7/10
This was good
20 January 2012
Warning: Spoilers
We are studying Romeo and Juliet in English, and we had to watch and compare this version to the 1996 version starring Leonardo DiCaprio and Claire Danes. I own the 1996 version because I am a huge Leo fan, but I must admit this version is much better. The best things about this film are the two outstanding teenage leads, expertly picked by Zeffirelli. 17-year-old Leonard Whiting is convincing and emotional as Romeo, not to mention very good looking, and 15-year old Olivia Hussey positively shines as the vulnerable Juliet. They have amazing chemistry and are really believable as the tragic star-crossed lovers. In the 1996 version, Leo is very very good as Romeo, but Claire Danes is underwhelming and the role is unsuited to her. However in this version the romance truly seems real and not wooden, and their portrayal of the doomed couple is out of this world. The other aspects of the film are excellent as well, such as the scenery, setting and costumes which stay true to Shakespeares original play. The supporting cast are brilliant, with Michael York as a chilling Tybalt, and a comedic turn from Pat Heywood as the nurse. In conclusion, this is a classic, and you must see it. Have your tissues ready for the end, you will need them.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed