Reviews

13 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Jack Ryan: Sources and Methods (2018)
Season 1, Episode 6
10/10
Powerful Film Making
9 March 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Some of the most emotionally powerful video ever put together for the small screen. The wide beach scenes where Syrian refugees are boarding Zodiacs for the dangerous journey to Lesbos bring home the danger they face. Earlier the scene with the drone pilot making amends with the family of a man he killed in error is also quite powerful. The action is edge of the seat viewing. A rather incredible hour of video.
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Uncomfortably Realistic
30 March 2019
An excellent period piece set in post WWII small town Pennsylvania. This is an unvarnished look at working class life among the "ethnics" and sexual dysfunction. The production values are fantastic. This movie really captures what it was like then including a passing shot of a large coal burning locomotive. The interiors are drab and worn with peeling paint in some scenes. The directorial style is similar to that of Michael Cimino in The Deer Hunter and Heaven's Gate.

The producers probably wondered why the excellent script and performances didn't garner at least Oscar nominations. It was nominated as Best Foreign Film for the French Cesar award.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Black Ice (1992)
5/10
Aspires to being really good.
30 November 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Black Ice (the original title) aspires to being a really good B movie. It is basically a film noir and was shot mostly at night. I found it quite enjoyable. There are some plot continuity problems with characters moving 1500 miles in a few hours in a car.

Ironside plays his character perfectly and has the usual terminator capability to find his targets when there is no discernible way that he could have done so. The most egregious example of this is when Pacula and Nouri buy a used car in the middle of nowhere and Ironside winds up on the car lot nearly immediately after they leave.

Pacula is perfect. Nouri less so. As the film was shot in the current time about 1991 it's now retro. I like it a lot.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
One of Cage's best performances, ever!!!
30 August 2011
Warning: Spoilers
One of Nicolas Cage's best performances. Extremely impressive. Didn't know this movie existed until it showed up on Encore and was it ever worth watching. Herzog and Cage give us a character that I both identified with and hated. The script is brilliant and has no correlation with the earlier movie which starred Harvey Keitel. It is an original which stands on its own. The plot is complex. Cage's character, Seargant Terence McDonagh, is established immediately as capable of heroic acts and is promoted to lieutenant. We learn that McDonagh is not all good guy in stages. First we learn about the drug addictions and later about the gambling addiction. This is one of those movies which will be recognized for its true brilliance about 30 years from now, like Scarface is now.
18 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Tall Guy (1989)
9/10
One of the Funniest Ever
17 March 2007
Warning: Spoilers
If you want to know what it's about go read the other reviews.

I laughed until tears were rolling down my cheeks. As a child of the 1960's and 70's I found this movie to be hilarious. It blows the doors off American romantic comedies. I've not seen one yet that could match "The Tall Guy." I could see bits of "Joanna" here and there and the sendup of Andrew Lloyd Webber musicals is fantastic. Note the flying chair and flying bed scenes. Besides that it contains one of the more athletic, and funny, sex scenes I've seen on film - starring Emma Thompson and Jeff Goldblum.

I would rate it well up in the top 50 comedies of all time. Everyone I've recommended The Tall Guy to has thanked me later.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Outer Limits: Final Appeal (2000)
Season 6, Episode 21
10/10
A rather incredible TV dramatic production - one of the best, ever
30 January 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I have seen Part II but not Part I. I was about to turn off the TV as this SciFi Channel rerun was put on the air and there was Hal Holbrook. What? The camera pans back and seated beside him are Charlton Heston, Cecily Tyson, Swoosie Kurtz, and Robert Loggia. They are apparently members of a court. At that point I decided to see what was coming on and it was certainly worth my time. The cast was phenomenal being rounded out by Amanda Plummer as a scientist whose life is on the line and who is appealing her conviction, Michael Moriarty who is arguing for the state that her conviction must be upheld by the court, and Kelly McGillis who is arguing for the defendant that the conviction must be overturned.

The court was debating science as a producer of good versus science as a producer of evil. Plummer's character had violated a law banning certain forms of scientific research and as a result had been sentenced to death. The script is excellent. My guess is that the cast was recruited to work for scale by being shown the script. I feel that I have not done justice to the incredible quality of this production so I will say that this is about as good as gets on an intellectual playing field.

If I were teaching a course in scientific ethics I would obtain a copy of both parts of this drama and show it to the class. Excellent all the way around. One of the best episodes of probably the best science fiction series ever put on TV.
17 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Beautiful Cinematography and Winger's Best Performance
23 September 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Beautiful cinematography, incredible scenery, easily Winger's best performance. It's well worth watching for the eye candy alone. That said, I will note that this movie is not for everyone. If you want the usual Hollywood special effects extravaganza, then it's definitely not your cup of Pepsi. If you want excellent acting, a wonderful script, real character development, and some of the most powerful use of natural landscapes as part of the dramatic structure on film, then this movie is for you. I will add there is an accurate depiction of the progress of cholera and that is not pretty.

If you love this film as I do, you will remember it for the rest of your life. It will be watched two hundred years from now just as we read Dickens today. It is great art.

Be sure to get the UNCUT version. Netflix has it.
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Caligula (1979)
10/10
Not for the Prudish who want to sanitize history
12 September 2006
This is a wonderful movie. Big sets, huge scale, a great cast, good acting, and a very well written musical score. It is not the usual Hollywood compromise. Get the Netflix UR director's cut. That's the best version available. Avoid the watered down, compromised, R version which is a travesty created to please the censors.

I have bad news for the prudies who don't like this movie because of its extreme sex, violence, and sensuality. The movie is accurate. This is how it was in Rome at that time. Go read the contemporary histories in Latin. I have. If anything the film downplays the reality of Rome during Caligula's reign.

The people who agreed to be in this movie, knowing full well that the project was VERY controversial, provide world class and Oscar level acting for the most part. The script is very good and largely based on histories of the time which are in the Vatican library.

Watch it twice. The first time you are going to be blown away by the sex, violence, and action. The second time you can see the acting. If you are a good Christian, cross yourself and run the other way. This film isn't for prudes.
3 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A Major Movie - A Must See - How did I not hear of it?
9 July 2006
Given the wonderful quality of Head In The Clouds I don't know how I never heard of it until I stumbled over it on the Netflix web page and decided to rent it.

This is a major movie. It is an emotionally powerful movie. It has a huge scope both in time and space, historical accuracy, an excellent, and at times complex, script, outstanding performances by all concerned, great direction, and superb cinematography. I loved it and I cried at the end.

Charlize Theron was fantastic as Gilda. I have known people such as the character she played and she had it just right. With her body language she told us she was rich, talented, cynical, very loyal to her real friends, and in the end so very brave. Her voice is such that sometimes I think she is channeling Theresa Russell.

Stuart Townsend played his part of a quiet underclass Belfast Irishman, Guy, perfectly. Some reviewers were disappointed that his performance wasn't stronger. Hey, Rambo wouldn't have survived long as a British operative in Nazi occupied Paris. Townsend triumphs in subtlety and his character narrates some of the story.

Penelope Cruz was perfect as Mia, who had been physically injured by Fascists in Spain when they came to take her brother away, presumably to be executed given that the time immediately preceded the Spanish Civil War of the 1930's.

Thomas Kretschmann is brilliant as Frans Bietrich, the personification of Nazi evil: educated, urbane, thoughtful, and completely ruthless when torturing and murdering.

The repartee among the three friends, Gilda, Mia, and Guy, during the prewar period is very realistic. I've participated in similar conversations. There are several back referencing jokes. You have to pay attention. In addition we see the best presentation of a three way sexual relationship I've ever seen on film. These three people love each other and this is beautifully communicated.

World War II was a cataclysm that shook the world. The free peoples were fighting for the life of their civilizations against what was one of the most evil regimes to ever exist through all of history, the German Third Reich. The story starts well before WWII and we are shown the good life of a wealthy young woman and her friends in Paris. We are then taken to the Spanish Civil War and on into WWII. The things portrayed in this movie HAPPENED although maybe not exactly as in the story shown; however, similar things are well documented as occurring during WWII. If one doesn't have much knowledge of the history of that period the story may seem far fetched. It isn't. For all I know the story is factual even though there is the usual statement at the end about it all being fiction.

More about Kretschmann: Toward the end of the movie there is a scene in which his character is supervising the torture of a young woman member of the French Resistance. The torturers are using the near drowning method, waterboarding is what the CIA calls it today. He is seated with his back to his underlings and gives the order to immerse her, then plays with a loose thread on his shirt cuff while timing the immersion. He fiddles with his cuff links. He is clearly bored. Just another day at the office. When he decides she isn't going to talk he gives the order to put her under and and never orders her to be raised. I have heard it phrased: "The banality of evil". Kretschmann and Duigan bring it off to perfection.

This is a must see movie. It will stick with you. Parts of it will come back to haunt you for at least several days. As I said before, this is powerful stuff.
38 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sahara (2005)
1/10
Absolutely awful
4 June 2006
Don't waste your time. I wish I'd used that two hours to do something else.

Clive Cussler must have asked that his name be removed after seeing this atrocity. Wonderful cast, incredible special effects, all wasted on a ludicrous script. The chase scenes went on and on and on. The fight scenes went on and on and on. Both were obviously extended ad nauseam because the story was so weak. With a competent script writer it coulda been a blockbuster. Another disaster was the out of place alleged theme music. For the kind of money they spent making this movie they could have spent a little more and had a decent theme - or could they? Movie theme composers work from what they see on the screen and in this case that would have induced nausea.

Note: Obviously lacking was chemistry between Cruz and McConaughey.
11 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Really excellent. Murray's best performance ever.
3 May 2006
Warning: Spoilers
A really excellent film which was completely misunderstood by the critics when it was released. Since the plot was a bit more complicated than cops chasing robbers around the block the critics had a real hard time with it. It is not a comedy, a tragedy, a soap opera, or a war movie. It is all of the above. It is like life. Having known several people who were somewhat similar to the man being portrayed by Murray I found this film profoundly moving. I laughed, I cried, and I was impressed.

Murray's performance, playing a serious man who doesn't take himself seriously, is very impressive. Theresa Russell is brilliant. Her scene with a nun in a hospital is possibly the best thing she has ever done. James Keach, Catherine Hicks, and Denholm Elliot played their roles to perfection. My only criticism of the movie is that it wasn't long enough. I didn't want it to end. I have put a lot of superlatives in this little review which I am writing 22 years after the movie was released. Perhaps, like fine wine, this movie needed to age a bit to be really appreciated.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Formula (1980)
10/10
A wonderfully complex movie
14 February 2006
Warning: Spoilers
This movie is not for the weak of mind. The plot is complex. I remember reading reviews that used words like "murky." Since the movie was a bit more complex than cops chasing robbers around some city at high speed most critics lack the intellectual wherewithal to keep track of what is going on.

Beginning with a friend's murder in Los Angeles Lt. Barney Caine, LAPD, (George C. Scott) follows a trail which takes him to Europe and leads to a formula for turning coal into gasoline. It takes Caine a while to uncover this and the plot takes a number of twists and turns. The ending can only reinforce one's cynicism about how the world works.

The performances are strong and the movie is well worth the time taken to view it.
12 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A true film noir
5 September 2005
This film is so film noir that it's difficult to see. There is more black than color in most shots. Most of the time it's difficult to figure out what is supposed to be happening. Sam Elliot is brilliant as usual but his time was wasted in this one given given the really crummy cinematography and editing. While the come on for this movie is sexual explicitness the version I saw, which was distributed in Canada, had none. About all the film could muster was in that department was some rather tame S & M and sounds of sex. That's sounds - not view of. I felt ripped off after buying the DVD for an extremely reasonable amount of money, i.e. cheap. With the exception of Elliot's performance watching this movie is a waste of time.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed