Reviews

20 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Good horror movie but..
27 September 2005
This is a good horror movie but it does not follow the real life of Ed Gein.

Because

1)The real Texas chainsaw massacre never used a chainsaw, he used a 32 caliber to kill his victim and a knife to take the skin of then.

2)In the movie he had a family, a mother, a brother etc.. But in real life his whole family died before 1945.

3)In the movie The Texas chainsaw massacre killed whoever he see's but in real life Ed Gein only killed females over 50 years old.Why??Because he mother was over 50 years old and he did not like her.

4)In the movie he had a his father to help him kill the victim but in real life he had a friend but in went in prison a short while after he started killing in 1950.

5)In the movie the sheriff was on his side.But him real life the cops were not on his team there were trying to get prove to put him behind bars.

6)In the movie where did he learn to take the skin of his victims??Nowhere but in real life he read lots of book about the human body.

If you like horror films watch this one but if you want to learn about the life of Ed Gein avoid this film and read about him and this film should not have been inspired by a true story.

7 out of 10 for a good horror movie not for the life of Ed Gein. Enjoy!
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Deep Impact (1998)
10/10
5.9? it should be at least 6.5
31 August 2005
I know that all the disaster movies are all crap but this is really a good movie.It has a really good cast and the plot is very enjoyable the visual effects it good etc..

This movie is very similar to Armageddon, it has the same plot but Deep impact is better because 1)In Armageddon when the astronaut goes on the asteroid nothing went wrong except that someone had to stay behind to detonate the nuke and the mission was success and the earth was save.But in Deep impact nothing went wrong on the asteroid but the only thing that went wrong was when they detonated the nuke it only separated the asteroid in 2 pieces and was still headed for earth. And that makes it more interesting. 2)In Deep impact, when the president of the U.S found out that the asteroid only separated in two and was still headed for earth he had something planed to save 1 000 000 people and i'm not going to wright it because it will not be fun to watch if you already know whats going to happen.And in Armageddon the president of the U.S didn't have anything like that planed. 3)Armageddon is predictable and Deep Impact is not because i thought that something else would happen at the end.

This is a really good movie and if you didn't see it, I think that you should because it's worth it.

Ten out of Ten
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Four Brothers (2005)
7/10
Nice little action flick
12 August 2005
I saw this movie August 12, the day it came out and I liked it.This is a nice action movie and probably the best action movie of 2005.But I don't understand the "R" rated it should be rated 14A because there nothing serious in it except for language and action but action is what most of the kids 14 and older prefers for movies.

**SPOILER IN THIS PARAGRAPH**

In this movie every thing was perfect like the action scenes.The actors all did a perfect job.But the only thing I did not like is the fight scene between Bobby Mercer (Mark Wahlberg) and Victor Sweet (Chiwetel Ejiofor) at the end of the movie because the camera was moving too much and it was going around people and behind wild the camera could've just stayed in the middle of the circle.You have a hard time keeping your eyes on the fight scene.

But anyway this is a good movie and anyway who is an action fan should go see it, it's worth watching.
8 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sin City (2005)
9/10
Great movie
12 August 2005
This is the only movie in the 21st century that deserve an "R" rated.Most of the other movies are rated are but should be 14A.

The only thing I don't like about this movie is the color.Black/white movie was between the first film ever made and the 1950's, but now we are in the 21st century this movie should've been in color and it would've made the blood stand out more.The only reason why I gave it a 9 out of 10 is because of the color.

Still, even if it is in black/white it is still a very good movie.This is in my top best movie of the 21st century until now and I can't believe it only made 50million$ at the box office, it should've made at least 75 million$ at the box office.

If you haven't seen this movie yet i suggest you go see it now.It's a good movie.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bad Boys (1995)
7/10
the best action comedy ever made period
10 August 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I laugh almost the hole movie.Will Smith and Martin Laurren are perfect for there characters and nobody could've replaced them.The acting is good is very good and the plot is a little cheeze but it will do.The cast is good and the directer Michael bay did an awesome job at it.

The ending is a little cheeze because four police officers take on 100 bad guys in ware house at the airport at the same time.Right! But the ending turn out not bad when the car chase started in the airport.

If you are an action fan and you didn't see this one go see it. Its worth a look.

**good movie 7 out of 10**
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
very good and interesting
10 August 2005
This is a very smart movie but there not much to say about it.

The acting very good but not good enough for academy awards.

The plot is very interesting and better than Hostage (2005 Bruce Willis)

There's not much that came to my mind after I was done watching this movie but it was really a good smart action movie.

If anyone ever saw hostage before and liked it well they should watch this movie because it is similar and better and more interesting and is worth watching.

Great movie an 8 out of 10 go see it now
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Titanic (1997)
10/10
the best movie ever made
2 August 2005
Why did this movie made 600million dollars at the box office?it's because you people loved it.

Why is this movie only rate 6.9 out of 10?It's because 10 000 people in the world didn't like it and those 10 000 votes on IMDb and the hole world would've voted on IMDb for titanic this movie would've been and 8.8 out of 10.

Why is this movie not in the top 250?Well because there is not enough voters on IMDb.

I don't know why people didn't like this wonderful masterpiece.Maybe because you don't like love stories and who ever doesn't shouldn't of watch this one then and go do bad comments on it.And maybe people didn't like it because it is a remake, well get over it, I like this one way more then the 1953 version and plus I like all the remakes because if Iwonna watch Walking tall well I have the choice between the good one or the bad one

I don't know why people didn't like the story.I think the story is great there could'nt of been a better one that shows the gigantic boat (titanic) sink in the middle of the Atlantic.

Every thing is wonderful about this movie, the actors,the characters, the music, the visual effects, the scenery, and every thing else.

Leonardo DiCaprio should've gotten en award for his great performance and Kate Winslet should've gotten one too.
9 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Punisher (2004)
10/10
Great movie
2 August 2005
Warning: Spoilers
***May contain a spoiler for some people***

People say that this movie had been taken from a cartoon character and it is true but I don't know people say that this is a remake because it's not.Was Star wars Episode One (1999) a remake.No it wasn't because George Lucas decided to had a another part before the original star wars (1977)

In 1989 Dolph Lundgren did a movie called the Punisher but it only shows Frank castle (the punisher/Dolph Lundgren) killing bad guys but not who killed his family.While The Punisher 2004 (Thomas Jane) it shows The punisher trying to kill the people responsible for his family death.Jonathan Hensleigh only made a movie the goes before The punisher (1989, Dolph Lundgren) so the punisher 1989 is now the punisher 2 or 3 because there's another Punisher coming out in 2006.

One of the best movie of 2004 and one of the best action movie in this decade. (2000-2010)

Enjoy watching this movie.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
What a movie
21 July 2005
This is a great forgotten classic movie.The special effects are very good and the brilliant actors Steve Mcqueen and Paul Newman did an awesome job for there amazing characters.

Steve Mcqueen and Paul Newman are a great team together and there no boy else that could've taken there place in this movie

I think that IMDb movie votes are wrong and I think that this movie should be at least over 7 stars out of 10.

Did anybody see Ladder 49 before and enjoyed that movie, I suggest that you go to blockbuster and rent this great classic movie and if you didn't like Ladder 49 I think that you should still go to blockbuster and rent this one because it worth watching.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hostage (2005)
9/10
wow! what a movie
21 July 2005
I didn't see this movie in theater but I wanted too and it was too late.I coulnd't wait for it to come out on DVD so i could go rent it.

The first thing that came to my mind when this movie ended was "wow what a great movie from Florent Emilio Siri (the directer). He did a very good job directing one of a kind movie.Robert Crais the one who wrote this novel is very smart for think of something like this it is terrific.

The script is brilliant and i havant seen a movie like this in a long time.Plus I havant see Bruce Willis (Jeff Talley) like this in a long time too.

All the actors in this movie were just wonderful and all the characters were well designed.If anyone who didn't see this movie should go rent it because it is very interesting and worth taken a look.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Jaws (1975)
10/10
Shark everybody out of the water
21 July 2005
When i first saw this movie i was impress by Spielberg's work it was unreal.the shark look real even when Matt Hooper (Richard Dreyfuss) was underwater and the shark came close to the gage it look real.The Special effects were extremely good.

I have one last thing to say about this movie is the 3 R's Roy Scheider, Robert Shaw and Richard Dreyfuss they all did a perfect job for there role and After this movie was done I did wish that those 3 actors would've been in Jaws 2 again because they make a good team together.

If you ever want to watch a shark movie don't watch Shark attack, Deep Blue see, Jaws 3, Jaws The Revenge or any other shark movie I suggest you watch this wonderful masterpiece.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The only word to describe this movie is "wow"
21 July 2005
There not much o say about this movie except the all the brilliant actors that did a very good performance in this truly good masterpiece.

John Sturges did a awesome job directing this movie.He does not just show how that Steve Mcqueen (Capt. Virgil 'The Cooler King' Hilts) and his war buddies escape.He also shows how was life being captured during world war two and for me that makes it an truly awesome classic.

If anyone saw one of those movie Hart's war, Escape from Alcatraz, Papillon and you like and you didn't see this one I strongly suggest you go rent in special edition DVD and watch the movie and all the special features
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
OK this movie should be in the bottom 100
21 July 2005
The first movie in the series what fantastic and the second was just horrible because they change the actors a little bit and now the 3rd movie in the series is just horrible.

The first movie in the series had a lot to tell about Bufford Pusser's life and the second in the series had just had few thing that really happened to Bufford but not enough to make it interesting and now the 3rd movie in the series is just horrible worst then the second one and this one doesn't tell anything real about Bufford life except for when he died at the end.

If anyone if planning on watching this movie you should not watch this one and just watch the first in the series its more interesting then this one.Please don't waste your time watching this movie go on and make coffee instead.
4 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
What happen??
21 July 2005
How can they from Joe Don Baker (as Bufford Pusser in the first sequel) to Bo Svenson (as Bufford Pusser in the second sequel).Why did they do that for.Just Because Bo Svenon look more a like to Bufford Pusser they still should'nt of changed it because the first sequel it was Joe Don Baker as Bufford Pusser and that one of the thing i wanted to see in the second sequel.

I would've given this movie a 7 out of 10 and i would've given it a 1 out of 10 if the story did'nt have anything to do with Bufford Pusser's life but it did and that why i had given this movie a 3 out 10.

I strongly suggest that anyone who is planning on watching this cheese i suggest don't and watch the first sequel instead.
5 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Walking Tall (1973)
10/10
Forget walking tall 2004 (the rock) watch this one instead
21 July 2005
Walking tall 2004 is only 80 minutes long and you have to quest you're self sometime in the movie for what happened.But this one is longer and more enjoyable and you don't have to guess what going on because it has more details in this on the remake.

I think that in this movie they didn't tell the real things about Bufford Pusser life.They change to many part of his life to put it in the movie. Example-Bufford Pusser studied law in the 40's at university and applied to be a police officer at a lot of stations but in the movie he just returns back home with his family and want to become the sheriff and i'm not going to tell you why because i don't want to spoil the movie for you if you already know what going to happen.

Even if they Skip a lot of parts about Buffor Pusser's life it doesn't mean its not a good movie.It is very interesting i think and anyone who didn't see should go see it.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The best western ever made
21 July 2005
As you all know The good the bad and the ugly is the best western ever made not just because of the good plot, the good acting but also the scenery of Sergio Leone because he took time and entered civil war scenes in the movie that makes it interesting and it shows how the battle took place and how hard the man fought for there country at the time. The acting in this movie is very good for a movie of the 60's and the script is brilliant and i'm glade that Sergio Leone chosed Clint to be the man with no name.

Anyone who like western movie and you never seen this one i suggest you go see it now and does who doesn't like western movie well this one is still worth watching so go rent it.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The best Alcatraz movie ever
21 July 2005
This movie shows mostly how the prisoners lived during there time in prison.They're is no music during the escape, and i was satisfied about that because its different for once.

As I already mention is that it shows the way the prisoners lived and I think it's different because for me I actually want to see other things that happened at Alcatraz then just the escape by Frank morris ( Clint Eastwood) and the two brothers Clarence Anglin (Jack Thibeau) and John Anglin (Fred Ward) that was brilliant escape I think, because they actually took time planning it.

This movie does deserve a 10 out of 10 and i recommend this movie for anyone.
9 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Space Cowboys (2000)
8/10
brilliant script , terrific actors, and one of the best film of the year 2000
20 July 2005
Space Cowboys is similar to the movie Armageddon.If you like the movie Armageddon you will definitely like this terrific movie.between those two movie i like way more space cowboys because the was a little more interesting then Armageddon.

This movie is in my top 10 movies because of its four brilliant lead actors that did a terrific job in this movie that could not have been any better then this.

When I first saw this movie I did not know what to expect.I was asking my self if I really wanted to stay there and watch the movie because it did not look to good when i saw the commercial on t.v.When the movie started I was asking myself is this movie going to be actually good or bad because the beginning was kind of cheese but it turned out to be one of the best movie i've seen in years and I was happy I watched it.

Anybody who like Armageddon would like this one for sure and if you didn't like Armageddon, space cowboys is still worth watching
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Blood Work (2002)
7/10
60 year old man still using a gun in movie
20 July 2005
Clint Easwood is over 60 years old now and he is still the main character in action movies.Clint was a good action star in the 60', 70's, and 80's but the 90's he is action movies was not that great.Now in the 21 century and he is still the action star in this movie.I think that Clint had his time for being the action star in movies, he should only be in drama, adventure, or even comedy movies now.They should'voe taken somebody else to play the character Terry McCaleb in this movie, maybe even Tommy Lee Jones etc.Clint should'voe just stayed the directer for this movie

Just Because Clint was not the best actor to be the main character it doesn't mien it's still not a good movie.The plot was excellent and it just keeps you guessing for who the bad guy is.

It is still a good movie and if you never seen it before, go rent it one day It's worth watching.I rate this movie a 7 out of 10
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One punch and one knocked out
20 July 2005
I read a lot of reviews on million dollar babe and i havan't read on bad yet and i hope i'm never going to read one bad on this movie.

This movie is probable the best movie of 2004.Clint Eastwood did a very good job directing this movie.If Clint is planning on stopping directing movies or acting in movies, million dollar babe should not be the last one.

All i can say about this movie is the acting of this entertaining movie.The acting in this movie could'nt be any better except for Maggie Fitzgerald's (Hilary Swank) family members, Earline Fitzgerald (Margo Martindale), Mardell Fitzgerald (Riki Lindhome).Those two actors wasn't that great in this movie but it still made a very good movie.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed