Review of I Confess

I Confess (1953)
7/10
An underrated Hitchcock masterpiece that shouldn't be ignored
22 January 2010
By the time Alfred Hitchcock shot this movie, he already had a really strong career, with lots of great and excellent films, but it was after this one that he made his best-known masterpieces that became all-time classics, with the exception of 'Rebecca' and 'Strangers On a Train', that came before.

This movie begins with lots of shots of Quebec, the town where it's set. Then it shows a dead man inside a house. Right after it, we see another man going into a church and confessing the murder to a priest. But the plot really begins when the priest is considered the prime suspect of the murder, and he can't tell the police who did it because of the church's principles. The plot itself is already very interesting, ans it's so well-written that doesn't make the viewer bored at all, with great character development and a few clever twists, it's but Alfred Hitchcock's directing makes it even more interesting, with some clever shots at interesting angles, and a film-noir style to it.

Montgomery Clift stars here as the priest. Even though he is, in my opinion, a too good-looking priest, and that feels weird, if you can get past that, you can see how powerful is his acting here. Karl Maden also gives a nice acting as the police inspector, but it's Anne Baxter that isn't good. Although her character is important to the story, she feels weird and out of place.

This movie also suffers from the same problem as many movies of its time: because of the Hayes Code, they were forced to chance the movie's ending from the one featured on the original play in which the movie was based on. If it had stick to the original ending, it would be much better. The other problem I have with this picture is the two major flaws that bothered me. I'm not gonna spoil it here, but anyone can see it, and one of the then is the ending itself.

Overral, this is a nice directed Hitchcock film, with a clever plot, but with a weird ending. It also features nice interpretations by Karl Maden and Montgomery Clift, but Anne Baxter screws it. In my opinion, it is much better than Hitchcock's so-called better 'Strangers On a Train'. I wouldn't put it on a list of my favorite movies of the master, but it's far from the worst ones.

7/10
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed