Reviews

29 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Birdman or the totally unexpected virtue of failed superheroes
17 February 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Riggan Thomson is an actor whose glory years are now in the past; in an attempt to regain the acclaim and leave behind the shadow of Birdman (the superhero that launched him to fame 20 years ago), he ventures to make a Broadway adaptation of Raymond Carver's What We Talk About When We Talk About Love, acted, directed and produced by himself. Just before the preview performances one of the players is injured, forcing the production to find a replacement, which comes in the skin of Mike Shiner, a brilliant but highly conflictive actor, due to his excessive commitment to the acting method. However, Mike is just one of the many issues Riggan must deal with before the opening night: his daughter Sam, fresh out of rehab and who's working as his assistant; Laura, her scene partner with whom is having an affair; a potential claim by the injured player; the pressure that brings the Times critic Tabitha Dickinson, who has the necessary influence to ensure the success or failure of the play, and finally is the voice in his head which manifests as Birdman and that makes him fantasize (or go delirious?) about his time of splendor.

In his fifth feature film, director Alejandro González Iñárritu takes a radical turn to his narrative style and bets for the black comedy and satire. This change turns out to be perfect, as he moves away from the stories infested of tragedy and suffering closer to what is known as "misery porn", and while they worked in the past for him, in his previous work Biutiful already showed that this formula was wearing out quickly. But he does not abandons them totally, since in Birdman explores the emotional misery of a man looking for a new opportunity to prove he is not finished and so redeem his failures as a father, husband and even as actor and how this search can cost him his sanity, all this with a very corrosive humor. Not coincidentally, Iñárritu has chosen the work of Raymond Carver, since it works as an irony about what love means for each of the characters: for Sam, the lack of it throughout his life; for Mike the love that borders on insane vanity and blinds him to the perception of others towards him and Riggan himself, looking for love in the form of success and lost admiration. At the same time Iñárritu with his co-writers throw a subtle but accurate critique of current Hollywood production system, concerned about over-exploiting movie sub-genres like the superheroes one and make endless franchises for the sole purpose of generating profits and how the same industry relegates and denies opportunities for older actors who are forced in many cases to create their own opportunities in order to stay relevant. On the other hand, it has no mercy with critics and how their work can turn into pure snobbery and some of them forget the sense of objective criticism and move it to the personal level.

Iñarritu has managed to polish his skills as a director and this time assumes a big risk by taking them to the limit, knowing that the result could have been disastrous. However, what he achieves is a hypnotic and captivating work. This with the help of a great technical team led by Oscar winner Emmanuel Lubezki, who continues to surpass himself, editors Stephen Mirrione and Douglas Crise, who executed perfectly the idea that the viewer is watching a long tracking shot and drummer Antonio Sanchez, who created based on jazz rhythms an energetic and disturbing score at the same time.

However, Iñarritu's best ability is the one that shines the most in this movie, and that's the capacity to create empathy with his actors so they can give the best of themselves and achieve unforgettable performances. This skill has been a constant since his film debut Amores perros and in Birdman takes advantage of a virtuoso cast with Naomi Watts, Andrea Riseborough and Amy Ryan in small but juicy roles, Emma Stone as Sam, Edward Norton who find in Mike his best performance in years. But certainly Michael Keaton is the soul, heart and brain of Birdman, at this point is difficult to conceive the film without his extraordinary performance as Riggan with all its nuances, from his emotional vulnerability caused by the fear of failure to his anger caused by his frustration.

This is how Birdman stands as one of the best films of 2014 and confirms Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu as one of the most daring and original voices in current cinema.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Far from all that heaven allows...
4 May 2016
Hartford, Connecticut, 1957. Frank and Cathy Whitaker are what people might name "The American Dream come true": he's a successful salesman, she's a devoted housewife in charge of a perfect house in the suburbs and two lovely children, and committed to the social causes of the time. But this will fall apart when Cathy discovers a shocking truth about Frank, and she finds solace in Raymond, the black gardener, which will make her the center of the town's gossips.

Todd Haynes has declared himself as a great admirer of the highly stylized melodramas made back in the 50's (especially the ones directed by Douglas Sirk: Imitation of Life and All that heaven allows). His third feature Far from heaven is an open homage to these movies, and it's also a compelling approach for younger audiences to an often forgotten genre.

Haynes' splendid screenplays offers a sharp gaze to social troubles that sadly still remain just like in the 50's: sexual preferences treated as a disease and racial discrimination towards black people (let's remember they basically had zero rights at that time). In addition to this, tells a poignant story about forbidden love following the rules of melodrama (a plot that appeals to the heightened emotions of the audience, suffering protagonists (usually heroines) facing tremendous social pressures, threats, repression, fears, etc), escaping its clichés and conventionalities skilfully.

As mentioned, in Far from heaven, Haynes' intention is to accomplish a faithful recreation of the old-fashioned period dramas in which production values become another character of the movie (an essential one). Thus, Haynes' creative team is able to put together a visually-striking gem: from Edward Lachman's exquisite cinematography, Sandy Powell's alluring costumes and Elmer Bernstein (in one of his final works) and his evocative music (it's not an accident the fact that Haynes chose him to score the movie, since he worked in several of those period pieces): all of them are perfectly assembled without overshadowing the final result.

The third element that makes this movie so powerful and compelling is the acting: Haynes trusts in Julianne Moore's tremendous range and she portraits Cathy's tribulations with an affecting honesty (this is one of her top performances, for which she won the Best Actress Award at the Venice Film festival and received an Oscar nomination, among many other awards). Then there's Dennis Quaid, delivering the best performance of his career: as Frank he embraces his confusion and pain brilliantly, and creates empathy for a man whose "sin" to live a lie and hide his true desires. And behind them, there's a firs-rate supporting cast, including Dennis Haysbert as Raymond, the gardener who will comfort Cathy (even though this might cause him some pain) and Patricia Clarkson and Viola Davis in strong turns.

With this movie, Todd Haynes let us know his superb skills as director by taking in a misunderstood genre, infuse it with new life and keeping its essence at the same time.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
45 Years (2015)
9/10
Smoke gets in our eyes...
9 January 2016
There are directors with the rare skill to make movies that don't require big, loud moments to leave a lasting impression in the audiences. Andrew Haigh is one of the best examples of this, and after his critically acclaimed debut Weekend, he's back with 45 years, in which he explores relationships from an engaging point of view: the marriage of two people who've been together for almost half a century.

In the eve of Geoff and Kate's 45th anniversary wedding, he's informed about Katya, his girlfriend who died in an accident in the Swiss Alps: her body has been found. And what seems like a curious anecdote from Geoff's past, slowly will become a painful shadow, poised to threat their happiness.

With this movie, Haigh confirms himself as a storyteller with a great sensibility, able to show a wide range of emotions using few resources. Taking as reference David Constantine short story In Another Country, he constructs with an unusual elegance and delicacy for a director as young as him, an absorbing study about two characters in a tranquil environment, which is about to fracture abruptly, due to an invisible (and yet, very visible) presence, that will uncover secrets and untold truths.

Haigh's mastery in the use of long sequences, close-ups and building pace reminds of Bergman's work (especially in Scenes of a Marriage) and like him, relies upon his actors who must be able to unfold the characters' internal conflicts and reactions in such situations. British legends Charlotte Rampling and Tom Courtenay offer a master class in acting: two supreme performances that depict Kate and Geoff's struggle with the past with a raw honesty and creating and affecting empathy for both. Is Rampling, nevertheless, the one with the bigger emotional burden: Kate's distress grows as Geoff becomes more absent than ever: she knows her husband is chasing a ghost and he's kind of becoming one as well, and her frustration and resentment as she finds out more details about Katya are beautifully displayed by Rampling, especially in two specific scenes with the potential to become iconic moments of modern cinema.

Another element brilliantly used by Haigh is the music, there's no original score, but he makes an exquisite selection of songs that work as emotional accompaniment of Geoff and Kate's predicament (this selection includes among others Leonard Cohen, Dusty Springfield, The Moody Blues and Aaron Neville) and the best example of this is The Platters' Smoke gets in your eyes, which plays in one of the film's most powerful moments.

45 years is one of the best movies of 2015, a smashing affirmation of Andrew Haigh's status as one of the best new filmmakers working nowadays, and a sensational reminder of the talents of Charlotte Rampling and Tom Courtenay.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Wonder Boys (2000)
10/10
Wonder Boys: Bring your brooms because this is a mess!
9 January 2016
Professor Grady Tripp's life is an utter mess: his wife has left him, his lover (who also happens to be the chancellor of the university he works at) is pregnant, his editor is visiting him to verify whether his new novel is complete, he must deal with his two most brilliant students: Hannah Green, who has a huge crush on him and James Leer, a rather somber guy with a great talent for writing. Add to the mix a dead dog, a priceless jacket, a stolen car and a nasty case of writer's block and the result is a recipe for disaster.

The above mentioned plot is perfect for a delirious comedy of errors, but director Curtis Hanson and screenwriter Steve Kloves take Michael Chabon's renowned book Wonder Boys and they achieve an elegant, witty and exhilarating portrait of a man whose life demands to get fixed before things get worse. This made with an admirable balance between comedy and drama that few movies can accomplish.

Some people may claim this is a movie about mid-life crisis, and in some level it is, but it goes beyond that notion and addresses the search of identity in more than one way. Grady, for instance is looking for himself and tries to find out what went wrong and what's gonna happen next. James Leer, a gifted mind rejected by almost everyone will find in Grady the encouragement he might need to come out of his shell. Or Terry Crabtree, Grady's homosexual editor, who's in urgent need of a literary hit in order to stay relevant and keep his job (and he'll be a key element in James' coming of age). In addition to that search, they have to deal with the pressure of not living up the expectations created around them and see how others enjoy the success that possibly has been waiting for them, but they're unable to attain.

Wonder Boys avoids favorably most of clichés seen in movies about writers thanks to Kloves' brilliant approach to Chabon's provocative work, remaining faithful to it, but giving in life on its own way. And Hanson's expert hand makes the movie flow with great pace and timing. But it's safe to say Hanson's best quality (as seen in his previous movie L.A. Confidential) is to push the right buttons with his actors. In this case we have people like Katie Holmes, Frances McDormand and Robert Downey delivering superb work, Tobey Maguire who captures James' vulnerability and sadness in a very unique way. And Michael Douglas in a career-best performance as Grady (superior to his Oscar-winning work in Wall Street and close to his Emmy- winning one in Behind the Candelabra). Is hard to imagine someone else playing a very conflicted and distressed man with such sense of humanity and plenty of irony and humor.

One thing must be clear: Wonder Boys is a comedy, but not in the traditional sense of the word: it's a sophisticated and smart piece about what we really want and need to do in life and how to do it before it's too late.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
And Cuaron's mother too... loved this movie
9 January 2016
Way before sweeping the Oscars with Gravity, and right before being in charge of Harry Potter's third movie, Alfonso Cuarón filmed in Mexico a little road movie that became a sudden hit around the world (and gave him and his brother Carlos an Oscar nomination for the screenplay), cemented his reputation as one of the top filmmakers currently working (and truth be told, his Potter gig wouldn't have happened without this one), and made the lead trio (Gael García Bernal, Diego Luna and Maribel Verdú) international celebrities.

In Y tu mama tambien, Cuarón tells the story of Tenoch and Julio, two best friends, fresh off their high school graduation and looking for summer action after their girlfriends leave for European vacations. After they meet Luisa (the Spanish wife of Tenoch's cousin), they invite her to a trip to the beach (a fictional one) and she declines the offer at first, but when she receives life- changing news, Tenoch and Julio are forced to improvise everything for the journey along with her.

Cuarón goes beyond the typical road movie and offers a luscious portrait of a Mexico marked by overwhelming social contrasts, as seen in Tenoch and Julio's friendship, the former son of a prominent politician with a turbulent past, and the latter, son of a working- class single mother, and also seen in the many places visited by them during their unusual trip (a country filled with poverty and misery, but with a strange vitality and beauty). At the same time, it's a seductive and fervid vision about sexuality, with a verve and naturalness closer to the French Nouvelle Vague, unafraid to question double standards that still prevail when it comes to sex and masculinity, especially in a society like the Mexican one.

A movie of such nature requires the right actors, committed to this fearless task. And Cuarón chose wisely with Luna and Bernal to play Tenoch and Julio, for they've been friends in real life since their days as child actors in Mexican TV and their chemistry is indeed remarkable. But the movie's revelation is Maribel Verdú (already famous in Spain before this movie), who finds in Luisa the perfect opportunity to show her acting skills as a vulnerable woman, ready to leave the pain behind and enjoy life in every way.

One can say Y tu mama tambien is a curious mix of coming of age movie + road tip + raunchy teen comedy, but the result is nothing like any of those. It just happens to be an invigorating creation from a master of storytelling.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Atonement (2007)
9/10
Atonement: When making amends might not be enough
9 January 2016
Briony Tallis has seen something. Something that will change her life forever, but not only hers: Cecilia, her older sister and Robbie Turner (the housemaid's son) will also be dragged into a spiral of lies and regrets that will last for years and decades.

Atonement is Ian McEwan's most famous novel: an intense, heartbreaking story about mistakes, their power to ruin lives and the atonement that might lead or not to forgiveness. Director Joe Wright, after revisiting Jane Austen in Pride and prejudice, goes for another period piece (this time set in pre-WWII England) taking McEwan's novel and the final result is just as provocative and moving as the book, but favored by ravishing costume design (that green dress worn by Keira Knightley is already a fashion icon), Seamus McGarvey's breathtaking cinematography, an incredible art direction and Dario Marianelli's captivating score (for which he won the Oscar). All these elements are perfectly assembled by Wright and help to create a bigger impact in the audience.

Wright relies on the work of Oscar winner Christopher Hampton ad whilst he doesn't derail too much from the original source, he achieves an emotionally compelling adaptation, that keeps most of the moral dilemmas pointed out by McEwan, such as how to make amends (and for how long) for something like Briony did? Or Is truly possible to forgive when the damage is too much? Briony's conflict is a tough one, and even though her action can be perceived as vicious and mean, she's not a bad person and as we can see she tries to fix things in her own way.

To play Briony through the years, Wright casts three actresses: the first is Saoirse Ronan (her Oscar-nominated breakthrough performance) as the young Briony, a girl enthralled by writing and whose imagination leads to the dramatic confusion that will cause Robbie's disgrace. Then comes Romola Garai, the adult Briony, the one who finally understands the consequences of her actions. And finally Vanessa Redgrave as old Briony at the end of her life, ready to end her atonement after living with the guilt all those years. All of them provide Briony's range of emotions with an adroit virtuosity. Also James McAvoy shines as Robbie with an affecting turn, we can feel his pain, frustration and anger, as he's sent to the war field and becomes a witness of the horror caused by it. And Keira Knightley offers a really mature performance as Cecilia.

Atonement is what can be distinguished as a beautiful ache: you know it'll hurt you, but it's inevitable to not watch due to its striking beauty.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Shaun the sheep: Breaking Baaaaaaaa...
28 November 2015
Shaun the sheep quickly became one of the most beloved characters from the Wallace and Gromit world, after his appearance in A close shave, back in 1995. His popularity led to the creation of a very successful TV series, and the transition to the movies was only a matter of time. And the wait was definitely worth it.

In this feature-length adventure, Shaun and the rest of the flock decide to take a break from daily duties and have a good time by sending the Farmer to sleep all day, but things will go out of control when he gets lost and amnesiac in the big city. Then Shaun, the flock and Bitzer (the Farmer's dog) go to the rescue of their owner in a dangerous and unknown place for them.

All the Shaun the sheep characters have always been silent, and it could have been tempting for the directors to give them voices, but in a clever move, they chose not to do it, which allowed them to work brilliantly with slapstick comedy and providing truly hilarious gags using pop culture references such as Breaking Bad, The Silence of the Lambs, The Beatles and some others that movie fans will recognize.

Another advantage of not using dialogue is that through highly expressive characters, the movie is able to deliver thrilling sequences and touching scenes with no need of words (this is the moment to praise Aardman's refined style, since stop-motion is one of the hardest animation techniques to work with, but they've mastered in an extraordinary way), and for younger audiences has a lovely message about friendship, loyalty and dealing with responsibilities.

The Shaun the sheep movie is Aardman's return to form after some weak works and it's great to have them back.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Objects in mirror are sadder than they appear
27 November 2015
Richard Yates' seminal novel Revolutionary Road, published in 1961 has become one of the quintessential books to understand the post-WWII America with all of its virtues (the promise of a better life, the notion of happiness being attainable by achieving economic abundance, the society and communities as emotional anchors), but also its flaws (the shallowness of a society more concerned about economical success, the fear to see beyond and look for a change, the lack of ambitions and dreams or how they get lost in the way in order to seek comfort.

Frank and April Wheeler have a life other people would die for: a beautiful house in the suburbs, two charming children and they're beloved by their neighbors. Together, they're gonna make a plan to escape from this suffocating and lifeless environment. This is how April finds the perfect solution: they'll sell the house and then move to Paris, where they can find their real purpose in life. Things, however, won't be so easy, as Frank starts to have second thoughts about this idea after he gets promoted at his job, and April is not willing to give up her dream, for it represents her salvation from misery.

Director Sam Mendes assumes the challenge to bring Yates' provocative prose to the big screen with a very faithful adaptation (penned by Justin Haythe), that remarkably recalls that feeling of "Hopeless Emptiness" described by Yates, which ends up devouring silently not only Frank and April's mettlesome minds, but also the ones from the people around them (even if they're not fully aware of it).

Thus Mendes develops a subtle, but emotionally powerful work, backed up by admirable production values, such as Roger Deakins' enticing cinematography, Thomas Newman's delicate music and Kristi Zea's eye-catching production design, that perfectly captures the 50's atmosphere without making it obvious nor redundant.

Leonardo DiCaprio and Kate Winslet find not only an excuse for a long-awaited reunion, but also a perfect vehicle to deliver vividly affecting performances as Frank and April Wheeler. Leaving behind the ghosts of Jack and Rose, they succeed by embodying the souls of two lost people trying to find out who they really are and how they drag each other into a spiral of regrets and frustration.

Along with them, there's a superb supporting casting, featuring Kathy Bates as Helen Givings, the real-state agent enthralled by the Wheelers' "immaculate life" and Michael Shannon (in an Oscar-nominated performance) as John (Helen's son), and emotionally disturbed man, who ironically is the only one able to see Frank and April's distress and will become the voice of truth when everything falls apart for them.

Just like Mendes' Oscar-winning debut American Beauty, this movie is a harsh and effective dissection of life in American suburbia, which by the way hasn't changed that much in over half a century.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Frankenweenie (2012)
9/10
Frankenweenie or bringing Tim Burton's mojo back from the dead
6 January 2015
In 1984, when Tim Burton worked for Disney made a short film called Frankenweenie, which tells the story of Victor, a boy who after losing his dog Sparky in an accident decides to bring him back to life in the purest Frankenstein style, without considering the consequences this may cause. This work helps us to understand the basics of Burton's thematic and visual style, which became his trademark over the years: dark worlds with isolated and/or solitary characters faced to the reality of the world that confronts or rejects them.

It is almost 30 years later and a streak of quite irregular films that Burton returns to his roots and decided to resume the story of Frankenweenie to make an animated feature making use of the stop- motion technique, with which he created some of his best works such as the Nightmare Before Christmas and Corpse Bride, and Frankenweenie is no exception, as it represents a return to the best films of Burton.

On this occasion the original story remains intact and makes a bigger emphasis on the impact of the resurrection of Sparky among Victor's friends and as they'll try to emulate the feat with catastrophic results for the small town they live in. Likewise, the relationship between Victor and Elsa, her neighbor and school crush is explored, through which a great reference to The Bride of Frankenstein is made, although it'snot the only one, since along the film there are winks to classic monsters movies from the 30's as the Mummy, Creature from Black Lagoon, Cabinet of Dr. Cagliari and even classic monsters like Godzilla. And the film itself is a homage to this cinema being filmed in black and white and with music in perfect tone by Danny Elfman (Burton's closest collaborator).

An innate quality of Burton is the skill to create endearing characters out of the dark and grotesque and the best example of it is Sparky, a little dog now part of the most adorable creations on the burtonian universe, and that somehow reflects many of elements or themes that have remained constant in most of Burton's filmography: childhood, loneliness, friendship and a strange fixation with death and what happens after this.

Excepting the end that seems to betray the original concept, it is safe to say that Burton needs to do more films like Frankenweenie and much less like Alice in Wonderland.
17 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Brave (2012)
9/10
Prince not required
4 January 2015
The canon of Disney princesses has offered us over the years iconic characters such as Snow White, Cinderella, Ariel and Aurora, which nevertheless suffer a mild "problem": they teach us that happiness depends on a prince who comes to rescue. Times have changed and apparently Disney has begun to understand this, introducing gradually female characters able to see beyond a "And they lived happily ever after."

An example of this is Merida, daughter of kings Fergus and Elinor, who must marry one of the heirs of the kingdoms that are part of the great kingdom of Dubroch in order to preserve the alliances; however there is one small detail: Merida refuses the idea of an arranged marriage, which leads her to confront her mother, who insists on keeping the tradition by educating and preparing Merida to assume her role as Queen in the future (and Merida, of course also opposes to this). The clash between the two is inevitable and in the midst of her despair Merida meets (by chance or fate perhaps?) a witch to which she asks for a spell to make change her mother. The problem is that the spell ends up being too literal and Elinor turns into a bear. With the witch gone, Merida along with her triplets brothers must reverse the spell before Elinor becomes a bear forever.

With characters like Mulan or Giselle from Enchanted, Disney had already begun to give a twist to the stories of princesses, but with Tiana from The Princess and the Frog and now Merida (in collaboration with Pixar) leads to a new stage in which the female central characters look for personal fulfillment instead of finding a man that will provide a happy future. At the same time keeps them away from the "submissive woman" role model seen in the media for decades; in Brave, Merida is a girl with a strong and determined character who enjoys her freedom, and she's willing to take the necessary risks to correct her mistakes.

Another key element for this movie work is the mother/daughter relationship, which is an unexplored factor in previous Disney movies (as most of their characters are orphaned or taken away from their family environment). The constant friction between Merida and Elinor is a reflection of the need for communication between parents and children and how the lack of understanding can force to take wrong decisions.

It has been questioned whether Merida's reluctance to marriage reflects a suggestive comment about her sexual identity, but that's not necessarily part of the central idea of the film, although it is an indication that the audiences begin to look for stories they can feel more identified with. On the technical level, there's nothing to complain about, which is understandable considering the very high visual level that Pixar keeps in all of their movies, and the recreation of the scenarios of medieval Scotland is extraordinary. And last but not least, it's required to highlight the vocal work of Kelly McDonald as Merida, who gives her a unique vitality and energy, Oscar winner Emma Thompson as Queen Elinor, serene, proud and with a strong temper and Billy Connolly as King Fergus. On the other hand, the masterful score courtesy of Patrick Doyle, who makes use of classic Scottish musical instruments and captures the essence of their sound away from the cliché and with a highly emotional charge.

Brave is a clear sign that times change and while Prince Charming can remain as an ideal for many women, in fact he's not so indispensable anymore.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Before Midnight: and they lived happily ever after?
4 September 2014
Warning: Spoilers
It's been nine years after Jesse and Celine met again in Paris. They are now married and have 2 daughters, Ella and Nina. Jesse continues his career as writer alternating with a job as a teacher and Celine faces several dilemmas about her work as an environmentalist. During their summer vacation in Greece, in which Jesse's eldest son (who resides in the United States) joins, what seems to be a respite from the routine of daily life, becomes a test their relationship.

The endearing characters created in 1995 by Richard Linklater for Before Sunrise return to continue discussing life and its ups and downs, but this time away from the aura of idealism and romanticism present in both Sunrise and its sequel Before Sunset, to show what's usually unseen or is reflected superficially in most American productions: what happens in the lives of the protagonists after choosing to be together? And life itself is exactly what happens: marriage, children, work and all the responsibility they carry, and how often dilute the dreams and ambitions of youth and early adulthood.

True to the style of its predecessors, Before Midnight plunges us into the world of Jesse and Celine through their talks, with dialogs loaded in this occasion with uncertainty about the future, much irony and even some regret and frustration for the past and the missed opportunities, as can be seen in the now famous hotel scene, in which a simple comment triggers a wave of complaints and repressed anger that comes to the surface. A moment somewhat uncomfortable to witness for the audience given its enormous realism.

But it is not all tragedy and broken dreams, since the exceptional script by Linklater with Ethan Hawke and Julie Delpy (for which they received an Oscar nomination) has the ability to make us see that despite everything, there's still between Jesse and Celine, but maybe not with the intensity as when they met in Vienna almost 2 decades ago. And that love, like everything else, changes over time, either for good or bad, it can become a great affection or great boredom, all depends on how one learns to handle it.

The success of this trilogy created by Linklater can (and should) also be attributed to Ethan Hawke and Julie Delpy, who over 18 years have grown in the same way as their characters. Needless to say that at this point they own and become Jesse and Celine in such an organic and natural way that sometimes gives the impression of watching a documentary on human relationships instead of a fictional story. Especially in Midnight both deliver the best performances of their careers so far; Hawke retains the same boyish charm as Jesse, but this time exposes his more vulnerable side admirably; Delpy gives Celine more neurosis than usual and while she's a little less sympathetic than in the past, all the anger that has been building for so long is completely understandable.

With Before Midnight, Richard Linklater confirms his status as one of the most invigorating filmmakers of American cinema nowadays, from which we can just wait to see whether Jesse and Celine continue discussing life in a continuation of what might be called one of the most complete film trilogies made in years (and maybe decades).
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Her (2013)
9/10
Her: Love in the time of isolation
4 September 2014
Warning: Spoilers
The solitude, the search for affection and the need to love and be loved has been a constant for humans over time. At the same time, technology has played a primary role in this quest, although ironically it seems that while all these technological advances are more significant, the man becomes more isolated and self-absorbed.

The premise of the latest film by Spike Jonze revolves around the aforementioned approach with a twist that up to 10 or 20 years ago may have been considered as pure science fiction and now may be close to happening: falling in love with an artificial intelligence. Theodore Wombly works by creating messages and love letters to those who need them; Theodore has trouble overcoming the separation from his wife and he does not feel ready to sign the divorce. One day, he gets the most advanced operating system ever created, which is capable of reasoning as a human and have their own identity. This is how this system calls itself Samantha and starts to become Theodore's company and confident, with who shares endless notions about the world and human beings. Both end up falling in love, to the surprise of Theodore's friends.

It's not surprising that Jonze has taken charge of such a bizarre notion considering his previous films (with gems like Being John Malkovich and Adaptation), but it is not surprising that the result is captivating, and his main success lies to he decides to tell a love story instead of a sci-fi one, and is a wonderful meditation on loneliness, emotional isolation (recurrent issues in his previous films) and even about forgiveness and learn to let go (and this is where Charlie Kaufman's influence on Jonze's style can be felt). Some people have highlighted the similarities between this and Lost in Translation by Sofia Coppola (who was actually married to Jonze), and even though both films handle common issues, the focus is what separates and differentiates them from each other.

However, if the relationship between Theodore and Samantha flows and feels natural and believable is largely thanks to the actors who play them. On the one hand we have Joaquin Phoenix, who delivers a very different performance from his usual range, which explores the emotions of a man overwhelmed by the melancholy caused by loneliness and who rediscovers the joy and the ability to love in the least expected way; a nuanced, subtle and heartbreaking work that ranks high among Phoenix's best. And on the other side is Samantha (who was originally played by Samantha Morton), who finds in Scarlett Johansson the perfect voice: a perfect mixture of innocence and sensuality that makes it easy to understand why anyone would fall for her. It would not be far-fetched to believe that in a few years this will join other iconic voice-only performances such as HAL-9000 or Darth Vader. Amy Adams also stands as Theodore's neighbor and best friend and Rooney Mara as his ex-wife.

Likewise, the production values of this film give a special quality: the production design by KK Barrett leads us to a postmodern and futuristic vision (and minimalistic at the same time) of Los Angeles without overshadowing the story development. The dazzling cinematography by Hoyt Van Hoytema that delivers images with a simple but overwhelming beauty and especially the masterful and elegant music created by Arcade Fire becomes the best vehicle for understanding the mood of the main characters, along with The Moon Song co-written by Jonze and Karen O for one of the most emotional scenes in the film.

Thus Jonze delivers a film that he himself has described as his most personal work, and ironically, despite its strange premise is the most touching and human of all.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Weekend (II) (2011)
8/10
A not-so-strange encounter
29 August 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Nowadays, the perception about relationships has changed significantly, due among other things to the changing priorities of life, in which casual encounters that do not involve any kind of attachments (either for lack of time to be in a relationship or even for fear of falling in love) are increasingly common. But what happens when the need to know the other person comes after one of those? What happens when feelings start to make their appearance?

This is the dilemma that faces Russell (Tom Cullen), a British lifeguard with a normal life with no major surprises, but with few close friends (the closest person in his life is his best friend Jamie). One night, on his way back home from Jamie's, he decides to go to a bar and meets Glen (Chris New) with whom ends up spending the night in his apartment. After detailing to Russell how they hooked up and slept together,Glen leaves, but Russell has the desire to keep watching him, which happens, but there is one small detail: Glen must go to the US to take an art course for 2 years.

Within the "genre" of romance movies, there are several examples of casual encounters, such as David Lean's Brief Encounter and more recently Richard Linklater's Before Sunrise. In fact, could be said that the latter is the most influential for Andrew Haigh, who in Weekend gives us a particular point of view about relationships and the reasons that lead us to want or not want to get involved emotionally.

In the case of Glen and Russell is evident that there is an attraction that goes beyond the physical aspect, and as they spend time together, the connection between them is notorious. Thus Haigh, no tricks, no melodrama, through his characters makes interesting reflections on what means to be gay in these times, and how gay men perceive concepts such as happiness, love or loneliness through their experiences and how they are noticed by straight people. Glen has a point of view about life that's slightly different than Russell's: despite being attracted to him, he is reluctant to fall because of a failed relationship and does not believe in marriage or long term commitments. Russell, meanwhile, believes in love and live life without hiding even though he is more reserved and somewhat shy.

With a film language closer to documentary, and a remarkable chemistry between Cullen and New, who are not afraid to take the risk of playing gay, Haigh takes us to be witnesses on how two people who barely know each other share their hopes, fears and cravings, making entirely believable that everything takes place in one weekend. Which in turn, makes harder for the viewer the inevitable moment of the farewell and in the end one can only hope that one day, they will meet again to find out whether it was really love what was flourishing between them.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Attila Marcel (2013)
9/10
Attila Marcel: or find your own voice
29 August 2014
Warning: Spoilers
With only 2 films, Sylvain Chomet has become a reference in the field of animated cinema, due to his unique and original style. His third feature film, Attila Marcel, implies a radical change in his career, being his first live-action movie (although he already experienced in this field in one of the short films from Paris Je t'aime), however, his style and quirks permeate along it.

Paul, a mute pianist since he was 2 years old because he witnessed the death of his parents, lives under the care of his aunts, a pair of single women who own a small dance school, and prepare him to compete in talent competitions. One day, by chance he meets Madame Proust, his downstairs neighbor, who runs a secret herbal business; intrigued by Paul's life circumstances, Mme. Proust decides to help him (via a mysterious herbal tea) to dig into their memories and traumas, in order to make him recover his voice.

A recurrent theme in Chomet's short but substantial filmography is loneliness, this primarily through the orphanhood, and the need for bonds of affection that drive the protagonists to overcome adversity; in this case, Paul seems to find in Mme. Proust an outlet to a cold and mundane existence along with his aunts and takes him on an inner journey of self-rediscovery. This without falling into sentimentality or cheap sappiness, but with a very emotional forcefulness and a quirky sense of humor, which is Chomet's trademark, evident since his first short film (The Old lady and the pigeons) and exploited to the fullest in The Triplets of Belleville.

The music is one of the aspects that Chomet has taken the best advantage of, to the extent that it becomes a prominent character of the story, as also happens in this movie; the piano plays a crucial role in the life of Paul, since it is the only mean of expression available for him before he meets Mme. Proust, who is curiously fond of the ukulele. In turn, some of the memories of Paul are manifested through curious and delirious musical numbers, which help Paul to find out a little more about the relationship between his parents before they died (and by the way, Chomet confirms his skill to create vigorous music and full of eccentric joy or a beautiful melancholy).

However, what distinguishes Chomet from the rest is his great ability to tell stories without using words, or using a minimum amount, such as in Belleville or The Illusionist. And while Attila Marcel is not a silent film, the lead character is, and in many cases is difficult to achieve a balance that does not distract the viewer to notice the lack of dialogue (that means to make the viewer attracted to the story from the very start of the movie), which Chomet achieves effortlessly. This is where is necessary to highlight the performance of Guillaume Gouix as Paul, as he manages to create an almost instant empathy using a face and a look worthy of the golden age of silent films. Also Anne Le Ny deserves mention as Mme Proust, who provides a perfect counterbalance to Paul, being the opposite of him: outgoing, outspoken, not afraid to speak his mind, but as lonely as Paul and with her own emotional issues to deal with.

In sum, Attila Marcel shows that the transition of animation directors to real action does not always equate to disastrous results, and is a somewhat modest but charming and stylish film exercise.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
If you're looking for wildly original animation then this movie is for you
30 April 2012
Warning: Spoilers
In recent years there has been a boom (mostly thanks to globalization) in the release of foreign animated films outside the common market (i.e. Disney, Dreamworks, Japanese anime), mainly European emerging as alternatives for those seeking animation not made for kids. Within this wave comes the french movie The Triplets of Belleville, one of the most original animated films ever made (in the opinion of this writer, of course).

Directed by Sylvain Chomet tells the story of Madame Souza who is in charge of raising her grandson Champion after being orphaned. In search of something that makes him happy, she discovers that Champion's true vocation is cycling and after years of hard training is ready to compete in the famous Tour de France. But in the middle of the competition he is kidnapped by a mafia that uses cyclists for clandestine races and they're killed if they lose. Thus, Madame Souza begins the rescue of her grandson in the bizarre town of Belleville with the help of the triplets of Belleville, famous stars of music hall in the 20's.

This is how Chomet creates an amazing story full of absurdities and nonsensical situations that works wonderfully and without the need of dialogues, creates absolute empathy to characters that appear to be designed to cause annoyance. A very curious element is Chomet's decision to portray Belleville (an obvious reference to New York) as a city full of morbidly obese people. Although this is meant as a critique of Western society where consumption makes people apathetic and uninterested in themselves.

Moreover, the music plays an important role in this film, without being a musical in the strict sense of the word has incredibly vivid and infectious musical moments, like the opening scene, which recalls the glory years of the triplets and in the making small appearances of legends like Django Reinhardt, Josephine Baker and Fred Astaire, in addition the soundtrack composed by Benoit Charest adds a feeling of nostalgia.

In short, The Triplets of Belleville is the perfect example of an animated film that breaks all established and refreshes the genre in an unexpected way.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Titanic (1997)
10/10
A misjudged masterpiece
30 April 2012
When Titanic was released for the first time back in 1997 it became a cultural phenomenon: for 12 years it was the highest grossing film in history, winner of 11 Academy Awards, turned Leonardo DiCaprio and Kate Winslet into huge movie stars and made My heart will go on sung by Celine Dion a romantic anthem.

However, with the passing of the years being a fan of Titanic became the equivalent of having bad taste and poor judgment in films. I personally disagree with this highly subjective assessment, since Titanic is the best example of how to make a sweeping epic like those that used to be made in Hollywood's golden age.

Thus, James Cameron uses the tragic sinking of the ship that "not even God could sink" to tell the already iconic love story between Rose DeWitt Bukater, the American girl betrothed to a steel tycoon whom does not love and Jack Dawson, the aspiring artist who has traveled the world in search of his identity becomes a desperate struggle to survive once the ship hits an iceberg and is destined to sink. This aspect of the movie has always been criticized, as Cameron chooses to tell a fictional story instead of focusing on one of the many true stories of the passengers; this is a risky decision that pays off due to Cameron's ability to associate reality and fiction respecting the historical perspective, the chemistry between DiCaprio and Winslet and the unexpected sensitivity with which Cameron tells a love story (something unusual for him, given his previous experience in science fiction movies), it could even be said that without Jack and Rose the film wouldn't have had the same impact and success.

This does not diminish at all the impressive historical recreation not only of the Titanic (for which an almost exact replica of the original boat had to build), but the period in general, and this is not limited to costumes and scenery, but also in the notes on the differences between social classes existing in the early twentieth century and decadence disguised as opulence, which unfortunately have not changed much today.

The sinking of the Titanic has been told numerous times in film and on TV, but James Cameron's version has become the obligatory reference, not only for the reasons already mentioned, but also for the incredible realism and technical accuracy this is portrayed achieving really shocking moments and scenes of high emotional impact that are not quite successful on other versions and that make us partakers of such tragedy as if we were watching it live. This is due to the use Cameron makes of digital technology without being overwhelmed by it, since he understands that digital effects must serve the story and not vice versa.

Special mention to the brief but poignant appearance of Gloria Stuart as old Rose, who serves as the narrator of the story, and gives consistency to the story as well gives it humanity and warmth.

Titanic has not only withstood the test of time but also the unflattering trials of those who call themselves connoisseurs of good cinema and remains one of the greatest epic films ever made.
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Beginners (2010)
9/10
Love for beginners (not for dummies)
29 March 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Cinema has always been nourished by stories from real life that may seem unlikely at first, but if they are told honestly and free of pretension not only are credible, but also become endearing. This is the case of director Mike Mills, who in Beginners portrays the relationship with his father, who in the last years of his life decided to embrace his homosexuality.

Under this context, Mills and his father are played on screen by Ewan McGregor and Christopher Plummer, and build one of the most poignant father/son relationships in recent years. The year is 2003 and Oliver (McGregor) after losing her mother to cancer, receives the news that his father Hal (Plummer) who is 75 years old has decided to come out of the closet and live to the fullest along with his boyfriend Andy. However, another event will impact their lives forever: Hal suffers from a cancer that cannot be treated. This is how Oliver begins to question his own life and decisions about love, which leads him to meet Anna (played by Mélanie Laurent), a French actress with whom he starts a relationship, but Oliver's real challenge will be overcoming his fear of failure.

With a story of this nature the result could have become a parade of clichés and caricatures, but thanks to Mills' expertise and his personal experience with the subject, it does not happen, and making use of a highly original narrative endows his characters with humanity and puts them in situations that make them vulnerable to others, to themselves and to the future that awaits for them, without reaching levels of shameless emotional manipulation.

Another success in Mills's decisions is the choice of the cast, as each role requires an actor to understand and capture the internal conflicts of their characters and serve to them. And they all do a marvelous work: Ewan McGregor finds in Oliver a perfect mechanism to portray the melancholy and loneliness of a man who has become incapable of sustaining a serious relationship for fear of repeating the same pattern of his parents. Mélanie Laurent after working for Tarantino delivers a nuanced performance as a woman who, like Oliver has trouble finding love. It is however, Christopher Plummer, the most pleasant surprise,since he injects Hal an energy and vitality rarely seen in an actor of his age,and he's incredibly devastating in the moments of great emotional impact of the history. Needless to say that the Oscar Mr. Plummer won for this film is more than deserved. Special mention to Arthur, the dog of Hal and Oliver, because unlike other animals in movies, is not a gratuitous presence made to win the sympathy of the audience, as he plays an important role in the story and gives a special charm the dynamics of the film. Mary Page Keller also stands out in a brief but significant role as Oliver's mother when he was a child, as she lets us see a bit of frustration and self-deception when there are problems in a couple that are to be ignored (in this case Hal's sexuality).

Beginners is a peculiar but charming love letter to Mike Mills' family in which the message is: in matters of love we always are beginners regardless of how young or old we are. And it is never too late to love.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Artist (I) (2011)
9/10
The Artist... or go back to the basics
28 March 2012
Warning: Spoilers
It's kind of ironic that in 21st. century in which the movie industry has saturated the cinema with technologies such as 3D and complex visual effects, a silent, black and white movie happens to be the one that won the Oscar for best picture in 2011. Many think that complies with the criteria and the age of most members of the Academy and although The Artist indeed appeals to nostalgia is an Oscar-worthy work.

Reminiscent of classics like A star is born and Singin' in the rain, The Artist goes back to 1927, when George Valentin (Jean Dujardin) is one of the most important stars of silent films and nothing seems to stop his splendor. On the other hand Peppy Miller (Berenice Bejo) is an aspiring young actress who, thanks to a series of coincidences starts a film career with the support of George. However, the situation of both will give a 360 ° turn with the advent of talkies, as the rejection of George to make talkies seems to condemn him into oblivion, while Peppy becomes a star. As if this were not enough, the financial crisis of 1929 hits George's interests severely, although Peppy will try to help him in one way or another.

Although there have been approaches to storytelling without using dialogs in recent years (eg WALL*E or The Triplets of Belleville), no one had taken the risk of shooting a film in the same way they were made in the early years of cinema. The credit belongs to french director Michel Hazanavicius who takes such a risk by telling a story that has been told more than once in a risky format with the possibility of feeling outdated for the new generations, but the result is extremely fresh and charming. Although much of the charm (and the success of the film) has a name: Jean Dujardin: an actor with an overwhelming charisma who surpasses the challenge of conveying all the emotions being experienced by George without saying a single word (not in vain his performance earned him an Oscar). Along him Berenice Bejo also delivers a remarkable performance and devoid of artifice in which both could easily have fallen, plus their on-screen chemistry is remarkable and possibly the impact of the film with other actors would have been different.

A noteworthy aspect is the recreation of the decade of the 20's and early 30's, including the Oscar-winning music written by Ludovic Bource, which contributes to creating the atmosphere that the film aims to create by sticking to the way music was added to silent films.

However, the only "but" to this movie is Uggie, George's faithful pet and if it is a crucial part in history, feels like a forced element to cause empathy in the audience and looks too trained and that takes away spontaneity.

In short, the artist turns out to be a return to an extinct type of film that is both innovative and endearing and works as a perfect way to bring silent movies to new generations.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Shame (2011)
9/10
It's not about sex, it's about shame
28 March 2012
Brandon's life is almost perfect: a steady job, a nice apartment, good friends and women adore him. But something prevents Brandon from having a relationship that lasts more than four months, this incapacity is due to the fact that Brandon is a sex addict: to casual encounters with strangers and prostitutes, to pornography (both during and after working hours), to masturbation. And to some extent he seems to have his addiction under control, until her sister Sissy arrives unexpectedly looking for a place to live for a while.

British director Steve McQueen delivers a fascinating character study that explores how modern life (in which new technologies play a major role), increasingly isolates people and makes them unable to establish emotional bonds with others. In Brandon's case, a hunter in search of pleasure and not love, the arrival of his sister will turn him into a prey of his own emotions and will make him face his reality.

One aspect that has caused controversy is the way so raw and explicit to show Brandon's sexual encounters, however this becomes a necessary element, since it is through them that you can see Brandon's need and desperation as Sissy is more involved in his life. Special mention deserves the dynamics established between them, since it is fully nuanced and can even be uncomfortable to witness but is devastatingly emotional (especially in the last minutes of the story).

However, the most important element for the success of the film lies in the performances: in the hands of less committed actors Brandon and Sissy's conflicts would be unconvincing, but McQueen wisely chooses Michael Fassbender (both had previously worked together on Hunger), who literally bares body and soul to take Brandon's emotions to the limit and does it so impressively in a brave and courageous performance (and unfortunately the Academy possibly considered too intense for consideration in their nominations). Meanwhile Carey Mulligan proves to be one of the young actresses with the best prospects and acting range nowadays: her rendition of the classic song New York, New York is an utter delight as well is one of the best scenes in the film.

Shame, in the end (as in most character studies) does not seek to create empathy for the characters, but rather wants us to reflect and ask ourselves how we would react in similar situations.
220 out of 267 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
WALL·E (2008)
10/10
WALL*E: a love story not only for robots
9 May 2011
Pixar has raised the modern animation to new highs in the last decade with hits like Toy Story (and its amazing sequels), Monsters inc., Finding Nemo and Ratatouille, among others, that can be considered now as animated classics.

However, their success lies not only in achieving first-class entertainment with some of the most advanced technology in order to achieve the most outstanding animation, but also in telling stories that adults can relate to easily (like parenthood, childhood fears or the pains of becoming adult): in other words, animation stops being seen as entertainment for children WALL*E, a curious story that goes from science fiction to romantic comedy as it used to be done in the silent era of cinema (and whose biggest influence is Chaplin) is one of Pixar's most remarkable achievements so far.

The year is 2116 and the earth has been abandoned by humanity as a result of excessive levels of pollution. The powerful company Buy N Large (which is given to understand is the one that rules the Earth at that time) has a cleaning program with thousands of robots programmed to collect debris. This program failed and only one robot remains standing after 700 years. This little robot called WALL*E (Waste Allocation Load Lifter Earth) develops a great sense of curiosity for the material things humans ever enjoyed on earth. However, one day he meets EVE, a mysterious search unit sent by the human for which WALL*E develops an attraction that will take them even to the very space and it decide the destiny of the human race.

Thus, it unfolds a very captivating and genuine love story that in the wrong hands could have been absolutely ridiculous or misplaced, but thanks to the ability of Andrew Stanton (the director of the movie) and his team the audience creates a total empathy for WALL*E and his curiosity to know more about the world (and EVE, of course).

In addition, the environmental reading that gives the film fits perfectly for this times when is required to create environmental awareness. A message that children and adults can perfectly understand.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Deconstructing Edith Piaf
25 April 2011
This is the story of Edith Piaf, icon and legend of the French music who immortalized many songs including the famous song La Vie en Rose. However, Piaf's life was a life full of tragedy, loss and excesses that eventually consumed her when she was only 48 years old.

This is how the French director Olivier Dahan takes us into the world of Piaf from its origins in the slums of Paris, her rise to fame under the nickname of "Little Sparrow" and her debacle due to illness and addictions. All this under the optics of the biopic but with a very unconventional twist having a non-linear structure, which gives the movie a different dynamic (although this might be confusing for some viewers).

However, the real driving force and soul of the film is Marion Cotillard's monumental Oscar-winning performance, who unlike other performances based on real characters, it transcends the mere act of imitation and becomes Edith Piaf delivering the portrait of a woman who despite her physical and personal tragedies became the inspiration for thousands of people through her voice and singing. And by the way she gives us one of the most spectacular and powerful performances in recent years.

In addition, the extraordinary work of characterization (especially in the last years of life of Piaf) and the production values ​​(art direction, costume design, the use of Piaf's songs) give more credibility to the magnificent incarnation (or reincarnation?) of Edith Piaf in a film that easily could become another lifeless biopic
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hairspray (2007)
10/10
Welcome to the 60's (or how a remake can actually work)
25 April 2011
Warning: Spoilers
In 1988, the cult director John Waters made a musical-type approach to his childhood in Baltimore that resulted in the film Hairspray, which in turn resulted in a successful Broadway musical a couple of years ago.

As expected in the wake of the recent spate of film adaptations of stage musicals, the adaptation/remake of Hairspray was expected and unlike earlier tries that gave extremely poor results (Rent, The Producers, The Phantom of the Opera) Hairspray works and exceeds the expectations of seeing a musical at the height and claiming the genre after several setbacks.

The story revolves around Tracy Turnbland (the wonderful Nikki Blonsky), who despite living with overweight dreams to join the group of dancers from the Corny Collins Show, and when the opportunity to audition comes, she must make aside the prejudices of his overprotective mother (played by a brilliant John Travolta) and the channel manager Velma Von Tussle (Michelle Pfeiffer), who above all seeks to privilege her daughter Amber. On her way, Tracy will find out not only the prejudices towards overweight people but also the racial prejudices prevalent at the time, and she will find love personified by Link Larkin (Zac Efron), the star dancer of the show.

Thus, the director Adam Shankman takes us to an era in which a teenager's dream translated into dance and being part of the latest fashion through costumes and retro art direction that really makes you feel you're watching the 60's, great choreography,the performances of a sensational cast in that absolutely no one is out of place (and by my surprise, in which they all sing and do it very well) and a catchy soundtrack and full of energy and an honest reflection on racial discrimination (which in fact works better than some "Pseudo-adult-manifests-on-racism" like Crash)

Without doubt, Hairspray is a major surprise in every way: a big and great musical with big songs and a big ensemble cast.In other words, is big as its protagonist.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Hours (2002)
10/10
You can't find peace by avoiding life
26 April 2010
Warning: Spoilers
All the decisions we make in life have consequences, no matter how small or big they are. And they will affect people around us, positively or negatively. But what kind of decision can you make when your life is not what you expected or when you lose your way and become somebody completely unhappy? Will you risk everything including your family's happiness in order to achieve your own? Or can you be able to live a lie and leave behind your dreams and hopes to satisfy others?

In 1998, a writer named Michael Cunningham wrote The Hours, a novel that tries to answer some of the answers previously made through the perspective of 3 different women: famous writer Virginia Woolf in the process of writing one of her most famous works: Mrs. Dalloway; Laura Brown, a depressed woman in post-war Los Angeles in the 1950's and Clarissa Vaughan, an editor from New York in present time, who's planning a party for her friend Richard, who's dying because of AIDS. Cunningham shows how these 3 women, with no apparent relation must decide what to do with their lives in one day. Woolf's mental instability is damaging her relationship with Leonard, her husband. Laura is married to a man who doesn't love and she's expecting her second child and Clarissa is living with Sally her lover, but she practically lives for Richard.

The novel became an instant hit and even won the Pullitzer prize. With this background, the movie adaptation was a matter of time. That's how Stephen Daldry, director of the acclaimed independent movie Billy Elliot along with screenwriter David Hare bring to the big screen this story about living in order to find peace, which was a big challenge considering the novel is so rich in elements that many people actually considered impossible to integrate in a movie due to its complex psychological and introspective charge. Fortunately both, Daldry and Hare accomplish to avoid sentimentalism and melodrama to create a very haunting meditation of life and death.

The biggest achievement of the movie, nevertheless, lies in the acting: all the cast members give superb performances and the 3 leading women are simply sublime: Meryl Streep as Clarissa, the confused woman who refuses to leave behind the man who she loved once. The always marvelous Julianne Moore as Laura, the desperate woman looking for herself before it's too late and Nicole Kidman in her Oscar-winning performance as the unstable Woolf. They give their characters a very melancholic depth that's quite rare to find in movies nowadays. The supporting cast is also remarkable: from Ed Harris as Richard, Miranda Richardson, Toni Collette, John C. Reilly, Allison Janney and Jack Rovello as Richie, Laura's son.

Many people might claim this movie is the very essence of a depressing movie, but that's not the point of it:if this movie tries to tells us something it's a simple thing: don't be afraid of living your life as long as you're happy with it and don't hurt other people in the way of finding your happiness.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Love is the greatest inspiration
20 April 2010
Warning: Spoilers
What inspired William Shakespeare to create his most famous work: Romeo and Juliet? Probably we'll never know with complete certainty. Through years, people have imagined what was the creative process behind it and one of the most intriguing ideas is what if Shakespeare had a muse that helped him to write the most famous and tragic love story ever told. Based on this premise, screenwriter Marc Norman and the acclaimed playwright Tom Stoppard play a little with historical facts to give us their own version of the story behind Romeo and Juliet.

London, 1593. Young Shakespeare is suffering a severe case of writer's block and he can't write anything. These are bad news for Phillip Henslowe, owner of The Rose (one of the most important playhouses of London at that time), who's in desperate need of a new play in order to pay his debts. In other part of the city, Lady Viola De Lesseps, daughter of a rich merchant is eager to be part of an acting company, even though women were not allowed to be on stage and let alone become actors. What they don't know is that destiny has a surprise for both of them: she will become his muse and will end up inspiring him to write again and he gives her a long-awaited opportunity by being part of the new play (although cheating a little since she has to dress herself as a man). But things won't be so easy for Viola, because she has been promised in marriage to Lord Wessex and she'll have to leave Will.

The screenplay offers us a completely different and fresh approach to Shakespeare and the Elizabethan period by choosing to explore a very risky field: the romantic comedy and the result could have been horrifying. Fortunately that never happens and instead we get a wonderfully charming and clever meditation about love as the greatest inspiration we'll ever find in life.

Also the acting is a pretty important element for the movie's success: all the actors deliver delightful performances, from Geoffrey Rush as Henslowe, Judi Dench (Oscar winner for this performance) as a complete scene-stealer Queen Elizabeth, Joseph Fiennes who gives Shakespeare a charisma that make people wonder if the real Shakespeare could have had and Gwyneth Paltrow, in her Oscar-winning performance as Viola, who assumes the risk of playing not one, but four characters and makes it in a wonderful way.

The production values, such as Sandy Powell's magnificent costume design, Stephen Warbeck's beautiful score also give the movie the necessary credibility and immerse the audience into a possibly not 100% historically accurate, but undeniably fantastic experience that makes us believe inspiration is possible to find.
9 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Moulin Rouge! (2001)
10/10
Love is a many-splendored thing... this movie too
12 April 2010
Christian is a young poet who arrives to Paris in 1899, the summer of love to be part of the bohemian revolution that's happening. With some luck and the help from a group of bohemians that includes Toulouse-Lautrec he ends up being the main writer of the most ambitious show that's about to be presented in the Moulin Rouge (the most famous night club of its time). What he doesn't know is that he would find true love personified in Satine, the star courtesan and aspiring actress.

However, things won't be easy once Christian and Satine are together: a jealous Duke who wants Satine only for him (who also happens to be the main investor in the show), Harold Zidler's refusal to the relationship (mostly because of the fear of losing the Duke's sponsorship) and a fatal disease condemn their destiny as lovers.

The plot described above easily sounds taken from any conventional romance novel and could have been an average period piece. In Baz Luhrmann's particular vision it becomes a completely bizarre and indescribable experience. Why? Luhrmann takes the risk of using a forgotten movie genre: the musical and with some of the most emblematic pop songs of the 90's creates what he calls a "real artificiality" in which anything is possible. Or where else is possible to witness a very unusual rendition of Like a virgin sung by Jim Broadbent? or Ewan Mcgregor singing' Elton John's Your Song? Another risk Lhurmann takes is hiring actors that aren't exactly known for being gifted singers. Nonetheless the risk works and Nicole Kidman, Ewan McGregor, Jim Broadbent and the rest of the cast prove to have stunning voices. In addition to that, they also deliver powerful performances that reach a very wide field of emotions, from the most absolute absurd to the most heartbreaking tragedy being completely believable.

A very important element for Luhrmann's vision to be complete is the recreation of the 1899 Paris. Luhrmann and his team decide not to do a carbon copy of the Moulin Rouge and its elements and instead they create a whole new Moulin Rouge based on how new audiences would imagine it if it had been existed in this time. Also the costume design has an important role here, every gown and dress has own life and differentiates this movie from others.

Also the choreography of the musical numbers are completely breathtaking and remind us every moment we're not watching a typical musical movie. And that's Luhrmann's main intention: to create a completely different movie that becomes an experience for the audiences. Many people won't agree with this point of view, but those who agree are grateful for a many-splendored thing like Moulin Rouge!
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed