I read the reviews on the site before watching and expected a lot worse than what I got. Most people are reviewing the series as an in-depth look into Elisa Lam and her story. And considering the title, I don't blame them. I expected the same. But that's really not what the series is about.
The series focuses more on the media circus and the social media influencers who dug into every tiny detail hoping to conform a real person's story to their desired narrative. The middle two parts were a bit drawn-out and frustrating, but I believe they were designed that way. The second episode starts off interesting enough, discussing more details that people on the internet came upon and theories that came from these details. Then this keeps going, with more details going into several tangents that are both related and unrelated to Elisa's story at once. While this was a bit dull to watch, and even very frustrating at times, the last episode put it into a better perspective. The tangents and frustratingly wild theories were exactly that. The influencers were a problem, and that's clearly what the documentary meant to say. This is not an in-depth true crime documentary that details Elisa Lam's case in a new way. It's a warning about unqualified internet sleuths and how they can damage people's lives and divert the justice they attempt to seek. And when looking at the series in this light, it is a lot more enjoyable.
Some people on here have claimed this gave a voice to the very internet sleuths that the series claims to hate. And in some ways this is true. However, at the end these influencers did admit they were wrong. And for the documentary to show how the rabbit hole of internet mysteries sucks people in, I feel the perspectives of internet "detectives" was valuable. So while giving these sleuths more attention it also warns other people about becoming like them. Even the sleuths themselves admit people shouldn't do what they did in the future.
Overall, I think the angry reviews here are due to bad marketing. The title "Crime Scene: The Vanishing at the Cecil Hotel" indicates the series is a hard-hitting, investigative peace about Elisa Lam and her case. But instead this is a cautionary tale about internet sleuthing and how, while sometimes beneficial, can turn into an obsession that harms the police, bystanders, justice, and the sleuths themselves.
The series focuses more on the media circus and the social media influencers who dug into every tiny detail hoping to conform a real person's story to their desired narrative. The middle two parts were a bit drawn-out and frustrating, but I believe they were designed that way. The second episode starts off interesting enough, discussing more details that people on the internet came upon and theories that came from these details. Then this keeps going, with more details going into several tangents that are both related and unrelated to Elisa's story at once. While this was a bit dull to watch, and even very frustrating at times, the last episode put it into a better perspective. The tangents and frustratingly wild theories were exactly that. The influencers were a problem, and that's clearly what the documentary meant to say. This is not an in-depth true crime documentary that details Elisa Lam's case in a new way. It's a warning about unqualified internet sleuths and how they can damage people's lives and divert the justice they attempt to seek. And when looking at the series in this light, it is a lot more enjoyable.
Some people on here have claimed this gave a voice to the very internet sleuths that the series claims to hate. And in some ways this is true. However, at the end these influencers did admit they were wrong. And for the documentary to show how the rabbit hole of internet mysteries sucks people in, I feel the perspectives of internet "detectives" was valuable. So while giving these sleuths more attention it also warns other people about becoming like them. Even the sleuths themselves admit people shouldn't do what they did in the future.
Overall, I think the angry reviews here are due to bad marketing. The title "Crime Scene: The Vanishing at the Cecil Hotel" indicates the series is a hard-hitting, investigative peace about Elisa Lam and her case. But instead this is a cautionary tale about internet sleuthing and how, while sometimes beneficial, can turn into an obsession that harms the police, bystanders, justice, and the sleuths themselves.
Tell Your Friends