7/10
A heady role for Colman that grows on you...to a degree
27 June 2014
Warning: Spoilers
This is my least favorite of all the Ronald Colman talkies, and I consider myself a huge fan of Colman. But, at least through the early parts of the film, this is not the Colman most of us want to see -- handsome, suave, sophisticated. Instead, until later in the film we have an unshaven and shabby figure...though of course, the voice shines through. So I will take "A Tale Of Two Cities", "The Prisoner Of Zenda", "Lost Horizon", and especially "Random Harvest" (and several others of Colman's films) over this one.

Yet, I must admit that, perhaps, this is as good acting Colman does in any of his films...because early on it is so against character. Here, Colman plays François Villon -- a real (and popular) 15th-century French poet who disappeared in 1463 after banishment...and at the end of this film, the character is banished from Paris. Google describes him as a "ne'er-do-well who was involved in criminal behavior and got into numerous scrapes with authorities, Villon wrote about some of these experiences in his poems". No one claims this film is an accurate biopic of Villon, but it loosely follows a tale about him and King Louis XI. It's my impression that Colman had a great deal of fun with his depiction of the rapscallion.

I'm not usually a fan of Basil Rathbone, although I admit he was a good heavy. I really disliked him here...or was it the way the director had him play the king? If you don't know it's Rathbone, it won't occur to you! Other supporting character include Frances Dee as a lady-in-waiting whom Villon falls in love with, Ellen Drew as Villon's sort-of girlfriend (and wench), and C. V. France as Father Villon. Henry Wilcoxon is interesting as Captain of the Watch -- a type of role he played later in "The Ten Commandments". All these supporting actors do their jobs in this film, but none are particularly outstanding. The multi-untalented Sidney Toler is also here in a small part as the owner of a tavern (not a mistake...I actually meant multi-untalented).

The production is a handsome one, with quite a few relatively elaborate sets.

As the film proceeded, I got more into it, and more and more into Colman's performance. It's definitely worth watching, and although far from my favorite Colman picture, it's on my DVD shelf.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed