4/10
Irresponsible and insensitive
28 March 1999
Reminiscent of 1949's "The Snake Pit" in that it treats mental illness in an exploitative manner with patients locked up in dark cages, looking wild and dangerous. "The Snake Pit" was acclaimed in its day despite promoting a misleading and damaging portrait of mental illness. "The Caretakers" was not accorded the same applause, perhaps because people were slowly becoming more sophisticated in regard to mental illness, seeing it as an ILLNESS, although even in 1963 (and probably in 1999, as well), it was still fashionable to equate it with the arm flailing, wild-eyed image created in film. Robert Stack, a one-note actor if there ever was one (he has, post-"Airplane," shown more versatility) swaggers through the film, portraying the doctor the same way he did Eliot Ness, while Polly Bergen as the patient, engages in the kind of histrionics that usually come across as a desperate campaign to snag an Oscar nomination. It's what Clint Eastwood once called "emotional gymnastics." The black and white cinematography is exceptional, however, although it too lends itself to the exploitative nature of the film. All those dark shadows and dimly lit corridors make you wonder if Stack and company will cross paths with Dracula. They might as well because "The Caretakers" is a horror film, and although mental illness can be horrifying, it's irresponsible, to say nothing of insensitive, to portray it for shock value. That is what this film does.
19 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed