Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Failed Sci-Fi plot filled with drama
26 October 2006
This movie is way over-rated (7.1/10 as of this writing). I read several reviews hailing this a out-of-the-ordinary science fiction movie, without involving green aliens, laser blasts, space ships, etc. Well, despite doing away with all the usual sci-fi clichés of Hollywood, its plot has way too many gaping holes.

For one thing, it intends to emphasize the atmosphere of solitude experienced by the main characters, especially by Zac, and to achieve this it relies on the severely mistaken notion that the world can come to a stand-still when 99.999999% of the human population simply vanishes. Anybody ever read Stephen King's "The Stand"? Or seen the depiction of post-apocalyptic chaos in TV series like "Babylon 5"? When people vanish, ovens don't turn themselves off, cars don't come to orderly halt, nuclear power plants don't just shut down gracefully. Huge fires would burn up the cities, most roads would be blocked by massive accidents and pile-ups, all food would rot; in short, all hell should break loose. And yet, in "The quiet Earth", the characters seem to have no trouble driving around town, picking up groceries and hardware supplies, and use electronic devices anywhere anytime they feel inclined to.

Some may argue that story is based on the premise that these characters were "transported" to a parallel universe, where the normal laws of physics don't apply. Well, if that is the case, it is just too convenient to twist the Universe to provide for the needs of three human beings at every twist and turn, and the film makes no substantiable effort in showing how this parallel universe is different from ours, except for a few vague hints here and there about how the "charge of the electron is now different", etc.

The only redeeming quality of this film is its study into the human psyche, in portraying the effects of isolation and boredom on individuals. Even then, this is based on the hypothetical premise that these individuals have all their physical needs met, and only have to contend with the fact that they have no sense of purpose, and no good idea of what had happened to their world. Api got introduced into the story line way too late, and his interactions and relationship with the other two characters had to be developed in such a hurry that the behavior of these characters became far too irrational in the second-half of the movie. Then add a pointless sex scene, and we find ourselves gravitating back towards Hollywood clichés, for lack of a better way to make the ending interesting.

As for the final scene, the scenery was beautiful, but they just had to strike another chop to the already dead credibility of this movie. Couldn't they at least get one thing right, i.e. show Zac freezing to death on the surface of Titan, the only moon of Saturn with a sea... of liquid methane?

My score: 4 out of 10, and I'm being generous!
11 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Unconscionable spoiler of "The sixth sense"
20 May 2005
Warning: Spoilers
*****No spoilers yet, safe to read until warning below.*****

I hate the makers of this movie, and I will never forgive them. EVER. "50 first dates" as a movie per se was not too bad of a Hollywood romantic drama, sprinkled with a few comedy snippets. As such, I would have rated it 7.5 out of 10; it has plenty of entertainment value, and an adequate amount of originality to its storyline.

The big problem for me came approximately 31 minutes into the movie. Let me say this before I begin with the spoiler: if you have not seen the movie "The sixth sense", directed by M. Night Shyamalan, starring Bruce Willis and Haley Joel Osment, heed my warning: DO NOT WATCH "50 FIRST DATES" BEFORE YOU WATCH "THE SIXTH SENSE". Why? I'll explain immediately below.

*****Begin spoiler for "50 first dates"*****

31 minutes into this movie, it shows how Lucy (Drew Barrymore) relives her last day before the accident in every detail, while her brother and father set up and clean up after the activities of that day, over and over. One of the activities is to watch a videotape of "The sixth sense". It is a time honored tradition for movie studios to include footage of earlier productions, especially if we are talking about movies that have become classics. In this sense, there is nothing wrong with "50 first dates" showing a few scenes from the opening scenes of "The sixth sense". In fact, showing how Lucy becomes frightened watching TV, while her relatives react in a sad deja-vu manner, is an effective way of depicting how the repetition of this day's activities is taking a toll on them (the relatives).

What follows next however, is totally disgusting, unconscionable and uncalled for: upon finishing their videotape, Lucy blurts out the surprise ending of "The sixth sense", with no warning and no useful effect on the plot of "50 first dates". This is called spoiling another film in the worst possible manner!!! I cannot express in words my disgust at this blatant act of chauvinism, as if the script were saying "You should have seen that movie by now; if not, you're screwed".

I am of the opinion that "The sixth sense" was a far superior movie than "50 first dates". (The number of awards nominated for and won by the former supports my opinion.) I point out as matter of fact that neither film has ANYTHING to do with each other. The question that begs to be answered is then, what business did the writers of "50 first dates" have in revealing the ending of "The sixth sense"? WHAT THE F*** WERE THEY THINKING?!?!

*****Begin spoiler for "The sixth sense"***** It turns out that I bought "The sixth sense" two-DVD set in a nice collector's edition box. As I watched it, I noticed too readily how the character played by Bruce Willis, a child psychologist, never spoke or confronted any person other than the boy played by H. J. Osment. He was never shown to be hired by the boy's mother. He never exchanged a word with his estranged wife. His actions were never shown to have an interactive effect with any other character of the movie. All these subtle details were carefully and meticulously filmed by director Shyamalan, but were intended to be reflected upon only after the viewer reached the final twist of this beautiful movie. For me, it was an agonizing torture to savor the tastelessness of each such detail, knowing all too well the ending that resonated in my head.

So, who in the cast and crew of "50 first dates" is responsible for this atrocity? Drew Barrymore, for speaking the unspeakable? Director Peter Segal, for forcing the words into Ms. Barrymore's mouth? Writer George Wing, for the incontinence and flatulence of his pen? Ms. Nancy Karlin, script supervisor, for neglecting to wipe the droppings of the writer? Whoever was responsible for this atrocity, he or she earned my scorn for eternity.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed