Just as one should never be sentimental about making a sentimental film, so one should not make a mystical film mystically. In both cases, there should be a firm underlying storyline. Here, there isn't. Unless I missed something, a man gives blood to a baby girl suffering from a defective heart in an experimental operation done during the mid 1950s. He dies on the operation table. Then he is shown raising her years later. Thinking that I *must* have missed something, I went through the excruciating experience of watching the film second time, but to no avail. I think the film-makers ran out of money before the full story could be told.
