Reviews

18 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
The Painter (I) (2024)
Another OK rehash of a thousand forgotten flicks.
21 January 2024
Right before seeing this I watched another 2024 action movie: 60 Minutes. There was practically no plotting on that one, but for a realistic feel and some decent action I gave it a 5 on another website. I was a bit surprised by the negative reviews of this movie here on Imdb, so I'm gonna write one that's not so upfront and insulting, you know, one that's more informative.

OK, so I'll point out that I thought the protagonist's essential super hearing was a bit creative. Other than that, I'm not really seeing anything here that hasn't been done before. Even though the writer certainly tried to bring some depth to all the characters (and thankfully the plot relies on this), the actual plot progression has been done many times before. Lather, rinse, repeat. Even the relationships between characters could be seen in the next Spy Kids movie.

We've gotten quite a few action movies that follow a basic formula this year, but this movie is more of a knockoff of many other knockoffs than others. Having said that, the filmmaking itself is never really terrible or even "bad" for that matter, but the acting quality varies and the plot can often be guessed.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A B-Movie directed like an A-Movie
25 November 2023
So, take Ninja Turtles, add an A-Movie studio with Power Rangers B-actors, write a knockoff of The Neverending Story, give us a villain who's essentially Loki, and you get one of the most well-directed dorkfests of the 90's. Warriors of Virtue is a forgotten movie with a large amount of effort put into the production value, one with costumes almost as good as the ones from the earlier costume-driven film Nightbreed. But its story needs some work.

This movie is basically all about energy told through the spectacle of production. We see some expertly-directed scenes in this debut of Ronny Yu, later known for Fearless. I mean, only Yu would put so much passion into directed a montage of a martial arts master using his skills in the kitchen. The flashiness of these action sequences still has the general behavior of 80's and 90's martial arts cheese, but each scene is handled professionally, which means the spectacle here is lived up to the fullest potential that 90's family films would allow. On top of that, we get a careful balance of colors through some highly convincing set pieces, which is probably the best thing about the movie. Obviously, Ronny Yu did the absolute best that he could've done with what he was given.

Unfortunately, there are a couple of problems. First of all, our out-of-whack story really does need some fleshing out. While it's not a horrible story and there are some decent moments, the whole of story-world concept wasn't given the care that was needed. On top of that, while we have much better kangaroo costumes than Tank Girl, we also have some pretty cheap acting. The cast of the kangaroos were not given enough character development to work with, and our villain, who easily has the worst dialogue in the movie (do not think thoughts???) is basically a bad proto-Loki and Angus MacFadyen performance so poor it's often laugh-inducing.

So Warriors of Virtue is basically a movie strictly for a Power Rangers fan. It's got most of the ingredients necessary for Power Rangers, but with an impressive production level. Yu justified his existence in Hollywood with his direction, although we rarely heard much from the four Law brothers who created the characters, largely because these characters were as thrown together for the 90's anthro buzz the same way Street Sharks and Biker Mice from Mars was, only being more tolerable.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
OK detective movie.
12 November 2023
I tried reading the reviews for this one to see if they had anything interesting to say, but they largely all stink. Here's how they basically go: "Nick Carter was a famous character who got a radio show and three movies in America. Pigeon plays a good Carter, Meek plays a good Bartholomew. Cool action sequences. Overall fun, 6/10." It actually pissed me off. TELL ME something about the movie instead of some base trivia that has nothing to do with the movie's quality and besides two actors.

So here we go: the plot has some interesting progression, but there's only so much detail that can go into an hour-long movie, especially since much of the movie is either about an action scene with a plane or about some beekeeper doing half of our main character's job in a humorous way. As far as the acting goes, while Pigeon certainly does a good job with the role, this Nick Carter guy is such a stereotypical crime detective that there's really no reason to watch this movie. On top of that, the only other character who gets any real development is Bartholomew, and he honestly feels smarter than our detective. On top of that, his humorous output is like a bad mix of showoffy sidekick and Gollum-knockoff.

Despite some good action scenes, there's very little character development here, which means that the movie's case rarely feels personal or human like it has in some of the best mystery movies ever, like Vertigo or The Third Man, or even modern movies like Seven. So the all-and-all is that this entire case feels like just another episode of an OK modern-day crime show like Law and Order. And while my score may stay the same as many other reviews for this movie, I hope I provided more insight.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
In before the review bombing's too bad
18 September 2023
I kind of hate purist attitudes, espeically since they need to keep things a very specific and cliched way. If we had done that, we wouldn't have rock music, abstract art or even new kinds of cartoons. Let it be said that there ARE in fact changes to this new Tiny Toons, such as the two best friends Babs and Buster now being siblings instead of besties, which might creep out someone who fantasizes about their original "intimate" relationship as if that really matters. The old episodes like the one where Buster planned to ask Babs to the school dance might've been fun, but let's be honest: do we really watch those two rabbits for romance? No. We watch them because they make us laugh, so this change, while unnecessary, is really not a con in anyway shape or form.

Now for some real cons. This is yet another Looney Tunes show, and Looney Tunes shows have been relying on the same humor for quite a while, even the HBO series Looney Tunes Cartoons. The franchise has needed a fresh start ever since Space Jam, and this series and The Looney Tunes Show are the closest we have. I'll take it if I don't have any control over it. But this also means the humor has been said and done before quite often. Even though there are some cool spins on old gags which rely on meta-humor, the bottom line is that as adults, we're familiar with it. Except maybe the tough gal flexing. There's an absurd amount of that, and yet no Arnold showing off???

And now for the pros. The first thing I'm going to point out is the energy. We adults might be more familiar with the humor, but even with the good chuckles, there's an incredible amount of energy in this show that keeps everybody Looney throughout the whole runtime of each episode. So there's a lot for the kids to love without selling out to cheap kiddie TV like many Steven Universe knock-offs. Another very important pro is a very personal one to me: the acting and voice changes. I absolutely ADORE Hampton's new southern accent. It brings out so much of his scaredy-cat persona that it separates him even further from Porky. Also, Plucky's voice has just that right amount of midteen smug in it, so Plucky's no longer just "kid Daffy." And guess what? They even gave Furball a voice. And it sounds PERFECT for him. It's cute and raspy, and now he's got personality, too. I'll let you see that for yourself. And even none speaking characters like Calamity can be extremely expressive in their actions.

Well, I'm more or less satisfied with this reboot. I expected familiarity, but thankfully the pros are there and they're fairly strong. I still prefer the original show, but I'll support this reboot.
2 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
One Piece (2023– )
Thank you for heading this, Oda!
12 September 2023
Fun fact: Eiichiro Oda, the creator of the manga One Piece, was very strict with the developers of this show over how it was going to pan out. It's obvious that certain Americanized story elements were put in for audiences in the US, but the honest truth is that the show is as faithful as a One Piece fan demands otherwise.

I recall the mid-2000's Peter Pan, which used intentionally cheesy lyrics in a charming way. This show kind of does the same thing, albeit with better effects than the movie, but still. This way, we get the cartoony behavior of the show at full force. And the best part is that the cast gets into their characters very easily, especially on the part of Iñaki Godoy. The show gets a lot of the best story elements right while condensing full arcs in very dramatic ways fit for the eight episode the show lasts. I especially love all the new touches they make with a couple of the minor characters, turning them into major characters with a lot of good delivery. Although, there are many key characters and brilliant scenes missing, so there is that level of disappointment for anyone who's easily seen a good deal of the original One Piece.

I'm watching the original show again in prep for season two, and partly because I want to further pic apart season one. This is an adaptation that recaptures the spirit and heart of the original manga and anime with very few blemishes.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A strangely understated classic
5 September 2023
Most millennials grew up with at least a couple Don Bluth movies. Mine were An American Tail, The land Before Time (which I stopped watching for years because it made my sister cry), Anastasia and Titan A. E. Effectively, I didn't see this movie until years later. Before I ever did, most of my childhood awareness of it was simply awareness of the two main characters' appearance, and not of the actual title of the movie. I finally saw it around in my early 20's out of curiosity, and a few years later I decided to revisit it.

This is one of the most unique kids movies I've ever seen, and easily one of the BOLDEST. I mean, this movie covers a plethora of mature topics: gambling, death, murder, loss, and it even has cigar smoke and references to drunkenness. But it's all justified by Bluth fans because "redemption arcs make everything fine." I'm not saying no kid should ever see this, just that it should probably be PG by modern standards. Having said that, I might show eight-year-olds this movie, as I believe they'll be mature enough to handle this by that point.

The boldness of the story makes it much more interesting than most kids movies, as we have real heart and even heartache attached. On that account, we can also thank Don Bluth's strongest sense of direction before Titan A. E. came out, which makes this his most artistic effort before then. On top of that, our cast is just incredible. Burt Reynolds is brilliant as Charlie Barkin, letting the role flow purely naturally. Fun fact: Charlie was modelled after Burt Reynolds, and Reynolds' mannerisms were animated for Charlie as well. Charlie might even be the best character Bluth ever featured in his movies because of the realistic behavior applied to his beliefs and changes. Charlie Sheen and Steven Weber couldn't even come close after replacing Burt (they didn't even sound like Burt). Dom DeLuise does his thing again as Itchy, who's just so funny and lovable to watch. And we have Judith Barsi in yet another perfect role, beating her own performance as Ducky from the Land Before Time. And finally, Vic Tayback is just plain frightening as Carface, who needs stronger development but has a great actor to back it up. Man, knowing that the whole major cast is dead feels weird when applied to this movie.

The movie is a largely consistent whole of themes for the most part, but there are a couple of scenes that aren't fully necessary and could've been tweaked, largely anything involving the alligator. Also, while the score is fine, the musical numbers need a little work. I can't imagine myself humming anything other than "You Can't Keep a Good Dog Down."

Overall, this movie has a lot of good decisions that make up for the bad ones, and because of the uniqueness of this kind of movie, it'll stand out forever. It's more than another fantasy or talking animal movie. It has maturity, themes and meaning. This movie is way better than the more popular cutesy films An American Tail and The land Before Time, which are good but nowhere near as unique.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
One of the coolest kids' shows I've ever seen.
17 August 2023
Unfortunately for me, I ended up stopping with most cartoons by the time this show made it to America. If it had been on while I was a kid, I would have watched this show to death and went back for a second helping. Then the next day, do it all over again.

The only reason I started witching this is because I remembered seeing the title on Netflix years ago, googled it out of curiosity, saw that the reviews were great and checked it out. And I got hooked. This Italian cult classic created by the man behind Winx Club is like a mix of Indiana Jones and Pokemon, centering around lost mythical creatures being stored in amulets and being able to bond with humans. The monster designs are pretty cool, even though most of them are one-track minded and don't always have the variety you'd expect in Pokemon. HOWEVER, there is real strength in the character development. The four main characters are all cool on their own. They learn from both their strengths and their flaws, which makes for some good drama among the kid-friendly action sequences and historical context. I watched Martin Mystery as a kid, and that mystery vibe is there with a new set of genres as opposed to the sci-fi horror comedy MM was: fantasy / treasure hunt adventure / monster battler.

Sure, the American transition has a few minor mistakes, like dubbing issues and even an episode where the English titles and subtitles overlap the original Italian titles and subtitles, but these are minor instances that never get in the way of the storytelling. My only other concern is that Marc Thompson, who delivers a great Dante Vale, also voices Cherit and his voice sounds very annoying at times. I guess that's to be expected from the guy who voiced H'earring in Chaotic. ONE MORE THING: The rhythm and vibe of the theme song is an absolute jam... but the lyrics suck hard.

Despite minor flaws, I seriously recommend this for the whole family. This wholesome show has a lot of information, a very cool genre-balanced atmosphere, typically strong acting most of the time and strong thematic delivery. I really wish I grew up with this.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dragon Ball Z Abridged (2008–2018)
One of the funniest things I've ever seen
12 July 2023
OK, before seeing this, I had seen exactly ZERO episodes of the original show. When my sister told me about Abridged the first time, I didn't even know what "abridged" meant. Then she showed me, and my life changed a little. I would go looking for abridged shows left and right, and even though I found a few good ones, none of them compare to DBZA.

Most Abridged shows will have crappy voice acting and direction, even hilarious ones like Yugioh Abridged. And most of them are loaded with jokes that require you to watch the original show. Not DBZA. The jokes in this are largely dependant on the personalities of the abridged versions of the characters, notably Goku's.half-witted innocence, Piccolo's snarkiness and sarcasm, Gohan's nerdiness, Nappa's stupidity, as well as other changes made to the series. Only a handleful of jokes per episode are really references to the old show, but most of it is just hilarious characters dorking around with a faint recreation of the original show's plot.

And on the subject of the editing and voice acting, I have one word: PROS. These guys sound like pros. It's hard to believe they weren't professionals before the show came out, because whatever voices don't sound almost exactly like the originals are not only superbly delivered, lines and all, but fit the character changes. This is especially true for Goku and Frieza. And the editing is superb. The direction and added scenarios and references all feel like they were taken from a good Adult Swim cartoon. This is professional series making.

DBZA covers almost the entire show. Apparently, none of the people behind it wanted to cover the Buu saga. This is probably for the best because what we got was starting to wane a little in quality by the end, but was still very funny. This is an abridged series with imagination, and it's constantly hilarious. I know it's only an abridged YouTube series, but this is one of my favorite shows ever. And, it's the series that actually got me to watch the original in the first place. And lemme tell you, I'm with those who say this new abridged version is better than the cool but filler-riddled original show.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
All Grown Up! (2003–2008)
Growing Up Is What Children Need
10 September 2021
I've watched Rugrats throughout my entire childhood. In my early teen years, Nickelodeon provider me Invader Zim and Disney gave me Gargoyles, but Rugrats always had a special place in my heart. And as soon as I heard that Rugrats would get a spin off when I was nine, one that centered on their preteen years, I was as curious as anyone. BUT I KNEW: I wasn't to expect their infant's way of interpreting the world.

Sure, the baby charm of seeing the world with newborn eyes is cute and wonderful to watch. Maybe even surreal. All Grown Up will never have that, which is why it will always be inferior to Rugrats. However, I need to say this. Children need to see their childhood heroes growing up and learning life-lessons, and All Grown Up provided that in a spiritual way that no show can do. The life lessons were pretty real, the morals were strong, and the characters were growing. The episodes featuring Angelica's growth occasionally got very interesting (and satisfying, likely for anyone who didn't like her toddler brattiness from Rugrats).

I think the world needed All Grown Up. Besides, I know a lot of adults today need to look at how these life-lessons and realize they can be more immature than these fictional preteens. If anything, the show is more necessary than ever. Rugrats might be better, but All Grown Up is about REAL growth instead of cute pretend.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
F-Zero: Farukon densetsu (2003–2004)
The Race Continues
25 July 2021
F-Zero: Falcon Densetsu (known in America as F-Zero: GP Legend) is the only anime adaptation of the once great racing franchise, and the source material for the last two games in the series before its initial dormancy that's lasted nearly two decades. The anime focuses on an original character and adds some along the way, but the spirit of the games is strongly represented.

Other that changing the year of the story from 2560 to 2201 and changing some of the characters' backstories, the anime adaptation captures the high-speed races, characters' personalities and alien planets very well. There are some pretty exciting moments now and then and the whole anime is worth watching. Plot twists are especially relevant after the 22nd episode, leaving 29 more for actual story development which only gets more interesting.

My biggest complaint is that they didn't fully explain everything. You're never sure why Captain Falcon became Captain Falcon, for example, and it's occasionally predictable, but it's worth watching. However, if you do watch it and you're not used to subtitles, you should get used to them. Because only 14 or so episodes were ever dubbed in English. And that was by 4Kids, who were responsible for Pokemon and Sonic X, so the voice acting can get pretty hammy in the English dub. Otherwise, it's well worth checking out and is responsible for getting me into F-Zero's games.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Diappointing Debut for Park Chan-Wook
10 July 2021
I love foreign cinema. Ironically, I haven't done enough diving into South Korean cinema as I'd like. Ironically (again), my favorite foreign movie is Oldboy. I'm planning on getting through many Park Chan-Wook and Bong Joon-Ho movies before I go onto other directors. I found this rare debut by Park Chan-Wook on YouTube, and I gotta say I wasn't impressed. The story of the gangster in love doesn't reach its full potential. It's like watching a collection of all these short stories only related to the main plot by point of shared minor characters, and the plot only starts to tie-up all its ends in the second half. The cast of characters don't look like they're having any fun at all. They're too quiet, and they don't seem to try to act. I'll admit, I liked the score. The deep, smooth jazz ropes a strong, almost sensual feel to the movie. And I think Park's sense of cinematography was very spot-on and skillful for his debut feature film. The final compliment I have is that the ending was decent. But both this film and Park himself hadn't reached their full potential, and it's a shame that movies don't get the second chance that people do.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Loonatics Unleashed (2005–2007)
An underdeveloped but misunderstood show.
25 August 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Loonatics Unleashed is a show created by people who made brilliant TV cartoons out of two franchises: Looney Tunes (i.e. Animaniacs, Tiny Toons and Pinky and the Brain), and DC Superheroes (i.e. Batman TAS, Justice League, Teen Titans and Young Justice). Nowadays the company is hell-bent on reviving old shows in a Steven Universe style except way worse. This has been done with Teen Titans, Powerpuff Girls and Ben 10 with unfortunate results. Before these came Loonatics Unleashed, a combination of the Looney Tunes characters and the Batman Begins style action hero vibe. While that sounds like a bad idea based solely on marketing, the obvious truth is that this show could have been so much worse and it gets unfair slack for not being Looney Tunes. Guess what? It's not and never was Looney Tunes, so re-evaluate your reasons for hating the show.

The show centers around the distant descendants of the Looney Tunes being affected by an alien meteor that spread supernatural energies across the planet, granting some people superpowers. The Loonatics band together to fight evil and save their planet from anyone who threatens them.

The show was in development hell for a little while before being released in 2005. The main cast all have traits that are either references or copies of Looney Tunes traits. Ace Bunny, who has laser eyes (possibly a reference to Bugs' pyromaniacal love of dynamite) does say"what's up doc?" a few times, but it's not really a running thing. He has some pretty cool stunts in the show, which leads me to mention that the action sequences were pretty cool. There's some real fun to be had in some of the action sequences. But they should have given him a different voice actor with a different approach, and a modernized parody of Bugs' tagline, like "What up, dawg?" That would've been a little funny, especially since Ace didn't flaunt the phrase half as much as Bugs did.

Lexi is a descendant of Lola Bunny from Space Jam who was put in the show to have a female character the same way Lola was put in Space Jam. Lola's personality had little to no development until she was changed into a hyperactive and ditzy woman possibly carrying OCD, so Lexi's lack of development other than cheerful but independent teen girl who was a cheerleader-turned-hero like Kim Possible is UNDERSTANDABLE. And her voice actor was perfect for the role. Absolutely no complaints there.

Danger Duck was the real problem. I'll admit, he was probably the coolest character as heroes go. He could teleport and he had the power to summon glowing orbs that turned into different liquids (and at one ppint, boulders which is cool), and in season 2 he was given a form of hydrokinesis (psychic control of water) which makes a good amount of sense because ducks are waterfowls. And he has some pretty sweet moves. The show put enough emphasis on his gymnastic movement being able to stand on one hand and do double-flips effortlessly.

But Duck had a serious problem: the show flaunted his ego too much because most of the humor revolved around him being a self-absorbed idiot in less funny ways than Daffy could pull off. If they had given more humor to other characters, he would have been better.

Slam Tasmanian, who has super-strength and the ability to create lightning tornadoes was quite a cool character. If you're trying to make a superhero out of Taz, Slam was done EXACTLY like how one should make him. There wasn't enough of slam in the show.

Tech E. Coyote, the "super genius" had his differences from Wile E. Coyote. Instead of being the pathetic, slobbering airhead skilled with machines, Tech was a confident brainiac who was both cool and nerdy at the same time, having some of the finer moments in the series (and an excellent voice role for Kevin Michael Richardson) and some good humor about his nerdiness. The regenerative power was a good touch referencing Wile E.'s unnatural resistance to falling off cliffs and electrocutions, and the magnetic-control power was PERFECT for him due to the genius/machines personality trait.

Rev Runner was both good and bad. As opposed to the Road Runner's silent treatment, Rev was a super-talkative teenager. But that gag of his got old fairly quickly. Thankfully, the fiery spin on the Road Runner's super speed was a good touch, and we got to see his character get expanded on in an episode where we meet his family, capitalizing off of Rev's best-bud relationship with Tech and love of machines, pleasantly contradicting the enemy relationship of Wile E. and the Road Runner. His GPS vision (in layman's terms) was actually pretty cool as well, and it wasn't used enough in the later episodes.

There were a lot of good ideas for Loonatics, such as the action scenes, certain superpowers, good casting choices and some good stories in some episodes. Other episodes were predictable but still offered personality, and there are times when the show was brimming with personality. However, the characters were always in costume and the efforts to parody darker superhero stories like the successful Batman Begins went to waste. But is the show an "embarrassment?" No. The crew just had no confidence in it because blending Looney Tunes with dark and edgy superheroes proves a little hard at times.

However, if the constant parodies in old and modern Looney Tunes skits are any indications, then such a superhero Looney Tunes show can be done. Keep in mind Warner Bros. and Cartoon Network are the world's best choices for Looney Tunes and superhero cartoons. There just has to be an even balance: light parody. You can give it a serious story, but make fun of it in a very similar fashion that the film Galaxy Quest does with Star Trek. And Cartoon Network has made great superhero comedies before. Perhaps you have seen Teen Titans? If they took influence from the action-packed and hilarious Teen Titans for this show, it would have been less polarizing and much funnier. And if they found a balance between referencing the source material instead of ripping off some aspects, the characters would be more original.

But overall, the show was decent with some good action, a few episodes with interesting plot twists, and a great cast. The problem wasn't that the show was bad, the problem was that WB didn't have confidence because they didn't know what to do with it. It's not the "embarrassment" WB says it is. If people want an embarrassment, they should watch Tenn Titans Go or the new Ben 10, Steven Universe rip-offs that shamelessly forget the heart and soul of their source material for a cash-grabbing fad. They can get away with that because Looney Tunes has a more prolific and famous history of more than 80 years, but these shows are way worse than Loonatics Unleashed.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Toad Patrol (2002– )
A Forgotten Animated Classic
16 December 2015
Toad Patrol is a magical piece of work that any fantasy fan may enjoy. For one thing, the soundtrack is awesome, made entirely of tribal sounds that are meant to coincide with the forest setting that gives off a similar serenity to the show Mushi-Shi, except not as powerful. It also has a similar feel to The Land Before Time for its slightly dark undertones and its topics. Toad Patrol was something I wish I had gotten myself into much earlier in my child life, then I could've known more about it, and seen it more. A child and an adult can enjoy, and I recommend it. Like I said, it's a great little children's fantasy that tackles dark subjects, and sadly only lasted 26 episodes. Don't let the dark subjects chastise you, though. This has little to no teary moments. Please try it out.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
F-Zero GP Legend (2003–2005)
Avoid the English Dub, and You'll Have Fun.
8 July 2015
4Kids is notable for their cheesy voice actors and novice dubs. They practically ruined One Piece. So, the best choice is to go to the source of these shows: Japanese dubs. I'll admit, I liked Kirby and Pokemon. But 4Kids didn't do as good of a job as they could've with F-Zero.

F-Zero Falcon Densetsu (a.k.a. GP Legend) is a cool enough show in the Japanese dub. It goes into a little more detail, has better character development, and a cool story going on. Partially intended as a TV reboot, F-Zero may have slight differences from the games. However, that does not derive from the aforementioned qualities and it's notable great animation. The animators tried hard to make this look cool, and they never disappoint. The races are usually a little thrilling, and the character development helps bring more story to the show. Sure, it's no super-awesome chase scene like in carsploitation films, but it's got enough to keep you paying attention to some action, and a story. It could use a tiny bit of work, but nothing about the Japenese dub is "bad." It's just not a masterpiece. It's good, not amazing. However, it does please fans of the video games and it lasts for 51 episodes in the Japanese dub, and that keeps me busy.

If anyone's worried about similarities and differences between the games and the shows, that does not play much of a factor in the enjoyment of the show since many fans of F-Zero are pleased with it. I've been on F-Zero pages, and they like the show enough to translate it themselves on YT for people who want to watch all 51 Japanese episodes instead of the only 13 English dubbed episodes. 4Kids is lame.

F-Zero is no ultimate spectacle, but there's more than enough in the show to watch it. Likable, occasionally mysterious with a few great twists throughout (little or big, I'm not revealing any), F-Zero is mostly well-crafted, well-animated, and representative of the games enough to please fans.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Fly (1958)
Flawless Fly
23 June 2015
Now, when it comes to movies, anything that's hokey or flawed in the movie lets me give it an imperfect rating, whether it be 0 or 99. The Fly didn't have that kind of flaw. The acting was completely well done, the creature had an actual background, and there was enough mystery, suspense, and horror to make this romance movie well done. I suppose my favorite thing about the movie was the acting. None of them were bad in any way. Plus, the story had some truly and unforgettably iconic moments. The Fly is definitely a perfect movie. I believe it is best you watch this movie without knowing anything about it. Otherwise, you may have an idea of what's going on. If you know nothing, then you'll expect nothing. If you expect nothing, you will not be subject to any disappointment. The Fly, in my opinion, is a perfect movie. Not even some of the movie world's most memorable films rival this.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
G.I. Joe: Sigma 6 (2005–2006)
For the Whole, Not Just Fans
14 June 2015
I didn't grow up with G.I. Joe action figures, so I wouldn't know how this compares to the patriotism the originals carried. But this adaptation was indeed col. I mean, sure it was a 4Kids show, but the show had some really cool action scenes from really cool characters (I think my favorites are Long Range and Snake Eye), it had a cool story going on (I'm not going to mention the story), and the animation was extremely good for its time. Congrats, Gonzo (Gonzo is the animation studio)! Would I have liked different voice actors and music? Sure. Watching 4Kids shows, it's a little tiresome hearing the same kind of orchestra perform the same style (not the same compositions, but similar styles) that they use in other 4Kids shows. Plus, hearing voice actors like Veronica Taylor and Jason Griffith all the time can be tiresome. Still, it's good enough to watch.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Chaotic (2006–2010)
Chaotic could've been better.
2 March 2013
Warning: Spoilers
The thing about this estranged show Chaotic is that it was an ups and downs show. The show follows Tom, played by Jason Griffith (former voice of Sonic the Hedgehog), who enters a place called Chaotic where players around the globe can play the game as the creatures themselves, or actually meet the creatures in the world of Perim. The plot episodes were put together well, but the lower ratings are the result of poor voice acting and bad dialog. Other than these two problems, Chaotic is a good show. If the voice acting were better, it would've been a GREAT show.

If you wanna watch Chaotic, I hope you can handle cheesy voice acting. If not, I suggest the far better Yugioh.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Avengers (2012)
Avengers = bad reviews = what?
2 March 2013
Many people give the Avengers bad reviews because it has too many superheroes. But here's what they need to realize = you don't walk into a theater to watch "The Avengers", a movie that's SUPPOSED to have multiple superheroes, without realizing it's supposed to anyway.

This movie had a lot of action, good humor, and great acting. What are people thinking giving this movie bad reviews just because one thing was hokey = how Loki got out of that place he was stuck in. Maybe if they saw the post-credits scene to Thor, they wouldn't mind as much.

Whatever is running through the heads of the people who rant on this one, I can think of something that will turn their argument around. If not turn it around, at least make the argument a tie. Avengers was a great movie. Bottom line.
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed