I viewed the stop-motion animated 2012 expanded remake of this first, and this live-action original is much better because its plot is direct, and it's focused on referencing mostly only one monster movie, the 1931 "Frankenstein," although it ends with a poodle with a white-lightning-striped Nefertiti hairdo à la the 1935 sequel. Having seen this, it's now more apparent how much padding unrelated to the pastiche of monster movies is in the 2012 movie: the father pushing his son to play baseball, the parents getting a science teacher fired, the school science competition, the Dutch festival, etc. The movie would've been better without all of that, and this 1984 short film is the proof.
It also doesn't reduce Victor's parents to negligible nincompoops, so it doesn't have the ridiculous message of the 2012 feature that children are smarter than adults. Additionally, professionals like Shelley Duvall and Daniel Stern add credibility to the parts. I don't recall my favorite line from this film being in the 2012 remake, either: "I guess we can't punish Victor for bringing Sparky back from the dead." The windmill scene bothers me in both movies, though; the adults should've and could've ran in there. Thankfully, the 1984 film is also less saccharine than the 2012 one.
The focus on paying homage to one horror film also benefits the plotting. Almost everything in the 1984 version is directed towards it. Dog dies, Victor reanimates dog with household appliances in a scene that otherwise resembles the 1931 film with flashing and spinning gizmos and the spark of life from a lightning bolt, townsfolk react in horror towards the creature and form a mob per usual for Universal's classic horror films, chasing dog and Victor to a fiery windmill climax--in a miniature golf course this time, which is a humorous touch absent from the 2012 version.
The one thing the 2012 one did better was the opening film-within-a-film, as it was a pastiche of the B-picture giant monster movies of the Atomic Age, which the outer movie, then, went on to parody. We don't get that here, although it's likewise pastiche from a young artist just as the outer film of "Frankenweenie" itself is, so the reflexivity to the film and to its director, Tim Burton, still works.
It also doesn't reduce Victor's parents to negligible nincompoops, so it doesn't have the ridiculous message of the 2012 feature that children are smarter than adults. Additionally, professionals like Shelley Duvall and Daniel Stern add credibility to the parts. I don't recall my favorite line from this film being in the 2012 remake, either: "I guess we can't punish Victor for bringing Sparky back from the dead." The windmill scene bothers me in both movies, though; the adults should've and could've ran in there. Thankfully, the 1984 film is also less saccharine than the 2012 one.
The focus on paying homage to one horror film also benefits the plotting. Almost everything in the 1984 version is directed towards it. Dog dies, Victor reanimates dog with household appliances in a scene that otherwise resembles the 1931 film with flashing and spinning gizmos and the spark of life from a lightning bolt, townsfolk react in horror towards the creature and form a mob per usual for Universal's classic horror films, chasing dog and Victor to a fiery windmill climax--in a miniature golf course this time, which is a humorous touch absent from the 2012 version.
The one thing the 2012 one did better was the opening film-within-a-film, as it was a pastiche of the B-picture giant monster movies of the Atomic Age, which the outer movie, then, went on to parody. We don't get that here, although it's likewise pastiche from a young artist just as the outer film of "Frankenweenie" itself is, so the reflexivity to the film and to its director, Tim Burton, still works.