Am saying this with regret. 'What a Woman' may have sounded quite silly in concept, which was not unexpected as romantic comedies and comedies at the time were not the type to be seen for their stories. Saw it anyway, being someone who likes Rosalind Russell and being someone that likes romantic comedy and films from the 30s. Haven't seen enough yet of Irving Cummings' work to say what my overall stance is on him as a director, what has been seen of his (and there is a lot more to see) has been variable.
'What a Woman' left me very mixed. It is a truly great showcase for Russell, in terms of performance that is, because without her or if her role was performed by somebody not as talented or as experienced in this type of role, 'What a Woman' would have been a dud most likely in my view. It does have things that are good, but it does have its fair share of frustrating failures that could have been avoided. A silly premise executed in an even sillier way.
Russell is the reason to see 'What a Woman' and she is a sheer delight all round. Her comic timing soars, even when the comedy itself flounders, she is really charming and easy to engage with. Brian Aherne is more mixed for me generally, have known him to be bland, but he here has a likeability about him and doesn't come over as dreary, he even amuses at times and suitably insensitive when needed. His chemistry with Russell is sweet and tense and it is not hard to see what they see in each other. Willard Parker has a more reserved character, one that isn't as interesting, but gives it a good go.
It looks great, Russell looks luminous in her clothes, the glossy style of the photography isn't gaudy or drab and the lighting is atmosphere. There are very amusing and witty moments in the banter between Russell and Aherne and the more romantic parts have moments of not too sentimental charm.
However, the story is very silly, sometimes straining credibility to the limit, is quite paper thin at times and has very few surprises. It could have done with a tighter pace, clearer character motivations as the final decision was not very easy to buy and the ending comes out of the blue and doesn't feel rounded off enough. The supporting cast are more competent but nobody stands out in sketchy roles, the most interesting being a debuting Shelley Winters. Cummings' direction similarly is far from inept but feels undistinguished.
The script has moments but could have done with more spark, and there isn't enough generally of the sparkling wit and sophistication associated with the best romantic comedies from this period. Funny moments come in spurts, at other points there is a try too hard feel, and the romance is predictable and more complicated than it needed to be.
Summarising, watchable for Russell fans but nothing special. 5/10
'What a Woman' left me very mixed. It is a truly great showcase for Russell, in terms of performance that is, because without her or if her role was performed by somebody not as talented or as experienced in this type of role, 'What a Woman' would have been a dud most likely in my view. It does have things that are good, but it does have its fair share of frustrating failures that could have been avoided. A silly premise executed in an even sillier way.
Russell is the reason to see 'What a Woman' and she is a sheer delight all round. Her comic timing soars, even when the comedy itself flounders, she is really charming and easy to engage with. Brian Aherne is more mixed for me generally, have known him to be bland, but he here has a likeability about him and doesn't come over as dreary, he even amuses at times and suitably insensitive when needed. His chemistry with Russell is sweet and tense and it is not hard to see what they see in each other. Willard Parker has a more reserved character, one that isn't as interesting, but gives it a good go.
It looks great, Russell looks luminous in her clothes, the glossy style of the photography isn't gaudy or drab and the lighting is atmosphere. There are very amusing and witty moments in the banter between Russell and Aherne and the more romantic parts have moments of not too sentimental charm.
However, the story is very silly, sometimes straining credibility to the limit, is quite paper thin at times and has very few surprises. It could have done with a tighter pace, clearer character motivations as the final decision was not very easy to buy and the ending comes out of the blue and doesn't feel rounded off enough. The supporting cast are more competent but nobody stands out in sketchy roles, the most interesting being a debuting Shelley Winters. Cummings' direction similarly is far from inept but feels undistinguished.
The script has moments but could have done with more spark, and there isn't enough generally of the sparkling wit and sophistication associated with the best romantic comedies from this period. Funny moments come in spurts, at other points there is a try too hard feel, and the romance is predictable and more complicated than it needed to be.
Summarising, watchable for Russell fans but nothing special. 5/10