Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
1/10
What a joke!
25 July 2009
Warning: Spoilers
(spoilers from the beginning of the movie only)

Being a fan of Nikita (the original movie), a fan of Besson's work and open-minded to whatever remake Hollywood want to make from a good story, I had some expectation for this movie; a great writer, a good director, some very good actors, what could go wrong? Well… everything!

Don't hear me wrong. I have nothing against Hollywood remakes of foreign movies. I liked a lot True Lies for example, which have not much in common with the original French movie except roughly the underlying story. But it was fun and entertaining.

First I was surprised to watch the beginning of the movie almost identical frame by frame to the French movie. Okay, why not. As I said I'm open-minded. The first scene, where Bridget Fonda Character Nina is supposed to kill a cop in cold blood… well… we don't see it. It is suggested only because she is later condemned to death for murder. Why? Is it too harsh to see a female kill a cop!? It makes no sense to cut that… that's the whole point! Second noticeable scene… again almost identical frame by frame to the original… after being beaten by a cop, Nina ask for a pen to fill her confession… and she is supposed to strike the pen through the cop's hand as a revenge. Well, she asks for a pen all right… smiling… and that's it. Nothing more! Too violent? Come on… Third major scene… She tries to escape, and when cornered his captor his supposed to put a bullet in her leg to calm her down. Well, she took the bullet all right as we discover a bandage later… but we don't see the scene happened in the remake! Again, is it to difficult for the audience to see someone take a bullet in the leg!!?? Last scene before I collapsed… when her karate instructor asks her to keep her guard high and try to hit him, she immediately slap him in the face in the original movie. That's the character. Not playing with the rules, unpredictable, and hitting the guy by pure surprise. But instead, I painfully watched Nina doing some silly karate movements, then when the instructor became suddenly and conveniently distracted she hit him. It makes no sense at all that way!!!!

What a joke! It is not that this movie was badly played… it is just that after a while I was thinking that I was watching a censored version of the movie I liked. Because it was a copy almost frame by frame, but all the punch that made the scenes and the story interesting where missing. Censored by people that had really no idea of what they where doing to a very original and very well written story!

That was too much for me, a complete waste of time. I stopped watching the movie after this karate scene, completely disgusted. Now those are small spoilers as you still have a whole lot of stupid movie to digest if you really feel up to it. But if you want my advice, clearly, watch the original!
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
San Antonio (2004)
9/10
Excellent !
18 June 2006
this is a fair adaptation of Frederic Dard's novels, most certainly beyond the understanding of a foreigner without a deep knowledge of the French culture. Too bad for them, but very good for an avid San-Antonio reader that want to put some pictures on typical characters found in the books.

Don't even think to compare San-Antonio with James Bond. San-Antonio is the archetype of a rude and sexual obsessed French macho, not your usual Jaaaames. He is just like that in the books, no need to adapt the character to be politically correct for all cultures and viewers. Read the books first, that will help to understand what all this is about.

9/10 for a lot of fun while watching this movie. Please watch it in Widescreen, and in French; subtitles are your friends.
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed