Reviews

5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Tenet (2020)
9/10
Isaac Asimov vibes
19 September 2020
Tenet was just brilliant. It was the perfect movie to go back to the cinemas with. It's a very high concept sci-fi spy story that involves crazy time physics, but I won't give anything away. Just know that going in, you will need to pay attention to every word to follow along and even then you might get lost a few times. There was a good 45 minutes I had absolutely no idea what was happening but I came back around to it. It's definitely a "see more than once" kind of movie.

I absolutely loved it though. I feel like Christopher Nolan just became the Isaac Asimov of the film world. I get a certain feel from Asimov novels that I've never felt anywhere else until now. If you're a sci-fi fan this is highly recommend. It's the same sort of high concept, hard sci-fi that I love Asimov's novels for, albeit with faster pace and more punching.

There were great action scenes, great moments of tension, some humour here and there. Extraordinary special effects and cinematography that coellesced into some of the most unique movie scenes ever. It's very well paced too, two and a half hours and it flew by. Every scene was important and nothing bogged it down at all.

Brilliant score, this is one of the first times in a long time that Nolan hired a different composer from Hans Zimmer, Ludwig Goransson who did a brilliant, synth heavy score that I hope to find on vinyl. It really elevated the movie in numerous ways.

Acting was brilliant, John David Washington is new to me but I'd love to see him in more films. Robert Pattinson and Elizabeth Debicki were great as well, and it was a nice surprise to see Aaron Taylor Johnson toward the end. I've seen some criticisms that the characters aren't well developed and that is true, they're very bare bones characters. But I feel like in a weird way the movie would have been bogged down if there was a bunch of backstory for everyone. In fact with it being a sort of spy film, knowing more about the characters may have ruined some intrigue and mystery. It's a unique tale and I didn't mind just being thrown in with these people along for the very crazy ride.

Another criticism I've seen is one I actually do agree with; the sound mixing was odd and there were moments the music or background sound made it hard to hear the dialogue. I'm not sure why it was mixed that way but when you already had to pay attention really close to the plot, that added another layer of unecessary confusion.

I had a great time, I think this will become a classic in time, I really do. I cannot wait to watch it again. I'm going to get the 4K and rewatch and rewatch and analyze it.

If you feel ready to go back to theatres, this is the one to see.
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Star Trek: Lower Decks: Moist Vessel (2020)
Season 1, Episode 4
5/10
A spiritual ascension in Star Trek?
29 August 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I don't think this episode was horrible overall and the show seems to be improving in minor ways, but one thing in this episode bothered me a lot and I don't see it being talked about much yet. Star Trek, and most sci-fi shows in general, never touch the supernatural. If anything seems like a ghost or spirit, they unravel a scientific explanation by the end of it. So in this show they have a guy trying to reach spiritual enlightenment through meditation and centering himself, which is fine. Though Roddenberry showed little to no religion in Starfleet, other shows did eventually show that some were still being practiced, such as Chakotay's native spirituality beliefs. But they never showed one way or another anything of the sort being real or proven. Well in this episode a character literally becomes one with the universe, has a spiritual encounter with some sort of Owl God, and dematerializes. It's never questioned. It's never investigated. It's just accepted as a thing that can happen. On a Starfleet ship in a Star Trek show. I'm truly baffled what the writers were trying to do here or how it got approved. If they had shown it in a dream-like way where the character believes he experienced it but can't prove it, that'd be fine. But he had a witness and several people attending an earlier ceremony where he first attempted it. They just broke an established Star Trek rule that had only been tested once before in a controversial Voyager episode that was dirided for not scientifically explaining a potentially spiritual encounter. But the keyword there was potentially. For that reason I have to give this episode a lower rating.

Edit: Another reviewer retorded this saying that the Q are quite God like and the Pa Wraiths and Bajoran Gods are supernatural, but at the end of the day they are still explained as aliens, just on a much higher level of evolution than humans, so that doesn't quite track. The closest Trek gets to being supernatural is the Vulcan Katra. I will admit to that, it's never been fully explained in a scientific manner. But I still think something that was created initially as a reason to bring Spock back is much less weird and crazy than the spiritual ascension that took place in this episode. And it still never gets investigated or questioned, I think that's the part that bothers me most.
2 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Star Trek: Lower Decks: Second Contact (2020)
Season 1, Episode 1
4/10
Is this a new low for Star Trek?
7 August 2020
Warning: Spoilers
This is rough. They're definitely trying too hard and the humour is very forced. There's a whole ton of things that don't even make sense if they want us to consider this canon, especially the behaviour of some of these lower decks recruits. One drinks on the clock and swings around a batleth and somehow doesn't get immediately fired. (They later reveal that the captain is looking for reasons to fire her too, how was that not it right there?) A cyborg and a trill go on a first date and start to click when a zombie plague breaks out around them, and they barely acknowledge it's happening while they continue talking to each other. Like people literally get eaten beside them while they ignore it and keep talking like the date is more important than the lives around them. That's colder than some of the most ruthless villains in Trek history, but we're supposed to laugh it off and like these guys? Who wrote that?

That's the biggest problem I have with this show besides the forced humour. The characters are painfully unlikeable. The female lead is obnoxious and just yells a lot, jeering her friend to the point you wonder how they even remain friends. The male lead is a nervous, self righteous wreck that wouldn't have passed the entry exams or psychological tests to serve aboard a star ship, no matter how low rank.

I'd genuinely rather watch Spock's Brain, Sub Rosa, or Threshold again. Those episodes are even funnier than this, though unintentionally, but more watchable because they have likeable characters.

This has been a very rocky revival era for Trek, with Discovery and Picard forgetting that Star Trek is supposed to be about hope and going downright nihilistic (not to mention copying each other with each doing a season about a potential AI apocalypse) and so far it seems this first episode of Lower Decks is the worst yet. Instead of taking advantage of being a comedy and going for a lighter tone, it goes for Rick & Morty style shock humour that really doesn't work in this universe.

It's disappointing as reading how much the showrunners loved TNG and wanted to pay homage to it made it sound like this had the potential to be the best show in the Kurtzman era yet. I don't know how the writers are justifying their love of Trek with this weird mess. Probably would've played better as a fan fiction or a non canon web series.
26 out of 52 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
More people need to give this a chance
16 April 2020
I had a ton of fun with this and I want more people to see it so it can possibly get another season. From the moment I heard of the idea I thought it was stupid and expected to hate it, but I gave it a shot and ended up enjoying it a lot. Get past the rough first few minutes and it's a very fun action series with gorgeous animation. If you missed the racing the franchise has moved away from, this series finds a unique way to blend the racing of the original movies with the action of the newer ones. Some of the car chases and action scenes are actually quite tense and had me leaning forward in my seat in anticipation of what would happen next. It's definitely not a perfect series, but it's made for a younger audience and you have to expect a bit more cheese. The dialogue can be painful sometimes and some of the humour falls flat, but I actually enjoyed a lot of the other humour and most of characters are interesting, besides the dumb comic relief mechanic. They even make you sympathetic towards the villains and give some of the characters a grey area in their allegiances, where a lot of cartoon shows like this would just make it more black and white. One thing that bothered me is that the main character is Dominic Toretto's cousin, and they do not let you forget it even for a second. They name drop Dom at least twice an episode and it's like "we get it, enough!" The episodes are short and there's only 8 of them so far, so if you're looking for something to do or something new to watch I honestly think that if you like the movies you'll enjoy this, and even if you don't it might be a fun distraction. Don't watch the trailers, they're what made me so reluctant and they don't capture the spirit of the show at all. Just give this a shot and you might enjoy it more than you expected to like I did.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Star Trek: Enterprise: Similitude (2003)
Season 3, Episode 10
9/10
You can disagree with the morals and still give it credit.
8 March 2020
Warning: Spoilers
During this whole episode, I was in awe at the raw emotions I was feeling. It got me more than any other Enterprise episode so far and even more than Voyager. But I felt a dilemma. Despite the insanely good acting, writing, and direction, I wasn't sure I agreed with what they did to save Trip. Creating another life just to use him to save another is wild. Especially when you see him explore, feel and live. But that's the point. I don't think you're supposed to agree. Enterprise is in an insanely tough situation facing the Xindi with all of earth at stake. What other choice did they have? And when you think about the fact their is a possible experiment cure for the rapid aging of the clone, it's another dilemma. Do they save Sim and condem Tripp, or the other way around? Letting Tripp's memories live on in a clone is not the same as saving his life. Heavy stuff. But I see a lot of reviews here giving this episode really low grades just because they don't agree with it. I don't know which side of the argument I fall on, but I kept thinking "this is really making me think and debate myself, man I miss when Star Trek did this more often". And that's just Star Trek to me. Thought provoking, engaging SciFi with great characters. This might just be the best Enterprise episode. We'll have to see as I keep watching.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed