Change Your Image
docsuds
Reviews
The Lost Special (1932)
good for fetish interest, only fair generally
Researching the origins of the TV serial "Lost", I bought a DVD transcript from a somewhat deteriorated print of this movie serial, now in the public domain. Fans of "Lost" will recognize several scenes and themes from this movie serial which were not in the original story or its other adaptations, which were recreated either literally or at some degree of abstraction in the TV serial. I laughed out loud at that. However, if you're not interested in how one screen production can cutely allude to others, or looking for clues to the mystery (if you even believe there was a mystery) of "Lost", then this adaptation, the loosest by that name that I've researched so far out of many in various media, of "The Lost Special", will probably not hold much interest for you. It does hold a bit of a mystery (albeit somewhat telegraphed for mystery fans) even for those familiar with the original story, and the plot overall is fairly decent, and some of the acting is excellent. However, it does stretch out the story and scenes as typical of a movie serial, and it has the worst stunt fights I could imagine. I've seen serials with excellent stunt fighting that stands up well even to slow-motion scrutiny, but in "The Lost Special" their blows miss by miles, the sound track represents punches by drumrolls, and they're drawn out to boot. There are also the usual far-fetched plot devices to produce silly cliffhangers.
The gimmick casting of Ernie Nevers as a Princeton U. football player works out about as well or badly as you'd expect. However, the other leads are good. The ending moved me to tears, and not only because of my recognizing its relationship to "Lost", so it's not a total loss from 6 hours of viewing.
The Avengers: The Morning After (1969)
resemblance to contemporary program episode
Cf. "The Pied Piper of Hambledown" that originally aired approx. 3 mos. later as an episode of "Dept. S". The resemblance is close enough that my invocation of it may be considered a spoiler for those familiar with the latter. I don't believe either plot was lifted from the other, however, although possibly they had a common source.
This was one of those episodes where one of the Avengers made only a token appearance, which mitigated the fact that it was a Linda Thorson episode. It's a good one in that it's close to solvable and presents the clues in an entertaining and intriguing order.
Although this may not have aired when originally scheduled in the USA, it was shortly afterward, which is when I first saw it. Although I also watched "Dept. S", I don't recall seeing its episode that I'm comparing to at that time.