Gus Van Sant's adaptation of Psycho is a good one. In fact, it's near perfect. But therein lies the problem with the whole.
Van Sant takes a classic, still revered by today's generations, and dips it in color, changes a few lines of dialogue, and props it up for all to see. He takes no risks, executing things exactly shot-for-shot, and making this the one thing all movies aspire not to be, good or bad: disposable. Why see this when you can see the original in all its groundbreaking glory?
It is somewhat fascinating to see the modern day ensemble act out the infamous parts, including Vince Vaughn's ambitious but overshot performance as Norman Bates, Anthony Perkin's iconic character. The violence is bloodier, the film colorful and vibrant, but what is added that makes this more important then the original? Not a thing.
The dialogue is taken word-for-word, the shots look exactly the same. Even actions and reactions remain intact. One has to wonder if Van Sant even did any work at all, or just took the storyboards and script from the original.
It pains me deeply to see a project that could have been great become something unnecessary: a re-telling instead of a re-imagining.
Van Sant himself claimed he made the film so that "no one else would". If you're not going to do it right, don't do it at all, but again, there is the problem. Van Sant did it right, and that, unfortunately, was the wrong thing to do.
Van Sant takes a classic, still revered by today's generations, and dips it in color, changes a few lines of dialogue, and props it up for all to see. He takes no risks, executing things exactly shot-for-shot, and making this the one thing all movies aspire not to be, good or bad: disposable. Why see this when you can see the original in all its groundbreaking glory?
It is somewhat fascinating to see the modern day ensemble act out the infamous parts, including Vince Vaughn's ambitious but overshot performance as Norman Bates, Anthony Perkin's iconic character. The violence is bloodier, the film colorful and vibrant, but what is added that makes this more important then the original? Not a thing.
The dialogue is taken word-for-word, the shots look exactly the same. Even actions and reactions remain intact. One has to wonder if Van Sant even did any work at all, or just took the storyboards and script from the original.
It pains me deeply to see a project that could have been great become something unnecessary: a re-telling instead of a re-imagining.
Van Sant himself claimed he made the film so that "no one else would". If you're not going to do it right, don't do it at all, but again, there is the problem. Van Sant did it right, and that, unfortunately, was the wrong thing to do.
Tell Your Friends