Reviews

8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
MacGyver: Deathlock (1986)
Season 1, Episode 12
6/10
Dress Rehearsal for Murdoc
20 October 2009
Warning: Spoilers
This story has all the hallmarks of later MacGyver episodes featuring the indefatigable Murdoc, but Quayle is given the usual James Bond villain dialogue. Astute "Doctor Who" fans will recognize Christopher Neame as the villain Skagra from 1979's unfinished storyline "Shada." I also thought the tepid romance could have been dispensed with, as it seemed very contrived, even for television. I think the blackmail motivation had been done more effectively in series such as "Danger Man." MacGyver's creators certainly wanted to follow in this well-tooled Cold War tradition, but it's not always very convincing.

I did enjoy the trapped manor, even if the familiar setup might make older viewers think fondly of a classic "Avengers" episode, "The House That Jack Built." It's a pity more could not have been made of the beautiful gardens and outer grounds, but this story relied too much on indoor electronic surveillance and booby traps to allow this scope.

Overall, "Deathlock" is mildly disappointing, with Pete Thornton being introduced only to suffer a serious shock, letting MacGyver handle all the action. I enjoy the adventures where Pete and Mac complement each other, and "Partners" from Season Two is a much better "origin" story. One should read Season One stories quite selectively for continuity.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Final Cut (2004)
4/10
Welcome to my life, tattoo...
20 August 2009
Warning: Spoilers
With apologies to Peter Townshend, I have to dispense with the main reason why I dislike this film. I did not mind Robin Williams too much, even though pawing Mira Sorvino at his age seems a bit much. Generally speaking, I agreed with the moral message of "The Final Cut," though it reminded me of the 1998 Ralph Fiennes film "Strange Days." However, I suffered a real disappointment with one of this film's overriding messages -- that in order to "rebel" against Eye-Tech's invasive surgery, one has to receive an "electrosynth" tattoo across their face. I felt so cheated by this solution, because I believe our nation's recent fascination with "body painting" is yet another form of abject conformity. It brings to mind Monty Python's "Life of Brian," where Brian's followers blindly chant "Yes, we are all individuals!" Talk about mixed messages! There's better ways to react against the technological society we are fast becoming, instead of this primitive streak we inherited from the Nineties. When even Jim Carrey's "Cable Guy" can deliver a better message, you know your film is in trouble! One can be a rebel without self-mutilation or anti-intellectualism!
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Doctor Who (1963–1989)
10/10
Doctor Who: Ultimate Adventures in Time and Space
16 May 2009
Warning: Spoilers
While I fully acknowledge that the "traditional" Doctor Who series has endured its ups and downs, I gave it a perfect rating because of its very concept and energy. One character, the time-traveling Doctor, could be interpreted by several different actors in so many different aspects. This ensures a long lifespan for any television show, but the Doctor's space-time travels offer so many story-telling opportunities, regardless of the limited BBC budget or the occasional blooper. Doctor Who began as a BBC family show in 1963, in those days when families -- especially in the UK -- were fortunate to own a single TV set.

Most fans consider the classic show in terms of which actor portrayed the Time Lord during which period. When William Hartnell began this role in 1963, no one could have envisioned six other actors playing the same character, until the conceptual introduction of "regeneration" in 1966's "The Tenth Planet." Hence, the Second Doctor, played for three years by Patrick Troughton, has his own "era" of adventures before his regeneration into Jon Pertwee in 1969's "The War Games," and so forth.

Unfortunately, many of the episodes of Hartnell and Troughton's tenures were destroyed by the BBC (or stolen in some cases) when their 1960s overseas resale values had expired. Periodically, "lost treasures" have been recovered by the BBC, such as the entire four-part Patrick Troughton story, "Tomb of the Cybermen," located in 1991 at Hong Kong.

One of the show's perennial attractions were its monsters and villains, adversaries for the Doctor and his friends. Beginning with the Daleks, those robotic mutants who spawned two films and "Dalekmania," Doctor Who has created its own unique mythology. Cybermen, while similar to the Cybernauts from the original TV Avengers, certainly inspired Star Trek: TNG's well-known Borg Collective. Other alien races have been introduced, as well as the Doctor's renegade arch-enemy, the Master.

At various points in the show's history, Doctor Who attempted to grow in terms of maturity, albeit not in the provocative sense of the 2005 BBC-Wales production. In fact, I approve of IMDb's separate category for the newer series, because it bears only topical similarity to the original. Unfortunately for traditional Doctor Who, parental concern over violence (mostly alarmist) and conservative watchdogs like Mary Whitehouse served as a shackle to prevent the show from reaching its logical potential. In comparison to U.S. productions, however, this series seldom ventured beyond PG boundaries of violence. Sexuality rarely entered the picture, even though many of the Doctor's female companions were considered attractive, even glamorous.

I am not going to speculate on my favorite Doctors, because I have enjoyed each actor's contributions at various points. I will leave prospective Doctor Who fans to discover their "favorite" Doctors for themselves. But as to general hints, William Hartnell began the role as a stern grandfatherly figure with occasional whimsy, while Patrick Troughton's whimsical wanderings masked an enigmatic intellect. Jon Pertwee's debonair Third Doctor resembled John Steed of the Avengers with perhaps a dash of James Bond, with Pertwee's love of gadgets and cars. Pertwee's era also debuted in color, well-remembered for its contemporary Earth-based format and the UNIT family.

After 7 years as the Doctor, Tom Baker became an icon, especially in the United States, where syndication and Public TV brought new fans and convention appearances starting in 1979. Baker's trademark grin and long scarf became famous, as did his off-screen clashes with some directors and producers. But Tom Baker's departure in 1981 marked a great time of trouble for the classic series. Incoming producer John-Nathan Turner would helm the series for its remaining decade, but he would be challenged to retain the show's once-invincible position. Arguably, Turner's removal of Doctor Who from its traditional Saturday tea-time slot caused a decline in viewers.

John-Nathan Turner sought to attract famous guest stars, and wanted a well-known actor to play the Fifth Doctor. Previous Doctors had been played by experienced character actors, whilst Tom Baker had been a virtual unknown. Peter Davison, already a television star in England, portrayed a much younger Doctor in a cricket blazer, with more subtle humor and a touch of irascibility. Davison's tenure lasted only three years, before John-Nathan Turner chose Colin Baker, best known for playing villains. Wearing a psychedelic jacket and a cat badge, the Sixth Doctor's crusade for galactic justice was plagued by renewed complaints of violence. After a year's hiatus, Doctor Who seasons were reduced to 14 episodes and four stories, and Colin Baker was unfairly dismissed in 1986 by BBC chief Michael Grade.

Doctor Who might have been phased out without a trace, if not for the valiant efforts of Sylvester McCoy, another obscure actor chosen to play the Seventh Doctor. After an uncertain first season, McCoy's portrayal had won over young fans despite some rather weak story lines. However, his last two seasons featured some genuine classic moments. Toward the end, McCoy's portrayal grew more somber and manipulative, even toward his companion, Ace. But when the series finally ended in 1989, the Seventh Doctor's era ended on a high note in "Survival," after the Doctor and Ace outwit the Master for a final victory.

One can still take the original series without reading the copious fan-fiction novels that ensued after 1991, or accepting the premises of either the 1996 Telemovie or the new series, which has destroyed or radically altered many of Doctor Who's original concepts. 26 years remains a body of work unto itself, and I believe families can still sit together and enjoy the legend almost 50 years after it began.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Star Trek (2009)
3/10
Hollywood Iconoclasts Strike Again!
11 May 2009
Warning: Spoilers
I believe two days is sufficient time to calmly organize my thoughts concerning "Star Trek 2009." When I reluctantly went to view it over the weekend, I expected the worst because I knew producer J.J. Abrams did not really love classic Star Trek. But I actually felt physically sick during some of the worst moments of the film. If I had written this review immediately after viewing, I would have been much harsher.

I knew I would dislike this film intensely by the time Nero destroyed the U.S.S. Kelvin and I realized the final communications between Lt. George Kirk and his wife were supposed to be some pale kind of homage to "Flight 93." What a cheap gesture toward a real historical event within living memory! I almost expected to hear "let's roll."

Having said that, I did find some enjoyable aspects in the production values, as well as some of the casting decisions. Karl Urban, whom I enjoyed as Eomer in Lord of the Rings, was immediately enjoyable as Dr. Leonard "Bones" McCoy -- though he would hardly have been contemporary with Kirk or Spock. Simon Pegg, contrary to other fans' impressions, did a creditable job as Scotty, although his introduction was rather contrived, and I do not think too much of Scotty's alien sidekick.

However, some of the other major characters remain somewhat uncertain, owing to the film's adolescent screenplay and weak premise. I will leave other reviewers to demolish these attributes, because for me, Star Trek was all about the main characters aboard the Enterprise.

Firstly, I felt Chris Pine was far too young to play James T. Kirk very convincingly, and the writers greatly exaggerated his "rebellious" MTV image to pander toward younger viewers. I'm surprised this Kirk does not sport some tattoos across half his body. But honestly, there are better ways to rebel than stealing a car for a joyride -- a scenario best left to the Canadian rock band, Rush, whose paean to fast cars, 1981's "Red Barchetta," is also set in the near future, complete with robotic pursuers.

Kirk also gains promotions more rapidly than any real military officer I have ever known. It would be as though Harry Potter graduated from Hogwarts by the third novel, only to become head of his own wizarding school. This Kirk is undisciplined, sullen, and anti-intellectual, everything that William Shatner's portrayal was not. Kirk bent rules, but he seldom violated them. Kirk almost always projected optimism, one of Trek creator Gene Roddenberry's best traits. And Kirk valued intelligence and reason, even though he followed instinct as often. This Kirk is pure Generation whine, with little real character development. Promotions do not equate experience.

Chekov is silly and geeky, with his idiosyncratic pronunciations played up for laughter. Sulu is bland and impassive, ultimately forgettable. On the supporting cast side, I thought the Vulcans were unbelievable. Spock's youthful tormentors acted like Draco Malfoy's band of truants, instead of the coolly aloof logicians that Vulcans are supposed to be. Ben Cross did a passable Mark Lenard impersonation, whereas I could not buy that infamous "scene-stealer" Winona Ryder as Amanda Grayson - an important character once played by Jane Wyman (Ronald Reagan's first wife and a fine actress in her day).

But my real annoyance lies in the ill-advised, exotic relationship between Uhura and Spock. While both actors, Zoe Saldana and Zachary Quinto, seem capable enough in their own right, their chemistry feels forced in several awkward love scenes. The original Uhura (Nichelle Nichols) flirted mildly with Mr. Spock on occasion, to elicit emotion. This does not give license to turn Uhura into an upwardly mobile cadet who sleeps with her instructor in order to get a good assignment.

Gene Roddenberry would turn in his grave to see his efforts to support civil rights become an excuse for exotica. In 1967, Nichelle Nichols was encouraged to remain on "Star Trek" by none other than Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., who saw Uhura as a positive African-American role model, particularly for girls. "Star Trek" also marked the first historic record for interracial kissing on television. But Captain Kirk and Lt. Uhura's kiss scene in "Plato's Stepchildren" happened against their wills -- a breakdown in military order. And what ever happened to Nurse Christine Chapel, Mr. Spock's real unrequited love, as portrayed by Majel Barrett -- Roddenberry's late wife?

Abrams and his stable of writers wanted to outdo the original source by almost cynically eradicating every trace of Gene Roddenberry's ideals. If writers Orci and Kurtzman have ever watched the original series, I believe they did so selectively. Gone are those familiar faces, that I used to see in my 1980s teenage dreams after late-night syndication. Like the traditional "Doctor Who" series, another part of my past is made irrelevant by iconoclastic writers and producers.

But wait! I have the whole original series on DVD! Popcorn anyone?
55 out of 90 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Farscape (1999–2003)
8/10
So close and yet so Farscape...
30 April 2009
Warning: Spoilers
I borrowed the entire series on DVD from my public library about ten years after the series debuted. Although a long-time science-fiction fan, I never watched Sci-Fi channel's original series because most of them were too much into the paranormal. But I was curious about the Henson angle, so I brought them home for my wife and I to check out.

Once the first season established John Crichton and his companions, we really got into the second and third seasons. I agree with another reviewer that FARSCAPE's strength is its major characters, with its stories of varying quality. Ben Browder really does grow on you, because he is so accessible -- though I find it hard to believe he would have a Ph.D. at such a relatively youthful age. But John Crichton is not afraid to show his Southern roots, almost a David Crockett of the unknown.

I personally thought Claudia Black a compelling actress, playing Aeryn Sun as a cold, aloof soldier throughout the series. She never got too soft, although she expanded and evolved as a character. Her chemistry with Ben Browder helped to make their romance believable. I also love Anthony Simcoe as D'Argo, because he provided a straight foil for Ben Browder -- one of the great friendships of TV science fiction. It was such a shame to kill off D'Argo in the conclusion.

The other companions were variable -- I enjoyed the animated Muppet characters of Rygel and the Pilot, but they would not have worked so well without the sterling voice actors. I never realized until I saw the DVD extras that Lani Tupu played both Pilot and Biallar Crais. However, I thought Chiana could have been better developed, instead of being a bit of space fluff. Za'an and Stark rather bored me, because their "magical" powers smacked too much of Dungeons & Dragons.

Finally, I thought the writers got too complacent and silly with the fourth season. Things were building nicely with the noble sacrifices of Talon and Crais (though his interest in Aeryn was somewhat muted) and we expected so much more. Scorpius ended up becoming a comic-book style villain, gloating but not doing much else. Worse, the scripts became more juvenile, with more bathroom and puke humor -- vomit does not carry sufficient DNA to launch D'argo's space-ship! I also did not care for the faux lesbian scene with Chiana and the vampiric shapeshifter. Color me uptight, but I prefer my science fiction "straight."

I agree with the fans that the Sci-Fi Channel cut off their nose to spite their face. I would rather the series finished the uncertainty of Season Four properly, instead of the patch-job miniseries we got with the "Peacekeeper Wars." FARSCAPE had so much potential, and it could have been saved with some cooperation from the corporation.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Miami Vice: Theresa (1987)
Season 3, Episode 16
7/10
Uneven story...
23 January 2009
Warning: Spoilers
One has to question how Sonny Crockett met the title character, played by a very youthful Helena Bonham Carter, in the first place? While I do not object to drug addiction tales involving medical professionals, Helena Bonham Carter was too young to be convincing as a full-fledged doctor. It has been pointed out that Sonny had broken off with Brenda, during the first season, for far less. And poor Brenda was closer to his own age. This was a fault of the casting agent and the producers. No matter how sincere the two actors were on-screen, this love story just did not do very much for me!

Elsewhere, the bureaucracy tended to bog down the story, where Sonny has to clear his name (yet again) and bend the rules in order to bring down his nemesis -- played well by Brad Dourif in his pre-Wormtongue days. Tubbs is the usual rock in this story, supporting his partner, and being characteristically polite -- except toward Ramos, who got dunked in the toilet for his troubles. I also enjoyed the explosions and the action sequences, but I can't help feeling it could have been so much better if the story had been more fair toward the characters.
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Miami Vice: Shadow in the Dark (1986)
Season 3, Episode 6
5/10
Highly Derivative and Uncharacteristic Vice Story
20 January 2009
Having closely watched the first two seasons of Vice in succession, I have found the third season to be a mixed kettle. "Shadow in the Dark" is so obviously a small-screen adaptation of "Manhunter," Michael Mann must have simply decided to use his television show as free publicity for the film he was then producing. I found Sonny Crockett so unlike his previous self, becoming an obsessive profiler instead of the Vice cop we have grown familiar with. While there were some suitably eerie scenes and good direction, it did not feel like Vice. I don't mind if Crockett gets his own spotlight, but this story did not feel right for his character. Moreover, this case should have been handed over to Robbery or Homicide instead of Vice -- a common failing with many later Vice episodes. The entire premise feels contrived if one looks closely. 5 out of 10 is being generous.
17 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Matilda (1996)
9/10
Best Roald Dahl adaptation
31 May 2005
I believe this film best represents the themes behind Roald Dahl's rather subversive children's literature. It follows the continuity of both "The Witches" and "James and the Giant Peach," casting repulsive Trunchbull into the roles of Grand High Witch and repulsive evil aunt, with a bit of the ogre (especially during the chase in Magnus House).

It's also pretty obvious that J.K. Rowling had read Roald Dahl long before she wrote the first of her Harry Potter books. I find it very odd how few people have noted Roald Dahl's literary influence on the spate of children's fantasy authors today. All the elements for Harry are here, in Matilda, right down to her unpleasant 'Muggle' family -- the Wormwoods -- and a brutish, Dudley-like brother.

And for the record, Mara Wilson does a good job!
57 out of 70 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed