2/10
Great idea, but horrible
5 November 2009
Warning: Spoilers
This movie was a train wreck. To eliminate the confusion about this being a prequel or sequel. It's none of them. This movie was a 'midquel' I was surprised there was such a thing. The Fox and the Hound is a classic Disney movie, a strong storyline and which this one lacked by far, the story of this movie was weak and unstable. Now granit kids from this time who watched this movie enjoy it. It's a kids film, but not like when I was a small kid. The fox and the hound is a powerful film it's a prized film for Disney viewers and Disney themselves. This particular film was a get rich quick film, by incorporating real artists to sing in the film so they can pretty much advertise their work to younger generations. Resaulting in the Hannah Montana effect, if you know what I mean. Tod and Copper were greatly remade near perfection in this film, like a copy and paste from the firstwhitch was great I thought. But that's why I gave this a 2.0. Copper and Tod were adorable as in the first one. To sum this up, this film was really unnecessary for Disney to release, it destroyed the original idea of the film. The fox and the hound was a happy, sad, cute and heart wrenching story, to this day I still cry to it. But this film lacked every thing the story of the cute dog and fox had in the first film. This was better off being a completely new original film. Then again it was a money game. They had to hurry and make a film and put a country artist in it cause they needed to put that specific artist on the map per say. Sorry to be so rough, but this is the truth of the film. Great kids movie but commercially inspired to make money quick.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed