9/10
Not bad at all
2 September 2000
This film was surprisingly well made, I was almost surprised at how decent it really was. After viewing the previews, I hate to say I really was not expecting all that much. The previews made it out to be one of those "made for video" films that somehow seeped through the cracks onto major theatrical distribution, but I am the first to admit how wrong I was. All in all, it really was a decent Highlander film. Much higher quality than the quickening, or final dimension (previous sequel theatrical releases). Although, I did think that the large amount of flashbacks began to become more the "meat" of the film than it should have been, it was still nice to see more elements of what the other films were missing (depth on characters), even if it was done in such a rash overabundance. Some of the acting was faltering at times, and Christopher Lambert in some of the flashback sequences does lose and regain his scottish accent more times than this movie changed titles before its release, but I wont pretend and whine about how they could have made a better film any more. I am glad this came out as good as it did. An admirable, and otherwise prominant addition to the series.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed