Reviews

1 Review
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
If you want to watch a halfway decent film or better this film isn't for you.
26 November 2004
I rented this film out at Blockbuster, the DVD case looked entertaining the blurb sounded interesting and that it might be a good film to watch. I wonder if you could sue for miss advertisement.

This was bad on so many levels it is unreal. I watched the movie hoping not expecting to be entertained, all i ended up was laughing so hard at the mindless, numbness of the film. No two scenes seemed to match, nothing made any sense at all. This is a film that if I'd starred in I'd take this straight of my resume and deny ever being part of the weakest, lamest dumbest attempt at a movie ever seen.

I mean seriously what happened did the editor drop all the rushes on on floor and they went everywhere and he just stuck them back together anyhow thinking.... "no-one will notice and if they do they'll love it, it'll be abstract." ? Abstract is about right, abstract of structure, plot, talent, style and even any resemblance to the story it was supposed to be.

Someone said on a scale of 1-10 this film would definitely be a 1. I'm sorry i wouldn't even grace this film with that higher mark, this was closer to 0.001 than 1 out of 10. If you want to watch a film where you wet yourself laughing this is the film for you, if you want to get a film that is watchable, entertaining and enjoyable this is certainly not the film for you. This film is sick, very ill, the dialogue was verbal diarrhea, the plot is thinner than public bathrooms' toilet paper, the talent is non-existent and the fact that Zalmon King actually put his name on this goes to show that this film belongs in the never-regions of WORST FILM MADE all on its own.
5 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed