I see a couple 10 out of 10 reviews. Let's be realistic, the second episode uses the wisdom of the crowd of outdoors experts to decide where a young boy might wander while lost in the mountains. Only they get it wrong because they weren't shown the right map accounting for new vegetation growth. Huh? Did it not occur to the writers that the search and rescue people are also all outdoor experts plus they are there on the scene, so why should the "crowd" be an improvement?
Similar to other CBS crime shows, the technology is not even close to realistic, the plot is painfully contrived and you have to really try hard to ignore the gaping holes in the logic.
Similar to other CBS crime shows, the technology is not even close to realistic, the plot is painfully contrived and you have to really try hard to ignore the gaping holes in the logic.