I can't get over the irony of the fact that the male 'oppressor' in the film, is the stand out character.
We all know Evan Peters is a phenomenal actor, and he didn't let the acting profession down in this.
So, why, for a feminist movie that is meant to inspire women and girls, was he the standout actor? And not for his character arc!
Was it the dialogue? Was it the filming? Was it the editing?
I'm so sad. This should have been a wonderful, inspiring film. Instead, it was mediocre at best. Still, it's a pleasant love letter to a mom from a child, which is nice. The son, not the daughter though, right?
We all know Evan Peters is a phenomenal actor, and he didn't let the acting profession down in this.
So, why, for a feminist movie that is meant to inspire women and girls, was he the standout actor? And not for his character arc!
Was it the dialogue? Was it the filming? Was it the editing?
I'm so sad. This should have been a wonderful, inspiring film. Instead, it was mediocre at best. Still, it's a pleasant love letter to a mom from a child, which is nice. The son, not the daughter though, right?