Reviews

6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Lovelace (2013)
3/10
Almost Doesn't Count
27 January 2013
Warning: Spoilers
I was looking forward to seeing Lovelace since I heard about its announcement. The cast makes a case for seeing the film regardless of what the film is actually about. I think the story of Deepthroat as well as that of Traynor and Lovelace are both very intriguing. Despite having all of this going for it, I was let down. The pacing of the film is the biggest problem. The film leisurely introduces us to the cast and the relationship between Traynor and Lovelace, so leisurely in fact that I was wondering when the darker elements would be exposed. At only 92 minutes the film feels a lot longer. Anyone with any knowledge of the story at all will wonder how they're going to wrap it up as the film meanders only to make abrupt leaps in time.

It makes sense that the directors chose to end the film in 1980 as opposed to 1984, because any longer and the film would have felt interminable. This does hurt the film, though. The way the subsequent events of 1980 are handled is rushed to the point that it feels amateurish. I imagine the pieces that were cut could have been included had there been a tighter edit of the rest of the film as a whole. The way the narrative is handled is wise - cutting back to show different interpretations of the story - because so many have disputed Lovelace's claims.

All that being said,the film has its entertaining sequences - mostly thanks to the performances which are great. Also, the production design never feels hokey or inauthentic (which easily could have been the case). Another issue is that the brutality of what Lovelace claims to have endured is watered down here (for obvious reasons), but it always feels like they could have pushed it further. The scenes of abuse seem so choreographed (and rushed) that it is hard to feel the weight or emotional impact that is intended. All of the threat and malice is left up to Seyfried to make real, which she delivers on, but it shouldn't be entirely on her. Even Sarsgaard's cruel moments as Traynor don't match the sleazy charm he conveys at other points in the film. It's as if the filmmakers just expect the top notch set decoration and costumes to be enough to convince us of the terrible events just by bringing them up. At one point Linda cries to her mother (Sharon Stone) that her husband hits her; sure we see him toss her around but the domestic violence is mostly implied and it feels cowardly. That's the problem, in too many ways the film just stops at almost.
33 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Closer (I) (2004)
8/10
What a movie
21 November 2005
I saw Closer on the day it was released and following that day I summoned as many people as I could to see this film. The film relies heavily on its four characters whom as actors all have great strength in the film. Clive Owen gives a fantastic and seemingly effortless performance and proved to the American market that he is an actor that we should all be taking note of. Julia Roberts stunned me. It was wonderful to see her in a role with zero likability and to watch her go head on into it fearlessly. I heard Cate Blanchett was to play the role of Anna which I would love to have seen. I think she could have taken it somewhere Julia Roberts just isn't capable of. Ironically Cate Blanchett beat Natalie Portman for her performance in this film. Jude Law is phenomenal and repulsive all at once. There isn't a single character that we can feel bad for, which I think was a weak point, but that may have been the point. Natalir Portman hands down steals the show in what is her most grown up and involved role to date. All of the performances are great but what Natalie Portman brings to the character, the screen, and the film is AMAZING. Her losing at Oscar time was rather disappointing to me. I think this is a movie that deserves to be seen. Not everyone will like it, but there is brutal honesty. I would concur that the honesty is dramatized for the screen and hearing these people talk we may think "people in relationships don't talk like that." Though we may not, at least in Closer the characters will say what we think and want to say.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bad Education (2004)
10/10
Que Pelicula!
9 November 2005
This is an amazing film. It is rare that a film is created with such originality. Granted, the film takes itself a bit seriously but with reason. Gael Garcia Bernal is spectacular as is Fele Martinez and the rest of the cast. Almodovar is known for his amazing work and La Mala Educacion (Bad Educaction) not only holds up his credibility, but gives an indestructible strength. The film almost feels as if it could have been made in the late 1960s or 1970s and we are lucky enough to have just come across this antique gem. Although the movie is set in 1980 it has the style of a film that has haunted audiences for decades; no doubt that it will. Bad Education is a truly galvanizing experience and a beautiful piece of modern film noir.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
one of the greatest horror films ever
8 November 2005
I don't even know if this is a true horror film. I would say yes because the multi layered story keeps you thinking and caring for the characters long after it is over. Don't Look Now is a genuinely heartbreaking story. I feel that it serves its purpose as a horror film because all of its little elements that find their way deep under your skin don't settle there with ease. The film is like watching a nightmare unfold where you tell yourself 'I'm dreaming' but you don't wake up. Julie Christie and Donald Sutherland are both phenomenal. I think the dramatic portions of the film are heavy and make us care for these sad people enough to be afraid for them. This is a film which must be seen more than once; not only to appreciate it, but to understand that it really does all come together. It has been said millions of times, but "They don't make 'em like this anymore."
12 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A film that deserves to be seen
8 November 2005
I found this film to be exciting to watch but my excitement wasn't entirely consumated. A title such as 'Let's Scare Jessica to Death' almost dares you not to find out what this film could hold. I so appreciate the feel and suspense which old films in the genre capture. The story is far fetched, but it is a fun ride hoping something will take place among the sleepy little town. The script isn't great, but the direction and acting is respectable. By today's horror genre standards this film is a gem. On its own, the film is fair no real loss or gain for me. At least tell your friends to see it so you can be the one who told them about a film with a title intriguing as 'Let's Scare Jessica to Death.'
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Darkness (2002)
2/10
How do films such as this get made?
8 November 2005
I hesitate to give 2 stars. I only do it because they were clever enough to hook me in with the plot, granted I didn't know too much about it. Often times when a film has as many cliché copycat elements of other films it's a tired sequel. Not this horrendous insult to film-making. It wanted to be "The Shining," it wanted to be "The Others" and failed miserably with no originality of its own. So many great films come out of Spain, but this is the result when an all too inspired foreign director decides to captivate an American audience. This movie is total s*it. I've fallen asleep watching it twice. At least I know what to do on those sleepless nights now.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed