Reviews

46 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
We're getting there
11 May 2005
Warning: Spoilers
This entry has the dubious task of linking episode I to III (the one we all want to see) as well as introducing some of the key characters from the original trilogy.

The Anakin we see in this film is an arrogant teen, skilled but hindered by his outlook. The best moment belongs to Anakin, at the point in which we see hints of Darth Vader, as he decides that the best option to solve the issue of his mothers death is to violently slaughter a load of sand people n cold blood. Top notch. He seems already on his way to inheriting his full-body asthma pump in this one.

The special effects, once again, are amazing, although I'm not sure I'm a fan of digital film. Whereas in Episode I the FX seemed natural and part of the overall film frame - integrated - in this episode it all looks a bit too clean. The effects still look slightly pre-rendered (I would have liked to have seen them slightly more 'weathered'). It's a hard concept to explain, see for yourselves.

This can't deny the fact that the action scenes are stunning and on an even larger scale than seen in Episode I. The light saber action is lacklustre compared to the previous instalment - in the sense that it is far too short. The Yoda/Dooku battle does make up for this somewhat, and is a genuinely impressive moment for fans.

No problems with the CGI yoda, he's great. Mace Windu gets a larger role in this one, and there is a memorable face off between Jango Fett and Obi-Wan (now looking like a Nicky Clarke model with his golden hair and beard).

It all seemed a bit soul-less though, we'll see how this changes in Episode III (after all they are meant to be viewed as one film, so we can let George off for now).
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Would be a 9 if it wasn't for Jam Jar
11 May 2005
The critical backlash against this marvellous entry into the Star Wars series is what is known as unfounded favouring of nostalgia, a refusal to advance forwards and being a bunch of knob cheeses.

Apart from the annoying JarJar Binks, Episode I is an incredible film, grand in scale and spectacle, introducing and elegant and historic - rather than futuristic - feel to Star Wars, additionally offering some great new characters.

The style of the film is different to the originals in the sense that the effects, a main element of the saga, through the undeniable naturalism have lost the unique 80s style that fans have come to love over the years. Once the new trilogy is complete, however, I'm sure that a massive U-Turn will occur and suddenly Episiodes i-iii will be declared a new masterpiece.

Think about it - does the original trilogy really have a better script than the new trilogy? The answer is no, the dialogue will always be simple and clichéd (that is the way Lucas works). This, as some may disagree, is the deliberate - this is a fairy tale after all.

The introduction of Darth Maul is the highlight of the story, his appearance before the stunning climactic light saber duel the veritable money shot of the piece.

Somebody please re-cut this film without JarJar Binks and then I can rate it a nine.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A New fairytale
10 May 2005
Warning: Spoilers
This film represents, I think, for many people, a new and vibrant mythology that will live on decades into the future and be passed on through generations in the same way that literary tales like Rapunzel or Jack and The Beanstalk are.

The advent of the cinema means that the medium on which the story is told is film instead of paper. It's as simple as that.

There are so many great moments in Star Wars thats its hard to pick out a singular event from the story to dwell on - but now that the Revenge of The Sith has finally elaborated on the Obi-Wan/Anakin compratriotship the final light saber duel between them is given a tragic excitement that wasn't there before the prequels.

Many people will disown the special editions as OTT, ruining the original vision - b*llocks to that. See the Special Editions - they are aesthetically much better and the expanded visions of creatures and systems fits in more with the new trilogy.

Look out for the Storm Trooper tw*ting his head against the blast doors in the death star and also notice that the fat sh*t pilot at the end is called Porkins.

A timeless classic.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fitting but flawed final instalment
10 May 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Only now does George Lucas feel ready to invest in a more adult representation of his Star Wars Universe. Back in the 80s his creative influence over Kasdan extended to the introduction of some hairy little gimps called Ewoks.

This however, remains my only real complaint about the additional characters in the film. Its not that the Ewoks are unlikable or insipid - but the fact that these little bears are capable of defeating hardened Storm Troopers with a twig hit to an armoured bonce. This is a narrative complaint, as the characters and their environment of the Ewok village actually lend quite an evocative atmosphere to the Endor scenes - especially the saccharine sweet closing sequence.

Personally speaking I think that Han Solo should have died for his friends in this one. Not only would it have added the element of tragedy that made 'Empire so great, but made the Rebels quest for freedom all the more poignant. It all seems far too convenient that the only people we see loose their lives are some unknown rebel pilots.

The most emotional moment remains the point at which Darth Vader decides that love for his son is far greater than his desire for power over the galaxy and decides to lob the Palpatine down a power shaft that engineers (disobeying intergalactic health and safety law) had placed in the Emperor's lounge room. The score helps the tears well sufficiently at this point, as Anakins story reaches full-circle.

The special effects are second to none, their combination of sophistication and simplicity becoming a unique style of its own. Highlights include the Battle of Endor (the space part of it) and the final showdown between father and son (quite a Freudian moment for all you psychology nerds out there).

A brilliant, yet slightly immature end, to the saga. Some fun moments:

1)Luke hiding ridiculously close to Vader and not getting noticed. 2)Han Solo surviving a Wembley Stadium sized explosion by hiding behind a log. 3)The Emperor gloating that the rebels are losing the space battle despite the ships being far too small to actually see who is winning. 4)Some one shouting "Die Dickheads" as the Super Star Destroyer crashes.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
One of those rare sequels....
10 May 2005
Warning: Spoilers
The Empire Strikes Back is a large improvement over the original Star Wars in terms of drama and suspense. The special effects are more consistent and more impressive (but this is because of the obviously larger budget).

The most significant development is the elaboration on the Skywalker/Vader relationship, as we are beginning to understand things run far deeper than just hero versus villain. Its actually quite pshycological in the sense that it taps into the "sons" fears of becoming their "Fathers" worst personality elements.

But enough of all that what we really want to see is large scale assaults on hidden installations, breathtaking space pursuits, Vader getting stuck in with Solo and the like and Luke screaming like a little girl at the moment of revelation no body was expecting but that now seems ingrained in the public consciousness. Does anyone actually remember being surprised to find out that Vader was Luke's father? The Emperor makes his first appearance of the original trilogy in this film, and remains enigmatic and suspicious. Vader is also extra shiny and even more relentlessly evil, having no problems in cutting his own sons wanking claw from his arm.

The music is once again integral to the flow of the story, which still struggles with some particularly hammy dialogue. Still an utter classic though.

Best scene: Vader sends out the bounty hunters to track down Han Solo.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Predator (1987)
8/10
Pure gold
6 September 2004
One of the best 5 action films of the 1980s and definitely in the running for the best action film tag line, Predator is an absolute treat from start to finish.

Of course, if you are a retard of film you'll probably look down on it as disposable rubbish, which it is, but that is the very reason it should be embraced.

Because this disposable rubbish is SH*T HOT! COME ON!

The ever legendary Arnie is on top form in this one - he looks great, he cracks a few decent one-liners, and the part was tailor made for him so his woodenness doesn't show one little bit.

THere are also appearances by Jesse Ventura and Bill Dukes so the 'daddies' quota is filled nicely. It's even got Action Jackson in it too.

Brilliant FX and creature work from Stan Winston is amazing. THe alien itself is a beast; intriguing as well as a deadly b*stard in equal measure, hopefully ALien Vs. Predator will go into it's culture in the ways that Predator and the poor sequel have tempted us to wonder just what that may be.

Because it's the first film in the 'series' it doesn't suffer from fan-boy syndrome and will stand in its own league as an introduction to a franchise, but a great film in its own right.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I, Robot (2004)
8/10
Plain and simple, a great blockbuster
26 August 2004
This film is really an update of Blade Runner. It's not in the same vein as that film; where Blade Runner was a gritty noir this is shiny and clean, with a hint of corruption underneath.

The actions scenes are noting short of breathtaking, there is some hilarious dialogue and Wil SMith proves himself one again to be the daddy of the blockbuster.

The CGI is particularly impressive, but does not lead the story, just enhances it. Sonny is a brilliant character - as impressive both in performance and looks as Gollum from The Lord of the Rings Trilogy.

People will resent the comparison with the supposed best sci-fi of all time but they can swivel - it is just as good, but in an alternative way. It takes that films best themes and puts them in a more optimistic rather than throat slittingly depressing light.

The twists and turns and little touches of genius are dotted around all over the film, but I won't ruin them if you haven't seen the film yet and are reading my review. I did however, find the reasoning behing the 'rise of the robots' as a bit weak and predictable.

See it, you'll be entertained at the very least. If not, you'll probably love it.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Better left forgotten
19 May 2004
This is an un-necessary sequel to a trilogy that was better left alone after part three. THe whole thing is done in a comic book style and so stands out from the naturalistic attitudes of the other films.

One reason to watch would be to witness the ALiens as fully realised CGI creatures - they are very impressive on land but weaker in the water scenes, looking a tad fake.

The series has become a bit tired by this point (Alien-human hybrids - no thanks, that is, unfortunately, sh*t and not scary) and Weaver looks bored in the role.

Ron 'Naughty Nick Nolte' Perlman is Great in it though! Overall a waste of time and money that should have been put towards a decent 'Predator' sequel methinks.

Tosh but semi-entertaining: 5/10.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Alien 3 (1992)
9/10
Re-born on DVD as a classic sequel
19 May 2004
The original theatrical cut of this film, as many have already stated, was a disappointment to fans of the original two films. However, 'Alien 3' is not a forgotten film due to it's re-release on the DVD format in which it emerges as a classic film from an on form David Fincher.

If 'ALien' was birth, 'Aliens' was Life, then 'Alien 3' is all about death. THe tone of the picture is all melancholy and gritty. The characters are a bunch of paedophs, murderers and possibly cat rapists if they put them in prison, I dunno. In this sense we don't really care what happens to them and are extra stressed about the whole thing because Ripley has to worry about unwanted 'bloodsports' as well as the Alien creature.

The casting is perfect though, with a great ensemble of thesps to keep the feeling of genuinely and respectability going.

The new DVD edition is a longer film and adds some more dimensions to the alien lifecycle, offers a much more tragic element to the part of the story involving trying to capture the creature, and adds some more iconic visuals with a new opening sequence. THe intended epic nature of the film is only visible in this cut and should be the only one viewed really.

Very frightening with no 'action for actions sake'. Remember one thing - this is not a film trying to top CAmeron's effort or replicate Scott's - it is a decidedly down beat Fincher version of the world created in the first tow films.

6/10 Theatrical 8/10 DVD re-release with re inserted scenes
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Goodfellas (1990)
8/10
A modern popularist classic
19 May 2004
First and foremost, much as many so-called film conosieurs would like to think, Martin Scorsese is not an underground name anymore - and Goodfellas marked his departure from exclusive to mainstream alternative.

Try to forget the urban chique that now surrounds Goodfellas and watch with a mind to experience the visceral nature of this brilliant film. Don't think of it on terms of whats 'cool' or what 'happens'; but why and how these events are occuring.

Just try to experience Goodfellas from the perpective it was intended -of Henry Hill, not of a comfortable arm chair perspective where what is, in fact sickening violence and abuse, can appear as glorified and entertaining. Imagine it was you who were at risk and apply this to Scorsese's in-your-face-approach.

Joe Pesci is amazing in this film, and once again DeNiro commands each and every moment he does not share with Pesci, with total charisma and power.

The benchmark to which many Scorsese and other gangster films will be measured, for years to come, and a certified part of popular culture.

Stunning.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Abyss (1989)
Brilliant, long and strong
19 May 2004
Some people may moan that 'The Abyss' is excessive in it's length, which is probably one of the reasons why the DVD and video sales of the film have been a major factor in it's success overall.

Like all of James Cameron's pictures there are many really original flares of genius with regards to plot twists that I wont give away (but will hint that the sequence in which Harris and Mastrantonio are trapped in the submersible contains one).

They final act is nothing short of wonderful - the entire film is all about taking the viewer on a voyage of discovery - and truly awe inspiring, with special effects that would make George Lucas swoon even now.

These last few moments also contain the trademark Cameron moral ambiguity, in which he highlights some major human weaknesses and questions them, making us all tae stock and think, despite the fact that his films are blockbusters we can still learn from them.

Brilliant cast and beautiful camera work, he's pulled another classic out of the bag here!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Aliens (1986)
9/10
The superior sequel (but a matter of taste too)
19 May 2004
James Cameron took the bear bones of the original Alien (claustraphobia, fear, corporate greed and that legendary creature) and injected the entire package with amphetamines in order to create 'Aliens'.

The film takes a similar structure to the original, with the entire first act being made up almost entirely of 'build-up', apart from a few gory nightmares to please the horror fans. In the special edition the tension is heightened by revisiting the planet from the original and seeing it colonized by naive humans.

When the touch paper is lit, however, 'ALiens' really comes into its own. THe action is frenetic and violent, the creatures savagery unmatched, and the situation dire, to say the least. These humans get basically butt raped by the xenomorphs and are forced into a game of survival.

The grunts vs. corporation power vs. unseen enemy gives the whole film an air similar to Vietnam movies, the special creature effects are stunning and the special effects have stood up to the test of time well. Stylisitically it could all be set in the same cinematic world as CAmeron's 'The Terminator' such is the director's consistency.

The Alien Queen is, to put it bluntly Sh*t Hot! This is by far and away what everyone wanted to see from a sequel; bigger, badder and better.

Don't forget thought that it is a re-invention of the franchise and a totally different type of film; but if we're all being honest then Aliens takes the original by the head and punches an extendable jaw right through its face!
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Alien (1979)
9/10
A landmark, a quality landmark
19 May 2004
Scott's 1979 'Alien' is one of the most emotionally manipulative films out there. It is more horror than science fiction, mainly because the technology in the film is actually plausable and believable at the very least.

When watching 'Alien' again for it's special edition release at the cinema I actually found myself afraid at moments I had seen time and time again, such is the strength of the tension created in the film.

The Alien creature's life cycle seems second nature to most film fans now, but it must have been fascinating to see first time round. Such is the modern-day legend created by the film that I was already partially aware of what I'd be seeing before I watched the film, even as a ten year old.

THis is a great piece of cinema, shot elegantly and with plenty of twists and turns to keep horror, sci-fi and drama fans happy for a couple of tense hours. Don't let the entire hour of "build up" fool you-keep watchin and you're in for a hell of a ride!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Van Helsing (2004)
7/10
For fans of the classics!
18 May 2004
For anybody who is familiar with the old Universal monster movies Van Helsing is a total roller-coaster, taking all of the aspects that made the vintage films great, and injecting them with LSD, speed and pyro.

The CGI, firstly, is at least complete this time, unlike the decidedly PS2 graphics like SCorpion King from the Mummy sequel. Particularly impressive are the werewolf transformations and the vampiric healing abilities.

Jackman carries his charisma well across the film, but unfortunately Beckinsale has none of the English charm that Sommers saw in Rachel Weisz - if only she would have done this one for him.

The design and shooting of the action sequences is absolutely perfect -everything can be seen in it's full glory - it's all physically plausible (within the context of action/adventure!) and it never fails to surprise.

David Wenham's character has a couple of good lines but he's generally pointless but fun (a bit like the film I suppose).

A great ride with a few surprises, the film can't really be called frightening, but it's definitely worth a look for action fans and lovers of the brilliant 'The Mummy'.

6/7-10
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Troy (2004)
7/10
Ashley Cotton and the sons of Troy dress to impress!
18 May 2004
This is a sterling effort at the epic genre by legendary 'Never Ending Story' helmer, Wolfgang Peterson. First and foremost, the casting of the film is expertly done, with all of the best actors that come to mind cast so that blood ties become perfectly believable indeed.

Brian Cox may get a gong or two for his deliciously despicable portrayal of Agammenon that is so evil and conceited the audience - and a British one at that - cheered when he was killed.

The cinematography is absolutely stunning and their are some brilliant wide-angle sweeps over the battles that bring the story to brutal realistic life. One problem with the battles, however, is that the close up work lacks continuity and appears like a sort of 'highlights' clips package.

THe sets, costumes and style of the film cannot be faulted really. THere were some greeks next to me in the cinema and they all seemed perfectly happy to gasp and whoop in all the right places.

There is a camp-factor about it all, with the guys getting their bums out all of the time and a particularly homo-erotic sparring session between Achilles (a brilliant, on form Pitt) and his cousin where they giggle like little girls, fighting with a veritable 'Ohh, smack my bum and I'll hit yours harder' attitude.

That's before Bean shows up to break it up and talk some man-sense! He's great and steals the show as usual. Eric Bana is so much harder than Achilles - he's a natural warrior, whereas Achilles is a gods-blessed cheat - and their final battle was one of the most excruciatingly tense one-on-ones I've ever seen.

Lovely music that sounds like a combination of Gladiator and Titanic. An absolutely essential blockbuster for 2004. 7.5/10

WARNING: This film is completely ruined at the climax when 'Eastender's Ashley Cotton appears for a cameo. Please shut eyes when Paris releases the sword of Troy or the entire film experience is undermined and destroyed. Thanks.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Gladiator (2000)
9/10
Emotional, evocative, emphatic - and f**cking violent!
18 May 2004
This film really does have it all.

It's got the best British director at the wheel, it's got the pure charisma of Russell Crowe, it's got sword fighting with Romans, it's got an amzing musical score, it's got great special effects, its got the best cinematography you've seen in years, it's got evocative historical accuracy, it's got a man fighting a tiger, it's got Ollie Reed (clearly p***ed on a few occasions)............the bloody lot then.

THe mastery of this film is the way in which the heart-wrenching story of Maximus is interwoven into a historical epic. THe story would have been a success even if Gladiator was lacking in the human element, but the fact is that the unholy tragedy that befalls Crowe and his subsequent quest for revenge drive the rest of the film, and make all of the various actions scenes those of 'higher stakes' than normally expected (ie. the only risk is your own skin, here it is a whole set of moral beliefs and a legacy of love).

Such a perfect fusion of drama, acting, action and musical score, this film is Hollywood at it's very best, with a British twist - humilty. See it as soon as you possibly can.

9/10 A future classic.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Cop Land (1997)
6/10
I'll be quick and to the point
8 May 2004
This is a film that is naratively too long and quite confusing. With some more editing this problem would be solved and is my only real major criticism of the text.

The cinematography and music is great but the main reason to watch this film is the totally stunning performance that Stallone puts in in this film.

Honestly, it really is unbelievable to see him act as well as all of the supporting cast - who are heavyweights themselves. I can honestly say that I couldn't take his excellence in; if you really want to be shocked then watch Rocky IV first.

An interesting and impressively intense, if flawed, crime caper.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
E.T. (1982)
8/10
I should be in the nines!
8 May 2004
Firstly, I cant believe that poor old E.T. isn't getting a better showing in the rankings than the high sevens - its a beautiful gem of a film and deserves to be at least a high eight.

Anyway, this is one of those films made by Spielberg that helps to cement his status as the premiere fairy tale teller of all (film) time.

The simple premise that not all aliens want to rip out our spines of lay chest bursters inside us a kill all our friends is a concept that has not been returned to since (apart from the dismal Cocoon).

This is probably because nobody will ever be able to recreate the intense emotional journey that Spielberg has portrayed. THe heart wrenching scenes between Elliot and E.T. at the end of the film will go to prove the exqisitely realised genuinity of the love and friendship that develops and actually exists (I mean that Henry Thomas - ELiiot - came to love the puppet as if he were real) is what makes everything in life worth it.

Full of warm moments, clever touches and humour, E.T. is an absolutely essential watch for all fim fans.

Timeless. 9/10
36 out of 68 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Will you laugh or cry - probably both...
8 May 2004
This is a film of exceptonal originality and achievement. It goes generally unnoticed by film fans but deserves a place in cinema history as a representaition of cinema in its purest of forms.

A highly visual and aural experience, with no real relevance or meaning. It's basically a mad head trip of a film full of freaks, freakish happenings and even more freakiness.

The production values are high and it shows - Jorodovsky really let rip with this one.

It's a quite disturbing film at times, with some of the exploits feeling unnessesary (but I suppose thats the point) so watch it when totally sh*t faced on drink/drugs/sunny delight and you'll have a great time!
1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
El Topo (1970)
5/10
I suppose so.
8 May 2004
Jodorowsky's El Topo is an extreme and surreal vision of what Mr. Leone did with the traditonal western.

The violence and it's execution is botyh intriguing and disgusting at the same time and there is plenty of the director's unique visual iconography. The trouble is that often this startling imagery doesn't really refer to anything in reality.

But I suppose thats no bad thing - after all, why should film have to mean something all of the time?

Even so, Jodorowsky knew that narrative is what the viewer yearns for and all of the shock and awe value in the world can't really distract from this aspect of the film slowly down far too quickly. It really drags on a bit.

A prototype for the superior 'The Holy Mountain', but still worth a considred look.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Great, great, great, great, very good!
8 May 2004
Elia Kazan's on the Waterfront is a genuinely pioneering piece of realist film making. The documeantary feel that the film emits adds so much depth to the socially relevant issues of the mob rule on the New York waterfront.

It is testament to the director's commitment that he completed the picture despite the constant threat of disruption and even physical abuse from the real life mob still present in the city during the 50s.

Marlon Brando puts in the performance of the decade, however I think it would be valid to concede that its stunning impact was given a little extra sting by the fact that 'the method' was almost brand new back then.

This is just a really classic peice of Hollywood - like all great realism the film cannot really be broken down into narrative 'chunks' until the events near the end, but the overall impression of gritt, sweat and tears of the New Yorker sets in nicely.

There is some special symbolism (the father's short left arm, of the glove antics of Evie Doyle and Brando) that just adds to its legendary status.

Essential to all serious film lovers (and blind people, possibly).
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Love me for a reason, let the reason be love...
8 May 2004
THe Rules of the game is one of those calssic pieces of French cinema that it has become ever so fasionable to praise and acknowledge as truely siginificant.

In this case however, I would agree - at least on a formal level. As a realist text it doesn't exactly have the impactual force it would have had when it was first released (obviously realism changes, by its very definition, with time) but it remains naturalistic and still, I suppose, has some valid social comments to make.

A stand out moment would be the rabbit hunt that highlights the oppression of the working classes by the bourgeois society (in MArxist terms).

Blah, blah, blah - but what are its bones? Well, I was totally impressed by Renoir's employment of the free roaming camera. He manages to construct practically each and every scene in about two cuts - its really quite amazing, and for this reason I am really fond of the aesthetics of this film.

The influence that the French new wave had on Hollywood is clear when you watch this old gem.

6/10
3 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Mission (1986)
8/10
Tragic and moving, with "powerhouse" performances
7 May 2004
Warning: Spoilers
SPOILER: Jeremy Irons is brilliant in this film!

'The Mission' is a masterful piece of emotional manipulation coupled with historical factuality. THe events portrayed within the film no doubt occured in real life, but I expect the reality of the situation was much less touching than portrayed in the film.

The film successfully romanticises the turmoil and sacrafice that the Jesuits and the natives went through during this colonisation period. The entire film is 'build-up' to a climax scored to perfection that draws on all of your sympathies and sorrows, creating a genuine emotional response.

It made me cry anyway. I would reccomend this one to anybody who doesn't mind being saddened by a film, but it's not all bad, because so much good has been done by Irons et al before it is all destroyed that the overall message is one of strength and hope.

The acting from Irons is unbelievably good, and De Niro has a small but powerful role that was impactual enough to get his bonce on all the promotional stuff.

Such a touching experience. Don't watch it alone or you'll have no one to prove that you're not just a big girl's blowse (believe me, there shouldn't be a dry eye in the house).

Also beautifully shot. 8/10.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Labyrinth (1986)
6/10
Reasons to watch Labyrinth:
7 May 2004
1. You like the sight of a huge codpiece inside a pair of leggings.

2. You're a ginger ninja and you find Ludo a liberating force.

3. Your name is 'Hoggle' and you want to find out how to burn diamonds.

4. David Bowie is one of your favorite stars and you want to see him make a total pilchard out of himself.

5. You saw Labyrinth when you were 8 and realised its still classic.

6. Jennifer Connelly is a green banana in it.

7. John Fashanu.

8. "Oh Yes Hoggle!"

9. The Goblins voices and comments on things.

10. You have lived in fear of the lady with a house on her back all of your life and wish to conquer the fear once and for all.

11. You are suffering from a terminal illness and need cheering up.

12. Huge codpieces this time in white leggings.

13. The ultimate house party (A 'How To' guide)

14. The "Bog of Eternal Stench"

I believe the saying goes; 'Jesus Wept'

Get this one in - it's a modern musical fantasy classic and quite unique. I'll give it a 6 (or a 7 if you're a fan).
1 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Nil by Mouth (1997)
8/10
Sobering and shocking, although hope remains...
5 May 2004
This is a piece of debutant film making at its best.

Oldman set about to create a gritty and colourful portrayal of the rough end of life in Saafff Lhaandan and in that respect he was f**kin sucessfull you bunch ah chaaaants!

The camera work is disjointed and initially appears clumsy, but the expertly chosen angles and focuses soon become enthralling. It is nicely gritty and rough around the edges. Take a special note of the excellent sound design - it really adds to the overall atmosphere of the cityscape Olman so expertly creates.

The narrative progression is pretty much non-existent. Like all realist films its not really about what is happening, but the broader issues exposed by smaller events within the film. These include some brutal moments from Winstone and also some heavy drinking/clubbing binges.

The acting is so good and so believable that I forgot I was watching a film - it is almost a documentary and those not familiar with the actors within the film may be fooled into thinking that is what they were watching.

Olman also introduces some subtle symbolism (the moment with the red balloon for example) but is never heavy handed or distracting.

Winstone and Burke really are stunning in this film, and the ending is a brilliant piece of ambiguity and hope. CHeck out Winstone's subtle touching moments with his daughter - it brings a tear to the eye.

Classic in the modern sense of the word.
26 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed