Reviews

27 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
1/10
The worst, not even up for debate.
26 March 2015
Warning: Spoilers
This is it! The worst of the worst. There is not story, this film actually made me dumber. There is no excuse for something this bad. It is fascinating that human beings came together and made something this awful.

The acting is non-existent, the story makes no sense. "The State Home for the ugly" plot line is the stupidest thing I've ever heard. The plot line that the kids can make clothes comes out of nowhere and makes no sense, the song was one of the worst I've ever heard and the lips of the puppets never sync up with their voices. I just can't wrap my head around why this film was even made. The Garbage Pail Kids themselves are (as well as being ugly) mean, rude, obnoxious and have no redeeming qualities, thus, making the moral that beauty is on the inside that count, redundant. Nothing about the film is charming, enjoyable or nice to look at. I honestly hate this film. Not only is this the worst film I've ever seen but I believe that this is the worst film ever made.

How could people make something this bad? this horrific? who knows? there is nothing much to say. It is just an ungodly abomination.It is just the worst ever made.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tarzan (1999)
7/10
Yeah, this works !
26 March 2015
Warning: Spoilers
A different but brilliantly adapted version of Borough's classic novel. From the get go Tarzan will have you wide eyed and waiting to see what will happen next. The opening sequence is one of the most impressive I have ever seen in film. The opening sequence is just so powerful as it shows the contrast of the human family (infant Tarzan with his parents) and the gorilla family living happily before tragedy strikes both families which leads Kala to finding the baby Tarzan. All done without dialog, all done with the great song "Two Worlds" in the background.

Changing Tarzan's adoptive family to gorillas worked well because it showed a more gentle side to these great apes, which are often depicted as savage bruits in such films as King Kong and Planet of the apes. Tony Goldwyn did a great job as Tarzan; he hit the right balance of fun loving, relaxed and also emotional when it was required. However, Glen Close gave a soft, angelic voice to Kala that only a mother could have and her bond with both the child and adult Tarzan was at the emotional soul of the film. This was contradicted perfectly by Henriksen's performance as the un-accepting and judgmental ape leader Kurchack. Jane, Tantor, Turk were all great characters that all did well with adding humor at the appropriate times and what I liked about Driver's performance was that she was neither the defiant heroine nor the damsel in distress but rather she was simply a girl who had come to an untamed land and became enchanted with the world of a man she would later fall in love with. I would even go as far as to say that Jane is one of Disney's best female leads.I also give the movie points for the animations, most adaptations would have Tarzan swinging through the trees, but here he actually surfs through the trees.

However, I do feel that the villain (voiced by Brian Blessed) was slightly weak in comparison to other characters, Clayton is not very interesting in terms of motivation but I do feel he could have been more unique if he had been made to look younger, I would have preferred to see him have the looks of say John Smith from Pocahontas, he just seemed quite forgettable but held up in the film's final third. I also feel the film would have been more effective if Sabor was given a speaking part. Simply having the leopard growl and roar seemed to make him a brainless carnivore as opposed to an enemy and in my humble opinion Sabor would have been more intimidating if the had a speaking role to match his ferocity.

The film's strongest point was it's music and Phil Collins and Mark Mancina joined forces to create one of the greatest soundtracks I have heard in a very long time. With the exception of "Trashing the camp" which was sung by Turk, Collins used his actual voice for all of the songs and tunes such as "Son of Man" or "Strangers like me" or the Oscar winning "You'll be in my heart" will all go down as classics and give the film for being original and not sticking to the traditional musical tone.

As one of the final traditionally animated films to be considered a hit, and is probably the greatest depiction of the story of Tarzan ever put on the big screen. An absolute must see.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
In the jungle, the mighty jungle
26 March 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Well, Simba got a bit of an attitude in this one. I loved this film when I was a bit younger but now, I'd say I have mixed views about it.

On the one hand, there are a few flaws; for one, the writing is not all that great and there are some very, very cheesy lines in there. Second, there are certain elements of the story that are just not believable if you are trying to sell this as a true story (e.g. the hospital scene) and I just wish they had stuck more to the book because there was (in my opinion) enough in there to sell as a film. Val Kilmer himself was not particularly interesting and I feel this was poor casting; this was more of a role for Mel Gibson or Kevin Costner.

However, there still is a bit to like in the film, Michael Douglas was awesome in his scenery chewing role as the big game hunter and you can tell that she is really enjoying the role. John Kani was good in his role as Samuel and reminded me a bit of Rafiki from The Lion King in that wise adviser role/ comic relief. From a technical stand point, the cinematography was awesome, I know the film was shot in South Africa and they got some really amazing shots. The music (particularly for the intense scenes) was awesome, one of Jerry Goldsmith's best in my opinion.

Overall, The Ghost and the Darkness is a mixed bag but overall if you enjoy films like say Jaws then you will probably enjoy this won OK, and that is my overall view of it.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Frozen (I) (2013)
8/10
Are we ever going to let this one go?
26 March 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Well, everyone is obsessed with this film and, they are right, it is fantastic. Though I don't think its quite as good as say The Lion King or Aladdin but its still pretty damn awesome.

The strongest point is the characters. Elsa is one of the best female leads in recent history. She's smart, compassionate and is conflicted having lived her whole life in fear. She also becomes queen, is not evil and does not end up with a love interest, being strong on her own. Anna was also really funny, and though there is a romance that occurs in only a few days (something that Disney has been criticized for) but its understandable because she has been locked away for so long. The other characters are all enjoyable and likable, Kristoff, Hans, the Duke, the reindeer; watch the film and you'll remember them all.

I was originally against the fact that their was eventually a villain that is eventually revealed but it works because it shows the danger of what happens if you open up to quickly. That is a great lesson, especially in todays world since everyone wants to be in a relationship and with the rise of social media. The film also touches on the fact that people cannot shut themselves out and, at some point, we all need somebody. The songs, you remember them all and "Let it Go" easily makes my top 5 for best Disney songs.

If I had any problems, its that the backstory is rushed and without giving away to much, there are many holes in the story. I guess it is Disney logic which can be pointed at any film. Overall Frozen had great characters and a great story. Not my personal favorite, but a favorite for many and I can see why.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
When Summer Movies Are Good, THEY ARE REALLY GOOD !!!!!!
22 March 2015
Warning: Spoilers
God, I love Summer Blockbusters! How to Train Your Dragon 2 is not just better than it's sequel but it is the best film by DreamWorks Animation to date.

To start off with, the animation was superb, the use of the new software shows because this is probably the best animation I have ever seen. I imagine seeing the film in 3D would be unbelievable. I was also impressed how far the animators took the animation, in the sense of the violence in some scenes, particularly the Drago's stumpy arm.

The character development was another huge selling point in this film for me. I don't know what it is about DreamWorks animation but they just have this way of developing characters that you can almost feel that the years have past, and you don't see that with other animation studios. First in terms of physical development as the characters actually seem to have developed but do not appear to be adults. Also in terms of personalities, for example Hiccup is much more confident in this film as opposed to the first film while other characters such as Astrid and Stoick are much more relaxed.

There is also the introduction of new characters such as Eret (Kit Harrington) who provides a bit of comic relief as well as Valka, one o the best characters DreamWorks has brought to the big screen as (partly through the brilliant voice acting of Cate Blanchett) as she hits the right balance between funny, kind and vulnerable. If I had a problem with the film, its that the villain was a bit weak. He does not do a lot and is not even that developed. His backstory is mentioned but it is glanced over and I would have liked it to have been explored more. I'm a big fan of Djimon Honsou and he's given his all. The film is ambiguous as to weather the character will come back but if he does, I hope he's more developed. However, he did still serve as a threat and has a few cool lines.

Honestly, I would say that this film is the modern day equivalent to The Lion King and will have the same impact on kids as The Lion King. There is just so much beneath the surface and life lessons that apply to adults as well as children.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
E.T. With dragons and vikings and its AWESOME
22 March 2015
Warning: Spoilers
When I heard they were combining making film about dragons and Vikings, I was beyond excited. Having never read the book, I had no idea what to expect. And I can honestly say, that I was completely blown away.

First, it must be said that the absolute star of the film, was the animation. I saw the film when it came out on DVD and even then the angles looked incredible, I imagine it would be beyond incredible if you see the film in 3D or on Blu-Ray. The amount of detail the animators put in to make the dragons seem as different as possible was unbelievable, to the point where you could barley believe that these were all different types of the same animal. The amount of personality that they gave Toothless in terms of body and facial expressions made him one of the most likable animal characters in film (at least in my opinion).

The human characters were awesome as well. Jay Baruchel was one of the most perfectly made casting decisions since Jodi Benson was cast as Ariel in The Little Mermaid. He embodies the film's moral (which is a great one) that to be different is to make a difference. Stoick the Vast was a great character, and I felt that one could really sympathize with his morale dilemma; he has a responsibility as the chief was well as an understandable prejudice that will eventually cause him to (temporarily) disown his son and you see the good in him when he comes to the revelation that he was wrong. There are also other likable characters voiced by the like of Jonah Hill, T.J. Miller, Kristen Wiig amongst others.

As I said earlier, the best bit of the film was the moral. I feel it could really speak to children (and possibly to teenagers to a degree) that being different, standing out from the crowd could give someone an even better chance to make a difference. Something I strongly believe in.

Overall, How To Train Your Dragon is brilliant and I could not find a single thing wrong with it.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Funny People (2009)
7/10
Adam Sandler can do drama ! Who would have thought ?
18 March 2015
Adam Sandler's best film to date, I know that is not saying much but this is still a solid film.

What makes the film work is Adam Sandler's performance (bet you never though you'd hear that ever). Sandler is much better at drama than comedy and in this film you see a real 3 dimensional human being who honestly believes that he is doing the right thing in terms of getting his life back on track. This is relatable because we have all been in that situation where we wanted something so bad we were completely blind-sided to how it might affect other people and how selfish we were being. The chemistry between Sandler and Seth Rogen, you really begin to sympathize with Rogen's character because you see how much he has grown to care for Sandler's character. The rest of the cast did well, Leslie Mann, Jonah Hill, RZA etc. They all served their purpose but I did feel that they were more there to help the plot move along as opposed to seeing characters.

An area where the film falls flat was, as with many of Apatow's films, the film could have been at least 30 minutes shorter and there were several scenes and characters that did not serve purpose and did not need to be there. For example, there were at least three musical montages over the course of the film, I believe the film could have got by with at least one fewer. Also, Aziz Ansari's character was not funny and really did not need to be in the film as he did nothing to add to the plot.

However, apart from that Funny People is still a strong drama. I say drama because it is not that much of a comedy. What I love about Apatow's films is that he makes dramatic films with very funny moments to balance out the drama and tension and I like that. You will not cry with laughter but I believe you will be entertained.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The expendables for comedians.
18 March 2015
I do love it when actors make parodies of themselves.

What I really liked about this movie is that the actors are playing very selfish versions of themselves and the versions that are played up in the media, which just shows the fun side to this guys, and the fact that they are all actually friends in real life which was a big up for me in the film because friendship is a big one for me.

Another positive the film had going for it was the movie references and the celebrity cameos. Celebrity cameos are normally annoying but here they all work because the celebrities are either making fun of themselves or are just completely off base with how they are seen in the media (e.g. Emma Watson or Michael Cera). As someone who watches a lot of movies, I liked the movie references especially the fact that they make fun of some of the bad movies that they have been in.

The only few things that go against the film where probably just the last third where jokes are unnecessarily dark and really pandered to the "toilet humor." But that was just a nit pick.

Overall, this is one of the best comedies I've seen in a while and probably one of my favorite comedies of all time.
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Most Disney films get better with age .... most
18 March 2015
As a kid, I loved this film. The Jungle Book was one of the first films I ever saw and is probably one the reasons I decided to pursue a career in films and I will always be fond of that. However, today, as a film, it's OK. That's not bad or good; it is just OK.

For one thing, the film is very slow, which for an animated film can be quite tedious at times. My second (and probably biggest) problem with the film is that it simply plays it too safe; I can't help but wish that if this film had come out during the era of the Disney Renaissance (Aladdin, The Lion King etc.) then a few more risks would have been taken, e.g. I felt the climax between Mowgli and Shere Khan was very underplayed and could have been a lot more tense and dramatic, for example, it would have been a lot more powerful if Mowgli had defeated his enemy for good and killed Shere Khan (in the manor that heroes normally defeat their villains in Disney films) or some of the characters could have been a bit more menacing such as Kaa or Louis. I also feel that film tired much too hard to make comedic moments through out the film. The songs themselves did not really measure up to the Disney standard (with the exceptions of The Bear Necessities and I wanna be like you) and felt that they where very dumbed down. I also felt the animation was somewhat lacking and again, I felt could have benefited had this film been made during Disney's golden age in the 1990's.

The film did have some positives as well, the best bit of the film is Shere Khan, and he's just a great villain. George Saunders gets the balance between Khan's sophisticated demeanor and his bloodthirsty intentions, the contrast is very effective and in my opinion, Shere Khan is one of the most memorable villains in Disney history. Baloo the bear was also a lot of fun, and it was really a shame when he appeared to have been killed at the end. Mowgli and the other characters are OK, and they all do their part.

Overall, I won't say I don't like the film or it's not worth watching because I can't imagine that anybody watching it would hate it. However, I can't see anyone today putting it at the top of their film watching priorities. With two film versions of The Jungle Book coming up (one by Disney, the other by Warner Bros.) I will be very interested to see how they deal with their adaptations.
3 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Goodfellas (1990)
10/10
Could a film be any better ?
18 March 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Possibly, the greatest gangster film of all time, everything is perfect; the acting is perfect, the script is perfect, the story is perfect, this is one of the first examples that comes to mind when I think of a perfect film.

The performances where outstanding and I would not have been surprised if all the cast received Oscars. The soundtrack (though, not a conventional score) was still very just as (if not more) effective than a score. The angles, and editing and cinematography where all terrific.

Overall, Goodfellas is Scorsese's best film by a long shot, which is saying a lot. This is a film I could watch again and again and again. This film is definitely not for everyone but fans of films such as Wolf of Wall Street and American Hustle will definitely love this.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Kung Fu Panda (2008)
8/10
Jack Black as a Panda ? And it was a good movie ?
18 March 2015
Hearing the title and the premise, I thought Kung Fu Panda was going to be a waste of my time but boy was I wrong. The film excels in almost all aspects from the likable characters to the amazing animation.

The film's strongest quality is its characters. Po is likable in his tenacity and determination never to give up and fulfill his dream whereas Shifu is sympathetic in living with a mistake and taking it out on others. The Furious Five are all wonderfully unique in their different personalities but are also relatable in that they think they have been cheated. The villain is also a lot of fun, and the fact that he is a Kung Fu master allows for some exciting imagery. The world that the animators create with anthropomorphic animals is a very unique and pretty world and there is also a good blend between the ancient Chinese culture and modern day humor. The Kung Fu displayed in the film (especially by Tai Lung) is always fun to watch as it has the right blend between animation and comedy. The music by Hans Zimmer was excellent, one of Zimmer's best in my opinion (particularly the music sequence used for the five's battle with Tai Lung). However, the film does have a few flaws, personally I felt that the film's climax was a little weak, so much had been building up to that point and they tried to play out the climax between Po and Tai Lung as both serious and funny. Personally, they should have gone one way or another, but that is simply a nit pick. The fight between Po and Tai Lung is still entertaining and the film does end on a happy note.

Overall, Kung Fu Panda is still a wonderful film, it has an inspiring message of hope and determination that will appeal to both adults and children and as much as it appealed to me.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
I always thought sequels are not better than the original. I guess I was wrong !
18 March 2015
Sequels never usually measure up to the standards of their predecessors. However, Kung Fu Panda 2 is an exception, not only is as good as the first film, it's even better. This is what I would call a perfect film, from the beginning to the end. A strong factor of the film is that they have continued the story instead of rehashing it. For example, Po is still likable but has developed in his Kung Fu, while the Five and Shifu have grown to respect and care about Po and not just making fun of him. There is an introduction of new likable characters such as the wise soothsayer or the humorous Master Croc(voiced by martial arts icon Jean Claude Van Damme). In the first film I felt the villain (Tai Lung) was cool but Garry Oldman's Lord Shen is quite the opposite. He has the right balance of malice and humor that in my opinion puts him on the same levels of animated villains such as Scar, Shere Khan or Gaston. The animation and action were both superb while Hans Zimmer and John Powell combined to make one of the best soundtracks I have ever heard. Overall, Kung Fu Panda 2 is not only an animated masterpiece but is also one of my favorite films of all time.

Kung Fu Panda 2 has the right balance of humor, drama, action, suspense and warmth that make it what I consider to be a perfect film.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Disney tackles religion. That's ... interesting
18 March 2015
After the disappointment brought about by Pocahontas, Disney needed to bounce back; and on the surface, a film based on a novel that addressed the corruption of church may not have been the best idea but what they did with it was still decent. The Hunchback of Notre Dame is one of my all time favorite animated films and is one of the most underrated films of the last thirty years.

Disney has created a cascade of memorable characters and have still kept aspects of the novel in the film such as Frollo's lust for Esmeralda or Quasimodo saving Esmeralda and shouting "sanctuary" but have added that Disney touch that makes all their films wonderful. Quasimodo himself is likable, the singing by Tom Hulce is average but there is softness to him and a likability that makes him a very sympathetic lead character. Tom Hulce brought to life the greatest Disney villain ever, not only does he do all the horrible things that Disney villains do but he is actually complex; he's not just after money or power as many villains are he is a man who believes that he is fulfilling his religious duties, his death is also one of Disney's best as it symbolizes that Frollo has been condemned to hell (as he dies by burning). Esmeralda and Phoebus are also very likable characters and their romance is believable as it develops over various circumstances. However, I was not a fan of the gargoyles; they were the most obnoxious things ever put on film and did not fit the tone of the story, if they were in Quasimodo's mind it would have been tolerable but in the end they help him fight the guards so they are real and I feel were not necessary.

An aspect of the film I also enjoyed was the music. The music was simply to die for, from the truly admirable songs that told the story and reflect on the emotions of the character at that one moment (which is what music of a musical should do) to a score that fit the film's darker tone, with the exception of the very obnoxious musical number sung by the gargoyles. The animation is wonderful and the use of computer animation makes everything else such as the bells seems so much grander.

This film is also so unique from other Disney films in other in the sense that it actually touches on issues such as religion and faith and even lust (the main motivation of the film's antagonist). Also, the hero doesn't get the girl, that is one of the many risks that this film takes which shows the extent the writers went to keep some of the tragic aspects of the novel in the film.

Ultimately I believe that The Hunchback of Notre Dame is on par with Disney's best and would recommend it as perfect family entertainment.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Noah (2014)
6/10
Updating well known stories, good idea or bad ?
18 March 2015
A mixture between a good CGI film and Hollywood elements! For better or worse that's up to the viewer to see. Personally, though I do not find the film to be a great adaptation, there are some very impressive features about the film.

Russell Crowe was fantastic as Noah, what I liked about it (which was just as much to do with the writing as Crowe's performance) was the morale dilemma that this man was forced to suffer. You can clearly see that though he thinks he his doing the right thing, Noah is forced to make some very tough decisions such as potentially killing his own grandchildren. The rest of Noah's family (Watson, Connelly etc.) they were all wonderful. Another strong aspect of the film where some of the awesome angles and shots that Aronofsky got of the landscape as well as the CGI.

However, where the film fell short was in some of the Hollywood Clichés and strange adaptations. For example, though I am a fan of Ray Winstone I do not believe that he was right for the part of Tubal-Cain, his cockney mannerisms just hindered me from seeing a character, all I saw was Ray Winstone! I could have seen Liam Neeson, Gerard Butler or Brendan Gleeson pulling of the role better. Also the use of the "watchers" put me off, both in terms of their design and the fact that they did not contribute hugely to the story and I feel they could have been written out and the film could still have been as affective, if not more.

Overall, I did enjoy Noah, despite its flaws and it's not for everyone. I'm glad I saw it and will probably see it again.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A movie that made people go Ape Sh*t !
18 March 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Quite possibly the greatest sequel, period. Dawn of the Planet of the Apes is without doubt, the best film of the entire franchise. Just like the last film, the best thing about the movie is Caesar, played brilliantly by the always fantastic Andy Serkis, who has turned the genre of motion capture acting into an art form. Caesar goes from being a revolutionary into being a leader, Serkis' commanding presence transcends into Caesar's command over the apes. I also a huge fan of the ending, when Caesar is pushed to break his own law by murdering the villain, Koba. I always find it compelling when heroes or leaders are forced to break the morals in order for the greater good such as Superman in Man Of Steel. Koba is also shown to be compassionate and caring, such as allowing the humans to work on their electricity, all in an attempt for peace, showing Caesar to be much more than a one dimensional lead.

Another great quality in the film is Koba, the villain. One thing I must say, is though he was a vicious antagonist, I actually ended up feeling sorry for him. From the first film one could see that he had been a victim of long term suffering as a result of being tested and his hatred for human beings is coming from. Apart from that, he is a completely awesome villain. When he murders the two guards (after putting on the cute monkey act) was terrifying for two reasons, one it was terrifying and two it completely contrasted our cuddly perception of apes with the reality of how fierce and powerful they really are, it reminded me of the orangutan that murders a woman and hides her body in a chimney in the novel The Murders of Rue Morgue by Edgar Allen Poe. Koba also represents the side effect that if animals were to gain the intelligence of humans then as long as the positive qualities like ambition or desire for freedom (as shown by Caesar in "Rise") they would also inherit the negative aspects such as hatred, bittrernes and prejudice. I also love the dramatic irony that in the mission to eradicate humans, the thing he hates most, Koba almost becomes more human (by showing negative human qualities).

The human characters were also likable, but it must be said that the biggest surprise was Garry Oldman. In all the trailers, he was made out to be the villain, but in the end he turned out to be one of the most sympathetic characters. The man had to balance the pain of losing his family along with leading the few human survivors. I honestly felt sympathetic when he blew up the tower, and I probably would have done the same thing in that situation. Malcolm and his family were also likable as they were able to be good without being one dimensional, as they had all experienced pain as a result of the disease and were all trying to avoid feeling such pain themselves.

The best part about the film was the story. What I loved was that it was not actually humanity's fault that the two species went to war but in fact it was the fault of the apes, as it was an ape (Koba) that started the war, showing that, if given the intelligence, animals could have the same potential to be cruel and evil as humans.

This has been one of the best reviews to write about the best film (so far) of 2014. Dawn of The Planet of the Apes is a must see.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The comic book movies are at a new level !
18 March 2015
In my humble opinion, the greatest comic book film ever made.

To start, Heath Ledger made the film. His performance as The Joker was one of the greatest performances ever given, which is made even more amazing by the fact that just by looking at him or the films he has done (where he is the pretty hero) you would never see him as this iconic villain. He got the right balance of creepy, psychopathic and at times funny, making it the best performance of The Joker in history. It was a shame when he passed and that he never received the Oscar himself that he most definitely deserved but at least he (as a man who took pride in his work) left behind a performance and a legacy that many actors could only dream of.

Aaron Eckhart was awesome as Harvey Dent/two-face as well. The turn from being the white knight cop to the murdering two-face was not an easy one to do and I don't think many actors would have got it right but Eckhart did and was very convincing as Dent. The returning cast, Bale, Caine, Freeman, Oldman etc. where fantastic, particularly Bale who had to take on a new stage in Batman's life, where he is now an established protector of Gotham but now must put his own codes and rules when facing his greatest foe.

The music was awesome and Hans Zimmer (as well as his team) have really gone out of their way to create a Batman theme that I believe is as iconic as John Williams' Superman theme.

Christopher Nolan redeemed the Batman franchise with Batman Begins and took it to new heights with this masterpiece, The Dark Knight, you will all just have to wait and see where the franchise ended with the final chapter The Dark Knight Rises.

The Dark Knight is not only the best film in Nolan's Batman franchise, but also the best comic book based film ever.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Medea makes a crap film, again.
18 March 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Someone, please, please, tell Tyler Perry to stop making movies please. Its just one contrived, forced, heavily religious themed film after another. This is no exception.

I really don't have much to say, the acting ranged from being dead on boring (the main character) to being so over the top, I felt like I was watching a cartoon (the mother), there were forced Christian themes (and this is coming from a Christian by the way. The plot was predictable from the opening credits to the end credits. I honestly can't even take away any positives.

The film's characters are also so hollow, so one dimension that I felt that these were the draft of characters, not fully formed characters. Overall, Temptation is boring, predictable and is actually one of Tyler Perry's worst, and that is saying a lot.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Pearl Harbor (2001)
2/10
Before he ruined Transformers, Michael Bay tried to re-write history
18 March 2015
The visuals were amazing, but the film unfortunately sucked. We were all expecting this grand tale, also seen in Saving Private Ryan or Platoon. However, Michael Bay took one of the most significant moments in American History and one of the most significant moments of the Second World War and turned it into a three hour mess in which the morale of the story was "America-**** Yeah".

My biggest problem with the film is the depiction of the events. When the Japanese attacked, they only attacked soldiers and did not target civilians while when the Americans attacked, they targeted civilians, and in the film it is the opposite. Also, I did not appreciate the Indiana Jones style stunts the pilots pull off, particularly during the attack on Pearl Harbor, I know the film was meant to reach a wider audience, including a younger audience but, WHY? Kids will learn about this stuff in school, I believe that in making the film more family friendly, they did not do the story justice. If you are going to represent a historical event, you must show all sides and not just the romanticized Hollywood version that kids will enjoy, if you want your kids to have a good time, take them to see a Disney film or a Superhero film, not a film depicting an important era in history.

Though I did not find the acting was great, I did not feel that the actors had a great deal to work with from such a lack luster script as well as such hollowed out characters that were just walking clichés, Ben Affleck's character being the "cowboy" etc. And while giving these uninteresting characters the most screen time, the film takes focus away from the event it is meant to be portraying as well as actual real life characters such as Doris Miller or Roosevelt who had more of a right to have had their stories told.

Overall, I am probably being too harsh to this film, but the saving graces are the technical aspects such as the explosions and the angles from the planes are actually quite good. The sad thing is, there is a good film in there somewhere but it was never realized and I hope if Hollywood ever visits this topic again, they will.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Blood Diamond (2006)
8/10
An Eye Opener !
18 March 2015
Gripping, touching, thrilling, awesome; just some of the words that come to mind when I think of Blood Diamond. It's just a terrific film and what I really liked was how much depth the characters where given, not just the protagonists but even the lesser characters such as the villain, RUF leader Captain Poison. This is something that director Edward Zwick has always been very good at and has demonstrated in earlier films such as Glory or The Last Samurai and I hope he begins directing such films again soon.

Other than that, the music was excellent (One of James Newton Howard's finest) and the pacing was effective in that you truly felt as if you were on a journey with these characters. The cinematography was outstanding, and despite being centered on a civil war, the film allows for some beautiful shots further emphasizing the natural beauty of the majestic African continent. Important issues were touched in the film such as the Wests exploitation of third world countries but it was done in a way that (at least in my opinion) was not too controversial in a time where films can be banned in countries, so I don't feel the film went too far. Also the film touched on the West's view of Africa, as brought up by Hounsou's character in the film, and I do share his view that Africa will one day be a "paradise." Though not a family film, Blood Diamond is a spectacular film and would recommend it to virtually anyone.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Aladdin (1992)
9/10
A great film that sums up the career of a great actor
18 March 2015
Not only is Aladdin an incredible stand alone, motion picture, it is also (in my opinion) the greatest performance by an actor we lost too soon. Robin Williams.

Williams as the Genie, made the film, the fact that he improvised so much and left over 16 hours (more than a day) worth of recording just show how much he made the character his own and I love it when actors do that. This is one of the few films where I felt that a supporting character left a greater mark on the film, he was just so animated and probably the funniest Disney character of all time. The sentimental moments between Aladdin and Genie also got me tearing up, particularly at the end.

The other characters were awesome, I honestly believe that this is the Disney film where the two leads have the most chemistry. They just go together, and the fact they are oblivious to whom the other one is but still fall for each other just shows how well they go together. Also, Jafar!!! By far one of the greatest Disney villains of all time. He was funny, menacing and had a devious voice and the contrast between him and Iago A.K.A. The Gilbert Gottfried bird, just made all the more awesome.

The music was good, the three songs "Friend Like Prince Ali "," A whole new world and Me" are all classics, the rest of the songs were unfortunately forgettable.

Overall, Aladdin is great fun, emotional and came at a point when Disney was at its strongest (The Disney Renaissance) and, 22 years on, the Disney magic still holds today.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10,000 BC (2008)
2/10
Mel Gibson should have sued these guys ... BIG TIME !!!!
18 March 2015
My God, this film has, in everyway, ripped off the entire plot of Appocalypto.

This film was boring, poorly, stupid and a complete waste of time. My biggest problem with the film is the story. It's complicated and it's stupid (especially when it gets to the climax and the death of the old woman).

Also, the hero is not interesting at all. He's just the generic good guy who defies the dangers and everybody likes and saves the day and unlike Appocalypto, you don't care because he is not an engaging character. The CGI is not terrible and some of the animals and landscapes are really fun to watch. I do think there is a good movie somewhere in there trying to get out but you are just stuck with typical clichés like the "prophecy" stuff and the hero not believing he is the one but he is and he defies the odds and….You have seen this movie. Trust me, you have seen it.

This movie leaves not impact at all. Do not watch it, if you want to see an ancient epic, go see Appocalypto instead.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Woah !!! That was disturbing
18 March 2015
Hands down the most disturbing film I have ever seen. American History X is simply outstanding.

One of the film's great strengths is the great all round performance by the cast. Empire Magazine claimed that Edward Norton did not win an Oscar for his performance one of the greatest Oscar injustices of all time. And I completely agree. Some of Norton's racist monologues were so convincing they bordered on being scary. The rest of the cast did great as well. I do think, however, that they could have selected a better actor to play the younger brother, Danny, but that is a nit pick, the actor in the film did fine but I just think someone could have given a more compelling dramatic performance.

Overall, what I loved most about the film was the fact that it shows racism for what it is, something that is taught, how naïve people can be led to believe anything if their circumstances call for it. The disturbing scenes where very disturbing and encapsulated the sheer lack of humanity that comes with such racist cults, such as, in this case, the Neo-Nazi's. Ultimately, American History X is not for the squeamish but it is one of the best films I have ever seen.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The all time greatest
18 March 2015
There are very few films that can simply blow a human being's mind away but boy; Shawshank redemption does one hell of a job. From the very get go, Shawshank will have you on the edge of your seats.

Tim Robbins, a man whose career was on an initial down hill slide with flops such as Howard The Duck redeemed himself and then some with his portrayal of a man who looses everything in a second and then spends 20 years trying to get it all back. Robbins gave a calm misdemeanor to his character, which always gave the impression that he had something planned, that we were not expecting. Morgan Freeman gives, in my opinion the best performance of his distinguishable career. He maintains a streetwise wisdom and this, too me, makes him the "go to guy" of the prison. His calm yet intelligent nature is kept through out the film and does not seem affected by Andy but after the escape, Freeman does superbly in showing the contrast in the streetwise dealer of the prison to a man who misses his friend. Thomas Newman's compelling score sets a dark and ominous tone and does what many scores don't; it reflects the thought of the characters as opposed to the tone of the scene. Darabont created a diverse prison world from the street smart ones, to the homesick ones to the rapists but I was not a fan of how racism was sidestepped in the movie. If I had one nit pick, and this is scraping the bottom of the barrel; I would have expected a few racial slurs directed at some of the prisoners, particularly Red. It would have been true of the time but then again its not the point of the story.

Ultimately, Shawshank Redemption is a masterpiece and has a powerful yet happy enough ending to touch the heart of anybody.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Skyfall (2012)
3/10
The best Bond film ever, really ?
18 March 2015
Skyfall, the highest grossing James Bond film…and also one of the most overrated films of all time. I have never really been a huge James Bond fan, but I saw the trailers and I went into the cinema feeling very excited, and, sadly, left the cinema half a sleep. God was this film boring! Despite all the money and Oscar-nominations, I genuinely struggle to find anything of credit in the film. I am not a fan of Daniel Craig either, but even by his standards, he was very dull in this film. His Bond was not engaging in the slightest, we learn nothing of his past and if he was a supporting character, I would have been rooting for him to die. Judi Dench was not much better, with the ever present scowl during the film, it was almost as if she was channeling my feelings when I was in the cinema.

The Bond girls were also played up greatly, but to no avail. One dies after barley 20 minutes of screen time and the other (Harris' character) apart from having a few sexually tense scenes with Bond, was as dull as a rock.

One of the few aspects of the film that I enjoyed was Bardem as the villain. His accent along with his over-the-top nature, made his scenes enjoyable and to be fair I did enjoy his backstory. Also, the actions scenes where also pretty damn cool.

Overall, I have sat through this film twice and I can say I didn't like it. It was boring, the characters where predictable and I didn't even like the song (Yeah I said it). I know the film is considered a "hit" but one of the beauties of our world is the difference in opinion
4 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
300 (2006)
7/10
Could have been a classic
18 March 2015
If I had to describe this film in one phrase it would be, a good film that could have been great.

The film fell flat in the way it was set, like a video game. I know it is based on the graphic novel by Frank Miller, but I just felt that had the film taken a more serious approach then we could have had something as moving and powerful as Gladiator or Braveheart. Yet we are given very below par CGI effects as well as your typical war stereotypes. Also, I was not a fan at how the Persians were portrayed as sub-human and again I feel that taking a more serious and realistic approach could have made a stronger film.

Where the film did excel though was with some of the characters. Like with anything he is in, Gerard Butler is wonderful as King Leonidas and really captures the guts and glory persona but also gave a sense that he was simply going on instinct and did not always know what he was doing. Xerxes was enjoyable as the villain and some of the other Greek soldiers were also a lot of fun. The battle scenes were fun and the overall message of the film, standing against the odds for what you believe in ultimately won me over, just.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed