My biggest complaint about Wes Anderson films is the constant exposition full of whimsically redundant details. A little bit of this is okay but this film was non stop.
The film felt like one long exposition rather than a story. It's like a constant narration of what is happening instead of letting the story tell itself through dialog. The first story was good. I enjoyed it. It was a bit silly but that's okay. The movie gets progressively worse from there. The second story makes absolutely no sense at all. And the third story is somehow even worse.
It's the kind of story where it probably makes sense to the writer but the audience has absolutely no clue what is going on until watching it a second or third time.
That's not why I watch his movies though. I watch his movies for the production design and style. And this film was absolutely beautiful visually.
The story sucked but it looked nice. Typical Wes Anderson.
The film felt like one long exposition rather than a story. It's like a constant narration of what is happening instead of letting the story tell itself through dialog. The first story was good. I enjoyed it. It was a bit silly but that's okay. The movie gets progressively worse from there. The second story makes absolutely no sense at all. And the third story is somehow even worse.
It's the kind of story where it probably makes sense to the writer but the audience has absolutely no clue what is going on until watching it a second or third time.
That's not why I watch his movies though. I watch his movies for the production design and style. And this film was absolutely beautiful visually.
The story sucked but it looked nice. Typical Wes Anderson.
Tell Your Friends