There were things I liked and hated about both versions however, I don't think a side-by-side comparison is a good idea simply because of the different attitudes during the time frames the pictures were made in
Not to mention the difference in attitudes between the 1945 version and when the book was first published in 1890.
Each version was an interesting look at what is considered to be a classic novel of morality all in all I think each version did a fair job of telling the story for the times they were set in.
The interpretations were vastly different but the question is still valid would you sell your soul in exchange for everything you ever dreamed of and if your answer is yes is it really going to be worth it?
Each version was an interesting look at what is considered to be a classic novel of morality all in all I think each version did a fair job of telling the story for the times they were set in.
The interpretations were vastly different but the question is still valid would you sell your soul in exchange for everything you ever dreamed of and if your answer is yes is it really going to be worth it?