitely superficial
21 December 2004
I'll give this film credit for two things: 1) being fairly focused on only refuting elements of Fahrenheit 911 , and 2) having Zell Miller in the film. This guy is like a legend in Georgia, and comes across as very wise.

Besides those things the film has its share of problems. The one point they have on Michael Moore (if this is true, which it seems to be) is that he took an opinion article and changed it to make it look like a newspaper headline. I agree, that was wrong, but to tell you the truth i never notice it when i watch the film.

Politically I belong to neither party(i voted for Ralph), so it's easy for me to spot the bs on both sides, and I feel that many other viewers can too(i could be wrong). For example, i'm sure kids weren't laughing and flying kites in Iraq just before we bombed it, but I also don't necessarily believe someone in a film like this saying something about what Michael Moore said firsthand to them, like "You're making too much out of these 911 deaths". Proof, please? Anyone who's ever seen F911 will know that Moore would never say or think such a thing. Maybe he gave off a certainly vibe they didn't like or they think he's anti-American.Here's a thought for the director: keep opinions *out* of documentaries, at least as many of them as you can, and just focus on the FACTS. not just something Ann Coulter says about betting someone anything that "a liberal will never mention the Kurds." That is just faulty and mindless rambling imo. The narrator or Ann COULD have made that into a constructive argument, like how many Kurds were killed, or SOME FACT instead of some funny jab at the lefties. It's not offensive, just annoying.

Maybe Moore did his math wrong and OK, maybe $860 billion *isn't* 7-8% of our economy, however i doubt a fan of F911 would ever spout that percentage as it's obvious in Ft911 that he just guessed the percentage while he was on the side of the road talking to an officer. Again, pointless.

This film goes on further to attack the film over minute points from the fact that "not ALL recruiters are pushy, LOOK! Here's a real good-looking non-menacing one...BINGO!" Come on. They also say stupid things about why Moore's statements are false. Example, "we didn't go to Iraq for oil, because otherwise why would the gas prices be so high?!" Oh, and even more brilliant, "we don't go into Iran for oil", (so what?) and Israel is our friend and **they** don't have oil. (No sh** sherlock, they're not making a point, just proving the opposite, that if Israel did have oil America wouldn't have the same buddy-relationship.)I understand that some Bush supporters get offended by little bites and quips such as those recruiters and those soldiers at war that seemed cold-hearted in F911, but trying to whine over the most superficial points ain't gonna get you anywhere.

Another thing~ noticed I use the term "Bush supporters" and not conservatives or Republicans. One of this film's biggest weaknesses is to portray Democrats/liberals as "the other side". That's what upsets me, because it's something Moore never does. For example, this film tries to defend Bush and the Carlyle group by naming the Democrats who got rich off of it as well. OK, does that make it any less corrupt? Or the banquet to raise $ for Catholic schools wasn't elitist, because Al Gore attended. Oh, yeah... a Democrat! I just think these arguments are childish and the film sort of looks too desperate and too sensitive on parts of Moore's film that weren't even the real issues.

No one talked about, for example: -Why out of all other countries, including Saudi Arabia, was Iraq more of a target than the others. -James R.Bath, and why the Bush team blacked his name out of his military records if they weren't afraid of being linked to Osama bin Laden's family. -Why we gave Osama a 3month head start before looking for him. -Why the Patriot Act (and others) don't get read by most of Congress before getting passed. Instead they talk about only why the PAct is so great. -Dick Cheney's involvement at Halliburton and how lucrative the war is for him.

All in all, this film is too loaded with opinion and perspective, though I liked Zel Miller's story about the copperhead snakes:)and what's worse is it accuses MM of profiting off others' misery but it's as if this film tried to do that even more, with crying families saying that Moore is shaming the soldiers that dies for the freedom of our nation and that many liberals are misguided (there they go again with grouping one side against the other.

Bottom line: this film confirmed what i thought about F911 in the first place: that Bush is a man with a lot of ties to various interests and is indebted and obliged to the Saudi family, in many ways because of his father. THIS CAN't BE GOOD FOR US. I'm not questioning Bush's resolve, determination, patriotism, contribution to troops, sense of humour, and prise for America, and Moore never questioned any of it either. The only thing he (and I)questions are his motives and friendly attitude toward the Saudis.
68 out of 115 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Scrooged (1988)
"The b*tch hit me with a toaster"
11 December 2004
This is one of those films that I loved.....until the ending. I loved the new spin on Dicken's classic story, the creativity of the characters,and Bill Murray, the ghosts, all the acting was great. As a comedy it was one of the funniest I've seen. It was also disturbing, sad, and not afrraid to be mean-spirited at times. This was perfect as it fleshed out Murray's character.

As soon as it started I knew its quality rested almost completely on Bill Murray's shoulders. The problem is that the ending seems too happy for the biting, darkness that came before it, especially coming from Bill Murray. Since it's considered a more or less a comedy, I almost wondered if the ending was tongue-in-cheek. But then, that would have made it slightly depressing, which is why to this day I am not sure I like it on its own.

You can tell that since Bill probably didn't like the ending he figured he should still keep the integrity of the script by playing Francis as though he had gone insane. The way he played the character in spite of the sappy ending, in itself, is what I feel truly showcases Bill Murray's talent.

Don't get me wrong~I like many sappy Christmas movies; but this one started at the other end of the spectrum and could have done so much more with more subtlety at the end.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Possibly better than Dazed & Confused
7 December 2004
...that's a big "possibly", because D&C was awesome. I say it might edge it out if you're looking for something more well-rounded. Dazed was more of a realistic,personal coming-of age heart charmer. In a way, School of Rock is just like that, except it's even funnier than Dazed. (but of course Matthew Macconoughey and Ben Affleck are still hilarious every time!) Linklater is himself here, especially with the length of his pan-in and -out shots (I have editing deficit disorder, so I appreciate it). There's also his persistence at keeping everything completely realistic and keeping a great narrative throughout until a great climax.

All the characters are fleshed out, even the no-name band mates of Dewey's at the beginning of the film. He trusts that the audience wants something steady that takes its time, not something flashy, overly edited, and unreal. This is even more crucial if you're working with someone like Jack Black, who can never sit still and who never goes out of character. Though his character's been established as a "loser" by society, the director and the script let you know that this guy is able to really connect with a good band, for all his passion and intensity for rock and roll music.

Kudos should also be given to Mike White, who had a vision of Jack Black with a bunch of kids forming a band.

The kids are just the coolest. They're all each so different in their own ways, yet bright and work all together and never try to grab any attention from anybody else. They're very natural.

Of course, the fact that Zeppelin, Hendrix, and ac/dc comprise the soundtrack doesn't hurt things either. Overall, this was a really kick-@ss movie that showed Jack Black in a not-so-raunchy role. A hilarious script that could've been cheapened by one of those first-time directors, but turned here into almost a comedic masterpiece.

p.s. Don't drink milk while watching Jack Black; it'll come out of your nose.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
This movie reminds me of how old I am now..
29 November 2004
Lisa Kudrow, Mira Sorvino, Jeanne Garafolo, "lingerie" dresses, No Doubt, all stuff I remember with a sort of fondness from the 90's.

Then I think, damn, am I getting old? I mean, sure the Spice Girls aren't popular anymore. but they're at least covered in the news sometimes, right? And girl

power is still cool.....¡¡¡RIGHT??!!

In all seriousness this film was cool and didn't spend every five minutes of the film making the characters do something more "likeable" for you..it didn't care and just went for it. This made me wanna watch Clueless again..even

SheDevil... hell, even the B-rated 90s movies are better than the best ones out today.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Good..until the end! See the original
10 November 2004
Warning: Spoilers
***Spoilers Herein*** I was against the idea of a remake from the beginning, But I figured not enough people have or are ever going to see the original (although hopefully now, some might),so the idea of a remake sounded pretty fresh to me. Plus, the original worked so well as being scary and not funny, but when I saw that it would be more comedy I thought this could really give them a lot to work with (more plot lines, characters..)

They did change it in style and tone, and had an *adequate* movie there...UNTIL THE LAST 20 MINUTES. All I wanna say else about this remake is that it should have ended *with the shopping cart scene*, (implying that YES, Kidman WAS changed into a robot, (or implanted, whatever the film wants to jump to), saying basically that yes, some men still feel threatened by powerful and successful women, but the **difference** or silver lining, is that it was *her choice. I mean, she could have run or resisted, but that scene where she and Matthew are being lowered could've been her realizing that she would rather be a Stepford Wife to her husband than to live without him. Then the shopping cart scene. And then THE END! That would've been SUCH A GREAT FILM!

Instead, you get another 20 minutes of pure crapola, that although includes Glenn Close, is not bad because of her. She's by far the best performance here, though Kidman is good. Glenn Close has also never looked better

Overall, I'm gonna have to say WATCH THE ORIGINAL! Especially if you've already sat through THIS one; you'll need the original to redeem your experience. ~peace, estelle
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Malena (2000)
Not enough plot, reduces characters to stereotypes
8 November 2004
I realize that this movie is supposed to show the tragedy of a beautiful woman in a small village, but it seemed to beat the emotions into your head in case you missed them: Lust. Jealousy. Lust, jealousy. And all you feel is pity for Malena.

I feel this film suffers from wanting to show us too much of what it could have implied. It is obvious that Malena is devastatingly beautiful, and that she is set apart from the other women because of it. I think that Monica Bellucci did a good job at acting, because she probably knew the director was going to make the themes so in-your-face(guess which themes I'm talking about..women are ALL heartless, jealous women and men are all hopeless hornballs) that the audience isn't going to want an actress who goes over the top as well.

The emotions that are practically thrown at you, "feel this way right now" becomes more and more annoying as the film progresses. Then the scary thing happens: you realize either the director NEVER planned to have character and plot development in his movie or he got ahead of himself and couldn't fit it in at the last minute.

I don't want to discount the plus sides to this film: it is cinematic ally serene, beautiful, and besides all the other bad acting Monica does a great job (with the little she has.) There was just never any focus on Malena as a thinking, breathing, intelligent human being. And no, that doesn't necessarily mean a lot more dialog, but MAYBE a little. Just enough so that we get to know Malena at least a little. Though the director may have had honourable intentions, his one-note summary with a 'Pity Malena for all the lust and jealousy she faces,' attitude, he somehow also disturbingly added, "...Isn't that so tragic.....but so beautiful as well? Wouldn't you love to see these ugly people attack beautiful Malena?" I'm not here to criticize Guiseppe Tornatore, just that his film was kind of a depressing, one-note summary for me.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Chris Rock: Bigger & Blacker (1999 TV Special)
Best stand-up I've seen
4 November 2004
I don't have too much reference in stand-up, because I've never seen Eddie Murphy or Richard Pryor (I realize I am missing out and intend to see those VHS or DVD's next). But I can tell you that Bigger and Blacker is the funniest thing I have ever seen. PERIOD.

I've seen "Bring On the Pain", this one, and the new one where he wears a burgundy suit, and this one is definitely the best by far.

Chris Rock isn't silly. He's hilarious because he isn't silly, but smart, spot-on, pointing out all the f*ed up situations in the world. The only thing that dates it is his reference to Ricky Martin's "La Vida Loca" but that was a really big song back in the day.

His insight on women is uncanny, almost as much as it is hilarious. I couldn't believe someone put into words so well how we want our men to ask us the correct questions that will allow us to run our %$@ mouths. He also said how women always say they need to talk as a couple, but "oh, NO, they don't want YOU to talk. They want you to LISTEN, LISTEN, LISTEN!!"

As someone else previously posted, he talks about the $$ being in the medicine not the cure, a sad truth.

I guess with any stand-up, it's about the delivery. There's this one part when he talks about how The Jerry Lewis Telethon is the same dismal atmosphere every year and the kids still look miserable. I couldn't stop laughing at the way he said. "Do SOMETHIN'! Prop a stick under the kid. LIE TO ME, JERRY!! LIE!" And then talks about how all the $ must go to keeping his hair black, because "Frank Sinatra, Jimmy Dean, Dean Martin, all dead, and Jerry Lewis has a full head of black hair!" LOLOL I can't rave any more about this, because you have to see it to really laugh!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
You'll have fun!
27 September 2004
Warning: Spoilers
I wasn't gonna bother commenting until I saw the amount of negative reviews. I feel compelled now to pay my respect to O Brother, Where Art Thou?

Sure, when I first heard that it was going to be The Odyssey retold in 30s Mississippi, I scoffed a little thinking that sounded so contrived. After watching Sullivan's Travels and Lady Eve, I had developed a deep appreciation for Preston Sturges' films; mainly the witty dialogue between people and physical comedy. I though maybe this O Brother .... film was a nod but also a riding-on-the-coattails-of-Hollwood-classics type of inside joke.

Who knows how the idea got started, but the end result is a fantastic movie.

I have to tell you a secret. Lean closer. Ready? (whisper)I never read The Odyssey. I was sick at home with mono that spring, and was exempt from it. But I'm glad in a way because I got to watch O Brother Where Art Thou? without even the slightest twinge of recollection of another story. I took the story as it went, as one should do when trying to get the most out of the film. Like others said. it's not like the similarities are glaringly obvious. For example, (SPOILER!!!) the part with the 'sirens', you can hear sirens vaguely in the background.

Finally, why wouldn't anyone not like a film that enhances their musical education? (The soundtrack to this is one of the best EVER) I already knew Emmylou Harris, but I was introduced to Alison Krauss, Gillian Welsh and Jon Hartford after seeing this.

And the comic timing is understated but perfect. It's not underestimating the intelligence of the audience with cheap humour. The jokes instead are mostly laced in with wordplay and irony. Who else could get away with the KKK dancing and singing the blues?

The Coen Brothers are awesome and this is a classic.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
In the Cut (2003)
The acting saves the film *Spoilers*
24 September 2004
Warning: Spoilers
I finally watched this film, (rated version,though..i live in atlanta after all and i have to say some things.

The acting is top notch, and the cinematography and editing are awesome. Mark Ruffalo will never have you doubting him for a second, and he is really sexy in his charismatic-but-mysoginistic air. I love Jennifer Jason-Leigh, and in this role, you just want to hug her and give her a big kiss. I was first worried for Meg being in this role, but then I realized this is one of the few roles I really like her in. She's always been in those "films-you-gotta-love" that don't require the sort of drama she puts out here. She's sooooo good at drama and though i've seen it before, it went against her character roles. It's like finally now, the emotion and sadness of her character doesn't look out of place. Finally!

Also, Jane has a way of capturing details that aren't just images, but a visual stream of consciousness. The proximity between bodies, the flavor of the moment. She also puts special importance to props to sentimental scenes that are moments of realization. For example, toward the end, when Frannie goes into Malloy's coat and finds the charm piece, we are so transcended back to that special scene between Frannie and her sister earlier, when she gave it to her as a gift, that we understand Frannie would be irrational. Even though the audience doesn't think there is any reason to suspect Malloy any more for having a charm he picked up.just because Despite all the positives, I had problems with the writing of Detective Rodriguezin a MAJOR way.

I realize this is taken from a novel, this leads me to believe that book may not be so perfect either/ I mean if they're gonna change the ending, they might as well tweek a few problems with the script. Why were there so many "red herrings"? ANd why were they developed as red herrings, about as formulaic as you can get? I feel this is definitely a weakness of the script.

Plus, every possible relation with the actual killer just sort of ticks me off. Why is Detective Rodriguez the killer? Don't get me wrong, I'm glad it wasn't Malloy, but there's NO MOTIVE for the killer. I realize motives can be incidental, but at least give us some other bone then, to keep us involved. Because if the story revolves around crimes, your killer's motive should at least be looked at, imo. And if there is none,that fact should be a recurring theme throughout the film, shouldn't it?

Why wouldn't we see something in the film (however subtle) that shows us that there is some kind of distance between Malloy and Rodriguez, something that would prevent him from having discovered how f*ed up he really is. Aside from the gun he's prevented to have, there is every indication that these guys are in sync with each other.

Of course, i didn't understand the symbolism of the lightnouses, but i suppose i need to see it again.

All in all, this film is definitely worth watching, if for the acting alone.

~aurelie
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Refreshing and not afraid to be melancholy
14 September 2004
Warning: Spoilers
If you spend your movie days watching great films, indie films, in short, a variety of films and not just the run-of-the-mill easily-accessible Hollywood films, you'll still probably like this movie. But if you haven't seen anything fresh and unique for awhile, you'll really, really like this movie.

I saw it because 1)I've loved Laura Linney since Primal Fear, never a false step in her acting, imo; and 2)Mark Ruffalo,I saw Mark in 13 going on 30(I was babysitting, gimme a break)and I realized he was good enough to make the film likable, so I figured he must be a pretty good actor.

Anyway, what I got out of this film is you need to know and appreciate who you lean on when you're in trouble. Whether it's for money or spiritually, or something you hold onto.

***SPOILER!!!!!!***

Like in the end, when LL's character is at the restaurant and in the car, and she finally looks at her boyfriend in a different way. She realized two things: that she does need him and what she needs him for. I think all the characters to some extent felt this in the end, and maybe that made them more honest with themselves. Even the little boy, who saw his dad, now understands his mother a little more now and why she kept him a secret. He always says "I don't care" because he doesn't want his feelings hurt, but now maybe he will care because he knows about his father and he knows that at least someone, his uncle, stuck up for him on it.

I think Uncle Terry realized that his sister is the way she is toward him-not because she's so different, controlled and reserved because of the town, etc-but because she sincerely worries about his well-being. And he realized that he needed that and it was one of the things that kept him going on.

It's hardest to read Sammy, imo., but I think it was an awareness of herself and a coercion to being more honest with herself.

The open endedness with the way this ended didn't make it cheerful , but it made you realize that sometimes things have to be the way they are and you have to look at them for the way they are, and maybe that will lead you more to a positive outlook.

Peace, ~Septembre
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Village (2004)
Film was awesome. Quit whining, people! (Possible spoilers)
31 July 2004
Warning: Spoilers
I've heard all I can stand about how people who didn't like "The Village"were disappointed with this film because of the way it was marketed.Marketing?? Really??! Because I was thanking them as the movie ended, for the love of all things holy, that the film was NOT marketed to show you exactly what to expect.

I guess some couch potatoes are a bit too in love with the trailers and TV commercials for this film, which by now they may have memorized every line to. They "expect" something. No, they need to see what they expected to see or they're not satisfied. Wow, I wonder how these people function with their real lives? Scary!

Where would the fun be if you got what you expected? For the many who enjoyed the film, be thankful that Shyamalan himself had some pull with trailers and marketing. Imagine if it had gone into the hands of other producers...we would had the ending given away in the trailer.

I wish these naysayers could see that part of what makes this film so brilliant was the marketing strategy. Imagine you walking right up to Shyamalan, telling him, "you shouldn't have made this look like a horror film", he would've answered"what made you think it'd be horror? Because it was "set" in the past? I can't have a suspense thriller "set" in the late 1800's?" and you would've answered, "uh....it's not that, it's just..." and would've looked like a fool.

Shyamalan is just doing his job: entertaining us. If you babies are upset cause you demanded something out of a movie, then let me help you out. Expect to see the cast of characters. Expect to see brilliant direction and mood from Shyamalan. Expect this and THE REST WILL TAKE CARE OF ITSELF! Everything else you expect needs to be discarded before you enter the theatre. Come on, people. don't you WANT to be entertained?

That being said, the film does make you jump at times, although it is a suspense thriller, not a horror film.

See it, and for f&%k's sake, leave your @#! expectations at the proverbial door.

~peace
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Truly unforgettable
3 July 2004
Warning: Spoilers
*****POSSIBLE SPOILERS!!!!*******

I saw this film when I was 8 and it stayed planted in my brain. A passionate little boy in the middle of a terrible war doing what he can to keep his life and soul intact.

People get sick, disillusioned, but not Jim. He is the heart and soul of the English camp, who by his own words, had become "too lethargic." There is even a scene where, if he lays some traps, is cool enough to move to the American camp. Of course,this consists of baseball, good times, the latest magazine subscriptions, and saluting. Really cool scenes there and not overly done. Watch for a cameo of Ben Stiller saying one of the coolest lines ever, about a Hersheys bar!

Make no mistake, there is a lot of wit and humour in this film. This is especially due to John Malkovich as Basie ( as a street-smart, f-you,i'll-look-out-for-myself attitude) and Joe Pantoliano as Frank,(his secretary/a**kisser). I would say that Basie's role kind of clichés Americans, but he stands alone among them anyways.

Of course, since this is a war film, you will need some tissue, because Steven Spielberg knows how to tell a story. It is so dramatic because of its poignancy. There are scenes that induce tears of sadness, yes. But there are also scenes that induce tears of joy. Like one, involving Jim on the roof, with a B-51 passing by..that's all I'll say. Scenes that come after such a build up of character from Jim, played by Christian Bale, that you know more than information by this scene. By the time this scene rolls around, you *feel everything Jim does. From his love for planes, from his need to be young and free, and to focus on survival instead of tragedy.

I realize a film is supposed to make you feel for the main character, but it is more than that in this film. It's almost as if you are falling in love with this boy. He has the attitude and the cajonas to be the way you'd like to be in a war situation. Spirited, intellectual, healthy. You even hear him recite Latin with Nigel Haver's character in a hospital room with people dying right next to him.

This film brushes a bit with irony, but never makes it too obvious. It is more of a visual beauty, then another cliché thrown at you. The whole idea of rich(mostly English) people living in Shanghai who for generations, had been building an image of their own country. Then all of the sudden, war breaks out and they are trapped. Suddenly they feel just as hopeless as all the struggling lower-class people in China.

Spielberg has taken a beautiful novel by JG Ballard and has added his stylistic and lasting touches. It is a visual feast, the I feel that his best movie is probably Schindlers List, but this is my favourite Spielberg film.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed